All Activity

My response to this question was always squirt a little on my hole and fuck the rest in.

i live in So New England and i have not noticed any uptick in the good old "no fats, no fems, no asians" stand by that the gay community can't seem to ever shake. what i have seen go wild is the whole "use me like im not even human" fetish. it used to be just "cumdump collecting loads, contact me and if a fit i'll send dets" now it's "took a sedative and about to pass out. here's address. door unlocked all night anyone invited to come breed me while i sleep" like WTF one guy used to post every weekend that he was hosting ass up door open. then it was every night. now other guys are posting "hey, heading over to breed the (town name) cumdump. who wants to come tag team w me?" 😮he went from weekend party boy to tourist attraction in just a few years.

1. Get back on Grindr and let any guy I find hot fuck me raw in nearby motel. If I get knocked up it is what it is. 2. Top a bit more, although HRT has messed with my erections a bit. 3. Have a few rendezvous with other trans folks. 4. Visit my first gloryhole. 5. Have a threesome/group encounter or two. 6. Have any of my hookups who are willing to do so film it for me to post my slut sessions on a few tube sites and social media.

Deposited deep inside and churned until it foams up.

I haven't noticed it, but as a white guy I might not notice.

btm_cumslut

This is a hot story please do a part 2

I need a few more tops like you in my neighbourhood!

^^i think this nails it. ^^ Where i am coming from is likely vulnerable to triggered subjectivity lol, so please forgive where it may bleed through. my desire and goal is objectivity. i escaped a fundamentalist religious cult culture that i'd been raised in and conditioned by from birth. One of the results of my escape is a super sensitivity to authority. "Pluralism" by definition (especially when speaking about government?) is "the co-existance of two or more groups, states, principles, sources of authority" (that's the google search result/definition). Here's a more detailed explanation from Britannica: "pluralism, in political science, the view that in liberal democracies power is (or should be) dispersed among a variety of economic and ideological pressure groups and is not (or should not be) held by a single elite or group of elites. Pluralism assumes that diversity is beneficial to society and that autonomy should be enjoyed by disparate functional or cultural groups within a society, including religious groups, trade unions, professional organizations, and ethnic minorities." my sticking place of authority is the form it takes. Beyond arithmetic, i find it impossible to believe in absolutes... i.e., every belief involves an element of faith. The scientific approach, ideally, recognizes this is what we know now, but further research often demonstrates our knowledge was not complete, or downright wrong. The authority i'm most apt to get along with in a pluralistic setting, is the one who may argue a particular point, citing evidence, reason, etc., but who always holds some reserve doubt. The understanding and premiss for ongoing openness being that, in an infinite universe, our conclusions are not absolute? The sticking points, challenges, of pluralism arise (i think) when some consider their group to possess absolute knowledge vs belief. As an example, i'll choose religion since i'm pretty familiar with it. There are some who identify as "Christian" who live that as a belief, while the fundamentalist approach of others approach life choices convinced their basis is knowledge (absolute). They cannot be wrong, and because they cannot be wrong, they cannot truly engage in objective debate. As i see it, the issue with authoritarians like trump, those he surrounds himself with, and their 2025 agenda, is they cannot be engaged. I.e., their "authority" is not the type that is open to further learning through ongoing 'research' or debate, rather, they know the truth and their only goal is to rule and implement accordingly.