tallslenderguy

Research from Rutgers University with excerpt and link to the published study at the bottom. "TikTok algorithms promote the Chinese government’s narratives on hot-button issues such as Tibet, Taiwan and the Uyghurs — while suppressing content critical of Beijing, a new study has found. When users search for terms on TikTok — owned by Chinese company ByteDance — that are sensitive to the ruling Chinese Communist Party, or CCP, such as “Tibet” and “Taiwan,” the results show much more content that is pro-China than content that is critical of China, researchers found. Compared to similar searches on Instagram and YouTube, the results showed a pronounced pro-Beijing bias, according to the study, titled "The CCP's Digital Charm Offensive," by the Network Contagion Research Institute, or NCRI, at Rutgers University. The findings, “while not definitive proof of state orchestration, present compelling and strong circumstantial evidence of TikTok’s covert content manipulation,” wrote NCRI co-founder Joel Finkelstein in the report." [think before following links] https://www.rfa.org/english/news/tibet/tiktok-promotes-pro-china-bias-on-tibet-taiwan-uyghurs-study-08162024102338.html "In December 2023, the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) published an initial report that found a strong possibility of content on TikTok being either amplified or suppressed based on its alignment with the interests of the Chinese Government. The report concluded with a warning: “should future research find that TikTok users exhibit attitudes and assessments of world events aligned with these information distortions, democracies will need to consider appropriate countermeasures to protect information integrity and mitigate potential real-world impacts.” These findings underscored the urgency of investigating the specific mechanisms and broader implications of potential algorithmic manipulations." [think before following links] https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/NCRI-Report_-The-CCPs-Digital-Charm-Offensive.pdf

"Donald Trump issued an executive order rescinding two orders that Biden signed on his first day in office four years ago, one advancing racial equity for under-served communities and another combating discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation." “As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female,” the president said during his inaugural address." [think before following links] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/20/trump-executive-order-gender-sex

To me, sex is a holistic connection between me and another guy. i think we can connect with people intellectually, emotionally and physically, and for me the ultimate sex is when all three of those are in play, the chemistry is right, and we connect in all three of those places mutually. A step further is when all of those elements get exercised and experienced with one particular guy over and over and the connection becomes a bond. i've come to see that as the 'real' bond of "bondage." i see a 'Top' as someone wired to penetrate, fuck, mold, create, inseminate, impregnate, possess, control, _________ and a bottom as having the corresponding needs/desire to be penetrated, fucked, molded, created, inseminated, impregnated, possessed, controlled, __________. The wonder of it all is we are all individuals and can experience all of these things, or some but not others, in varying amounts and levels of intensity. For instance, to me, a Man Who not only wants to penetrate and fuck me physically, but that also extends as a desire/need to penetrate and fuck me mentally, or emotionally, or both. The variations, combinations, levels of intensity can be infinite. i also perceive myself as having a sort of womb that only a Top can penetrate, impregnatie, possess, etc.. That there is a mutual need, yin/yang. i see it expressed in nature at the most basic level of atoms, positively and negatively charged elements that naturally attract, connect and sometimes bond to form ("create") something other, additional, while still remaining their individual self.

Here's some more substantial benches, butt expensive. [think before following links] https://pleasurefactorys.myshopify.com/collections/benches Here's a pic of a wood, saw horse design [think before following links] https://metro.co.uk/2018/01/17/bdsm-enthusiasts-heres-where-you-can-get-handmade-sex-furniture-7237039/ i wonder if a child sized picnic table could not be padded/modified as a cheap alternative? [think before following links] https://www.homedepot.com/pep/Costway-Blue-Kids-Picnic-Table-Kids-Dining-Table-Set-for-4-Wooden-Bench-Seats-Backyard-HCST02837/332111074?mtc=SHOPPING-BF-HDH-BNG-D59H-059_034_INT_FURN-NA-MULTI-NA-PLA-HDH-HDH-NA-NA-NBR-NA-NA-NA-All_Subclass_New&cm_mmc=SHOPPING-BF-HDH-BNG-D59H-059_034_INT_FURN-NA-MULTI-NA-PLA-HDH-HDH-NA-NA-NBR-NA-NA-NA-All_Subclass_New-11561183930-107925097170-2361450124465&msclkid=fd271756dc8e179b4b70702fbc92e593&gclid=fd271756dc8e179b4b70702fbc92e593&gclsrc=3p.ds

Speaking as a total bottom, it's not really a matter of elected or unelected, it's more about the dickwad.

Agreed. Given the original question, i'm assuming it's not the Top having and orgasm inside of the bottom that the bottom is concerned about, but the question is having the Tops resulting "cum" inside? I.e. a top wearing a condom may still have his orgasm inside of the bottom, but the seed is contained in the condom and doesn't go inside of the the bottom. For me, a Tops orgasm and cum are different, though connected, and i want Him to plant them both inside of me. The bottom who doesn't want semen inside of him, in my opinion, has no right to expect bare sex. Anyone with the internet can learn in less than a minute that a bottom is at risk of infection from pre cum that often a part of fucking, though quantity varies from Top to Top. So, if the bottom in question is not totally ignorant, i think he should not expect to have bare sex with anyone he doesn't accept the risk of fluids inside of him as part of the connection As for the Top? i agree with topblkmale. If a bottom doesn't want a Breeding Males seed then to me, His cock doesn't belong in that bottom. To me, a fuck without at least the potential of breeding, is not fucking. To me, the whole point is breeding... though i define "breeding" in a more detailed fashion than physical. For instance, a Top's desire to open, mold, penetrate, control, possess, etc., to me, are all forms of breeding... but that's another topic.

He just left. my sweet FB, usually 3 to 4 times a week. He wasn't feeling well today, said He'd been sick the last couple of days, probably food poisoning from how He described it. It didn't have and effect on His breeding though, even got a little vocal which He doesn't usually do when He is fucking. He pretty much always fucks hard, He's been weight lifting since He was 12 and it seems every single muscle on His body is hard, so fucking for Him has a lot of muscle behind it. But He seemed to be feeling particularly like He wanted to breed deep, even said: "I may need to come back for seconds tonight." i love when He slams deep when He shoots, i love when His seed goes past the curve... love being inseminated.

my whole body is pretty much an erogenous zone. A massage for me is foreplay, and sex for me is being bred. That said, a massage that leaves me horny is a really good erotic massage in my book. As a total bottom, i don't really want to orgasm when i have sex with a Guy. my "happy ending" is when He has an orgasm inside of me. Touch, from a Guy, for me, is about accessing, manipulating and ramping up my desire and need for Him. For me, being in that continual state of desire is a good thing, as long as i am receiving a Mans orgasm often enough.

As does fundamentalist Christianity. To me, it's more the mindset (emotional set?) of the espousing the religion, than the actual religion itself that makes for the bigger differences. After i stepped away from religion (fundamentalist Christianity in my case), i later ended up in a "Christian" church (to help them start a farmers market). The church was 150 years old, as were probably 70% of the congregants, and they voted unanimously to be a gay open and affirming church. As protest, they refused to perform any weddings until gays could get married legally. They were not fundamentalist in their approach, but still identified as "Christian," and they were accepting of me, not only as a gay guy, but also as someone who freely and openly debated many of their beliefs. After leaving religion, i also read the book Infidel by Ayaan Hirs Ali, who was raised in fundamentalist Islam. i was struck by the similarities between things and ways she was taught, to my own. i know people who espouse Islam and Judaism who are openly accepting of gay people. i know atheists who are just as hateful as many fundamentalists i have known. The US democracy long had laws against homosexuals, i was arrested and charged with a felony for asking an undercover vice cop if he wanted to fuck me (using a 100 year old 'sodomy' law). The state AG in office at the time was a rabid anti gay and had directed those under him to go for blood. i think there are, and have always been anti gay people in every corner and walk of life. I think those in power at the time largely set the stage for the performers, so, we will see.

You do realize that the stuff in yellow and quotes is an excerpt from an article? The writer is not here to respond.

i was going to put this in the Bigly thread, but see it's been closed. Despite the frequent forays into snark, i thought there was some descent debate and discussion as well in that thread. Ah well. Here's an opinion piece i read this morning. i have not verified it's authenticity, but still have known enough people who have similar thoughts and feelings that i think it's a valid piece from a real person. Here's a partial excerpt with a link to the entire piece. "Commentary: I am a Mexican American who voted for Trump. No, I don’t hate myself I’m a proud, first-generation, college-educated and gay Mexican American with undocumented family in the United States, including a mother who was previously deported to Mexico, and I experienced homelessness as a child. I am everything Democrats claim to support, right? Wrong. Democrats have accepted a progressive platform, ignoring decades worth of change and focusing on erroneous issues. They have built campaigns on a foundation of misleading airs and fake vibes. Voting for Donald Trump does not make me racist, sexist, misogynistic, homophobic or any other “ist” and “ic” I’ve been called. I, along with more than half of the voting public in America, am sick of the self-righteous and label-obsessed left alienating us over differing opinions. In her concession speech, Vice President Kamala Harris claimed to have built strong coalitions. What she did was the opposite. She did not motivate enough Black voters, Latino voters, Asian voters, Jewish voters, union voters and female voters to cast their ballots for her. Fewer women voted for Harris than they did Joe Biden, even with abortion being a top issue. To the very end, Harris ignored the data; she ignored what voters needed." [think before following links] https://www.yahoo.com/news/commentary-am-mexican-american-voted-131500521.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&segment_id=DY_VTO_NTK_T2&ncid=crm_19908-1202929-20241115-0&bt_user_id=wU8przkQslG8%2BgQgEkTQ7DrYat2QR1cLn%2BDaVmZzxngIqJCvefWqmIQ%2BWVYABQxG&bt_ts=1731673543360

You are such a sweet, awesome fucker. One of the advantages of a well used hole is not having to use lube. i can't remember the last time a Top used lube with me. i love the feel of a Mans warm spit dropping onto my hole before He penetrates me.

"WASHINGTON — Former President Donald Trump said once again Wednesday that he would pardon Jan. 6 rioters if he wins the election, repeatedly lying about what happened during the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol, which injured more than 140 police officers. "Oh, absolutely, I would. If they're innocent, I would pardon them," Trump said during a panel at the National Association of Black Journalists. "They were convicted by a very tough system."" [think before following links] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/donald-trump-says-absolutely-pardon-jan-6-rioters-rcna164565

i have found some things about me are more intrinsic identity factors, others i can go either way. For instance, i'm total bottom. i've found a work around for guys who wanna suck me, it's actually hot if they like to suck me but not make me cum that way. But i know myself pretty well and that's something i can't honestly choose. Hair i can choose. i think it looks better smooth, but i'm not really doing the hair thing or not to please myself because it really doesn't matter that much. i can be naturally hairy. fur on the ass, bush, hairy legs, moderate chest, pits... never had facial hair because i look like Shaggy on Scooby Doo with a beard, and fucking a cartoon character is a narrow niche. i have found guys are about 50/50 on hair, so if it's an ongoing thing, my Top chooses. Since it doesn't really matter to me, i'd just as soon do whatever turns Him on.

Just finished prepping for my FB and sometimes after i'm done, i will insert a tampon to absorb excess water. It's not me being fem, just really utilitarian, but it does feel kind of kinky at the same time. my reasoning is that if there's to much water there's not as much friction for Him and it may feel better for him? i take it out when He arrives and He doesn't know i do it, and by the time He leaves, i'm always sloppy. Just wondering if anyone else does this?