Phallarchist
-
Posts
700 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Phallarchist
-
That's several standard deviations above any reported norm I've seen, e.g. [think before following links] https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/health/sdut-penis-length-study-2015mar02-story.html%3f_amp=true Maybe one in a thousand online profiles I've seen actually requires 8" or more.
-
Right, you can get those illnesses from anyone. If you're going to have any unprotected rectal penetration, that level of risk is unavoidable. The STD risk from cunts that get fucked by a lot of random men is added on top of that base rate. So, I consider @BreedingTop71's use of the word in context perfectly reasonable.
-
I think he was referring to diseases made epidemic by promiscuity, not the rectal flora that everyone has.
-
I think 14" was a rhetorical exaggeration. I don't think I've ever seen anyone demand more than 9".
-
In fact, the most intense sexual pleasure I ever experienced as a receiver was from an enormous penis. If I were in the rectal-receptive habit, it would make perfect sense for me to pursue men with similarly massive genitalia and disfavor the rest. Concentrating on my enjoyment would be inappropriately selfish by my own standards, and I think I have too much reverence for other aspects of maleness to ever really adopt this policy, but it seems straightforwardly logical that many others would do.
-
Urine is much safer than semen. I think most disease risk is hypothetical rather than clinically established. [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.gmfa.org.uk/how-risky-is-watersports
-
I don't know what's to learn besides cleaning your cunt. Get a boyfriend and he'll provide you loads continually. I can deliver several loads per day and I don't think I'm much out of the ordinary.
-
The original poster also has this feature. I would think that thickness counts. If a man's pride had the dimensions of a typical beer can, I would certainly be impressed, though it would be well under average length. And practically speaking, a thick one is more likely to hit the prostate (or press on internal clitoral structures, depending on the cunt).
-
While it's not my personal policy, I completely support the choice to reject men with small penises. Mating is brutally competitive of necessity. If you can't stretch cunt, you had better find other ways to demonstrate that you can make an impact as a man.
-
I hate shit more than anyone I know, but the fact is, the way both of you reacted to this situation is exactly right.
-
Yes, it's a beautiful way to connect your moment of glory to the assaultive degradation of your victim. You might want to read a previous discussion.
-
Your post was excellent in every detail.
-
Do you still cum in a bottom who asks you to pull out?
Phallarchist replied to blktone67's topic in General Discussion
No, they're functioning as female for the penis, factually. There is no such thing as breeding without a vagina analog. -
Do you still cum in a bottom who asks you to pull out?
Phallarchist replied to blktone67's topic in General Discussion
Which is to serve and be used as female. Penises become erect solely for reproductive purposes and reproduction is exclusively the coitus of male and female. Offering a man your rectum as a vagina substitute is inescapably, and gloriously, to perform a female sexual function. It's just how penises work. Looking or behaving like a real typical girl or woman ("femininity") is an entirely separate matter. For my taste, you should never aspire to be anything but a boy. But all men who fuck need cunt and encouraging them to think of your rectum in quasi-vaginal terms properly recognizes the nature of breeding. Your rectum only works for sex with a man to the extent that it resembles a vagina and you should be proud when his penis responds to it as if it might be the real thing. -
Right, but that's not a given. I just don't want to have anything to do with such a person.
-
I'm glad a worthy man claimed your raw cunt and proudly took your true virginity. Breeding is the path to erotic intimacy. Did receiving his seed cause you to consider him as a potential long-term mate? Did he show interest in possessing you?
-
traininghole How to fix a broken sucker
Phallarchist replied to UrBoyHenry's topic in Cocksucking Discussion
Define "bad at it.". -
A thundering herd of desperate faggots tramples you in their rush to lick up the spill.
-
Rapey-est Travel Locations (otherwise safe)
Phallarchist replied to 408curious's topic in General Discussion
Since you'll presumably be unable to control the brutality level, you should also consider the availability and quality of emergency medical care. If you're looking to be violated without needing a colostomy, then you might want to pursue a "consensual non-consent" arrangement with someone less likely to do permanent damage. -
It's not what I wrote or intended, but your proposal is certainly pleasant enough.
-
The physical aspects of length, girth, and hardness all matter, but pride and aggression are fundamental to phallic power. Let them flow and cunt will surrender.
-
Yes, a man has to keep in mind that the excitement of forcing a faggot can come at the expense of optimal performance. There might be a balance worth finding. But something would be missing for me if there were no coercion at all.
-
I agree with the spirit of this assertion in this context. I believe that consent to provide oral service should automatically imply consent to throatfucking. That is, it should be the normative understanding between men and faggots. If a faggot doesn't want to have his throat forced, he should make it clear in advance. And personally, I have always found it hard to respect men who hold back or, even worse, ask for permission to do what comes so naturally.
-
Yes, that's definitely the dominant legal standard. There's no contradiction. You have a right to enjoy being violated and otherwise choose how you react.
-
Popping a Bottoms Second Hole ... Myth or Fact?
Phallarchist replied to RVAGuy's topic in General Discussion
I think they're super-ugly and anyway, the point would be to destroy his manhood with my own.
