Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. I love the idea personally. I have always been interested in sub whores who get castrated . I would love to have a cumdump nullo. I think it’s beautiful when a fag whore is so slutty and in need of a man inside his fag pussy. And it’s even sexier if they are castrated .
  3. Have you gone to the Chem Sex section and typed in keywords such as : Twink, money, Bathhouse?
  4. Wish I had a cock sucking slut like you. I wish I could find a whore that loves being skull fucked until they can barely breathe . Especially if they’re dressed up like a slutty cock hungry girl .
  5. Fuck yes!!! Every inch!!! Balls deep! I would spread my legs all day long for you!!! When? Where?
  6. Me too! This pussy is available for ANYone who wants to fill it. No limits!
  7. If I was in Denver and you are for real.... we would know.
  8. I can’t wait for the next instalment 🥵
  9. I'm a big New Orleans Saints fan and I had a deal with a Falcons fan from a local bar that I would suck on his cock during the whole Saints/Falcons game. He sat in his easy chair watching the game on the television. Except for a few bathroom breaks I blew him the whole time, and he gave me play-by-play since I was on my knees and couldn't watch the screen. Saints won and I took a huge load of his cum down my throat. I'll let you decide who was the big winner in that scenario. I don't remember how long the game lasted, but I had kneepads on and could have easily done overtime.
  10. @tallslenderguy I saw your last post before I have to do a a bunch of stuff today. Two quick-hits to respond before something more thorough: Re: "just blow it up" no issue from me. agree on all points. It happened, can't change the past, move on...it's a great opportunity in the future. You asked: "Would you go into some detail about what you see as "the left [getting] their way previously" that would have resulted in "Trump being in charge of so much more!" " Let's say Biden had been able to create UHC, for example. How would you feel with Trump and RFK Jr leading our national healthcare system... not just the payment of it via ACA.
  11. Yes, first time when he was 22 (before any piercings lol). After a crazy night of too much merlot and silliness and porn and nudity and dares, I laid back naked and spread my legs wide open and he climbed naked on top and went for it. Bareback. We even caught it on cheap low-rez video on our computer camera. Here's a freeze-frame from the long lost video, taken at the moment he was cumming.
  12. I want his poz load deep in me!
  13. I am a cum slut!
  14. Someone poz me!
  15. Damn thats a huge cock! I bet your a big cummer!
  16. I only get fucked bare and I always accept guys loads!
  17. MountMe63

    hungry

    Nah. My nose is going to be buried in that bush. Count on it.
  18. Today
  19. I have never been fucked with a condom, ever. Have always taken every load. This is a still frame from a video of the first time I ever got fucked, taken at the moment he was cumming. It was bareback. Over the years, this guy has dumped around 30 gallons of his cum up my pussy (based on 10ccs each time).
  20. LICMan

    2025-11-12 174433.png

    Bottom is so cute
  21. Totally. I love being fucked but I love being bred the most.
  22. Id take you up on the offer, but don't think my lil ass could take it all....LOL
  23. We agree. Whew. Glad we established that. Got it. Sort of an example. i quit my Hulu streaming service when Jimmy Kimmel was "indefinitely suspended." Apparently lots of other people did too, "collectively." Though i do not know how we can accurately measure the impact, it appeared to have an impact. This was where i was going earlier in the discussion when i referenced topics, taking a dive into sepsis and healthcare, looking at trust, experts and added a nod to Krishnamurti's assertion: You Are the World. "Where does [one] start in terms of solving a problem?" i think, realistically, it always starts with ones own actions. E.g., The question of "organic" labeling grew to the point of legislation. As an individual, i'd been an "organic" grower for years prior to that becoming a legislative issue. i promoted and supported that locally and state wide by growing my own food organically, providing organic produce at a local farmers market, participating as a member of a state wide organization that did similar stuff to me as an individual. When it became a national question, i contacted my representatives, signed petitions on legislative definition of "organic." While problem solving starts individually, much of it is more effective collectively. A point i'm making of the "endless trail," is any individual is limited by capacity in how much and in how many things one can be "expert." i used the example of healthcare. We cannot all get 12 years of education to be doctors, and that is only one branch of the complex healthcare tree. Doctors specialize because physiology is vast (infinite), then there's nutrition, pharmaceuticals, physical therapy... ad infinitum. i get sick, i go a doctor. Solving the problem of sickness starts with me, but i'm asking/demanding, relying on, someone else to "fix things for [me]." i think this approach applies, in varying degrees, to a lot of things. Healthcare, plumbing, government... on down "the endless trail." i think it's vital to be engaged as an individual. Honest, caring professionals from the endless list will both praise and bemoan stuff like youtube. On the one hand, it can be very helpful to me as a critical care nurse for a patient to be engaged enough that they have understanding about issues and interventions affecting their individual health. But, it's impossible for that individual to have the collective understanding and expertise of the "complex healthcare tree." So, they extend trust. But to whom? Ultimately, their own self by the choices they make individually who to trust with their issue. It may be the youtube vid vs their primary care doctor. But really, they are trusting their own emotions and rationale. There are trustworthy people, and there are liars and cheats. But there are also unsolvable problems. i saw a recent discussion/interview between HC Richardson and Rep Adam Smith. i found it refreshing to hear an American government member asserting that America needs the humility to be a part of the world community vs being in charge of it. That we cannot 'fix' everything, nor should be necessarily take on that responsibility every time we do. There are problems that cannot be fixed by us as individuals, collectively or by experts. Goes back to (i think need for) things like "grace," "love" ( i think love can more than an emotion, that i can have a very practical, principled side). Because the human condition is, we know and see in part. Ditto "massive topic." i think that there was a time when "conservative" meant "dislike [of] all tax, in general." Both sides of our political parties approve of taxes because both want to spend, the distinctions are where the money is spent and who pays for it. But, at least in current times, the "conservative" assertion of being anti tax is disingenuous at best. i may get crucified for saying this, but there is a secret part of me (no longer secret with this writing lol) that thinks there may be a silver lining to the current administrations slash and burn approach. No, i don't agree with the careless approach, but, on the other hand, when i consider the "massive topic," it is a sort of approach to making it smaller. i say "sort of," because, well, side effects. my point being, in the US history, we've created a "massive topic," that is not easily or simply addressed. The current approach has a lot of "just blow it up" approach to it, which may present opportunities for a do over? Many of our issues are from constant adding with never any subtraction. We run into sustainability issues, while continuing to introduce new and different stuff that costs additional sums. i think we both have a similar sense of right and fairness when it comes to "targeted tax." in my (ignorant, non professional) "do over" scenario, a more simplifies tax system strikes me as more egalitarian. A straight percentage tax on all income. Of course, that means defining "income." If there is a loophole, people will find it. A world where one can choose which group they want to be a member of, and that group (country?) decides how much to charge and for what services and infrastructure. None of that is going to happen, we have to work with what we have, adding snow here and there to the massive snowball, taking away snow here and there. To me Trump and his inner circle (guys like Miller and Vought) are examples of "despot, oligarch and monarch" approach. i think they exist because "we the people" (individually) became too disengaged from those we hired to run and "fix it." my hope is, the current situation will result in more people who "stop and think about that." Would you go into some detail about what you see as "the left [getting] their way previously" that would have resulted in "Trump being in charge of so much more!"
  24. This is my second time reading this story and it never fails to turn me on. Excellent work!
  25. I agree. I would be visiting him often.
  26. Gentlemen, it's time to step out, connect, and celebrate! Join us for unforgettable nights filled with great music, good vibes, and the best company of like-minded men. Whether you're here to mingle, dance, or just enjoy the atmosphere, this is your space to feel free, confident, and connected. Don't miss the next party-where good energy and good men come together.join our telegram [think before following links] https://t.me/safemedilabs0
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.