Jump to content

ejaculaTe

Senior Members
  • Posts

    1,476
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ejaculaTe

  1. Anyone who can write phrases like "his body was lean yet ripe with innocence," "a body built from sin itself—rough around the edges and brimming with desire," and "a night filled with untold horrors and unparalleled pleasures" instantly gets my attention. 

    • Upvote 1
    • Thanks 3
    • Haha 1
  2. 7 hours ago, GFF92 said:

    The guy talking at the beginning is Cole; Hunter is the guy holding the third guy. Cole and Hunter run Maverick Men. Gay Demon has a review of the web site: [think before following links] https://www.gaydemon.com/reviews/Maverick_Men.html.

    • Thanks 1
  3. 17 hours ago, PozBearWI said:

    @ejaculaTe the operative words in your post being "In general".  That doesn't mean charges can't be brought elsewhere...

    Oh, I totally agree, and in fact the first sentence in the quote makes that point. The second sentence is no more than internal guidance expressed by the folks at Main Justice, likely because it's easier -- there's no need to bring the defendant to a different district for trial, etc. (And I suspect that any assistant US Attorney who wanted to depart from the administrative guidance would need a good reason.)

  4. 7 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

    But once you've produced obscene material (which isn't protected by the First Amendment), you can be prosecuted anywhere it's shipped (electronically, if it's online). 

    From the DOJ Manual, §9-75.400: "Cases under the child pornography and obscenity statutes in which the crime was committed via computer may be prosecuted in the district where the defendant committed any of the acts proscribed in the statutes. In general, in cases in which the crime was committed via the computer, all of the charges (distribution, receipt, possession, etc.) should be brought in the district in which the target and his computer are located."

  5. On 7/10/2024 at 5:11 PM, BootmanLA said:

    Based on the criminal complaint, he has not been charged with "sending 300 files" to anyone. That's not how this generally works; the penalty for sending one file are pretty much as drastic as sending ten, or fifty, or whatever. It's a lot easier to prove one count of something - you pick the event that's easiest to prove, and they had the receiving phone in their possession when it was sent and found the sending record on the phone seized from the defendant. That's pretty much a slam dunk. (I wouldn't be surprised if they'd gotten the phone company records and linked Wolf's known location with the geographic location of the phone at the time of the transmission for extra proof.)

    The sentencing guidelines take into account the number of images involved, the offense level increasing according to the number of images. Paragraph 8 of the complaint shows that investigators, looking at cell-site data, determined that Wolf was in the Southern District of NY on March 24. The FBI may well have connected Wolf's various locations with the location of the phone.

    [Much legal mumble-jumble for anyone who cares: "Images" has a slightly different definition than the one you'd find in a dictionary. A photograph, picture, or computer-generated image is "one image." A video, video-clip, movie, or similar visual depiction is treated as 75 images. (US Sentencing Guideline §2G2.2, Application Note 6) When more than 600 images are involved, the offense level is increased by 5. (US Sentencing Guideline §2G2.2(b)(7)) As part of a plea agreement, the government can agree to a lower number of images which in turn leads to a smaller increase in the offense level. It might sound like small beans, but 2 points off the offense level, say from 40 to 38, can mean a sentence range 5 to 7 years lower. Acceptance of responsibility, which drops 2 points off the offense level, can have a similar effect.]

    • Upvote 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. On 7/9/2024 at 3:59 PM, brnbk said:

    I noticed in the complaint document/Indictment, it is alleged that Austin shared files containing sexual material of a 10 yr old, the age being determined by the filename, which was in Spanish! How would Austin know that as he is most likely not a Spanish speaker? 

    If you got that far in paragraph 6(d) of the complaint, you should have seen the next sentence: "The video shows a child of approximately 10 years old bound, beaten, and raped by an adult man." The magistrate judge who issued the arrest warrant on the basis of the complaint could reasonably infer that the FBI agent had watched that video.

     

    9 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

    the prosecutors do have to actually secure an indictment (I believe they have 30 days).

    Yep, 30 days. It's in the Speedy Trial Act (18 USC §3161(b)).

     

    • Thanks 1
  7. Just because I'm bored and don't want to resume painting the trim in the back hallway, I'll take a stab at translating. It won't be 25 words or less though....

    ========

    -- We have an obligation to build the finest world we can possibly build. Do we really want to be mini-Epsteins?  [The reference is to Jeffrey Epstein.] What is the distinction between vice and virtue? Does sexual freedom and financial freedom always end in "human degradation and self aggrandizement?"

    -- There exists only one group -- the "superior class" -- the OP can ask for answers though he expects to be met with a wall of silence. The question the OP asks [presumably the first question since the OP says he has "a few questions"] is "How many of you who claim the title of "superior" actually believe themselves to be such?" The question is not directed towards "the Bruder Class" [this incorporates the correction in OP's second post]. The Bruder Class is nonetheless free to comment even though the lines likely to be drawn by them aren't necessarily the lines drawn by "those of whom I speak." In any event, in OP's view, "at least the 88 crowd" articulates the rationale behind their claim of superiority and "owns" it, "bullshit as it is...."

    =========

    Text in brackets is an explanatory note by me. I'm returning to painting the hallway trim.

  8. I initially thought the knock at the door was going to be the host's probation officer. "How to introduce your Grindr trick to your probation officer" likely isn't a self-help/DIY video on YouTube.

    • Haha 8
  9. This story was absolutely smoking when it first appeared. I read it again the other night, and it’s just as hot now. The description of Jake’s first slam is so right, you’ll think you’re getting the slam or are in the room watching.

    • Upvote 1
    • Thanks 1
  10. 24 minutes ago, BootmanLA said:

    Reading over the reports of his arrest and the charge against him, I'd say you're right (at least as far as it affects him directly; porn itself will carry on).

    The word "toast" accurately describes Wolf's future condition. (For the law nerds in the audience, based on the description given by NBC New York, the offense level is 40 (base offense level of 22 and 18 more points due to circumstances of offense. Even with a criminal history category of I, the Guidelines range is 292-365 months. The statutory maximum is 20 years (240 months), the most he can get, notwithstanding the Guidelines range.) 

    • Upvote 2
    • Thanks 1
  11. @Heir2012 - I've read the blogs by @hungrypighole and @versmetropig, not just once, but several times. I can absolutely recommend them for bedtime reading. When you read @hungrypighole's posts, you'll swear you're at the baths -- his description of the pillow the desk clerk handed him one night is absolutely spot on. @versmetropig  puts you right there in the same room, and he also lets the reader see the other characters as individuals. 

    • Upvote 1
    • Thanks 2
  12. 5 minutes ago, 50latinos said:

    Sounds hot. 

    If one reads enough posts on Reddit and Twitter, one could reasonably infer that BNWO is a fetish word that has to do with BDSM and, in particular, race play. Black superiority over all other races is emphasized.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.