All Activity

YES! An update! And as usual, it did not disappoint! Thanks!

[think before following links] https://xhamster.com/videos/anonymous-cum-donors-breed-ex-military-fag-xhWsVa6?utm_source=ext_shared&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=link love to be the btm here...woof!!

[think before following links] https://xhamster.com/videos/i-need-to-fuck-you-right-now-6859271?utm_source=ext_shared&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=link damn thats hot!

[think before following links] https://xhamster.com/videos/bareback-pounding-and-seeding-in-the-basement-8524235?utm_source=ext_shared&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=link Love this top, execellent fucker and breeder!

You said it right there. I hate mainstream porn for exactly the reasons you stated. There's something unfulfilling about the staged, scripted performances that lack genuine emotion and connection. I prefer the kinky couple who get off on showing the world just how perverted they are. When the moans are real, we all recognize them in an instant. They can't be helped, for it is a moment of surrender to the pleasure received, a raw and unfiltered expression of ecstasy that transcends any act of performance. The look of a bottom who can't handle the fucking but keeps submitting to the dick is absolutely priceless. It's a testament to their trust, their willingness to push beyond their limits, and their utter devotion to the act of submission. There's a certain beauty in the struggle, in the way their body betrays their mind, craving more even as it reaches its breaking point. And nothing is hotter than watching a guy's eyes roll back as he is overwhelmed. It's a moment of pure, unadulterated bliss, a surrender to the sensations that consume him completely. The way his body tenses, the involuntary moans that escape his lips, the sheer intensity of his expression—it's a sight that leaves an indelible mark on the mind, a reminder of the power of pleasure and the depths of human desire. These are the moments that make kinky performances so captivating, so authentic. They are a window into the raw, unfiltered experiences of individuals who embrace their perversions without shame or hesitation. It's a celebration of desire, a testament to the beauty of surrender, and a reminder that the most powerful connections are forged in the heat of genuine, uninhibited passion.

I'm hoping HIV treatment gets to the point of six month injections.

@Pozzible I think you've down a different road. You can see the exit polls here for VA and navigate to NJ too: [think before following links] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2025-elections/virginia-governor-results These are regular studies of voters done by a Edison Research, paid for and reported by all major media. I think NY Times and FOX News team up for a different service...that may be Presidential elections only. Given the depth of questions and limited time, they asked / reported only two political questions this year -- one supported by each party as noted above. Again, you can see the results there on the site. Additionally and on those topics, I'm not sure how many Republican governors or state legislatures led by same have passed pro-gay rights bills let alone trans. Equally, I'm not sure how many Democratic governors or Dem-lead state legislatures have passed law restricting migration. The point of their work, as reported by media companies, is how divided we are. I'm not sure where you're going with your response.

ohh wow it is so hot!!

Sorry that that was such a long AI response. So do you think the AI listing is an example of this? Because I don’t think those ideas are responding to anything mainstreamed by the Democratic party. The Republican ads set up straw men rather than respond to anything promoted by Dems.

The way I look at it, there are some HUGE guys out there, and they need to fuck, too. My loose, sloppy hole isn't for everyone, and I'm happy to be of service to huge hung dudes. They seem to like that I'm not going to tap out, and they can go as hard and fast as they want. Honestly, I think it's more THEIR insecurity. They're nervous you cant feel them because they are so small. Don't let their insecurity get in your head, bro.

Yes Sir!! That’s the way to use us bottoms.

Pin me down Sir. Make me your son.

Never stop 💧

Hot 🔥

She's leaving soon, I'll be getting my sheet out for this 💧

I would like to meet other faggots to degrade each other but I haven't met any :((

Fuck yeah 💋

Well here it is 30 days after my injections. The only negative thing(s) that I experienced are minor 1. I developed a lump of medication under the skin at the injection site in my left thigh. It is still slowly going down. It's about the size of a US Quarter coin and feels to be about2-3 mm thick under the skin. 2. I had about three or four days of occasional diarrhea, but I believe that may be due to a diet change that occurred at the same time. Other than those two things, I haven't had any noticeable problems. Since this is a once every 6-month injection, I think it this will probably be very popular form of PREP. And as I have said previously, it is expensive, but both insurance and Medicare has approved it here in the US.

Part 4 “Hey,” John said, voice a whisper lost in the bass. He tried again, “David, babe, let’s get you back, okay?” David mumbled, first inaudible. “I wanted to make you happy tonight”, David eventually was able to slur. “You feel so good in me”. As John turned around he saw a new man fucking his boy. A different man, older and lean with a gaunt face and a predator’s grin, was already pumping into David with a weird, mechanical rhythm. John hadn’t even noticed him circle in, but there he was, hands braced on either side of David’s waist. His cock speared between David’s cheeks, buried to the thatch of his wiry pubes. John stared, slack-jawed, at the breach. At how easily David took the second cock, at how there was no flicker of resistance. John’s body shrank, cold and small in its shell of flesh, but his cock refused to go down. He should have been angry, protective. Should have shoved the man off and barked at the others to give them space. But he just hovered, watching the new man’s balls slap up against the back of David’s thighs. The sound was hypnotic. “Am l making you happy? You feel happy, as l feel you in me” David mumbled to John. He looked at David. He was waking up, but slowly. Eyes still closed. John worked his hand around David’s face, stroked the side of his head. John didn’t know what he should do. “You’re doing so good, babe,” he heard himself murmur, the words pulled from somewhere far away. The skinny man’s thrusts weren’t fast but they never hesitated, never lost the perfect rhythm. There was a look on his face, hungry maybe, or just empty. John felt himself get even harder. He hated himself for it. The man increased his pace and didn’t seem to care that John was there, not even as an audience. It was as if he were a lamp, useful only for casting more light on what was going on. John watched the man’s face, how each thrust carved hollows in the man’s cheeks, how his eyes locked not on David’s face but on the raw junction of their bodies. The man wanted only the hole, not the person, and that somehow made it worse and better at the same time. John reached for David’s hand, squeezed it, trying to keep him tethered. The man increased his breathing until he sounded as loud as the first man, slapping forward with a violence that shamed John all the way to his bones. The fucking stopped. Cock still deep in David. Then slowly pulled out and it looked like he was pulling something out of a wound, something that would never close, and the hole just gaped, pulsing lightly as David shuddered. Still not knowing what was happening to him. The hole was wet with cum. John saw his chance to get the finish he needed. But could he, in front of these men? He got up and behind David. It was like some monster inside him. Every thrust David had taken had built a hungry. He knelt, hands trembling, and pressed the thick head of his cock into the mess that was now David’s hole. The heat, the shock of easy entry, nearly made him black out. He gripped David’s hips hard enough to bruise. One thrust, and the world fell away. He’d imagined being a monster so many times, if he was honest with himself. Imagined what it would take to break through the cautious, loving front and get to the animal underneath. His cock sank all the way in on the first stroke, and the movement forced out a low groan from David. “Mmm you feel so good” John wispered to David. He said it because he needed to believe it. That there was an interaction, that this wasn’t something being done to David. That he wanted it too. His hands ran over David’s spine, feeling the tremors as he pushed in slow but deep, every movement mixing with the filth of the men before. The sounds from the watching men, sometimes a whispered comment, sometimes just the low, rhythmic slap of hand on cock, blended into the static in John’s head. He was doing this. He was fucking his boyfriend, full of other men’s cum, and David was taking it with a soft sound, helpless and perfect. His own body betrayed him: it felt so, so good. The heat, the looseness, the frictionless ease of it. He gripped David and went faster. David was move more, increasing control of his body. “What are you doing” David said, looking around. “Stop” The air tightened between them, the silence too thick to break with just his own breath. “Sorry. I thought you wanted this.” The words came out dry, chemical, not anything close to an apology or an explanation. David squirmed under his grip; not like before, not wanting more but wanting out. His legs kicked, his voice growing louder. “Stop. John. What the fuck. STOP.” Thoughts went through Johns head. David didn’t want this. Didn’t want him. He was still deep in him. Fuck, he thought to himself. What have l done. But also going through his mind was the fact that David had taken three cocks, but only refused one. His. He felt shame. Shame for what he had done, and shame for being rejected in front of these men. He felt them judging him. He was overwelmed with emotions. His head a mess. But he needed to finish. It was like he had no choise. He grabbed David’s hips and went hard, punishing them both. Fucking him in front of everyone, his balls slapping loud enough to echo against the wall. The voyuers didn’t matter, the looks on their faces didn’t matter. Only the wet, ruined hole. Each time he bottomed out, the heat of it made John’s head pulse. He only needed a few pumps before filling David with his cum. He squeezed David's hips with shaking hands, pulled in, ground out a sharp, almost sobbing breath. Heat flashed up his spine. He pressed his forehead to David’s back and let go. The relief was like a full-body collapse; the rush and then the hollowness after. He stayed inside him, softening, half waiting for judgment, half begging for forgiveness. He didn’t remember pulling out, only that his thighs prickled with sweat and that his cock looked raw and angry. John reached for a towel someone tossed, wiped himself off. He wrapped David in it, cradling him like a lifeline, ignoring the mess and the fading eyes of the men in the room. David was silent now. He seemed confused more than anything.

As a liberal, supporting trans community is important to me. But I hardly think most Dems have been on a “push” for trans rights. Does anyone remember a single Democratic ad from ‘24 that emphasized that push? What I distinctly remember is Republican ads spouting extreme untruths. (Some of which were unfortunately probably effective..) So I just asked Chat GPT-5 about Republican ads… “Here are the major aggressive, inaccurate claims made by Trump and Republican candidates in 2024 about what Democrats support regarding trans youth, and why they’re false — focused on policies, medical care, and schools. Claim: “Democrats want to federalize puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries for minors nationwide.” Why it’s inaccurate: Medical decisions for minors are governed by state laws, medical boards, and clinicians; there is no active federal plan to mandate such treatments for minors across all states. Most major medical associations (e.g., AAP, Endocrine Society) provide clinical guidance emphasizing individualized care, informed consent, and age-appropriate decision-making. Surgical interventions for minors are extremely rare and generally not recommended for prepubertal children. Reality: Policies vary by state — some states restrict or ban gender-affirming care for minors, others allow it under clinical guidance. Federal Democrats broadly support access to gender-affirming care and oppose discriminatory bans, but do not propose a federal mandate that overrides state medical or legal authority. Claim: “Democrats support routine genital surgeries on teenagers and even younger children.” Why it’s inaccurate: Major medical bodies do not recommend genital surgery for minors except in very rare, carefully considered cases, and typically not for prepubertal children. Puberty blockers are reversible and used to delay irreversible changes; cross-sex hormones are started with caution, often at mid-to-late adolescence, with informed consent. Full surgical interventions for minors are rare and usually reserved for exceptional, multidisciplinary evaluation. Reality: The mainstream medical stance is conservative about irreversible procedures on minors; claims of routine genital surgery are exaggerated. Claim: “Public schools are teaching children how to transition and encouraging irreversible medical interventions.” Why it’s inaccurate: Most school policies that Democrats support center on nondiscrimination, allowing students to use chosen names/pronouns, and access to appropriate facilities and support. School health services typically do not perform gender-affirming medical treatments — those occur in clinical settings with parents/guardians and medical teams. Reality: Education policies vary; curriculum discussions about gender identity are limited and often focused on inclusion and anti-bullying rather than medical guidance. Claim: “Democrats want to remove parental consent from all decisions about a child’s gender care.” Why it’s inaccurate: Democratic positions generally emphasize parental involvement and oppose state bans that remove families’ ability to seek care. Where Democrats oppose restrictive laws, their aim is to preserve families’ access to medical advice and clinician judgment, not to bypass parents. Reality: In most jurisdictions where care is provided, parental consent/participation is required for minors. Claim: “Gender-affirming care is experimental, harmful, and unproven for youth — Democrats hide this from families.” Why it’s inaccurate: While long-term randomized controlled trials are limited (as in many areas of pediatric medicine), decades of clinical experience and multiple professional organizations recognize gender-affirming treatments as evidence-based for alleviating gender dysphoria in appropriately assessed youth. Studies show mental-health benefits and reductions in suicidality among treated youth, though research continues. Reality: Medical consensus supports carefully screened, multidisciplinary care; the claim that Democrats “hide” harms is a mischaracterization of the medical and policy debate. Claim: “Democrats support allowing minors to legally change sex on birth certificates without parental or medical involvement.” Why it’s inaccurate: Most policy proposals supported by Democrats focus on enabling people, including adults and sometimes older minors depending on state law, to update legal documents; they do not broadly advocate unilateral changes for young children without parental or medical processes. Rules vary by state; many require documentation and/or parental consent for minors. Reality: Legal-change procedures differ widely; Democrats typically support reducing bureaucratic barriers rather than enabling unilateral, secret changes for young children. Claim: “Democrats want to punish or criminalize parents who oppose their child’s social transition.” Why it’s inaccurate: Democratic platforms and mainstream Democratic officeholders have not broadly advocated criminalizing dissenting parents; most oppose state intervention that removes parental rights. Legal actions that have occurred relate to alleged abuse or neglect in narrow cases, not a general policy to punish parents for disagreement. Reality: The claim conflates rare child-protection cases with general Democratic policy. Sources & context (summary): Professional medical organizations’ guidance: American Academy of Pediatrics, Endocrine Society, World Professional Association for Transgender Health — endorse evidence-based, multidisciplinary, age-appropriate care; emphasize consent and clinical oversight. State-level laws: Since 2021 many Republican-led states enacted bans or restrictions on gender-affirming care for minors; Democratic responses focused on opposing bans and protecting access. Fact-checking outlets: Multiple fact-checkers examined ads/claims in 2024 and rated many of these assertions misleading or false where they portrayed routine, widespread, or federally mandated practices that do not exist. If you want, I can: List specific 2024 campaign ads or candidate quotes that made these claims with exact wording and fact-check links, or Summarize state laws enacted in 2024 restricting or defending care by state. Which would you prefer?”

Looks delicious to lick it