rawTOP

If you didn't bareback much before testing poz, it's likely you became infected through "safe sex". Safe sex is 10 to 20 times safer than bareback. So if you had safe sex 100 times, that's the equivalent of 5 to 10 bareback encounters... "It only takes one encounter" applies to safe sex as well as bareback.

I'll fuck you, but don't really qualify as an "old troll" unless you're pretty critical...

I've met two boyfriends at bathhouses - including the current one - and we're on 13+ years now... I think bathhouses and sex clubs are great places to meet boyfriends.

I always have more than one bottom at the gangbangs I host. The main reason is that one bottom can't keep up with the tops and when that happens random guys start bottoming, which is a disaster IMHO... Gangbangs are orderly, orgies aren't. Things get stolen, bottoms have dirty holes, etc. The other reason is that a bottom might not show up. I rarely know the bottoms, so I need to know that a no-show bottom won't ruin the gangbang. The bottoms still leave with plenty of cum, so it's not like they missed out on much by sharing the loads with another bottom...

If you're planning on doing a cam session with someone else and want an audience, post a message here telling guys when you'll be online and what sorta stuff you'll be doing. You might also add it to the site's calendar if you want a little extra attention. If you're a particularly good/nasty pig - announce solo cam shows here as well - just make sure you put on a good show If there's anyone in NYC who wants me to fuck them on cam, send me a PM...

Looks like we accidentally deleted the thread on the new user map feature. So I'm recreating what I can of that thread... Most of the user comments said that the accuracy wasn't all that precise and they liked the feature and wanted me to add user names to the pins on the map, but if that happened an opt-out was also needed.

I'm going to try to do some shooting in March. It's a bit too cold right now...

A new feature went up this morning - chat and cams... I'm still testing it out - I'm not sure I've got it tweaked quite right, but you guys can now chat with each other - both text chat and video chat. Text chat is unlimited, but video chat is limited 'cause it can burn a lot of bandwidth. Let me explain... The video chat / cam feature here is not "chat roulette" (e.g. TIM's "Fuck Roulette"). It is not peer-to-peer. Peer-to-peer is inexpensive to run because it burns very little bandwidth for the site owner because the video streams go user -> user rather than user -> server -> user(s). BUT, with peer-to-peer you can only chat with one person at a time. What I've implemented is a proper video chat / cam site where groups of people can all chat/cam with each other simultaneously. Unlike the roulette systems - it can be a group experience. Why is that important? Well, it means when you're having a hot buddy over to fuck you can turn on your webcam and let EVERYONE here see it. You can also set up a private chat room and let just a few friends see. [Just for full disclosure, Admins can see in private chat rooms - we need to be able to know what's happening to avoid things like child porn being conducted on the server.] Of course, it's not just sex that can be broadcast - you can just show your face, or your torso, or you can jack off, etc... The point is things like Fuck Roulette are the equivalent of the private room for two in a bathhouse. What you've got here is the equivalent of the public orgy areas - you can see and be seen by a lot of guys. In other words, this is more like Cam4 than Fuck Roulette. For now video chat is free but limited to 45 minutes per day. As more people use it I'll reduce the number of free minutes to 15 or 20 minutes per day. Hopefully soon I'll have a paid upgrade in place - an inexpensive paid upgrade for an hour or two a day, and a slightly higher price for unlimited usage. Having paid upgrades is necessary to pay for the bandwidth this is going to use. Text chat will always be free and unlimited, and there will always be at least 15 minutes of free video chat. Give it a try and let me know what you think of it. There are a lot of settings I can tweak, so if you want anything to be better or different let me know by responding to this thread and I'll try to make it happen. BTW, I'll be watching for major exhibitionists who repeatedly put on a good show and are fun to watch. If I notice you, you'll get more minutes and a free membership when I start charging. Also, I'll comp reasonably well known porn stars who like to cam...

Well, his hole felt good...

Tony was one of many performers who died of AIDS prior to the advent of ARVs.

All discussion of porn should go in this forum - everything from talk about studios, to talk about particular DVDs and porn stars, to talking about amateur porn you shoot of yourself... HOWEVER, there can be no discussion of how to get pirated porn. That means no discussion of illegal tube sites. No discussion of bit torrent sites, etc. Legal tube sites are fine (XTube, Rocket Tube, etc.) There will be one thread per studio, porn star, DVD, porn site, etc. The first post in that thread should give some sort of review or videography of the porn star / studio / site. Then discussion can follow. I've moved old threads into this forum. They don't always use that format, but going forward that's how I want things structured... Have fun!

How old are you, and what's your longest relationship? Talk to long-term heterosexual couples and you'll find even the monogamous ones will say the relationships turn pretty much non-sexual after a while. Relationships that are based on sex or sexual monogamy don't last because that's not what relationships are about. Relationships are about being the best friend to your partner. Relationships are about being their for each other. Relationships are about companionship and mutual support. None of that is sexual. If you have sex with your boyfriend - great. If it dies out and you have sex with other guys - who cares? It doesn't change the fundamentals about why you're together. While society puts monogamy on a pedestal, I put open relationships on one. Open relationships are far more balanced.

I'm on Mac (no IE), and HungLatinDom is on Linux (also no IE). Next time I fire up my PC laptop I'll check it out (it's a piece of crap and takes forever to start up).

Being poz is inevitable for some guys (and they're generally the type that would be on a forum like this). In fact it's inevitable for most bareback bottoms/versatiles who enjoy getting fucked by strangers - and there are a lot of guys who fit that description. In those cases I'd rather they come to terms with being poz while they're still neg than stick their head in the sand and be devastated and feel like a victim when the inevitable happens. Thing is, guys who understand that they'll become poz sometimes do aspire to it. For them it's about accepting who they are - and from that perspective it's a very good thing. All they're doing is being honest with themselves.

Well, it's not a date exactly, but it tells you how long ago they were posted. And if it's long enough in the past, there's a date... I've checked and I see the same thing when logged in as a regular user (admins see different options for some things).

I know only one gay couple of >10 years that says they're monogamous. All the others admit to an open relationship. For the VAST majority of gay guys if you want an enduring relationship it's going to be an open relationship. Monogamy/jealousy kills relationships. It's sorta funny when I see monogamy types wanting what I have with my bf... I feel like telling them to stop being so jealous - then their relationships will last longer.

No questions asked.... Perfect!

If you can't get in with missionary position, then I don't think it's gonna happen...

PLEASE tell your wife you're gay... Not knowing isn't fair to her. If she wants it to continue after she knows, that's one thing... But don't keep her in the dark. I have a sister who's husband told her years ago that he was bisexual. While I think she should have dumped him (for a variety of reasons), at least she's not being deceived...

The level of abuse that 'boyhood' experienced is pretty remarkable and can't be typical for very many people. I had a good friend a few years ago (have lost touch with him) who's mother was abused by his step father (apparently she had a series of relationships with abusive men). However, she had the good sense to to lock my friend in the basement to keep him away from her abusive partners when she wasn't home. Not much of a childhood, but she bought him this enormous play city and told him she wanted him to be like Frank Lloyd Wright. He spent hours with that city and went on to get his Ph.D. in environmental psychology - basically a field of study that blends psychology with architecture and urban planning. He had his demons, sure, but they didn't get the better of him - not at all... My point is that parents should be held accountable when a child is abused over a long period of time. It's their job to protect their kids. Even parents in bad circumstances can do things to protect their kids - even if it means locking them in the basement with a play city. In the case of 'boyhood' I blame his parents for not teaching him to stand up for himself. It appears no one told him he could say 'no' to abuse. If they had given him a sense of self worth he could have avoided a lot of that abuse by just saying 'no'. My friend knew his mother was proud of him and thought he could be a great architect. That's all it took to get him through a bad childhood... A parent who genuinely believed in him. By contrast the there are clearly some of you who sought out sex with adults when you were still "too young". While it was technically rape, it wasn't abuse (IMHO) because you were at least in some way in control of the experience. Empowerment is key. Empowered kids don't become victims (very often).

I see 83 vists (48 new) in the past month to BreedingZone (most of which have been in the past week). This site isn't exactly a hookup site, but you're the 2nd person I've heard that hooked up off the site. I want to increase that, but it'll take come tinkering... I've pissed off a number of guys to achieve that harmony... My moderators and I use the site's infraction system pretty liberally. There's just zero tolerance for guys who are divisive. A point of view can always be worded politely... But honestly, most of the infractions we give are just slaps on the wrist for putting a post in the wrong section. There just aren't that many guys who cause real problems. Guys are just here for sex.

Just wanted to keep everyone up-to-date about the status of the site... Visits to the site are growing steadily... Since the site was launched we've had almost a quarter million people visit the site, almost a half million visits total, and over 4 million page views. That's a great start, and I want to say thanks to everyone who's participated, but I'm hoping the site will get much bigger, so tell your friends and fuck buddies about Breeding Zone. If you have a blog, put Breeding Zone in your blogroll. In terms of enhancements. Looks like I'll get a chat and cam feature implemented early this week. And I want to upgrade the user map feature to show profile names so you can use this more like a hookup site. That means I'll also be working to beef up the user profile pages. And most importantly, I just want to say that by and large you guys have been great. I've had to ban a few people, and people keep posting bug chasing stuff outside the backroom, but all in all you get along with each other really well. That's really what makes this site a special place.

Unless you're one of the 1% of Northern European guys who are immune, then there's no way you'll stay neg taking anonymous loads.

Yup. You just described what I tell bottoms I see with little dicks - almost word for word in some places.

I think shame is just one of a few factors. There are clearly cases where there is physically abusive rape and in those cases shame has nothing to do with why it's a negative experience.