rawTOP

Different guys are "ready" for sex with adults at different ages. The laws are imperfect because they need to set a single age for everyone. Plus, the common age of 18 was set decades ago before youth became so sexualized and sexually aware. So what age would you set and why would you choose the age of consent? Or would you get rid of the age of consent completely and maybe just stiffen penalties for rape when the victim is young. But isn't there some age that's always too young? Personally I don't know - all I know is the current system doesn't work very well.

Just got done fucking this HOT little muscular Latino. His profile said "neg / safe sex only", but he took my load no questions asked...

Good points, though more advertising than marketing... I was envisioning advertising for the Cumdump Network as I was reading your comments... The cumdump network will be totally about instant gratification for the tops. "Why bother with a fussy safe sex bottom? A cumdump will your load now - no questions asked."

GREAT comments... Design - My boyfriend is an excellent designer but possibly busier than I am... I've been begging him for months to do design work for me. I've got some logos done, but nothing else... I really need to find a good junior designer and have my bf manage him. Any designers out there looking for work? Mobile - I know what you mean, and I've been thinking about it for a while... This site has a mobile interface via a 3rd party iPhone/Android app, but it's lacks access to the galleries, the blogs, etc - so it's hard to use it to jack off unless you jack off to stories (possible, but not so sexy). My blogs aren't mobile optimized and the videos are Flash-based, so they don't work on the iPhone... Been wanting to fix that, but it's a bit complicated. I'm working on a iPhone/iPad optimized picture gallery site. Still conceptual at this point - trying to figure out how to build it simply. And then there's the tube and chat site I want to deploy. Working out hosting details now and that will be mobile-optimized... (and I'm going to try to have HD versions of the videos available to paid members - too expensive to give away for free, and the membership price will be cheap). BTW, HTML5 video isn't quite "there" yet... There are some fundamental player issues that are still missing. Seems everyone who tries it rolls back to regular video players that degrade to something usable on mobile devices. I really like the focus on design and mobile. It makes sense and gives me something practical to work on. The guy who works for me full-time is 27 y.o. dom poz top, and one of my writers is a hot 23 y.o. jock...

I've asked a similar question for tops in a different thread. If you're versatile just answer in terms of when you bottom... So what type of bottom are you? Do you like to get fucked by as many different guys as possible or do you prefer just having a group of regulars that fuck you? (or something in between?) If you go to sex clubs and sex parties chances are you want loads from as many different guys as possible. But I know there are some of you who get a lot of loads from just a few guys - both strategies seem to work well...

I've done a similar post for bottoms, so just answer if you're a top. If you're versatile think in terms of when you top... Personally I really like getting my load into a hole that's never taken my load. I want to fuck as many guys as possible in a year, so fucking 50 guys is better to me than fucking the same guy 50 times... That said, regular fuck buds have their place - they're consistent and get the overall number of fucks and loads up in a major way. It's easier to have a regular thing with a fuck bud than find a new hole... So which do you prefer - a new hole or one you've fucked before?

Did a pump-n-dump with a hot muscular poz guy tonight. It had been 2 1/2 weeks since my last fuck. I needed it badly..

I'm not really trying to get at how to hookup with young guys as much as how to market barebacking to them... The question is more like how do we get them to be regulars at sites like this or how do we get them to create profiles on bareback hookup sites like BBRT? It more than getting them to bareback. It's about getting them to think of themselves as barebackers - how to get them to crave giving and taking loads... We all know barebacking is addictive... How to we get them to be an addict and crave more of it? That works 1-on-1, but what can people like me do to get more guys to crave barebacking? Do young guys want tube sites with bareback porn? Should I advertise on particular sites where they hang out? Stuff like that?

From what I hear young guys (say under 21, but legal) bareback a lot, but I think for them it's more 'regular sex' than conscious barebacking - they don't seem to seek out giving/getting loads the way guys who are older seek them out. While there are always a few that seem to figure things out at a young age, it seems most guys don't really join the bareback community until their mid-20s. Maybe it takes them becoming poz before they fully embrace barebacking - I'm not sure... So, my question is sorta a marketing question... How can we get teens (legal) and twinks immersed into the bareback community more quickly? How do we get them from regular sex that's bareback into specifically seeking out loads? (preferably multiple anonymous loads)... Should we market bareback sex differently? Are there forms of marketing that are more effective for younger audiences? What things are a turn off for young guys? This is probably best answered by those of you who are young... You're more connected to the target audience...

I have a new version of Forum Runner that will work on Android. I'll try to install it tomorrow. The current version may also work, i'm not sure - you just don't get the alert when you come to the site that it's available... Again, tomorrow things should be different. Forum Runner is found at ForumRunner.net you should be able to search for it in whatever Android app store there is...

I'm referring to the Raw Rider parties - see BBRT (and maybe A4A) for details...

Looks like you guys are starting to formulate something of substance... Flesh it out a bit more so I understand it... How it is different than being on a hookup site? How are people (both bottoms and the tops who rate them) vetted? How public should the information be? I'm envisioning a public listing of cumhole bottoms who are available to take any load. There would be pics and stats and a fairly accurate location. The idea being if you don't want your location or identity known, you're not really a public cumdump and shouldn't be on the list. There would also be contact information - a cell number would be ideal so the top could contact the bottom for a spur of the moment fuck. Cumdumps might want to think about getting a dedicated cell for fucks... Cumdumps could optionally even list their address. If you've seen Ted's Cumwhores you know there are guys in LA who put their addresses out and then just let tops randomly stop by. That could also be useful for things like IML or when a bottom is traveling and in a hotel. He could list the hotel and room number and just let guys stop by. The top goes on the site and using geolocation (similar to what you'd see with Grindr) could see cumholes close to him. The question is whether it should show distance or a map with an actual location? He contacts the bottom, fucks him, and then has the option to leave a rating and a review. There would need to be some way to validate the tops so you don't get bad reviews from fake tops. The other question is how to show online/offline status for the bottoms. If it requires constant logging in it may seem dead and pointless. Maybe bottoms can fill out a schedule and block out times they know they won't be available (work hours, times they're sleeping, etc.) So I guess it's different than a hookup site in that there would be no profiles for the tops - it's just a listing of bottoms. And it would also just be a listing of the most diehard cumholes - ones who literally dedicate their lives to taking loads. Though I could also see it being used by guys on sex vacations, or tops who are whoring out bottoms. In terms of vetting, we'd need to start with a few trusted cumholes who validate other guys. Maybe a phone call is required to be validated. Tops could then choose whether they want unvalidated cumholes shown when they're looking. And likewise a top wouldn't be validated until one or more validated bottoms said he was for real. So does that sound like what you guys want? What changes/enhancements would you make to that idea?

Wet Platinum is incredible. The best lube I've ever used. I've noticed I'm more likely to cum when I use it.

I'm sorta disappointed... Only 16% of you were influenced by blogs and forums... Too bad... But on the sister thread in the backroom I see blogs and forums influenced 40% of guys to start taking poz loads when they were neg. So from the looks of it first you start barebacking, then you find the bareback community and the community encourages you to get further into barebacking... Still, I wonder how to up the 16%...

In a month or two I'll have a tube site up that will take large videos...

Sounds like you've got a CCR5 mutation and are either resistant or (more likely) immune (from most form of HIV)...

Just wondering what factors got you to start barebacking... Was it bareback porn? Barebackers on hookup sites? Bareback discussion forums? The desire for a better sex life? Or a sex partner who insisted on bareback? For me the first time I barebacked was with a guy who insisted on it. Then years passed and I started barebacking with a boyfriend. Then I didn't want to go back to condoms.

That's not the reason. Legally you can't consent when you're high. And if you consent before the fact and then get high the consent becomes void. Without legal consent the video can't be distributed/sold. Then there's the whole issue of documenting illegal activity - not a good idea. The last thing it's about is barebacking...

It's not exactly moved out of the bloggers section. There's a permanent redirect there. It's in both places now. 2 places = more visibility...

I left a permanent redirect in the Bloggers forum. It was just a matter of giving the post more exposure. It's still available to everyone.

Josh, It's not about it being commercial as much as looking commercial. The signature pics shouldn't dominate the page. Looking in the admin section, you have uploaded your signature pic. Not sure why it wasn't embedded in your signature. Put the following in your signature where you want the pict... Change the { } to [ ] {sigpic}{/sigpic} You can also put a URL around the sigpic so clicking on it takes the person to your blog.

Yes, you can upload a pic or link to one on another server. The options are right under the text area for editing your signature. Keep the pics small though.

It's possible - there's a section on the edit signature page for embedding pics, BUT that pic is way too big. General rule is I don't want signatures to feel too commercial - so pics have to stay pretty small. See Seth_BBP for an example of a user who's gone about as far as I'd want anyone to go. His is fine, more would be a problem.