blackrobe

I'm always looking to fuck. The Blowers is too much oral only energy for me. Gotta get that main event fucking and breeding thing happening. For those reasons, its Sniffies for me.

Well, that didn't take long. Connor Storrie and Hudson Williams were just announced as presenters for the 2026 Golden Globes this coming Sunday. It seems that Storrie is also announcing the Actors Awards Nominations today (Jan 7th, 2026) (Source: The Hollywood Reporter). Interestingly, they are the only presenters announced so far. I smell an attempt to get a bigger viewing audience and capitalize on Heated Rivalry's intense buzz. Hudson Williams will be on The Tonight Show this evening (Jan 7th, 2026) and Connor Storrie will be on Late Night with Seth Myers right after the Golden Globes on January 11th.

In any fuck, I'm a participant, not a prop. I'm a total bottom who loves to please and connect with a breeders vibe. I'm instinctively reading his body, thrusts, and movements to try and anticipate and give him what he needs. It's like dancing (the Baptists got that right at least) and everyone needs to be paying attention so you can flow from one moment to another. Someone leads and someone follows or you swap places multiple times during the fuck. You can tell if a breeder needs you to hold your ass still for them to pound you out, or if they're inviting you to slut out into a deep arch, or thrust your ass back onto their dick like you need to own every inch. You can feel how their movement changes when they feel you react to that thing they did and moan like a wild animal. It's about being present, paying close attention, and listening to your instincts. I'm not sure what a breeder is looking for in a bathhouse ass-up situation, but when I've been ass-up in my room I'm working on feeling the energy in the music in my body. It means I move a little, not much, but hopefully enough for breeders walking past to see I'm reacting to what's happening and might be a fun hole for them to spend some time in. There's lots of things a bottom can do to make doggie more interesting and fun and many of them come from reading the energy of the fuck. Sometimes when a guy is absolutely wailing on my ass with my shoulders on the bed, I feel he's clearly challenging me to match him. That's when I grab the sheets and push away to make firm handholds and walk my hands back to flex my body up onto all four limbs and back even harder onto his dick and hips. It gives me more ability to throw back into him, and lots of those guys seem to find another gear when they realize you're a lot stronger than they thought. Some of the best fucks I've had have been dominant guys who really love how submissive I am, but who get startled and then really turned on when they hit my button and see how I get much more primal. In doggie, there are moments to just take it like a helpless hole and moments to up the ante. Paying attention is how you don't miss them.

Provided you bred her I'm sure it's fine.

Don't be *too* sad about that. All the production's money coming from only Canadian sources meant there was no negative creative interference with the adaptation of Rachel Reid's book. Jacob Tierney, the show runner, writer, and director, didn't want that. If there had been US money in the production it would almost certainly have made the series less than it is. Remember, Boots was a huge streaming hit on Netflix, based on a memoir called The Pink Marine. It got cancelled and didn't get a second season because of a media company merger that the companies thought would be threatened if they renewed it. I don't want to engage in a political discussion at all. I'm just saying that in these fraught times it's not a bad thing that Heated Rivalry wasn't distorted by US money or creative influence. FWIW, the budget for HR was minuscule. In an interview I heard Tierney say a number so low I won't repeat it as it can't be true. Best estimates I saw were CAD $10-12 million in total which I find difficult to believe given the quality of the results. Tierney has said he thinks the budget for Season 2 when they adapt The Long Game will be about the same. The program was produced by Jacob Tierney and his producing partner's company for Crave and initially picked up by HBO in Australia (I love my people). The HBO exec for AU suggested to his US counterpart that they look into Heated Rivalry and a rights deal was inked very shortly afterwards for the US. Yes, it totally sucks that the HR team aren't eligible for the Emmy Awards. When I balance an almost certainly lesser adaptation in terms of authentic queer representation versus what we ended up seeing, I'm at peace with it. I would expect HR stars to be showing up at US Awards season events perhaps as presenters this year.

The power of hockey smut, and specifically Heated Rivalry, strikes again.

I don't think these questions illuminate my thinking on AI imagery much. Whether it's hot or not, or feels real/authentic aren't even the most important issues. I think there's a strong case to be made that Generative AI of this type relies on the theft (or at least unlicensed use) of many people's work product (training sets for models contain many, many millions of images in this case) to produce new derivative work products. The other issue is the impact of Generative AI images in society. We know that images of real skinny women and muscular men created serious outcomes with various forms of body dysmorphia. There's very strong reason to expect even more severe forms of this and skewing of human beauty and attractiveness standards. The same will be true in the realms of porn and porn addiction in distorting peoples expectations and self-perceptions in comparison. There are many concerns about these impacts and there's already been lots of scholarship in this area. Plug "AI-Generated Pornography and Its Potential Influence on Homosexuality" into Google and look at the research out there on deepfakes and other forms of AI generated porn. Ironically, the above in-progress research paper has a notation in the summary text under Acknowledgments, saying "The manuscript was created using ChatGPT." Even the researchers curious about and studying AI impacts are using other forms of AI to author their research on the subject.

I'm going to push back on the idea that everyone has "standards" or the presumption that they get lowered. Instead, I think people can grow, learn, and change their behavior for lots of other reasons. I mean, even the idea that you "lower your standards" is really judgy and unpleasant to think about. Even that concept *way oversimplifies* how sexual attraction works, at least the way I experience it. I'm always looking to find chemistry and connection in the sex I have, whatever that might look like in the moment. That doesn't happen along age, racial, body type, etc. lines because I've had chemistry with so many different types of men. When I say a blanket "no" to someone fucking me, its usually because they want to use a condom, I've seen them being unkind or an asshole to someone (I don't reward that with hole), or they trigger my self-preservation/safety spidey-senses, etc. My turning point came from realizing that awesome sex is purely a numbers game. The more guys you fuck, the more likely you'll find good, satisfying sex. It's just probability. I also realized that the more filtering criteria you have, the less candidates are available to provide that satisfying sex. There is this weird thing we've been trained to believe that we can magically decide who will float our boat just from some arbitrary criteria. Then once you've fucked some guys who are absolutely fantastic at sex that you and other guys have routinely overlooked, you start to realize how little the things we thought were important have to do with being sexually fulfilled and satisfied. When I let go of the ideas I had about what I *thought* would make me feel good, and instead just tried lots of kinds of men to see what actually *did* make me feel good, then things got interesting. I don't think that was dropping my standards so much as letting go some impractical BS and taking a practical and pragmatic approach.

I think there's an important place for older men mentoring younger men, with the "Campfire Rule" being in full effect. (The campfire rule is where you leave everything and everyone in better condition than you found it.) I wish I'd had that kind of man in my life as a young man.

Let's see... legal adults having sex they choose with someone who turns them on and they keep coming back to? There's no problem here.

If you're concerned, just go and get STI testing.

If you're calibrated so 11" is "boyfriend dick", I'm somewhat envious. I need to be in good fighting trim to handle anything over 9".

A quibble is a very small nit picking after all. The fates need to mend their ways to allow some of those decisions. Let's hope.

I think when bottoms use the word "heat" they're talking about a cycle of dramatically increased horniness over a period of time that then reduces to either a more normal level, or much lower horniness.

I get what you're driving at. Allow me a small quibble? I think the preponderance of men do have *very general* preferences about the holes they breed. Some men are only going to breed specific genders and specific holes that align with their desires. Outside that, the intensity of a man's need to breed (rut, deprivation, intoxication, etc.) rules what individual's holes they will settle for breeding. This is what makes your statement so true in spirit. Straight men talk about women's role as sexual gatekeepers and that is from where so much grievance, privation, and pathology springs. They also talk about the ease and low cost of getting relief from other men. In a world where what you propose is true in every way, men would be infinitely happier. Breeders would rut in as many holes (many male because - gatekeeping) as pleases them, depositing their seed. So many men would line up to help fulfill that unmet need. That's a world I want to live in.

FYI, the slurp ramp that was in Steamworks Seattle has been removed and replaced with a more open play area with a large bed and a sling. Make of that what you will. There's always been plenty of cock sucking at SW, after all it is the gay handshake and an almost required prelude to fucking. In eCommerce terms, sucking a man's dick is a "conversion opportunity" - you engage with sucking and close the deal by fucking. There's plenty of fucking going on from the smashing and moaning noises that are clearly audible as you walk around. And when I've been fucked in the public spaces guys seem to want to either fuck me, or catch some of my top's dick.

I have to ask. What SharePoint site were you intending to post to where that pic did belong?

There are plenty of men hardwired to be load cherishing bottoms.

You lucky, lucky bastard.

Every time I see this poll question I want to fix it. There's so much ambiguity and overlap in the choices, so it doesn't make a clean forced choice. The fixed pairings are too limiting as well. Intercourse (isn't that the same as bottoming and topping and piggy raw sex?) and kissing at 1.11%? I don't think so.

I use the same app. It's a great tool for answering questions at STI screenings and for personal interest. At the end of each year it helps me to recognize the MVB (Most Valued Breeder) of the year, who has pumped the most loads inside me.

This ^^^. You embed your dick inside the bottoms mind long before you stretch his hole around it. Getting the bottom to let go of any anxiety and feel all their needs and arousal is key. The more turned on and needy for dick I am, the more ready my hole is. Even eleven thick inches slide in a treat with the right mind-fucking beforehand.

Emasculation is depriving someone of their male role identity. Feminization is giving someone a feminine quality or character. It could be either or both of these that are driving your FB "bitch(ing) you". Or it could be that he instinctively understands your nature and connects with you authentically in the moment. That kind of connection is deeply bonding.

I'm very glad to hear it. From everything you shared previously, I'm not too surprised with how this has shaken out for you both.

That's a data driven, but likely unpopular, as well as unfeasible choice. The economic, social, and political impacts would be staggering. I respect how you got there and why, it just seems a really tough sell.