Minimum number of people to make it an orgy?

[cintarius]

What is the minimum number of people needed to make it an orgy? Two people definitely not. I think a threesome is too few. Even a foursome is it's own thing. One bottom with a bunch of tops seems more like a gang bang than an orgy. Is there a top/bottom combo needed to make it an orgy? What do you think?

[Justyn]

Three is a three-way, threesome or trio; add one more and it is a fourgy, and 'orgy' is part of that.

By the by, I will attend ANY of them!

[DNG999]

What @Justyn says

[Tanbbottom]

1 hour ago, Justyn said:

Three is a three-way, threesome or trio; add one more and it is a fourgy, and 'orgy' is part of that.

By the by, I will attend ANY of them!

I'm with you. As long as more than one guy breeds my ass it works for me. 

[IllinoisCumdump]

I’ve always thought that the number of bottoms was the biggest variable. If I’m on my back, grabbing my ankles, and surrounded by 6 tops, it’s a gangbang. If it’s two tops and there’s a second bottom in the mix, it’s an orgy. Both are pretty great but I do love having all that dick for myself and not sharing it. 

[NWUSHorny]

I put a minimum of 5. An orgy for me has to include some spit roasting as well as train fucking, i.e. fucking while getting fucked. I also need to get my pole in at least 3 holes, and at least 3 poles in my hole, so a gang bang won't cut it for me. 

[cockfun69]

When there's more cocks for your holes + mine is fucking someone else and there are spares waiting is what makes an orgy for me

[BB4fking]

I think a minimum of 5. But it has to be 5 active participants, I don’t think someone who just watches can be part of the quorum. I agree with others that if there’s just one bottom with 4 tops fucking him that is a gangbang and not strictly an orgy.

Qualitatively, I think there needs to be some interchange not necessarily involving everyone but at least some crossover. What I mean is if three couples are in the same room just fucking their own partner that doesn’t seem like an orgy to me. There needs at the very least to be some caressing of a non-partner, so it has a group activity vibe.

[Read1]

I've heard this: Two's a partner, three's - the beginning of an orgy. You need mixing and participation for it to be real and fun! Exploration is key!

[cman54]

I answered 5 or more.  I guess a foursome could qualify. I do feel one thing that would make it a good orgy is that all sex is bareback..and anon guys. No talking before hand. A female or two involved could be interesting I guess too. Should last a minimum of a couple of hours. But am overnight orgy in the same room or bed would be great to 

[hntnhole]

I don't think there is a certain number to qualify as an "orgy". 

Obviously, an orgy would be comprised of a number of guys, but what makes the event an "orgy" is the uninhibited serial sucking/rutting/breeding that takes place.  The only "measure" that creates an orgy out of a roomful of gay guys, is the degree of love for wanton raw sex the participants share. 

It could be 5, it could be 10, it could be 20, it could be 50.  It's determined only by the willingness of the guys attending to push their boundaries.  

[PozBearWI]

Indeed @hntnhole.  It isn't the number but how much we mix it up with each other; all taking turns as fucker/fuckee so we all enjoy each other directly at some point. 

[partying.hard]

I’ll say minimum of 5

[ffabbian]

The  number of men and ratio of roles needs to be considered equally.  

The minimum number required for an orgy is 5  well chosen versatile men. I only  play in a 5 man orgy with friends or friends of friends.  

 

 

 

 

  

 

[ChiPozPigHole]

47 minutes ago, partying.hard said:

I’ll say minimum of 5

That's a gangbang!😉