Becoming a rent boy?

[Guest]

Would becoming a rent boy be the best way of meeting older men?

[BootmanLA]

On 10/23/2023 at 6:17 PM, Straightd said:

Would becoming a rent boy be the best way of meeting older men?

Unlikely.

Unless you have some amazing attribute to set yourself apart from all the thousands of other wannabe rent boys, you'll make an occasional few bucks here and there, and that's about it. And more importantly, this is not "Pretty Woman" where the rich older guy falls for the pretty hooker; chances are that the guys who hire you will want you gone as soon as they ejaculate. Most will be married men who can't manage a side relationship, so they hire a sex worker for the occasional romp, and they're not about to jeopardize their carefully constructed home life by getting involved with a rent boy.

If you want an older man because you find older men more attractive, mention that in any online profiles you have, and if you're in a larger city, find out which bars, if any, cater to an older clientele. If you want a sugar daddy, there are sites available for that, too, but again, you'll be competing with a lot of others.

[yunghungtop]

On 10/25/2023 at 2:51 PM, BootmanLA said:

 

If you want an older man because you find older men more attractive, mention that in any online profiles you have, and if you're in a larger city, find out which bars, if any, cater to an older clientele. If you want a sugar daddy, there are sites available for that, too, but again, you'll be competing with a lot of others.

Yeah this is solid advice. 
 

As an older man into young bareback pussy, I never pay for it. 

[tallslenderguy]

On 10/23/2023 at 4:17 PM, Straightd said:

Would becoming a rent boy be the best way of meeting older men?

i can only speculate about the rationale behind your question?  Are we talking just hook up sex? Are we talking relationship?  Or____________? 

Take two gaggles of gay guys to the local gay retirement home. One gaggle is labeled: "Free," the other is labeled "For Rent."  my guess is, the "Free" guys are gonna get used up first. 

Check out (ostensibly assumed) gay sites like "SilverDaddies" [think before following links] https://www.silverdaddies.com and you'll find >120k guys, young and old, looking for each other. Many of those profiles will specify: "not a sugar daddy," or respectively, "not looking for a sugar daddy."  And then there are those not so subtle profiles where guys are clearly looking for a sugar daddy.  

To me, it really depends on what it is you want? Are you looking for money? Something along the line of "rent boy" would be an avenue to take. If you are looking for just sex? i'm gonna guess free will get you more than charging. If you are looking for some form of romantic relationship? my sense is anyone looking for that would find paying for it contradictory to the intent. 

[Bokkierob]

Probably not. As an older man (54 now) I’m up to my balls in young ass. I have found over the last few years that young men are more turned on by experienced daddies so I’ve not (yet!) found it hard to get a young man on my cock. Indeed, I have a much younger live-in fuckboy, Drew who I met when I was 50 and he was 19. He is turned on by older men (daddies) and my mates regularly fuck him and I regularly fuck his younger buddies. Be up front and state your preference on any hookup apps you use. Good luck

[FelchingPisser]

1 hour ago, Bokkierob said:

Probably not. As an older man (54 now) I’m up to my balls in young ass. I have found over the last few years that young men are more turned on by experienced daddies so I’ve not (yet!) found it hard to get a young man on my cock. 

This is, thankfully, so true.  I used to wonder if I would have to pay for it as the years advanced.  But many young men are eager for daddies who know how to fuck.  I have even had young men refer me to other young men who are looking.

[BootmanLA]

3 hours ago, FelchingPisser said:

This is, thankfully, so true.  I used to wonder if I would have to pay for it as the years advanced.  But many young men are eager for daddies who know how to fuck.  I have even had young men refer me to other young men who are looking.

Older tops, particularly skilled or gifted ones, seldom have to pay for sex. Older bottoms, however, may not be so lucky.

[topblkmale]

On 10/23/2023 at 7:17 PM, Straightd said:

Would becoming a rent boy be the best way of meeting older men?

You'll have to show the old fuckers how to download CashApp.

[TaKinGDeePanal]

Looks like the OP is in the process of deleting his profile. Either he found the answer - or he didn't like what the answer was.

[ellentonboy]

Post a profile on Silver Daddies (hope that's right) and mention specifically you are not looking for cash, but love and companionship.  At least I hope that is what you are looking for because if it something else (like financial gain) don't ask for that directly - you never know who you are messaging and a "solicitation for the purposes of Prostituiton" is not something you want on your resume.

[ErosWired]

4 hours ago, ellentonboy said:

Post a profile on Silver Daddies (hope that's right) and mention specifically you are not looking for cash, but love and companionship.

I’m not sure that’s the best tactic. The rash of spambots in recent times features pics of pretty young men all stating that they’re looking for love, friendship, companionship, etc. - which, for me anyway, is the clue to ignore or block them. Plus, if a guy’s looking for NSA fun, he may be hesitant to reach for someone who’s advertising clinginess (whether he means it or not).

The OP did not specify whether he hoped to Top or bottom (though the username suggested a Top) - I’ve always been a bit bemused by guys who have the notion of being paid to bottom. Is ‘rent bottom’ even a thing, when the world is afloat in a sea of desperate, unfucked bottom ass, and bottoms gluttonous for any load by any means? When a Top need only jingle his belt buckle to draw every hungry bottom within earshot like gnats? There is - literally - no need for any Top within reach of me to pay for ass, ever, if he were only aware of the fact, and I’m just one drop in that sea of ass.

I could see it, I suppose, if a bottom had gained a reputation for exceptional skills, and, much like the elite courtesans of Chinese brothels in historical times, might become highly sought after, and available only to the wealthy and influential. But again, that’s a lot of competition to rise above to get that kind of notoriety, and indeed, how skilled is it possible to be? I’ve worked hard to become something Tops will appreciate, but it’s taken more than a few kegels - it takes research into anatomy and eroticism, chemistry and psychology…and I feel like I’ve just scratched the surface, like I could be so much more with more knowledge and experience.

In other words, it seems to me that to be worth someone paying to fuck you, you really have to have been fucked so much that it’s almost impossible to get fucked enough to achieve it.

I do suppose that certain individuals might be able to leverage certain qualities like exceptional attractiveness and make it work - or, for a limited time, monopolize on their youth (or for an even more limited time, their virginity). But it’s still ass surrounded by a glut of free ass, it seems to me.

[ellentonboy]

11 hours ago, ErosWired said:

I’m not sure that’s the best tactic. The rash of spambots in recent times features pics of pretty young men all stating that they’re looking for love, friendship, companionship, etc. - which, for me anyway, is the clue to ignore or block them. Plus, if a guy’s looking for NSA fun, he may be hesitant to reach for someone who’s advertising clinginess (whether he means it or not).

The OP did not specify whether he hoped to Top or bottom (though the username suggested a Top) - I’ve always been a bit bemused by guys who have the notion of being paid to bottom. Is ‘rent bottom’ even a thing, when the world is afloat in a sea of desperate, unfucked bottom ass, and bottoms gluttonous for any load by any means? When a Top need only jingle his belt buckle to draw every hungry bottom within earshot like gnats? There is - literally - no need for any Top within reach of me to pay for ass, ever, if he were only aware of the fact, and I’m just one drop in that sea of ass.

I could see it, I suppose, if a bottom had gained a reputation for exceptional skills, and, much like the elite courtesans of Chinese brothels in historical times, might become highly sought after, and available only to the wealthy and influential. But again, that’s a lot of competition to rise above to get that kind of notoriety, and indeed, how skilled is it possible to be? I’ve worked hard to become something Tops will appreciate, but it’s taken more than a few kegels - it takes research into anatomy and eroticism, chemistry and psychology…and I feel like I’ve just scratched the surface, like I could be so much more with more knowledge and experience.

In other words, it seems to me that to be worth someone paying to fuck you, you really have to have been fucked so much that it’s almost impossible to get fucked enough to achieve it.

I do suppose that certain individuals might be able to leverage certain qualities like exceptional attractiveness and make it work - or, for a limited time, monopolize on their youth (or for an even more limited time, their virginity). But it’s still ass surrounded by a glut of free ass, it seems to me.

I did respond sort of "tongue in cheek" but I understand what you are saying.  Ass and dick are readily available, and for free.  If a top really wants to find a bottom, he doesn't need to pay.  How many threads have we seen from thirsty bottoms looking for that elusive top, some of these bottoms are indeed very attractive.    Granted, geography comes into play.  I understand we don't all live in large metro areas, and I know some guys have to drive hours to make themselves available.  That is a shame.

But it's 2024, and the need for "rent boys" I believe is on the decline.  Many guys have adopted the attitude that "size over quality", or "quantity over quality" is key,  I don't share that view, and I wouldn't pay for a bottom or a top.    I'm not saying the "world's oldest profession" will end anytime soon,  many guys who are in relationships or have jobs that might be unhappy with their orientation, have found ways to work around their predicament and find opportunities  to get laid.  They still have no need to open their wallets.

You only have to look at Twitter or "X" as it is now called, and you see all the guys selling their "content".   It's a "buyers" market right now, you have to be in the exceptional 1 percent or have porn credits before posting pics and ads saying you are available for companionship.  This is not 1991 anymore, guys need to wake up and face reality.  As you said "ass surrounded by a glut of free ass".  So true.....

[Phallarchist]

My understanding is that most customers of male prostitutes are a predictable collection of the fat/old/ugly, so it probably depends on how low you're willing to go. But there's no reason to ask when you can just do the experiment. Put up a "dating" profile with $$ in the title or text and see whom you get.

Edited January 9 by Phallarchist

[ErosWired]

29 minutes ago, Phallarchist said:

My understanding is that most customers of male prostitutes are a predictable collection of the fat/old/ugly, so it probably depends on how low you're willing to go. But there's no reason to ask when you can just do the experiment. Put up a "dating" profile with $$ in the title or text and see whom you get.

I take your point, and certainly there’s no reason (aside from legality) that one couldn’t simply put it to the test. But the observation that those who pay for male prostitutes may tend toward the physically unappealing - by an arbitrary community standard - or older doesn’t necessarily go any farther to explain why anyone pays at all. I am cunted by the fat/old/ugly already, regularly, without compensation, because those men have the same right to fuck me as any other man, and they take advantage of my presence.

Admittedly, those men face rejection at a higher rate, and may not be able to have encounters with men with physical attributes at a certain level of what is considered desirable without incentives, if they are choosing to be selective.  I have never been one of the ‘beautiful people’, so I don’t really comprehend interactions in that atmosphere. But if they’re simply looking for hole, these boards are replete with bottoms willing to take cock indiscriminately.

[Phallarchist]

1 hour ago, ErosWired said:

Admittedly, those men...may not be able to have encounters with men with physical attributes at a certain level of what is considered desirable without incentives

I think that's the point. Desire itself is not negotiable. Prostitutes are compensated to forgo their own desires in service of their customers'. If it were just a physical experience the customers were after, they could fuck anyone, or a hole in the wall for that matter.