tallslenderguy

i think i must have done a poor job explaining my thoughts, some almost seem to take umbrage at the suggestion. i get that, because i know many here revere Dom's. i see the desires that come along with being dom, or sub for that matter, are naturally wired in. i don't think someone just chooses to have those desires, though i think they can be refined, modified, etc.. To me, guys like Trump and Musk are good examples of what happens to a person with dom wiring when they don't develop or mature. i don't think having dom or sub wiring automatically confers respectable attributes or that the person possessing that nature is intrinsically good or bad. On the other hand, i get that there are those who don't see Trump or Elon as "dom." Honestly, they are not my idea of "dom" either. Sort of like a bird that never learned how to fly isn't much of a bird. i was looking at this as nuanced.

Damn, did i write "dom?" i meant to write "dumb". Never mind.

Yes, to all of the above, i think this is well put and explained. To me, Trump is an example of a person with a dom nature who hasn't developed or matured. He's a quintessential bully, stunted. i think that there are many like him, both sub and dom and all the infinite variations on the human spectrum, who respond to the illusion of strength and confidence because they relate or something of their own stunted nature is sparked on an unconscious level. Not a universal thing that can be applied to all, but thinking it could be a factor for some. i count myself as having a sub side to my nature, but have encountered more than a few guys identifying as "dom" who would disagree because i did not respond as they wished or expected. As a kid, i attracted plethora bullies until i learned how to not present as a faggot. Retrospectively, i realize i was pretty sub in my nature and presentation as kid. i believe attributes like dom, sub, etc., are wired in, part of ones nature. What one does with what they have can be worlds apart. i've also come to believe that some of those bullies were probably guys that simply did not know how to deal with their own nature, who did not trod the path of attaining self-knowledge and developing attributes like character or compassion.

i've been thinking of this for awhile, thought i'd throw it out for discussion. This is a little tongue-in-cheek, and a little serious too. To me, Trump qualifies as a type of dom. Not one i measure as attractive or my idea of an intelligent dom, but to me he has the energy and nature of a dom person. What i have wondered is weather this, in part, played a part in his election? Simply put, i wonder how many people with sub type natures voted for him because they were somewhat dommed by him, and possibly some with dom wiring related to him on some level? i also have my bowl of popcorn waiting for the outcome of Trump choosing Musk, also another guy who strikes me as have dom wiring, because both also seem to have alpha aspirations. In a sense, both have realized those aspirations and continue to pursue higher heights. This is of course all just fun speculation. i do think dom/sub is part of human nature though, and have long seen it in Trump, but just recently considered how that may have been reflected in the voter population.

Yesterday. my regular FB, usually 2-3+ times a week. As i've mentioned, about a year ago, he expressed interest in being penetrated and fucked. The last 8 months or so we always start out with me sucking him and eating his ass. i'm not usually into rimming, that 'feels' top to me, but when i do it, he is so verbal and expressive, obviously enjoying it, so the sub part of me kicks in and gives him what he wants and the sub part of me is fed, if not the bottom part. He also likes to suck me sometimes. We've been fucking for about 5 years now, and no matter how many times i've explained that i'm "total bottom,' with all that means to me, he just doesn't get it. He's sucking me yesterday and looks up: "do you like that?" and i just smile and say: "feels good." And physically it does, just doesn't connect with me psychologically. But sex has so many layers, eh? He is obviously enjoying it so much that i end up getting hard. i've never cum that way with him. Actually, out of 100's of fucks, i have never cum once with him. It always ends with him breeding my ass (except one time he came in my mouth, but only once). Yesterday, after sucking me awhile, he gets on all fours and wants his ass eaten. That's usually about 2/3 of the time these days, and then always finishes with him fucking and breeding me. But i always feel like he wants more when i am eating his ass, so yesterday i was hard, so i lubed and fingered him to open him, then slid in and fucked. He so obviously loved it, again, so verbal and expressive. Then he asks if he can ride me, so i acquiesce... at least he's on top that way lol. Well, i can see his face and hear all his ecstasy, he was really liking it. i was married to a woman much of my life and trained myself never to cum until my partner has, so i didn't cum, not sure he even wanted that. But after some time of him riding me, he fucked and bred me.

Guantanamo seems his primary choice to send people he wants to relocate.

Our current knowledge and response to both Ebola and Covid are based on antiviral research because of HIV. "One undeniable fact is that most of our current knowledge on viral and antiviral science comes from the study of HIV. The science of antiviral research was well established when HIV/AIDS appeared as a major viral disease in early 1980s. An increase of antiviral therapy studies with no equal took place when the first cases of HIV were reported. " [think before following links] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S166557961500037X

"At the direction of the Trump administration, the federal Department of Health and Human Services and its agencies are purging its websites of information and data on a broad array of topics — from adolescent health to LGBTQ+ rights to HIV. Several webpages from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with references to LGBTQ+ health were no longer available. A page from the HHS Office for Civil Rights outlining the rights of LGBTQ+ people in health care settings was also gone as of Friday. The website of the National Institutes of Health's Office for Sexual & Gender Minority Research Office disappeared. (Most of these pages could still be viewed through the Internet Archive.)" [think before following links] https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2025/01/31/nx-s1-5282274/trump-administration-purges-health-websites

Research from Rutgers University with excerpt and link to the published study at the bottom. "TikTok algorithms promote the Chinese government’s narratives on hot-button issues such as Tibet, Taiwan and the Uyghurs — while suppressing content critical of Beijing, a new study has found. When users search for terms on TikTok — owned by Chinese company ByteDance — that are sensitive to the ruling Chinese Communist Party, or CCP, such as “Tibet” and “Taiwan,” the results show much more content that is pro-China than content that is critical of China, researchers found. Compared to similar searches on Instagram and YouTube, the results showed a pronounced pro-Beijing bias, according to the study, titled "The CCP's Digital Charm Offensive," by the Network Contagion Research Institute, or NCRI, at Rutgers University. The findings, “while not definitive proof of state orchestration, present compelling and strong circumstantial evidence of TikTok’s covert content manipulation,” wrote NCRI co-founder Joel Finkelstein in the report." [think before following links] https://www.rfa.org/english/news/tibet/tiktok-promotes-pro-china-bias-on-tibet-taiwan-uyghurs-study-08162024102338.html "In December 2023, the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) published an initial report that found a strong possibility of content on TikTok being either amplified or suppressed based on its alignment with the interests of the Chinese Government. The report concluded with a warning: “should future research find that TikTok users exhibit attitudes and assessments of world events aligned with these information distortions, democracies will need to consider appropriate countermeasures to protect information integrity and mitigate potential real-world impacts.” These findings underscored the urgency of investigating the specific mechanisms and broader implications of potential algorithmic manipulations." [think before following links] https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/NCRI-Report_-The-CCPs-Digital-Charm-Offensive.pdf

"Donald Trump issued an executive order rescinding two orders that Biden signed on his first day in office four years ago, one advancing racial equity for under-served communities and another combating discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation." “As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female,” the president said during his inaugural address." [think before following links] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/20/trump-executive-order-gender-sex

To me, sex is a holistic connection between me and another guy. i think we can connect with people intellectually, emotionally and physically, and for me the ultimate sex is when all three of those are in play, the chemistry is right, and we connect in all three of those places mutually. A step further is when all of those elements get exercised and experienced with one particular guy over and over and the connection becomes a bond. i've come to see that as the 'real' bond of "bondage." i see a 'Top' as someone wired to penetrate, fuck, mold, create, inseminate, impregnate, possess, control, _________ and a bottom as having the corresponding needs/desire to be penetrated, fucked, molded, created, inseminated, impregnated, possessed, controlled, __________. The wonder of it all is we are all individuals and can experience all of these things, or some but not others, in varying amounts and levels of intensity. For instance, to me, a Man Who not only wants to penetrate and fuck me physically, but that also extends as a desire/need to penetrate and fuck me mentally, or emotionally, or both. The variations, combinations, levels of intensity can be infinite. i also perceive myself as having a sort of womb that only a Top can penetrate, impregnatie, possess, etc.. That there is a mutual need, yin/yang. i see it expressed in nature at the most basic level of atoms, positively and negatively charged elements that naturally attract, connect and sometimes bond to form ("create") something other, additional, while still remaining their individual self.

Here's some more substantial benches, butt expensive. [think before following links] https://pleasurefactorys.myshopify.com/collections/benches Here's a pic of a wood, saw horse design [think before following links] https://metro.co.uk/2018/01/17/bdsm-enthusiasts-heres-where-you-can-get-handmade-sex-furniture-7237039/ i wonder if a child sized picnic table could not be padded/modified as a cheap alternative? [think before following links] https://www.homedepot.com/pep/Costway-Blue-Kids-Picnic-Table-Kids-Dining-Table-Set-for-4-Wooden-Bench-Seats-Backyard-HCST02837/332111074?mtc=SHOPPING-BF-HDH-BNG-D59H-059_034_INT_FURN-NA-MULTI-NA-PLA-HDH-HDH-NA-NA-NBR-NA-NA-NA-All_Subclass_New&cm_mmc=SHOPPING-BF-HDH-BNG-D59H-059_034_INT_FURN-NA-MULTI-NA-PLA-HDH-HDH-NA-NA-NBR-NA-NA-NA-All_Subclass_New-11561183930-107925097170-2361450124465&msclkid=fd271756dc8e179b4b70702fbc92e593&gclid=fd271756dc8e179b4b70702fbc92e593&gclsrc=3p.ds

Speaking as a total bottom, it's not really a matter of elected or unelected, it's more about the dickwad.

Agreed. Given the original question, i'm assuming it's not the Top having and orgasm inside of the bottom that the bottom is concerned about, but the question is having the Tops resulting "cum" inside? I.e. a top wearing a condom may still have his orgasm inside of the bottom, but the seed is contained in the condom and doesn't go inside of the the bottom. For me, a Tops orgasm and cum are different, though connected, and i want Him to plant them both inside of me. The bottom who doesn't want semen inside of him, in my opinion, has no right to expect bare sex. Anyone with the internet can learn in less than a minute that a bottom is at risk of infection from pre cum that often a part of fucking, though quantity varies from Top to Top. So, if the bottom in question is not totally ignorant, i think he should not expect to have bare sex with anyone he doesn't accept the risk of fluids inside of him as part of the connection As for the Top? i agree with topblkmale. If a bottom doesn't want a Breeding Males seed then to me, His cock doesn't belong in that bottom. To me, a fuck without at least the potential of breeding, is not fucking. To me, the whole point is breeding... though i define "breeding" in a more detailed fashion than physical. For instance, a Top's desire to open, mold, penetrate, control, possess, etc., to me, are all forms of breeding... but that's another topic.