PozBearWI

Years later, but Bentley's story is a fantastic read!  Kudos to him!  And RIP.  

18 hours ago, myDNA4u said:

Unfortunately @bently67is no longer with us. I had the luck of actually getting to play with him once 8 years ago. He always had refused meds and at some point got HIV2 as well. .

Damn, that is Sad.  We used to chat quite often here; but never were able to piece together common time to play even though we were just a couple hours apart.  

11 minutes ago, myDNA4u said:

The only thing safer than a U+ is a Neg on PrEP guy. 

Technically yes as "undetectable" doesn't mean our jizz is free of any virus.  Detectable as a metric has changed over the years as the sensitivity of tests has improved.  So now it means <20 copies per ml.  Could it be zero copies in our semen?  Maybe.  

Bottom line in now several repeat studies there have been no transmissions within serodiscordant couples even when "undetectable" was <200 copies per ml.  

Nothing is without risk.  Even the guy neg on PrEP; especially with the rather sloppy way PrEP is being dispensed these days.  There are way too many fellows on PrEP who haven't tested in years; and whose compliance is spotty.  

While I will sometimes ask when there seems to be an extended break, @Jaygusher is a reliable and talented author.  As @kspozcum pointed out, none of our authors here are paid to write. 

Us readers who appreciate these great stories I hope keep the authors well aware we appreciate their talent and time. 

Developing nicely!

Man what a lovely horny twisted (delightfully) rabbit hole!  Seems like a hell of an orgy is cumming.  

@Jaygusher how is the next chapter coming along???

At least here in Wisconsin; I sort of view bookstores and bathhouses in the same context; paid places you can go have anonymous sex with less police interference than parks, rest stops, etc.  I am unware any remain anywhere in Wisconsin.  To some extent this is social pressure, a subset of that being disinterest.  Meeting places for men wanting sex with men have shifted to online.  Even Gay Bars have thinned out considerably here.  

Honestly I really miss that form of meeting other guys.  Online comes often with filters so that one starts by limiting to specific attributes before the first "hi".  Physically we didn't have that "dossier" on the guy we saw across the room; and thus we had to learn to meet with and get to know each other before we discovered he was a closet axe murderer.  🙂  TBH I chose that reference as it is I hope the worst case scenario.  But on the plus side; we got to know each other by conversation rather than profiles.  In my opinion this is one very influential cause of much of our social polarization.  

Indeed, in primaries I typically vote for the one I want; although I've found myself voting for "least worst" in primaries at times as well.  

Hopefully this story will continue....

I had the same thought; initially I thought it was a sound.  Then perhaps a pipe.  But honest I am not sure....

1 hour ago, justsexnowatl said:

I am so confused by this thread and especially the comments from the +UD guys.  I feel like I MUST be missing something.  Although I agree with the title of the thread (you don't need to accept STIs), this specific case of Herpes has me baffled.  And the top's disclosure actually seems strange to me too since he's "dormant and no outbreaks".  Both my straight female doctor and my pharmacist (a friend) have told me "most" sexually active adults with "multiple partners" have Herpes.  I found out 20+ years ago I tested positive for Herpes, but I never thought I had an outbreak.  Finally - twice since that time I realized the blister on my ass cheek was my outbreak.  Trwice in 20+ years, and basically EVERYONE I'm having sex with (other slutty guys) 99.9% chance they have it too.  Almost everyone on this site probably has herpes whether they have outbreaks or not.  It seems virtually impossible to have been fucked "well over 1,000 times" and not have it yourself.  

The only analogy I can think of is a +UD bottom saying he will not let another +UD guy fuck him raw because he's going to give him HIV (which he already has - and the top is UD too U=U).  But almost everyone seems to agree that @eroswired should NOT take this guy's (dormant) herpes load, and the top seems to be getting shamed for disclosing it.  I'm pretty sure "most" guys on this site have herpes, and I'm guessing next to no one discloses it if they are NOT having an outbreak.  I can vouch that NO ONE out of thousands have ever disclosed to me that they have herpes, and after the first few guys laughed me off for telling them, I stopped mentioning it too.  Those couple times I had an outbreak, I just took a break till it went away.  What am I missing here?  Maybe I am a sociopath too?

I certainly don't understand shaming or otherwise castigating someone for herpes.  It is pretty ubiquitous. I control mine with thrice daily acyclovir.  Inexpensive and effective at managing outbreaks. Compared to my HIV it is nothing I fret.  

10 hours ago, barefucker44 said:

I completely disagree

On what basis?

1 hour ago, Jaygusher said:

Thanks, I was going for a corpse like look, or a generally unwell sickly look. 

You succeeded

I believe what "woke" lacks is a common definition.  Honest I thought that is what I did with my husband each morning.  I woke him....  Words which mean anything to anyone; or are meaningful in a panoply of narrow context have no meaning at all.  I've tended to interpret (I am not attempting to make a definition here) it as somewhat equivalent as "aware". 

Perhaps this accounts for some of the social strife we experience.  We are disappointed when our fellows don't know what we mean when we use a word whose definition is, at best, vague.  

My bad habit which has developed as a result is that I tend to tune out the words when words like that begin to appear.  I am not going to pretend to be Carnack the magician (of Johnny Carson fame).  I think the only reasonable approach is to ask the speaker what they mean when they use words like this.  

To me "woke" is a verb.  

Modern equivalent of "sock it to me"?

I am curious about what we can learn.  

2 hours ago, Lindorm482 said:

This is getting good, I definitely think he took him to a poz party. What about uploading somewhere else with a direct link to the picture?

Left off at them just getting to the seedy venue (I am certain a poz event).  Debate in my head about how I hope this unfolds.  On one had, I like the idea of uncle infecting nephew.  On the other hand; the surety of pozzing after dozens of viral loads is also attractive.  

For certain I hope this continues until nephew gets his poz diagnosis.  And I could imagine him and uncle breeding a few after. That would be the total transition for the nephew, and a completion where his dad never went.  

@Jaygusher check with @viking8x6 on whether you've hit a limit.  Mods can check that for you.  

The world of difference between R and D this time is that one is for our imperfect democracy, the other for an authoritarian regime.  

If the choice is only Biden or the dictator, I am voting for Grandpa Joe.  But I would like other viable choices....  

@Jaygusher buddy you don't disappoint.  Fuck great story...  I am looking forward to the next chapter.  Also, very nice artwork.

What a well crafted set up.  One day I hope to be able to read this whole story front to back without the breaks.  But until then I am going to enjoy seeing this one unfold.

I vaguely recall that.  Long gone and thus ...  

33 minutes ago, Jaygusher said:

You think so? 😈

OH hell yeah.  It wasn't the dildo in the boy's ass in the shower....