Future of porn (and this site) is really uncertain right now…

[PozBearWI]

It's not just "one old geezer".  But you're welcome to display your utter ignorance....

[BootmanLA]

On 1/17/2023 at 6:42 AM, harrysmith25 said:

Why do you keep saying "hordes" when Trump supporters are supposed to be a minority? lol. Every single damn day you're saying how afraid of the "massive hordes" of rednecks despite saying Biden won by 7 million votes. You wake up just to do this thing alone, every single day. No. other. Hobbies. Or. Interests. In. Life. To. Speak. Of.

Those people who "deny" the 2020 election aren't insane like you're suggesting, they are entitled to their opinion... they're just frequently not allowed to say their opinion (including here).... just like you're not allowed to say a lot of things in the new, uh..."non-fascist" America. LOL

Boot so-called "man", you are just spouting off like any sophomoric college student, typing a list of people which are supposed to be bad, "FOX NEWS, ELECTION DENIERS" etc in the hope that it will impress somebody. Perhaps also you're hoping someone in real life will mistake you for a college student, sorry bud, that wrinkly dinosaur skin isn't going away.

More importantly, you only talk about why those people you listed are supposedly "bad", you can't tell us why the  shrivelled hind-leg-walking tortoise called Biden is supposed to be good. Tell us a real, convincing reason why he's supposed to be "good".
(gay marriage rights will not be a lot of use to your average American gay, when Biden and pals have finished flooding the entire country with people who've just come from backward hellholes where they kill gays and stone their wife to death for showing too much ankle)

If I come back later and find you actually want to continue the conversation instead of having me banned for saying the truth, then maybe we'll get onto that "equivalency" you were asking for.

"Horde" is not a synonym for "majority". A large group of people can be a "horde" without being anywhere near a majority, or even a plurality.

You are, of course, entitled to your opinion, whether it's that the 2020 election was stolen, that the earth is flat, that the moon is made of green cheese, or that there are secret cabals of globalist pedophiles operating from the basement of a basement-less pizza parlor in suburban Virginia. That doesn't mean anyone else has an obligation to respect that opinion, and yes, if it's a stupid one backed by no evidence whatsoever, I feel free to mock that opinion.

I have no illusions of youth - I'm very up front about my age, my location, and so forth (unlike some people on here I could name, but won't). 

As for "bad" vs. "good" - in a political system like what we have in the United States, we frequently have to choose between two options, neither of which is 100% desirable. Rather than bitch, threaten to hold my breath till the choices improve, or stay home and complain that nobody is representing me, I always choose the least bad option, when there's no "good" option, and then work hard to press that least bad option to a better place. I think that's far more productive.

As for your racist screed about immigration, well, I think that again shows your true colors, just like your "tranny" comment and a lot of other things you've said here. Again, you're entitled to your opinion, racist and ill-informed as it may be, but that doesn't mean I feel any obligation to respect it, or you. What I do have to do is treat you with respect - by not attacking you personally, only the (foul) ideas you spout.

 

[harrysmith25]

Hahah I've had two of you sad fuckers pull out the S-word now, in the last 24 hours. "Screed"

oh no, I'm so totally bowled over cause you pull out your little vocabulary word "screed".

Well despite  the fact that you HAVEN'T been designated as the New Shakespeare yet... (and you spent all that effort struggling in your wheelchair to get into that Toga) if you can get over that disappointment.

How did you come to the conclusion that a guy who uses the ISISlamic phrase "Inshallah" during a presidential debate was the "least worst candidate"? You refuse to even think about the realities of how violent Islam is towards gays, all over the world

You never address anything with any substance you just go on boring lectures about how you're supposedly so much more "civil" than me, and you use the sheer dullness of your personality as a weapon hoping to make the other person go away out of boredom, instead of actually making any kind of point. 

You actually expect that Ive never been moronically labelled "racist" by ostriches such as yourself, and its somehow going to impress me, which shows you're very unrealistic and childlike.

Here we have yet another ISISlam-swooning freakshow who, when he gets beheaded, is planning to comfort himself by saying, in the most nasal voice ever: "like, at least I like, never like, went on any racist screeeeeeeeeds. That's the most important thing"

Edited January 19, 2023 by harrysmith25

[BootmanLA]

7 hours ago, harrysmith25 said:

oh no, I'm so totally bowled over cause you pull out your little vocabulary word "screed".

Congratulations on recognizing the word (assuming you didn't have to look it up). I wasn't sure if you would.

7 hours ago, harrysmith25 said:

How did you come to the conclusion that a guy who uses the ISISlamic phrase "Inshallah" during a presidential debate was the "least worst candidate"? You refuse to even think about the realities of how violent Islam is towards gays, all over the world

1. The phrase means, roughly, "God willing". I heard the English version of that phrase growing up non-stop - does that mean everyone in the US who uses that phrase is a terrorist? Moreover: it's not an "ISISlamic" phrase; it's Arabic, which is a secular language shared by Arab Christians, Arab Muslims, non-theocratic Arabs, and more.

Like I said, your bigotry and racism shine through loud and clear.

2. Not "all over the world". There are Islamic nations that are, if not welcoming to gays, at least basically tolerant of them, and in many others, it's not the religious leaders who are so vocally anti-gay; it's the secular, often military rulers of the country who impose those measures. That's not defending theocratic states that oppress, torture, or murder gays; it's pointing out that it's a mixed bag, and Christianity has a long, long record of doing the exact same thing. And there are plenty in the Christian movement today who would happily reinstate that record as contemporary practice.

7 hours ago, harrysmith25 said:

You never address anything with any substance you just go on boring lectures about how you're supposedly so much more "civil" than me, and you use the sheer dullness of your personality as a weapon hoping to make the other person go away out of boredom, instead of actually making any kind of point. 

1. I see plenty of substance, as opposed to your hurling of bigotry as though that made it an "argument" or a "point".

2. If I'm trying to get you to go away out of boredom, I'm only sorry that it's not working very well. 

7 hours ago, harrysmith25 said:

You actually expect that Ive never been moronically labelled "racist"

Oh, I very much assume your racism has been pointed out to you many times - to be honest, I'd be shocked if you'd led such a sheltered life that you hadn't encountered anyone else willing to call a spade a spade and tell you what you are. 

7 hours ago, harrysmith25 said:

Here we have yet another ISISlam-swooning freakshow who, when he gets beheaded

Honey, if you're actually worried about being beheaded by Islamists, then I suggest you move out of whatever Islamic law jurisdiction you're living in, or (assuming the more likely option that you're living comfortably in a western country), get therapy for your delusional paranoia, and soon. There are medications that can help.

[BlackDude]

Funny I just went through Utah, an I couldn’t access this site at all

[Guest]

29 minutes ago, BlackDude said:

Funny I just went through Utah, an I couldn’t access this site at all

Utah is on a different planet 

[BlackDude]

50 minutes ago, faggot4play said:

Utah is on a different planet 

Or so they would like us to think….

[BootmanLA]

3 hours ago, BlackDude said:

Funny I just went through Utah, an I couldn’t access this site at all

This site blocks visitors whose IP address resolves to a Utah or Louisiana location, because of restrictive laws in those states (see this topic for more information).

 

[Guest]

10 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

This site blocks visitors whose IP address resolves to a Utah or Louisiana location, because of restrictive laws in those states (see this topic for more information).

 

thank you

[ellentonboy]

I knew this was coming but I wanted to ask since I noticed one poster has a LA location - does a VPN prevent this from happening?

Correction:  I didn't read the entire thread, I see VPN's can help should this nightmare continue.  Sorry for being both lazy and stupid.

Edited March 1, 2023 by ellentonboy
My stupidity.....

[BootmanLA]

3 hours ago, ellentonboy said:

I knew this was coming but I wanted to ask since I noticed one poster has a LA location - does a VPN prevent this from happening?

Correction:  I didn't read the entire thread, I see VPN's can help should this nightmare continue.  Sorry for being both lazy and stupid.

Neither lazy nor stupid - it's a reasonable question. I use a VPN to access this site, without confirming or denying that I'm doing so from within my home state of Louisiana 🙂

[hntnhole]

1 hour ago, BootmanLA said:

I use a VPN to access this site

So do I ... I've been all over the world, and didn't even know it !!!  I don't need the DullSantis Death Squads coming up my driveway .... 

[Tyburn]

I see Mickey Taylor's just been fucked by the UK High Court, after Dominic Ford sued him. About the most hardcore content of any legal judgment: 

[think before following links] https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2023/2399.pdf

[BootmanLA]

6 hours ago, Tyburn said:

I see Mickey Taylor's just been fucked by the UK High Court, after Dominic Ford sued him. About the most hardcore content of any legal judgment: 

[think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2023/2399.pdf

I just read the judgment in its entirety. I will admit upfront that I have no specific knowledge of UK defamation law, other than a few ways in which it differs from US defamation law. Nonetheless, assuming the evidence (including testimony) is as the justice recounts it, I don't think it's fair to say that Taylor got fucked by the court. Rather, it looks to me like he fucked himself by some exceptionally careless, defamatory tweets and a YouTube posting.

I'm also not sure I'd describe this ruling as "hard-core". I'd say it's definitely explicit, but I think of "hard core" as pornographic bordering on obscene, whereas this opinion is just, well, clinically very explicit. 

[ErosWired]

2 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

I don't think it's fair to say that Taylor got fucked by the court. Rather, it looks to me like he fucked himself by some exceptionally careless, defamatory tweets and a YouTube posting.

You got through it quicker than I did, but I came to the same conclusion. He couldn’t have shafted himself any better if he’d been sitting on a dildo on the witness stand. The whole “acting like a reporter” thing had my eyes rolling like a marble on a roulette wheel.

As to it being hardcore, it’s kind of difficult to take something that way when it has ‘(sic)’ in it. Also, a man calling another grown man ‘gurl’, when quoted by a officer of the court, lends an air of the ridiculous to the whole affair.