All Activity

I think it would be cool and sexy, if i could do a London weekend sex trip , and finish the weekend having covered my costs of travel and expenses. I've no idea how i'd go about it, but would certainly be an interesting life challenge

There is another layer: the artificial creation of indivisible blocks of space that are subject to centralized extraction that are too juicy for psychopaths to ignore. The premise of this conundrum is that instruments of government can be built to do ONLY good without inherently being empowered to also do evil. It is also premised on the idea that human nature would magically change so that the pool of humans would somehow be GOOD. Another way to manage the projection of evil is to stop building political structures that subject large groups of people to the rule of a single psychopath. Smaller scale government would not change human nature but WOULD limit the extractive tools available to any one psychopath. Anyone who builds a new bureaucracy for GOOD should go in with eyes open that psychopaths will see this new instrument as a juicy banana to subvert

Two other severe problems with this whole topic: 1) people tend to overfit socially centric issues to “science” and ignore other variables that rightly affect the rules of the game. Those who think a “solution” should be derived solely from “science” are abusing science by treating it as a sacred arbiter of conflict and increasing the likelihood that it will be corrupted to politics. They are also underusing the skill of sound judgement. 2) The scale and scope of Federal government and the use of Federal tax money drives us to the least empowering method of spending energy on the topic. In this scenario, I have 1/340,000,000th of stake in the matter, $0.53 of my annual tax assessment is used to subsidize leagues in Alabama, Vermont, and all the states ideologically in between. Instead of letting this be a decentralized decision for each team and league to make with their own resources, it gets marketed to people as something they should have an opinion on but which leaves them with nothing to do but execute against central policy. While I definitely feel the pain of individuals, for reasons of not having the connection of thought and action be completely broken in two, I’d prefer to see each league pay for itself and navigate the complexities of decision-making at a “team-sweat-equity,” “paid-for-by” so ownership-rule-making alignment. The continued usurpment by the Federal government of local flavor and initiative has completely recast people as passive complainers trying to hijack others’ leeway with one-size-fits-all policy and tiny amounts of tax money confiscated from people of whom a significant minority will be opposed to the policy.

It’s dull because for whatever reason, explorations of how to create futures have been dumbed down to how to spend other peoples money. This framing crowds out all participants but critics and passive observers, driving the topic away from creation and self-empowerment and toward bickering about the size of someone else’s slice.

Love it bro...

There is a critical qualifier that frequently goes below the radar so that a comparison of “individual” versus “collective” becomes almost non-sensical. To make any sense of the balance, you must determine whether the collective was voluntary or involuntary. Since this distinction is often obscured in commentary, we lose a lot of nuance in simplistic working agreements that collectivism is “left” and “individualism” is “right.” It REALLY matters when someone’s agency is removed from the equation. It allows people to retain the silly notion that big things can be done only if the government imposes a single solution on everyone. Rhetoric long ago hypnotized those involved in civil discourse to think democracy looked like voting and then imposing the majority decision on all. Real democracy may look much more like a population of individuals exposing their opinions, which enables voluntary coalitions to form around not only the majority views (forced on 100% of the population) but also minority coalitions, who can use their energy to advance their goals. If you’re tempted to argue that crises sometimes necessitate 100% alignment, then you should also concede that non-critical conditions do NOT necessitate involuntary adherence to majority votes. The issue hiding behind the ridiculous divide between “collectivists” and “individualists” is centric to “autonomy.” Under what conditions should someone or some group have the right to curtail someone’s autonomy?

As someone almost religiously awed by cock-and-cum-in-ass and to a lesser extent mouth-cock, I hated the sterile idea of a side. I would never try to hook up with a side, but I HAVE come to appreciate sides as a fallback in group sex when I feel a connection but not a sexual compatibility with an awesome guy. It’s at best a fallback but given typically uneven top-to-bottom ratios in generaland the exacerbation of unevenness when the top minority gangbangs a bottom, it’s useful to open the aperture of sexual enjoyment when you’re spending time with cool guys who are not sexually compatible

Great story, but I feel bad for Leo. Despite all his intentions and efforts, he's still a virgin by the end of the story , and his cock-blocking father got no come-uppance.

I typically JO at night in bed to porn. I usually wear gym shorts to sleep in. It’s not uncommon for me to JO up to 3x a night. On average, I wear the same shorts to bed . When they start to feel a little “crusty “ or smelly, I toss them in the hamper and start fresh.

Just one. Considering the “dry spell” I have been in, I am hoping things are changing for the better.

Orally, I was 6 years younger than the first demographic. Anally, I was 12

Anyone mention "Harlem Vista Hotel" yet? They do short stays of $60 and $80 for four hours. Hooked up there several times in the last couple of months...

orally at 13, anally 15

4 at a bathouse

I got home still aroused and horny. I got out the dildo and lube and fucked my self by riding it on the neck cushion and shot all over. I licked it clean and then lie in bed. I went on BBRT and looked up profiles. That got me horny again. I searched 55 yrs +, Top only and take load in ass. I don't know why I kept going to the HIV section and debating on what to click. I thought I should just click negative and maybe undetectable. When I did that sort I got 80+. I looked thru the profiles and some were hot but I kept looking at the status part of each profile. My cock was getting hard again and I started to stroke it. Then I was curious and went back to the section and unclicked negative and undetectable. Then I clicked HIV. Then about 28 popped up with 18 online. My cock got really hard as I read the profiles and looked at their pics. So many hot older men. All seemed to have good size cocks. None had a small cock. I wondered about that. Then my phone pinged. R- What you up to boy? D- AT home on BBRT R- Really? You like that app now? D- Yes R- What you looking up? D- Just checking things out R- What did you search for? Tell me all? I told him the two searches that I did. R- Good. What did you find? I told him that there were more sexy guys who had HIV and they all had good sized cocks. D- Is that the norm? R- lol. You mean do we all have large cocks? D- YEs;) and sexy R- Yes of course...lol R- It actually makes sense. We were more likely to fuck more and anyone for that matter. Dip our cocks in all pussys no matter how nasty. And had cocks that attracted bottoms. My ass twitched when I read that. D- That makes sense. I guess more so than those with HIV and on meds and undetectable? R- That's a nuance look. I know lots of POZ undetectable tops who are great fucks and bottoms chase and beg them all the time. Maybe we are more the bad boy types...lol R- What else you do tonight? I explained everything that happened at the Professor's place. Going over to swim and what ended up happening. R- Sounds like you had fun. I am glad. D- Yes I did. It ended odd. R- Well you both still had oral and fun at the end. R- Gotta go TTYL. I looked at the clock it was almost midnight. I needed to get to bed.

sometimes when i was younger but i stopped

The newest BZ classic

My owners let men fuck me not for money, but they often are rewarded by men using me by being gifted a bottle of whiskey or vodka or gin or a six pack of beer. They are Moslem and getting alcohol for them is not easy so in this way they ensure a decent supply of drinks. In a few days it's Ramadan so the price of my use gets a bit higher. Of course depending on how hard I am to be used also adds to their reward.

In a way yes, they paid for the gas. But that’s few and far between I have been offered several times and i didn’t take it.