tallslenderguy

i found this to be a great commentary on a great film. To this day, i still find the film Cabaret captivating (almost put this in the LGBT section, but thought... nah lol)

About 10 minutes ago. i was all dressed and ready to go outside and paint the trim on my house... butt. my FB called and wanted more (He bred me last night too). He's going to Hawaii and wanted something to tide Him over. He's on the DL and will be with straight family so won't be getting any there. He identifies as Bi, and i'm pretty sure i'm the only guy He's ever been with, so i get a lot of His testosterone lol. 5 years seems a long time to me, sort of mysterious to me that He seems so satisfied using me for His sexual outlet. Pretty sure He hasn't had a GF in maybe a couple of years now, but He doesn't really talk about it, just occasional comments, and i just let Him be who and how he is. He loves getting fucked recently, and i continue to do so but don;t breed him, and it always ends with Him breeding me. So, no guarantees there will be no drips while i paint.

Found this a very informative watch. If your attention span is stressed, fast forward to the 13 mark to see where wealth distribution in the US starts to diverge.

And i was among those who voted for Harris. To clarify, what i am saying is she was a last minute decision. I don't think i am alone in how big of a part money plays in choosing candidates for president, and we get to choose, realistically, from two. If we had a system where the playing field was level when it comes to campaign financing, i think it would make a big difference in the choices? Idk, i think it would allow (force?) Americans to be more engaged in the process of who becomes their representative.

So true. If it's so "beautiful," why wait to reveal the results till after you're long gone? Making tax cuts permanent to those who can afford to pay for the wall and dome (in some cases, the ones who will benefit financially from their building), while throwing a token temporary bone to the waiters by not taxing tips. My guess is you did not "allow this to happen." Elections are not in the hands of any one individual. We get two selections, but who among us would have actually chosen either of those selections? Professional politicians on all sides know how to work the system, and each has their base to whom they pander. And of course, it takes money to pull all of that off, so money (and those who have lots of it) play a huge part on who we end up getting to select from. i think the majority of Americans are not at one extreme end or the other... that even many total bottoms occasionally find their cock in an ass. The election winners definitely pander to their base, but can only win if they sway the what i believe is the majority middle. Those who espouse some of the ideals from both camps. For example, i don't think most Americans have much of a clue about what is in a 1000 page bill. The stuff that gets summarized and gets attention maybe accounts for 5%, what else is not being discussed and debated publicly? Hell, we have senators admitting they didn't know what was in it, yet still voted for it. i don't think that is unique to this particular bill, i think it is business as usual. The debt keeps growing no matter who's in office, but where the money is spent shifts to the winners choice agenda. To me, it comes down to trust. i think your feeling of needing checkers to check the media and fact checkers really gets to the root of the problem: trust. I think most vote based on emotion and the hope that they can trust who they elect, despite decades of evidence to the contrary. Our country does seem to have entered a new era of extremism though. i cannot remember a time where a president could actually get away with saying "i hate democrats." Many politicians may think it or feel it about their opponents, or an individual, but to actually say it about an entire group of people creates a stereotype and panders to the extremist element in this country. It also solidifies Trump as one of them. He does not even attempt to represent all the people of this country. He cannot claim to love our country when he hates god alone knows how many Americans disagree with him. They are also America.

The following is off the cuff, and not well thought out... The middle east seems one big grudge fest to me, an ancient Hatfield/McCoy feud. So many play the long game when it comes to revenge. From Trumps mouth to their ears: "nobody knows what i'm going to do," which often seems the concerns the world has with certain other guys in charge of means to destroy. To me it feels like, with Trump, the US has taken the route of joining the bully dictators in the world, sort of "if you can't beat em, join em" approach (e.g. Putin, Kim Jong Un,, Xi Jinping, Khamenei, Netanyahu, etc.). The double entendre "bully pulpit" comes to mind, considering Trumps methods; ruling by coercion, force, fear. i don't believe those kinds of rulers are good for the long term stability of the world and that the world would be better off without them, but there is no doubt that that type represents a large portion of world leaders. Short term, i can see Khamenei fearing Trump enough to capitulate... short term. But these guys all seem cut from the same cloth to me, i don't see any of them actually agreeing to long term peaceful terms. It seems to me that each of them wants to be "first," that they do not want to coexist on more level or balanced terms.

Bout 15 minutes ago. FB. Still 4-5 times a week after 5 years. He wanted to breed yesterday, but i was gone all day, so the last time was day before yesterday. He did something different the other day. Usually start with me sucking him, then he likes to suck me on his knees, me standing. Then he gets on the bed so i can suck him some more. But this time, he got on the bed ass up, so i rimmed and fucked him. i never cum in him, but he has gotten to where he really loves to be rimmed and fucked... so i do, cause he obviously loves it. Always ends with me getting bred though, which is probably why i'm able to compromise and fuck him. Today he wanted to video me fucking him, said he needed something to watch when i'm not available. For some reason, i didn't get hard though? i've found taking a Viagra works to get me hard, not sure why it;s like that because i still get rock hard whenever a Guy even just talks about wanting to fuck and breed me, so i know it's all in my head. But, for some reason, the viagra usually works. He was totally cool about it and just went straight to breeding me. He's a decided muscle Boy, and fucks like a full on Bull. He's a silent cummer, but i've gotten to the place where i can feel His seed going into me, which is really awesome. Gotta put up some window trim on the house now 🙂

So much for "America First" lamo. Couldn't bring herself to honestly and clearly state "other Americans" are going to be hurt... they're simply "not going to be advantaged." Murkowski after selling out the country for self interest: “Do I like this bill? No. But I tried to take care of Alaska’s interests.” " Do I like this bill? No. I tried to take care of Alaska’s interests, but I know that in many parts of the country there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill. I don’t like that,” she explained. “I don’t like the fact that we moved through an artificial deadline, artificial timelines to produce something to meet a deadline, rather than to actually try to produce the best bill for the country. " [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.yahoo.com/news/lisa-murkowski-stares-down-reporter-211200306.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&segment_id=DY_VTO_CORE_NT&ncid=crm_19908-1475736-20250702-0--A&bt_user_id=0zq5wpODabowPMFg2NYdKMiNgU%2BEeSF55uflkp%2F%2BUgLBvI08WaWZaVUQ2JgthHCg&bt_ts=1751453726860

i watched several commentaries at the same time as this one, so cannot remember the source. One showed several quotes of Netanyahu doing his own "two weeks" thing. In each quote, he was asserting that Iran was "weeks away" from having nuclear weapons. The quotes went all the way back to 2012. i appreciated the tone of this discussion, particularly the comment that "peace is inherently messy" (paraphrasing). None of this is black and white, there are too many irons in the fire to make any world peace negotiations neat and clean. Both peace and conflict are unstable, but fewer common people die with peace, and fewer weapons manufacturers get rich. It seems no matter how you slice it, the people of all nations end up being at the mercy of, and are often victims of, those in power. If it were possible to do a world pole, i wonder how many people would actually say they are represented by their government?

You mock and disqualify when others cite or link a source, so i am wondering where you get your information? I'm glad you think that i am "not even that bad," because i genuinely want to engage with others here, including you, not spar. You are right, i'm not a dyed in the wool liberal, democrat, progressive, republican or conservative. i do not disagree that people should immigrate to the US legally vs illegally. One small example, i want our government to scrutinize Chinese students because i believe that the CCP is just like N Korea, they want to destroy the US and they use Chinese students to that end. I don't care if democrats or republicans do it, i want my government to represent US concerns, in this as one example. But i cannot substantiate if the current US government is actually going to follow through and do that on a large scale. From what i can ascertain, the past US government has not. I'm more concerned about Chinese Students smuggling in potential bioweapons to clone than Latin Americans coming in to find work. But here is what i mean by substantiation. i can provide what you might reject as a notoriously 'left' source on this story (CNN), what others would reject as a notoriously "right' source (Fox) and then the Justice Department. Do any of these three have a pristine record as objective information sources? Nah. We the people are in a position of having to figure out what is true and what is not. So yeah, i think it's good and healthy to state opposing sides . i have done a lot of conflict resolution between parties and have often found the 'truth' is often somewhere in the middle. i think it's important to speak, and it's important to listen when trying to discover the truth of any specific thing. And yeah, try and substantiate, or at least cite sources as part of that process. Three different sources, and i am guessing we can all find points to agree on even though we disagree with the sources amongst our selves. There is no pristine source and i think it's good to have people looking at things from all angles. i do not suppose any one is absolutely right or absolutely wrong. [think before following links] https://www.justice.gov/usao-edmi/pr/chinese-nationals-charged-conspiracy-and-smuggling-dangerous-biological-pathogen-us [think before following links] https://www.foxnews.com/us/patel-chinese-nationals-charged-smuggling-known-agroterrorism-agent-into-us-direct-threat [think before following links] https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/04/us/chinese-researchers-smuggle-pathogen-university-of-michigan

Your only answer to why you do not "substantiate" and demonstrate what you say is trustworthy is "why not?" So essentially you are doing the very thing you rail against "leftists" doing in an attempt to "manipulate anything you can so it's more favorable to your...viewpoints." The tax bill is not law, it's a 1000 page proposal. So this does not answer the question of what Trump has actually done. One thing it includes is no taxes on tips... for 3 years. Only 3 years. i agree, it's a good thing (does that make me part of the "majority?), but it is token to only have it for 3 years. Trump has said many things, but what has he actually done that you can "substantiate" he has truly accomplished and also substantiate: "THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS AGREE WITH." You don't need to "keep going," on my account, you haven't even started. You curse, call names, accuse, make claims... but you do not provide any substance to back your claims. Just "why not?"

You seem to believe what you are saying, i don't think you are just a 'troll' trying to get a rise. Trump is president, the "woke ... regressives" are not in power. Instead of focusing on the "losers,' that's history, will you provide a substantiated list of the things Trump has done so far that you agree with and believe "THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS" agree with? Why should we "trust" you? Honest question.