All Activity

Yeah, I would have found a way to go to this. Too hot to pass up. Anyone else find guys online that surprises them?

I barebacked through all that though I had a period where I went safe. Funny thing was I already was pozzed and did not know it. Once I was diagnosed (early 90s) I went back to barebacking and been bare consistently ever since.

In my experience, there are some number of men who feel as the OP does, and are looking to put the choice in someone else's hands to avoid taking responsibility for it themselves. Often it's paralyzing fear or shame that locks people into inaction. It can also be a form of denial, avoiding acknowledging their nature. Having someone else push them over the line they are afraid of crossing themselves.

I fucked raw all through the 90's and finally got pozzed in 2007. It was a few years before PrEP appeared. I was shocked but not surprised when I tested poz but in a way it was a relief. No anxiety about getting it. I was also lucky that medication was easy to take and very effective

Do you know this guy? https://x.com/Draconblue_OF Hands-free nuts are kind of his trademark, but it is all solo.

I don't mean this in a hostile way, but my advice is therapy. Your need to control has left you a virgin at 35. Please get some help before you waste the rest of your life.

I wanted to suck off my dad my entire adolescence. From age 10 or so, we had this routine in the summer when mom was gone of him watching TV in his boxer briefs and t-shirt with legs up on the coffee table. I would lay on the sofa next to him and lay my head down on his bulge. He would start getting hard and rubbing it gently against my cheek. By the time I was 11 or 12 I would get so aroused I'd have to go to the bathroom to jack off, only to return again. I could do this 3-4 times. His cock was meaty, cut and with a full sack and big balls. I was obsessed with it. It never went further, but it was my first indication that my sexual passion was programmed from an early age. And my first partner just continued that growth into what he started calling me, an ORAL COCK WORSHIPER.

NOVEMBER EVENTS This Week … Bear Night - Thursday, November 20th @ 8PM Happy Hour - Friday, November 21st from 4-7PM

I did, but almost strictly as a too

@Jaygusher Welcome back, it has been awhile. Another great little story.

Fucking hot and romantic 🥵

Or will he? Poz is hardly certain here. Just "in play maybe". It will be a delight to see where Jaygusher take's this. He always writes excellent stories. I am definitely looking forward to reading where he takes this one.

Bummer "justsexnowatl" once again left BZ. This is a good community; always glad to be part of it.

Eek, i repent. Bur seriously, that was a throw it at the wall to see if there's any adhesion comment. i resort to my foundational assertion that i'm a regular guy talking about stuff that confounds experts. On the one hand, a flat tax seems to treat all equally, but then it doesn't take into account that all are not (e.g. financially) "equal." From my limited grasp, it seems a method more suited to starting out an economy, than it does applying to an already complex economic system. Looking at your response, the progressive tax system seems more suited to the realities facing individuals, while a flat tax seems to assume one total group would be equally affected. YES!! Agreed. Go back to my previous paragraph (where i to my credit "repent"), some guy (i.e. me) on the internet suggesting a flat tax does not constitute a "real leader," (at least, not on that topic). In this case, i'd be the patient who watched a youtube video and then chose my own judgement over my doctors. On the other hand, those patients questions can help challenge presumption that often comes with 'expertise' or professional authority. Sort of how the ongoing scientific process (ideally, more study is always needed) disallows static notions in a an infinite, fluid reality. A challenge is, knowing when we need to go to the doctor. Vive democracy. i'd (likely) be by your in the vehement fight. The notion of "take from these people to give to these people" strikes me as the opposite of moral. How to we reach the Star Trek era where "those with more" agree and voluntarily (even want to?) "pay more?" Yes, you are right of course. It's not as if we are starting from scratch here, society already is a huge system that has long relied on taxation. Day to day governance is more like tending the establishment garden vs a revolution that does a reset. Yes and no? (note the question mark). The wealthy benefit maybe more from the roads and infrastructure they use to transport their stuff to the workers they employ who buy the stuff they make to make the wealthy, wealthy (is that convoluted?). Pharmaceuticals. i did an investigation a few years ago on the cost of developing a new drug. Then, it was about 5 billion dollars. Half of the cost is subsidized by federal grants (i.e., tax dollars). Half of that 5 billion dollars is profit. So, as the 'patient' watching the youtube vid, i go to my 'doctor' with a cure. Why not skip the middleman. NIH hire, instead of fire, those same scientists working for the pharmaceutical company. The incentive for creativity could be enhanced by paying the research scientist more than the pharmaceutical company did, or maybe a bonus system to incentivize creativity, would still result in a much lower cost for drug development. It would still employ the same amount of productive people. The primary investors would be the ones to lose out, but then, what are they really contributing? The small investor whose few dollars a month go into a mutual fund won't take much of a hit on that side of the equation. I'll use the incendiary term here, the "oligarchs" are the biggest losers? But, have they produced anything or just exploited the productivity of others? The notion of risk of investment is pretty watered down by federal grants. i wonder how many are super wealthy because they benefit from our system of taxation? No, no particular direction other than publicly discussing and learning to perhaps better refine or qualify a direction to go. It seems to me that all government programs are directed to "one group of people," but the benefits vary amongst the members of the group. E.g., national defense (spending), benefits Lockheed Martin more directly than the person working at McDonalds (referential). Having fun with AI: "Usage Statistics: In 2020, it was reported that Walmart accounted for approximately 18% of all SNAP transactions in the U.S." i know i'm maybe missing your point, but maybe simultaneously making a valid point that "one group" is hard to label or define? But to your question: Some argue the current guys in charge used group programs like SNAP and ACA tyrannically. i don't presume to have the answers, just thoughts and more questions... but to me, this is part of the process of maybe finding answers. i've been pretty fiscally 'conservative' my whole life. I.e., i work hard to get out of and stay out of debt. i was first debt free at the age of 43 when i paid cash for my first house. i worked my ass off to get there. Then at 51, i got divorced and my former wife got everything (long sordid story), and i started over. i'm currently debt free again, and that's after paying of >100k in student loans from a career change at age 55, and own my house again (no mortgage), no credit card debt, etc.. my individual experience and philosophy is one remains solvent through hard work and not spending more than one has. Debt should be a short term tool vs an ongoing integral approach. i honestly do not know if that would or could work on a huge government level? my intuition asks: "why not?" my rational brain says: "it's complicated." Volume of taxation can be summed up as "driven by the activities of government," but it seems to me, the devil is in the details? Some activities are driven by the voting population. Some are driven by greed, corruption. Some are driven by systemic red tape. The list is probably really long, but it seems to me the activities of government often fly under the radar. Legislation often feels like buying a used car from a disreputable dealer, where the sales person is always leaving the negotiation to "check" with their "manager." I.e., the disguised or buried add on expenses are SOP. So, "what it takes on" is way more than the proposed used car. All my answers refer back to my first disclaimer lol. Education and engagement seem important to me to managing capability. i think US government does a lousy job of managing expectations. i think we Americans often expect a panacea when there is no cure, just management of an ongoing condition. I.e, "needs" will always be a part of life, part of education and expectation management might include replacing the notion of a total fix with need reduction that fits within means. I may want a Ferrari, but i can get by with a Toyota. Both are capable vehicles.

@admmakarov

Some background then. Drew was brought up by a single mother, his dad was absent his whole life and they didn’t meet until he was 22 so they were like strangers to each other. By then I was regularly fucking Drew. His Dad knew that and if we stayed over at his Dad’s I would make no secret of fucking Drew when we were there. Drew’s Dad is Bi and while nothing happened between them for about 2 years he was definitely interested. Drew was also up for it so I encouraged them to try it. No brothers, Drew is an only kid. He does have cousins.