All Activity

Love this story! Wish I had a Dad like this! Can't wait for the next chapter!

Interesting take. Since I've never used or been a wingman, I can only speak to what I've observed, but there are at least a couple of different wingman dynamics that exist. I think you may have a regional bias based on where you live. The one you described is the only one that is common in the PNW. In other parts of North America, you see both the dynamic you described as well as true wingman dynamics, where they do actively assist each other in trying to hookup, sometimes going as far as the wingman pretty much whoring out his partner. I've seen guys attempt it in the PNW, but I've never seen it work here, on the other hand it is highly effective in places like Palm Springs and LA where both of these dynamics coexist.

So, I mostly stopped ready/watching US coverage of US politics awhile ago -- most comes from BBC. The this happened today. First is BBC -- which I read and watch -- and via the linked page, I'm adding here the source reporting from The Telegraph -- a source I don't use [think before following links] https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cd9kqz1yyxkt [think before following links] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/03/bbc-report-reveals-bias-donald-trump/ I've seen the edited clip so much I don't remember the original. Shame on me. It doesn't change what actually happened, of course. But you can't fight a liar with lies. Now what CA is doing with redistricting, OK. fair is fair -- all in the rules and balanced, given TX, etc.

fuck that's a nice poz cock. wish it was inside me

On a Saturday night, after a glass of wine, I started feeling a bit horny and really craved giving head. I began chatting with a guy I'd never hooked up with before, though we'd flirted in the past. After another glass, I thought, fuck it, and invited him over. I straight-up told him I just wanted to blow him and nothing more. He was totally cool with it. He came to my place. We started kissing, and I took his cock in my mouth. Pretty soon, he stripped off my clothes, pushed me onto my back on the bed, lifted my legs up, and spat on my hole. He kissed me again and told me to open my mouth wide. Then he spat right in it. He fingered my ass and shoved his cock inside me. He started thrusting hard while forcing his tongue deep into my mouth. With one hand, he squeezed my throat tightly, and I quickly felt his cum shooting deep inside me. It was incredibly hot, and now I don't want anything else 😛

When I see guys out together with a wingman vibe at a venue/bathhouse/etc., it usually leads to neither of them having any contact with anyone else. It seems like the exact opposite of what a true wingman enables. I don't understand the dynamic, perhaps it's safety, perhaps it's concern about being judged for who/what you really want being seen by another, but it usually leads to looking and not touching. Why even venture out? To the OP's point, I'd love someone who knows what I need sending those qualified breeders my way. I just don't have a friend like that in my life.

CumUnion Party at Steam last night, I got there around 7:30 since they are typically mostly over by 10, last night got off to a really slow start, but around 11:30 things started picking up to the point it was as good as it ever gets. Unlike last Saturday there were plenty of bottoms, so I topped at least 10 guys, seeded two of them. Only had one guy fuck me wasn't sure whether or not he came, but woke up to a cum fart this morning so I definitely got bred. Did have one guy, who had never been to Steam before ask me not long before I left if it was always this slow, I hated to break it to him that it was as good as it ever gets at that point in the evening The highlight of the evening was right before I left around 2:30, it had mostly emptied out, and I wanted to get off a 2nd time before calling it a night. I tried to fuck the guy who had complained about how slow it was, but he was as tight as a vice and we couldn't seem to figure out how to make it work. I had stepped over to watch a couple fucking on the bench by the slurp ramp, but they quickly stopped and left, when the twink that had been watching with me grabbed my hard cock bent over the just vacated bench and guided me into his loose cummy hole and started practically raping my dick with it. It didn't take long for me to add my cream to his well used fuck hole.

Fucking masTerpiece

Isn't that just beautiful. 😛

This is some of the hottest -- and most relatable -- writing I've seen anywhere on breeding zone. (And as a massive slut who loves partying, pozzing, and anything sexually deviant, I have found a LOT of relatable writing on this site! So that's saying a lot! 😛😈)

I would smoke with you sir💋

I appreciate the 'guest' OP for putting this out there. Interestingly, the way the topic heading reads - I assumed (perhaps literally) it meant dating your wingman. Which made sense to me, a lot of sense to me. For the reason my brother @xxbjn2 so eloquently pointed out. As for fitting in with society and coupling up and having a "partner" for the 'bad times' I am conflicted by the following: anal gay bottoms, the kind that need to get fucked and bred by any horny man - can never seriously consider monogamy and accept or fulfill their calling of being used as a fuck hole for any horny man in need. this is where having a 'good friend' like a wingman as a life partner makes a lot of sense to me. especially when there is a shared purpose for the relationship. having another gay bottom as a partner that doesn't also want to act as your wingman, seems like a dead end situation unless the relationship is built on other common and shared activities beyond sex. oral gay men (sides), also just want to suck any dick. they may not need a wingman. this may appeal or lend itself more to the "lone wolves" of the gay community. why only oral? I never understood this aversion to using your ass to get bred...tbh. a-sexual or confused sexual persons. these people are the ones who complicate everything for all the actual breeders on this site. are these guys "tops" because they don't like anal? are they x, because they don't like y? not because they are hired to want z? is there a simple test to help a-sexual people figure this out? if you see a sexy ass and you don't immediate get hard and want to breed it, then: it's either not the ass for you or you don't want to breed ass if you see a sexy person, but don't imagine yourself penetrating them / or being penetrated by them it's either not the right person to breed or you don't actually want penetration to breed there is no way to "teach" these people how to desire to breed. you either need to breed (or get bred) or you don't. I think we need to find a way to let these poor fuckers off the hook so they can have their own letter in the alphabet of marginalized weird soup pop culture has lumped us all into. Sorry for the weird rant, but yeah...I don't know if gay men who want to be bred by any man are meant to be in any relationship, except for with their wingman. HMMMM, love you guys. Go easy on me.

Can you tell us more?

That’s a beautiful poz cock, even better with all that hair 🥵

Thank you! Glad u like 😈

I love it when a guy appreciates that final touch

This gets us to a very fun topic. It also gets back to one of your original questions to, re: leadership, which may be a good term to describe those who live with "pain only a moral person would feel--doing nothing..." or, in limitation. On the topic you bring up, the St Louis Fed posted a tangential document. [think before following links] https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2025/apr/whats-driving-surge-us-corporate-profits And, to continue beating on the human body as a 'system' analogy, let's go down a diagnosis and prescription road. The biggest drivers of post-COVID profit have been (point-of-purchase) retail and construction... combining for almost 40% of post-COVID growth of corporate profit of The Fed's selection set. There's a ton to talk about but I'm going focus here on retail -- a large part of which is Amazon. But it replicates across industries in digital consolidation which nationalizes products and services (if not globalizes them). In the case of Amazon, the amount of revenue they have sucked up from 1,000s of local stores which then goes to pay their workforce much higher salaries and [wealth] benefits (stock, 401k, etc.) than those local stores could have offered. Amazon is one example within this driver of wealth disparity: consolidation of supply and those suppliers' revenue (and profits) shared by their relatively fewer employees. AI is going to be the next. You can add Google, FB/Instagram, etc. But this brings it back to the bigger question, government's role in the problem. But additionally, how much is our own responsibility of that problem. Companies don't force us to use their products. We live in a free society. But we keep eating the sugar than complain about diabetes. Here's where leadership in government comes in, to one of your original questions. Someone open to a government role but also tries to lead people to make better decisions. Should government programs incentivize people to make better decisions or penalizes success. There's much more to be politically gained in the latter. That's poor leadership. On this specific topic, most Democrats take the latter position while Republicans simply abdicate for fear of government involvement. To switch gears a bit, here on environmentalism, I begrudgingly give Warren some credit in the 2020 primaries. She tried to bring up the amount we drive but it fell on deaf ears. Driving is the sugar -- due to direct and indirect environmental impact as well as lifestyle and its part to play on lower life expectancy (people don't walk/exercise enough in daily life). That last part is so important and missed in our national political discourse, our own role in our own health. This is true not only for the 'systems' analogy we're discussing but the cause and effect in so many other behaviors - health and healthcare, wealth distribution, etc. On health for healthcare's sake: Here's an interesting excerpt from a book I noted to one of your previous posts, this was specifically to lifestyle and food consumption, re higher age-adjusted life expectancy of Mexican and Latin American women coming to the US vs. white non-Hispanic women in the US: “...All studies in fact show that immigrants in general are healthier the day they arrive than after five years’ residence in the United States..." Excerpt From: A Population History of the United States: Second Edition, Herbert S. Klein To solve any problem, where is the balance between personal choice and government programs? Which should take the lead?