tallslenderguy

Today... had been awhile. We started out Him being total Top and me total bottom... but this year he got versatile and was getting into being fucked. Even still, i didn't cum (for six years He breeds me 3-4x a week). So, i really love giving him pleasure, so i got viagra to get past my head so i could fuck him. Then i turned out to be one of those guys having some pretty severe side effects from viagra, so i stopped taking it and the symptoms went away. i explained today, turns out he really didn't understand what "total bottom" meant since he didn't related, but He was totally cool with it and asked if He could still breed me and if i was okay with Him sucking me. I;m cool with Him sucking me, i never cum and it just makes me hornier for HIs cock. Recently He does this thing where He likes to get on top of me 69 when He sucks me so i can suck Him too. Even though i have tried to explain, He seems to get lost doing that and essentially just sits His total weight on me with His cock down my throat. He is balls deep and stationary the whole time and i'm sorta amazed and turned on that i can just hold Him in my throat that whole time and still seem to be able to breath. If there is any moving, i have to do it, forcing my head into the mattress, and He seems unaware until He gets up with this glazed look in His eyes and says: "let me fuck you." Easily over 1000x, and He always leaves me with His seed in me. Damn, i always feel so good. He's sort of oblivious, always sweet, and always wants to breed. love Him.

What politician have you fully listened to that you do not have similar concerns with? i have maybe a similar response to mike johnson... his constant smirk and lies. i can tell mike's gay and homophobic because trump constantly has his hand up mikes ass. i do force myself to listen to them both though, trying to find content mixed in that i can maybe latch onto vs listening to what others say about them. So far, both just manage to nauseate me. You mention not liking Sanders. What is it about him that you dislike?

"Trust, but verify," has a funny and ironic history turns out. Often attributed to Regan, who popularized it, but was quoting a Russian proverb to the communists. [think before following links] https://www.rbth.com/lifestyle/330521-reagan-trust-but-verify-chernobyl And i found this usage of modicum that also turns out to be fun... and in keeping with the situation: Mod·i·cum /ˈmädəkəm/ noun 1.a small quantity of a particular thing, especially something considered desirable or valuable: "his statement had more than a modicum of truth" my take on MGT is she is republican through and through, and that she is also a politician angling for power. i think she's doing a pretty good job of appearing to be loyal to trump by blaming his advisors for things she disagrees with, so she can play both sides, and preserves support of her constituency. i attribute most of her 'trustworthiness' to her play to preserve and advance her own power. Kinda cynical of me, but i trust she is doing some of what's right because she wants to be in it for the long haul and knows trump and those who support his policies are going hurt a lot of her voters.

A moment of emotional transparency for me. When it comes to politics and our politicians, trust is probably one of the biggest issues with me, and i am hearing this addressed in this interview. So tired of being lied to by politicians who want to keep power. Weirdly, the only politician in the republican party i feel a modicum of trust for right now is MGT. i don't agree with her politics, and she comes off as a bit crazy to me, but i'm hearing some honesty mixed in from her. i like Kamala, i like so much of what she is saying... it resonates, and i want to trust her. i do trust Jon. All emotional responses, i know, with some rational reason behind it all, but still, lots of emotion. Meanwhile, i think there's some great content here.

She states right up front that she is not advocating that people become Independent. i feel Stephen did a good job in a short interview when asking about the title: "... do you recommend that everyone leave the [democrat] party, and if so, where would they go? Organization is how you face tyranny" . my overall feel about Pierre was mixed. i think she made a salient point to Colbert's query: "I'm not suggesting that every one leave the party, i am not saying that we need a third party, i'm saying right now the two party system is not working." i feel she becomes disingenuous when she answers Colbert's question about why democrats are dissatisfied that she wrote the book as a "road map" and her main issue with the democrats is there's "no fight, no teeth." Interestingly (to me) her answers played well to the audience, less well to Colbert. Which i found disappointing, because i thought Colbert's audience would be more critically informed. i listen to audience response in Trump rallies, political discussions, because they are the voters being influenced. i was disappointed with her answer because it played well in the moment, but i do not think that's why the current administration is in power.

i listen to a broad spectrum of people on both sides. my posting the video was not intended as an endorsement of Jean Pierre. i don't think Colbert threw her soft balls or endorsed much of what she said. my point is to hear the voices of those in power positions.

As regards "rough." i suspect one Mans "rough" is another mans passion. i have a FB i write about often in "loads taken" since He breeds me about 3-4x a week for almost 6 years now. He's been lifting weights since He was 13 and He's a solid mass of muscle. He's also 27, so pretty hormonal lol. He pounds the hell out of me when He's fucking, has gone from using lube over the years to spitting on my hole and just pushing in without any prelude. But He doesn't have a mean bone in His body (including His cock lol). i see and feel it as pure lust, which is a big part of Him that i want to connect to. His lust evokes mine. It doesn't create it, but there is a definite control, response dynamic. And i suspect the lust He evokes in me feeds and stokes His lust as well. If i thought He was purposely just trying to hurt me, i'd be turned off. It's why i don't have sex with Sadists, though i do have two really close friends where we tried sexual relationship and it didn't work sexually, i still love both of them and were tight friends, just not sexually compatible.

So perfectly put. ❤️

Preface: Answering this as an individual, i don't presume to answer for anyone else. i believe we're all individuals on an infinite human sexuality spectrum, even though we use broad labels to make communication and identification easier. i never want or try to direct a Top while He is fucking me... but my profiles, or any online exchange can be very specific about wants and turn offs. AND i want the same ahead of time from the person i am exchanging with. Why? because we all do this because of want/need, so it makes sense to me to be self aware and skilled enough in communication, from both parties, with that info. In that vein, i appreciate your query and openness about what you want/need. For whatever reasons, i'm wired bottom. What that means to me is not a short answer, and how much of the answer one gets depends on their degree of interest. But some basic stuff? my lust/desire/need connects to a Tops lust/desire/need as a 'bottom.' If a guy is just 'willing' to fuck me, i'll take a pass. It's often why i do not hook with some versatile guys. Some can choose to be top or bottom, others need/want both. i can connect with the former, but not the latter. Why? Because i cannot satisfy their need/lust. There are some Tops i will take a pass on as well, if i know in advance... i've never stopped a Top while fucking, but i will not knowingly have sex with a Top who wants me to be something/someone i am not. It's a turn off for me to "direct" a Top "into what enjoy" while having sex. But it seems to me, anyone who lets another know they wanna be fucked is giving direction initially? Controlling pace? That's contrary to me connecting to Him and His need/desire. i've told more that a few Tops upfront that it doesn't matter to me how big or small their cock is, how long or how short the fuck is... what matters is they are getting what they want/need, and for whatever reason, that evokes, connects and even seems to control my own want/need. i think that may be why i'll receive things in the middle of a fuck that i might not agree to ahead of time? And, for me, it's not just about "the load." Sure, that's important, but i can get that from discarded condoms. And it's not just about the physical penetration, i can get that from a dildo (which i never use). It's the desire and intent the results in those things that matters most. Bottom line, i'd rather go without than have a guy fuck me in any particular way because it's what i want. To me, the best sex is when it's symbiotic so that takes me back to the self knowledge and openness part prior to sex. To me, that is not about direction, but about identifying and matching up needs/desires. Which gets into a discussion of hook up vs ongoing relationship. Plusses and minuses to both i think.

This too. Similar vein.

^^This^^. my experience as well from a bottom perspective. i want a guy to have easy access and an open invitation lol. Not to mention another practical side , which is keeping it clean. if one is wearing it while out fucking around, the part covering the hole gets saturated and stained very quickly... which i realize is not necessarily a negative to all Tops or bottoms, maybe even considered an added feature. As usual, this discussion is yet another reminder that we are all individuals and there is no one standsrd. Viva diversity. ❤️

i think thongs look sexy if one has the ass for it, highlights the gluts which, even as a total bottom, i find the most visually sexy part of a guys anatomy. On the other hand, i find them impractical because they cover up my most important part (i.e., my hole). i don't think a jock looks as sexy, but it sends the right message for me, cock contained, hole naked and available.