Iran/Israel/US discussion

[hntnhole]

5 hours ago, tallslenderguy said:

The following is off the cuff, and not well thought out...

If that's the case, you wear rather intelligent shirts (including the cuffs).

5 hours ago, tallslenderguy said:

"nobody knows what i'm going to do,"

Including, crucially him.

5 hours ago, tallslenderguy said:

To me it feels like, with Trump, the US has taken the route of joining the bully dictators in the world

Agreed.  To the Magaroid crowd, braggadocio, blaring insults, negativity in all it's hideous forms seems somehow attractive in a President.  The underlying reasons could be manifest and many.  A lack of curiosity about the world, other than how to demean it, is the hallmark of a disinterested, self-centered, self-focused bs artist, who's spent his 70-some years learning the craft of Circus Barker. ripping off every other person/entity he possibly can to inflate his own ego.  I laughed when I read the phrase (bully pulpit - as if he'd ever been within shouting distance of an actual pulpit).

 

5 hours ago, tallslenderguy said:

those kinds of rulers are good for the long term stability of the world

Entirely agreed.  Not the good of long term stability, not the individuals themselves, and certainly not the entire world.  To these kinds of so-called Leaders, stability is to them, as kryptonite is to Superman,  The more the population concentrates on the blaring trumpet of the day, the less they are likely to recognize the abject failures of the phony guy.  

[hntnhole]

4 hours ago, PozBearWI said:

To some extent, maybe our challenge is recognizing where the insane genius gets his power

I would say to a great extent; the more obvious it becomes, the easier to counter it.  Pandering to the fears, anxieties of those citizens that have been less successful is easy as can be.  It's inspiring them to a more productive thought-process, introducing programs to assist them, rather than push them even farther down would be far more humane than stirring the pots of hatreds. Yet, the clever conmen have always managed to figure out how to demean others, and thus seemingly make themselves attractive to the less-advantaged.  Apparently, some more clever folks in the Administration have taught His Nibs that lesson:  the most disadvantageous aspects of the Big Bullshit Bill won't even take effect until after the midterms.  Clever, craven, and crass.  

4 hours ago, PozBearWI said:

It feels like we need fact checkers to check the fact checkers to check the "media" and help us slough off the crap to help us focus...

I agree .... and here we are.  This is why I enjoy BZ so much:  we get to express our ideas, exchange viewpoints, consider and re-consider issues of the day.  My only wish is, one day the subject of Government-studies will be re-introduced into our public schools.  It's inexcusable that there aren't any required courses in that subject these days.  It used to be called Civics, but that or any other name would be a huge investment in some measure of awareness in the general population.  

To the "Where is Cronkite" issue, where indeed is his bequeathment to the current crop of tv "personalities"?  Look only to the current Cabinet the President has chosen to run the country.  Dullards, drunks, whoremongers, insipid fools - to enure that none of them outshine His Nibs, scrambling only to earn his favor instead of offering him one scintilla of "wisdom".  One could enlarge that conundrum to the Republikans in Congress as well.  Yes-men/women to a one.  Cowards, concerned only with ensuring the Presidential Mouth doesn't go after themselves.  

5 hours ago, PozBearWI said:

we need fact checkers to check the fact checkers to check the "media" and help us slough off the crap

Or, more plainly put, honest, well-reasoned women and men.  Some of the major media is more honest than others, but we're in a "truth-desert" these days.  BUT - we get to come here to BZ to discuss and share with others, so that's at least something.  

[hntnhole]

3 hours ago, tallslenderguy said:

who among us would have actually chosen either of those selections?

Well, some of us did.  She possess impeccable credentials, experience, intelligence, particularly compared to what she was running against.  If her only "negative" possession was being a woman of color, and thus denied votes, then our country is in deeper trouble then we think.  Her opponent possessed none of these attributes, "claiming" (read: lying about) all kinds of pseudo-impressive accomplishments, none of which has proven true.  Insolvency, failure at numerous businesses, an obnoxious temperament, pandering to the populations unworthy fears instead of offering sound proposals beneficial to all citizens.  Remarkably, many didn't even "bother" to vote at all.  And, you're correct:  any successful candidate for President must include the needs of all citizens, not merely of their own political party.  

3 hours ago, tallslenderguy said:

i don't think most Americans have much of a clue about what is in a 1000 page bill

How could we?  The great percentage of that unholy mess of a bill wasn't even read by most of our Representatives/Congressperson.  And that is the fault of the media.  Ever slow-to-learn, most Americans are too busy with their day-to-day responsibilities to study proposed bills in Congress.  I would guess that there are enough Congresspersons who didn't read the entire bill (which is their damn job) to sink a ship.  Plus, most Americans expect that their Congresspersons will actually do their jobs - before it it too late.  That's been the expectation for 249 years, and has served us well.  But this is a different day now.  Giving the insanely-wealthy such inordinate monetary rewards is nothing short of an arrestable offence.  

 

3 hours ago, tallslenderguy said:

To me, it comes down to trust

I agree.  It used to be a valid assumption that we could trust those who we elect to Congress.  Clearly, one of the parties has clearly been fucked into abject compliance with the Hater in Chief, to the point that care was taken in the voting process to make sure it would pass, so that a handful could vote "no" - assumedly an effort to help their re-election efforts.  All the while, Goebbels was yammering on their cellphones, threatening this, that, and the next thing.  Apparently, we citizens have made their jobs in Congress a little bit too cushy.  If there's one lesson to be learned by the American Voters, it's trust no one.

 

4 hours ago, tallslenderguy said:

They are also America

Lets hope they all don't get sent to those ultra-heinous prisons in South America. 

 

[tallslenderguy]

50 minutes ago, hntnhole said:

Well, some of us did. 

 

And i was among those who voted for Harris. To clarify, what i am saying is she was a last minute decision.  I don't think i am alone in how big of a part money plays in choosing candidates for president, and we get to choose, realistically, from two. If we had a system where the playing field was level when it comes to campaign financing, i think it would make a big difference in the choices? Idk, i think it would allow (force?) Americans to be more engaged in the process of who becomes their representative.