All Activity

A storage box under my bed. I've had to get a larger box a few times but it's never big enough for long

Started with my older brother when I was about 8 y.o. sucking his cock leading to him breeding my ass on the regular. Shortly after, around the age of 9, my dad started using my holes for his pleasure. Uncles and older cousins soon followed. My dad would "loan" out my holes to his poker and drinking buddies. Haven't been the same since it all started, started seeking out dick everywhere, men's room, parks, etc

Hottest chapter was when he sucked his own dad’s cock. Woof

Classmate in the boys bathroom every day during bathroom break of our science class—13. Did this for three years

I'm addicted to taking risks but fucking and breeding a complete stranger through a glory hole in an ABS unleashed the pig in me and after that it was bareback only all the time.

Necroing this post to say I want to be “turned” so bad but I’m not wired to just go hook up with someone whether it’s a guy or a girl. I need to find someone with mutual interests (not just turning me into a slave for their cock, though that’s a great place to start) and an ability to communicate. I don’t think you can be “turned” but I do think the experience can break down inhabitions you’ve conciously and unconciously place on yourself.

I'm sure that Mr. Wolf has turned down many men who wanted sex with him during his lifetime. He is not incapable of saying "no." We don't know where the young man lived, but crossing state lines into NYC can be as simple taking a short train or subway ride. The metro area is so integrated that it might not have occurred to him that he was crossing states lines or that it mattered. Fifteen year-olds typically are not well-versed in federal law. As for punishing the young man, I don't know that it is illegal for a minor to have sex with an adult, only that it is illegal for an adult to have sex with a minor. It can be argued that this young man was mature and more than willing to have sex with Mr. Wolf, and that 18 is an arbitrary number for age of consent. Perhaps. But, an objective number is the only way the law can work. Trying to base things on whether the young person involved is mature enough to make these decisions would make the law too unpredictable for everyone involved, especially the adult.

Also met him, and preaching to the choir. I ll add this, he worked really really hard at being macho butch, cuz once drunk all those lovely flaming traits came out screaming

Moderator's Note: Please keep this discussion civil and refrain from personal attacks on one another. I would prefer not to have to shut it down. This is just my opinion from here on out. Austin Wolfe was ALLOWED to plead out to this one charge. In return, charges for possession and distribution of child pornography much of which did involve prepubescent children which would seem to indicate he does have those proclivities were dropped. ["Those videos depicted children as young as infants, including a video showing a 10-year-old child bound and raped."] Almost certainly what that means is there were reasons prosecutors feared they could not successfully get a conviction on those charges meaning there were probably legal technicalities a lawyer could bring up. Instead they chose to prosecute him on a charge which they can prove which was the count of enticement of a minor. Also, there was doubtless intense negotiations between prosecutors and his defense team before this plea deal was offered. His willingness to plead to this charge which carries a sentence of 10 years to life indicates that he was willing to take that penalty to make the rest of it go away. I have certainly been approached by underage guys on hookup apps. I agree that morally they bear some of the responsibility if they get a grown man into bed. I agree we should be able to count on those providers ensuring the minimum age for using them is met. I also agree that some 15 year olds know who they want to fuck, and in my mind should be able to make those decisions without ruining their partner's life. But there are also some 15 year olds inexperienced enough to make them subject to manipulation and exploitation by those who know how to play these games better. The only solution I can think of to protect the ones who aren't able to protect themselves if for there to be a legal age of consent. Depending on where you are the Age of Consent in the USA is 16, 17, or 18. Nowhere in the country is a 15 year old legal. I have certainly known guys as young as 13 who could easily pass for 18, but that is pretty rare. Given Wolfe was also in possession of porn involving children as young as infants, I am not willing to give him a pass on this particular teen passing for old enough.

Thanks. Hmmm, I'll ask dreamhost if they have a way to block certain global regions.

The initial charging documents emphasized Wolf's possession and alleged online distribution of child pornography (using Telegram), like hundreds of such files. By child they specifically meant children under 12 ("SMITH possessed sexually explicit images of minors, including images of prepubescent minors and minors who had not attained 12 years of age.") Some of these files allegedly depict beating and rape of a child around 10 years of age. These initial charges are truly horrific, if true. If he is actually on trial currently for statutory rape, then either the two child pornography charges couldn't be supported or they added the charge in order to secure a conviction or they dropped the child pornography charges entirely and just went with the statutory rape charge. The age of consent in NY state is 17 years old. and the minor involved was allegedly 15 at the time. They are either going to throw the book at him because they couldn't sufficiently prove the two child pornography counts (which are horrific if remotely true) or they are going to add those charges in a separate case. Did the prosecutor drop the child pornography charges and if so why? It might have been the case that Wolf/Smith wasn't really aware that the young man was under 17 (even though it is reported that Wolf/Smith said he did know that - so there seems to be some kabuki [as in the Japanese theatrical form] going on here). This would have been easy enough to assert by his defense lawyer at any rate and would have been probably difficult to challenge. Perhaps he has been advised to essentially plead guilty to the lesser charge in order to avoid some kind of legal problems that arose with the prosecutor's case? Incredibly it appears that the child pornography charges only carry a 10 year sentence while the Advocate claims that the statutory rape charge is 10 yrs to life. Either way, 10 years to life for having engaged in consensual statutory rape seems excessive (although those terms are NOT at all excessive for the child pornography charges [except that life imprisonment is an excessive punishment in modern countries] ).

I probably have ten terabytes of videos that I’ve downloaded over the years on various hard drives and I have some more recent ones and my personal ones saved in the cloud. But I definitely have the largest collection of porn videos of anyone I know