TT2025

Yea, the bigger the better notion. 😂 For me, it may hold some truth, but up to about 8", then potential problems arise. But I actually had one of the best experiences with a boy with average dick. He was quite unsecure about it (even knowing he is average) and my bigger dick didn't help with that.. but this boy made me cum almost every time he fucked me (best in this metric I have ever met in my life). Frankly dick size isn't the main parameter upon which I let someone to fuck me (to exactly answer your question).

Remember it well (about 25 years ago). My first time raw was first time EVER. It happened when I was on sleepover with my friend (2 years my senior). We messed around before and he even tried to fuck me.. But we were young and stupid, so he rushed things and the pain was quite intense so we stopped. This time however he did some research in the internet (thank God for the dial-up connection!) and so he talked me into trying it again (slowly, me in control and with a sunscreen as lube). This time he was really gentle and patient, so after few minutes head of his cock was in my ass, so he slowly pushed his cock all the way.. Wow that felt so amazing that I wanted him to pull out and slide inside again (repeatedly). He remarked, that it seems to feel great if I wanted him so bad to repeat that. Then he fucked me slowly and shot his load deep inside. It went like that almost every sleepover with him after this episode 😍

Don't like randoms / strangers / onetimers. As a bottom I like to know how to please the top. Yea, I KNOW IT IN GENERAL.. but the variability of preferences is huge. So the second to third hookup is usually the peak in the context of me 'reading' the top. How he likes to be sucked, what the preferred position is, what he doesn't like, etc. And the guys usually tend to hold back on their kinks for longer. The harder stuff usually surfaces much later. With 80+ kilos, reasonably toned, I am probably deemed dangerous if freaked out, so the guys seem to be extra careful when deciding to grab me by the neck - I like it BTW 🙂 Actually don't care much where you live, or what is your job, but I really want to know how to fuck with you proper 😁

As the US officials are up in the ass of everyone in Kremlin, and are shopping in Moscow malls these things get publicized: [think before following links] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/29/viktoriia-roshchyna-ukrainian-journalist-death-russian-prison Its about Ukrainian journalist detained in Russia. Some gruesome reading, I must say ("...However, the exact cause of death may never be known because when her body was returned during the exchange on 14 February, certain parts were missing, namely the brain, eyes and larynx..."). Hope Mr. Witkoff will show some more respect to Russians he is dealing with, they are really some respectful people...

Don't think its about censorship (least not from EU).. The CNN was the US one (not one of those franchise offshoots). And BBC World service isn't practically EU anymore. But its hard to handle watching news for prolonged time.. Made me sick to listen that the US stance is that the Russia made big concessions by agreeing not to take whole Ukraine. (Yep, that is the world we live in). One wants to ask: What about returning Alaska to keep Vladimir happy? Even The Guardian or New Yorker aren't big on protests about el presidente. So don't know.. Are those protests you're talking about so big and consequential? (rhetoric question)

I believe you, BUT I today actually spent an hour watching CNN, some recap on France24, and part of BBC World News America. My take from all this is as follows: White House bickering, Trump is going to install new (BIGGER) flagpoles on White House, Washington is doing the Kremlin's bidding, Pope is dead, Musk is going to spend more time doing whatever.. and no reaction from the public was shown. Well, BBC added something extra, which I decoded as: 'Washington wants Ukraine to secede Crimea to Russia'. A while ago I saw some protesters in a news piece with a sign about Vance and skiing in jeans. Fun stuff 🙂

I mean that the majority electoral system (which BTW is implemented in US and only few other countries) by design doesn't allow for gradual change... In our system, when a party gets more than 5% of votes it is guaranteed seat(s) in the parliament (so it can be somewhat visible). One-party government is usually unheard of. So when one party fucks up, there is usually shift in power dynamics. Sometimes huge one. We have had parties, which ruled country for multiple terms (in some coalition), totalling more than 30% of votes, which went to fringes (and some came back to power). So left or right, you have at least two parties which you can vote for (and can be certain ti will be in the parliament). So if one of the fucks up great deal, it risks loosing all, because there is always viable alternative with similar programme.

Would love there was some communication-empathy courses for medical personal in my country. I witnessed how my friend was informed about proceedings about his mother death standing like 20 minutes in a hallway of hospital. (I thought: what a heck! You can't have some place quiet, to sit?) He was near collapsing when I dragged him from the hospital... (And yes, and I have some other horrific experiences with healthcare.) The thing is when trust is lost it is very hardly (if ever) regained back. But back to the topic - it looks like that it doesn't apply to US politics. Maybe it is for the reason you practically have only two political parties to choose from. There is no way to somehow stop voting for one ever, cause it will by totalitarian (One party system? We had that, don't recommend it.) So even after some interesting things (Nixon, Kissinger era) people didn't stop voting Republican.

FB does the same thing. As he is getting close, he fucks me harder and harder, but when he shoots a load it is balls deep as he can make it. It is some sort of instinctive drive, I suppose. If I (very) occasionally top, it is balls deep as well.

And so aren't they dodging their duty? It will not cost them dear in the next elections? They sit there, do nothing, say nothing - what a good representation. (Would you vote for someone like that?) My reasoning is that if you're loud enough, people get notice. Isn't that opportunity to show some moral fortitude and consistency? These people weren't voted for office just to be passive enablers..

You are right, but I have a better advice: If someone thought plausible that their bank is exchanging passwords in plaintext (or even better using HTTP auth in URL) should find a better bank. 🤣 (Sorry, couldn't hold my horses on that one.)

You, my friend, should give some people more credit. Sure not all the supporters of Donald are dumb sheep... The problem as I see it is lack of meaningful public discourse - political opposition used to be good for that some years back (least in my country). If there are people who are showed propaganda in the face constantly, they might stop thinking critically and someone must remind them that. Here in EU we have this 'Green Deal' thing - lot of dogmatic supporters and dogmatic opponents, well I'm none of them, so I tried to discuss with the opponent of this. Using this kind of reasoning: 'It sure has some good stuff in it and must be implemented (if at all) with a great consideration. By the way you installed heatpump a decade ago without anyone telling you to do so.' He was, yea, right then spit out some made up stuff circulating the news and internet. So I said: 'You must see, that these things are not feasible if not paid by the government or even ever.' And he was: 'Yea, thought it might be exaggeration.' So you can't just rule vast majority out as lunatics... You are risking their future actions to be fuelled out of spite towards you. - Does Brexit ring any bells? 😉

Yep, oratory capabilities of some folks are just out of this world. However I must apologize for saying it is short.. It is relatively to how it is packed with information and argument. But I strongly encourage everyone to give it a try. 😊

Woa, what moron came up with that PReP prerequisites? (And I thought we have it hard to get on PReP.) PeP is not available (probably not or some beautiful rules attached as well)? Well you could try to talk him into it (in advance). I mean explain worries and offer test as a way out (compromise as it really is, cause it sure isn't 100% bulletproof). Then you'll continue by his reaction (insist or back down). Two tests seem to be overkill, but would be nice if you took test yourself - just out of solidarity, purely psychological reasons (thou you could have better chance of success, when you want him to do what you will do also).

I admit, the kickoff was quite simplistic, but of course, I can elaborate: In past decades the US created and wielded what many call 'soft power' so it could nudge other states in certain directions, encourage/discourage some actions simply by asking nicely (or maybe not so nicely), nevertheless just by asking. And I'm pretty sure many things happened only after careful deliberation of 'what the Americans will think od it'. It was made easier for the governments of 'affected' countries the high approval rating of the US by general population. Poland for example had approval rating of USA above 90% (Poles, probably thought more highly of USA than its own citizens...). But actual establishment is deliberately ruining all that, so less 'soft power'. I would think, given the chance, everybody would rather live in a country, which is loved and respected, than hated and mocked. I'm sure, US (its actual government) could have much of what it wants by just playing it nicely (tariffs, border security, probably not Canada or Greenland). Its called diplomacy, I think (not an expert). When I saw Donald's: "...pease, please, we do everything.." speech I was horrified and I would have been even as US citizen (maybe more so). US is now just spitting insults with nothing to gain from it and it starts to have real consequences (eg. consumer boycotts, reevaluating strategic purchases). And there are probably some psychological consequences of being citizen of a country that used to be 'greatest in the world' to 'that odd bunch which wants to annex Canada and believes that Ukraine invaded itself with Russian tanks'. So my position is that public should be concerned.. It visibly was during Occupy WS in 2011 (but it was about the money.) I actually promoted it here once, but people still bumping into the subject which is explained in essay TWO CONCEPTS OF LIBERTY, Isaiah Berlin. In short its about difference between freedom from and an sinister version of liberty, which always ends up in totalitarian disaster. It is short and enlightening, promise 🙂

Not in the 'developed world'. Even if there will be drop in preemptive measures, the treatment of infected is really effective in slowing the spread of the disease on itself. (Non detectable viral load poz guys running around are a clear example of that). So if the treatment is available and accessible, it should be OK. 'Developing world' is another matter... probably a disaster in a making? Imagine what it is like to have to spend a day or more to get to the doctor. How you can do any prevention in that setting? This is why when any prevention is considered in eg. sub-Saharan Africa, the drugs are preferred to be longer period lasting (contraception is a good example, thou not really about infections). Well and if the all hell breaks out in Africa and some theoretical HIV-3 strain immune to known medicine will arise form it, we all will pay the price tenfold.

But voluntarism can get you only so far.. Some things have to be compulsory and enforced, I'm afraid. Can't get the criminals to be docile just by asking them nicely (partly a joke, but it illustrates the problem). And without strict regulations, we wouldn't be happy either (eg. safety standards) - Yea, safety protocols in some industries is pain in the ass, but they are there for a reason). In Victorian England there was heated debate about the building standards - makes housing expensive. One particular problem was the requirement for new-builds to have bathroom, imagine that! Eventually Lords were explained that it is also for their own good (overall hygiene will increase and so long the diseases and foul stench.) The more complex problem, or the more complicated endeavour, the top-down approach is really needed (eg. road construction).

Voted centre right for a long time, but won't anymore (probably ever). I have one big personal reason, but in general terms 'right' is more ideological than practical in my opinion. (Lefties tend to poke in everything and regulate everything, so they can score some positive points in the process.) Rights hands off approach is problematic (at least in some areas) and the state money is then used to make things work when cracks begin to appear: If you don't regulate industry in a way of environmental protection you end up using state money to clear up the mess. If you don't set reasonable minimum wage you spend shitload of money to social programs AND collect less taxes (really good combination). In both cases you really can't leave things by their own devices, cause results would be catastrophic (environmental damage would be huge and the people without their basic needs covered would probably turn violent.) So the right tends to run hybrid systems as a result: You have low minimum wage and can't stop social spending. So people work for a low wage and get food stamps. But there is conundrum: Who is actually benefiting form the food stamp programme? The poor sod on the receiving end or the company which can pay him meagre wage knowing he can work for that because of handouts from the state? On the other hand I think that if one can, one should work and earn a living for himself and state shouldn't poke to things that work well.

My favourite is when a guy lies on a bed (nice and comfy) and I am between his legs working on his dick. The comfy part of thing is essential, cause when he pumps his load to my mouth he usually let me to play with his dick after that while he is resting. Love this. Sex is much more than simple Pump'n'Go sort of thing.

Former FB once hit me, via text, if he could bring a friend to fuck me.. I was like: 'can try it sometimes'. And he was: 'Great, I knew I could count on you, you're best. What about in an hour?' I replied: 'What? Now?' Him: 'Yep, can pick him up and be at your place in no time. I'm sending you his photo. Won't see it on picture, but he has a big dick, you'll like it, promise 🙂' Well, I agreed he sent a friend my civil photo and in less than hour they were at my doors. It was a good threesome - they took turns on me and in the end the 'friend' pumped his load up my ass. I never seen him since. (But boy, I'd love to!) It was first and last time. FB tried couple times to pull this off again, but it always flopped, cause other friends were unreliable.

As the title implies, I'm not quite sure if US citizens are concerned how the perception of their country is changing. Here in the eastern flank of the EU, the society was always somewhat polarized in its views on US, but last few months the 'trans-atlantic' camp was hit like never before. And lessons learned will be hard to unlearn. Actually my views were shaken considerably. Spending my formative years oblivious of US involvement in affairs in Chile (etc.) and watching StarTrek and MacGyver I was buying all the 'do a good thing' and 'stand on the right side of history' stuff. After a heard from the US that it was Ukraine who started the war with Russia (presumably kidnapping Russian army and invading itself by it), followed by outright extortion by US top officials and half-aligning with Russia. (Odd silence after attack on civilian targets, lately at Sumy tells volumes.) I just can't fend off the thought that the 'do good' agenda was just a bate. US is now projecting a Goodfellas version of itself around the globe and US citizens seem to be content. Only real pushback was due to self-inflicted stock market near crash. So is it all just about the money? (Sincerely confused here.)

Cleanliness is a must. I personally decline to bottom if I'm not quite sure that it won't be a mess. And yes, I had some (small) mishaps, but the boys were always understanding. But even when they understood (and stated) that things can't be always 100% I felt embarrassed. So if not sure its 'blow-job only' sort of thing on my part.

Hey boys. I have interesting experience with how my fuckbuddy smells to me. He smells so nice to me.. I have never experienced that. I was not completely aware of it for some time (i thought that the alluring smell was aftershave or something, but I realized lately that it is HIM, or his sweat actually. He showered few times at my place, before we did our thing but the mysterious scent was always present (partially masked by shower gel or shampoo). Last time I was changing bed sheets cause we made little mess and I was like: God he smells beautifully! And for a moment I thought what a shame that bedding has to go to the washing machine. On the other hand one of my friends has really aggressive sweat smell that it is a big turndown for me. I usually don't react on peoples scents at all, but these two above are extremes ...and the firs one freaks me out a little. 🙂 So do you react to the smell of your partner?

My FB is an Ukrainian boy who found me on hookup website. He is 18 years younger than me. Although I have an advantage in looking 10 years younger (people say so often). But I have bad habit of being open about my age so he knew from the site. Well when first met it was jaw-dropping experience for me.. Beautiful boy athletic body, pretty face, gentle in manners and quite shy (but he had balls to hit me up and ask to meet in person). He has well above average dick, but not too much, so its great for anal and deepthroating. And yes he is great fucker 🙂 Actually he said I was his first and was quite unsure what to do, but after some gentle foreplay he fucked me like there was no tomorrow. And he sometimes has an "experimental" mood, so he also bottomed and tried dildo.

Yea, these "not gay" boys. Some would say: Hole is a hole. And girlfriends tend not to do anal (what a convenience for us..). Totally get that, but what I am still surprised when a boy won't kiss you "cause it's gay" and then sucks your dick like a vacuum cleaner. 🙂 (Happened to me multiple times.)