All Activity

I haven't noticed it, but as a white guy I might not notice.

btm_cumslut

This is a hot story please do a part 2

I need a few more tops like you in my neighbourhood!

^^i think this nails it. ^^ Where i am coming from is likely vulnerable to triggered subjectivity lol, so please forgive where it may bleed through. my desire and goal is objectivity. i escaped a fundamentalist religious cult culture that i'd been raised in and conditioned by from birth. One of the results of my escape is a super sensitivity to authority. "Pluralism" by definition (especially when speaking about government?) is "the co-existance of two or more groups, states, principles, sources of authority" (that's the google search result/definition). Here's a more detailed explanation from Britannica: "pluralism, in political science, the view that in liberal democracies power is (or should be) dispersed among a variety of economic and ideological pressure groups and is not (or should not be) held by a single elite or group of elites. Pluralism assumes that diversity is beneficial to society and that autonomy should be enjoyed by disparate functional or cultural groups within a society, including religious groups, trade unions, professional organizations, and ethnic minorities." my sticking place of authority is the form it takes. Beyond arithmetic, i find it impossible to believe in absolutes... i.e., every belief involves an element of faith. The scientific approach, ideally, recognizes this is what we know now, but further research often demonstrates our knowledge was not complete, or downright wrong. The authority i'm most apt to get along with in a pluralistic setting, is the one who may argue a particular point, citing evidence, reason, etc., but who always holds some reserve doubt. The understanding and premiss for ongoing openness being that, in an infinite universe, our conclusions are not absolute? The sticking points, challenges, of pluralism arise (i think) when some consider their group to possess absolute knowledge vs belief. As an example, i'll choose religion since i'm pretty familiar with it. There are some who identify as "Christian" who live that as a belief, while the fundamentalist approach of others approach life choices convinced their basis is knowledge (absolute). They cannot be wrong, and because they cannot be wrong, they cannot truly engage in objective debate. As i see it, the issue with authoritarians like trump, those he surrounds himself with, and their 2025 agenda, is they cannot be engaged. I.e., their "authority" is not the type that is open to further learning through ongoing 'research' or debate, rather, they know the truth and their only goal is to rule and implement accordingly.

My Grandad just wanted his cock sucked and my uncle would suck him off till my dad took over as my uncle always seem to be the dominant one. Both my dad and uncle were 6'2" and well built but my uncle took after grandad being about 10 inches uncut where I took after my dad being 8 inches cut. My uncle was 14 when he first fucked my dad who was 10 at the time and my uncles 2 boys were uncut but only about 8 inches but my uncle used to bring them over and take turns using my dads ass or mine before my uncle would plow my dad with my cousins cheering him on like "Fuck him hard dad" or "Make him grown dad" They used to use dad for what ever or wherever they wanted just like dad would use me when we were alone and even though dad would use my throat for quickies, he preferred that I would fuck him if time allowed or have me watch as guys took turns using his ass in parks or bar parking lots. As much as we played in groups, my favorite times were being held in dads arms with him nuzzling my neck with his 5'oclock shadow and then fucking me and falling asleep with his cock in my ass and then waking up in the morning and sucking his cock and drinking his morning piss. I have sucked a lot of guys off and drink a lot of piss over the years but there is nothing like the taste of your own dads juices.