Jump to content

rawTOP

Administrators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,101

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Everything posted by rawTOP

  1. rawTOP
    Not sure how that will work. Even if Gilead will cover the cost of your meds (not sure if they do this for neg guys), you still have to pay for doctors visits and labs every 3 months which will be costly. Maybe try to find a study near you? But if you're not in a major city, that's gonna be difficult as well.
  2. rawTOP
    BTW, I actually asked two doctors - my colo-rectal surgeon - who didn't think twice with her answer of "it's not a problem" - and my GP who thought aloud as he ran down the list of meds I took and then said "no problem". I trust my GP's answer more than the colo-rectal surgeon's answer.
  3. rawTOP
    I asked my doctor about that 'cause I saw the warning on the bottle - and he said it was fine - at least for the meds I'm taking (including Truvada). There are meds that aren't compatible with psyllium, but none of mine fall in that category.
  4. rawTOP
    Is there a decent bathhouse in Las Vegas? If so, just go and put your ass up and take loads from whoever fucks you. Or get a cheap no-tell motel room and put an ad on Craigslist and the hookup sites with your room number and just take loads from whoever shows up. Bottom line - you don't really need a top to organize things, though it is a bit safer to have someone watching over you in a motel setting.
  5. rawTOP
    That's not my point - I can deal with details. My point is why are public health officials obsessed with such low viral loads? Why aren't they happy with relatively low viral loads? It would seem to me that if the person is on treatment and the treatment is working pretty well, that they should be happy with that result and see it as success.
  6. rawTOP
    My point is that if you get into a relationship your boyfriend is going to want to have sex with other guys at some point. You may be monogamous, but your boyfriend and your relationship won't be. That is the price of a long term gay relationship. Unless you accept that fact, you'll never have a long term relationship (or your boyfriend will be forced to lie to you).
  7. rawTOP
    To that point isn't the graphic above a bit misleading? Wouldn't "well-controlled" be more of an objective and set it in the 200 to 500 range? That achieves the public health goals they're looking for, etc.
  8. rawTOP
    That means when you top, when you bottom - so vers guys could answer both questions. Bottoms often look for 100% tops because they're considered "cleaner" (less likely to have STDs, less likely to be poz). Also - as Max Sohl once told me - bottoms are bottoms, vers bottoms are bottoms, vers guys are bottoms, vers tops are often bottoms, only tops are really tops. In other words, if a bottom just wants to get fucked and doesn't want the guy to ask the bottom to fuck him- then the only safe bet is a strict top.
  9. rawTOP
    Long story - but the one you're thinking of will continue to be a primary pic. These were for something else. I take it out when I'm jacking my cock.
  10. rawTOP
    I thought it was more like 1/4 didn't know. Yeah, I get all that, the only thing I may have misstated is saying "guys" in the title. I still find 37% a bit shocking. I'd love to know the percentage for MSMs / gay guys.
  11. rawTOP
    Not to be Debbie Downer, but… 90+% of long term gay relationships are NOT monogamous. My bf and I have been together for over 16 years now. I've seen a lot of long term gay couples. There are maybe 2 or 3 couples who I think are more or less monogamous. The rest would probably say that if they stuck with monogamy they'd have broken up. In other words long term monogamous gay relationships are only slightly more common than unicorns. The sooner you embrace that fact the sooner you'll find yourself a long-term relationship. Personally I'm much more interested in getting sluts to form long term relationships with other sluts. Somehow our society has taught sluts that they're not deserving of real love or even companionship. That's wrong.
  12. rawTOP
    Sorry, we're too far along to make that change.
  13. rawTOP
    Just saw this graphic in an article I was reading… I was a little shocked to see that only 37% of people with HIV have an undetectable viral load. Based on what I see online it just seems a lot higher than that. Or are the guys lying about being undetectable? It's also a little unexpected that only around half of people with HIV have medical care. That also seems really low. Do these numbers ring true for any of you? They seem wrong to me.
  14. rawTOP
    I, once again, have no clue what you're talking about. AFAIK there's no Facebook setting on my end that would do what you want to do. If anything you need to control your own privacy settings - so the job is yours, not mine. Unless I'm misunderstanding something.
  15. rawTOP
    It's not the pride that's the problem, it's the expression of the pride. It doesn't suit someone who's primary role is service. I'd almost say the same thing of tops. A cocky, arrogant top can be a bad lay too. Self-assured is good, arrogant about it is bad.
  16. rawTOP
    Honestly, I have to disagree a bit. I feel like the term "power bottom" has been taken over by pushy, controlling bottoms who think they're more important than the top. That the top is there to serve their needs, not the other way around. IMHO, those folks aren't "power bottoms" - they're bad lays. To me a power bottom is someone who is there to service and can take pretty much anything that's dished out to him for hours on end. He's the bottom other bottoms look at and think "how in the hell can he manage all that for so long?" Power bottoms have a lot of the characteristics that the guy mentioned, but they lack the arrogance. They're quietly self-confident - they don't need to make statements like "They have an extensive amount of self-worth and value" or "power bottoms, indeed, have more power than any other sexual prototype".
  17. rawTOP
    otebbtop - This site is what it is. Major changes like that won't be made here. (Plus, I don't quite understand what you're asking for - I think you want me to mine other sites for data on users - but not completely sure). BUT, I'm (slowly) working on BBBH.com - it will be more flexible and have more of the features you're looking for.
  18. rawTOP
    otebbtop - take a look at your own profile page. It has all the activity for people you've friended. The only thing that's missing is the concept of a "status update" - because forums are more about longer-length discussion.
  19. rawTOP
    That's how the "What's New" page is supposed to feel. But describe what you're looking for exactly - I'm programming BBBH.com from scratch - I can implement something like that there, and try for more of that feel when I migrate this site to other software.
  20. rawTOP
    Just took two pics of my cock. Not sure which I should upload to my profiles. (Click the pics to see bigger versions of them). #1 is a vertical. My balls look huge for some reason… #2 is a horizontal pic… Which one makes you think "I wanna get fucked by that"?
  21. rawTOP
    I'm not making any changes to the software running this forum. I'm about to replace it with something else. But even then what I can do will be limited and complicated since it's off-the-shelf software so I have to make changes by writing plug-in otherwise it will break every time there's a version upgrade.
  22. rawTOP
    I'm not familiar with TapATalk. I'm planning on switching the type of software running the site, so will investigate more after that point (there's no point before that change).
  23. rawTOP
    Do not make assumptions about people seroconverting. I've talked to Jett Black who works for Michael. They do test their European models for HIV and serosort. I think the European stuff is still bareback, but I may be wrong. Anyway Jett said it's surprising how many of the new models are poz. He says Lucas tests consistently, but some of the other studios don't.
  24. rawTOP
    All blog posts are moderated and don't go live until I've reviewed them. Probably a 1/4 to 1/3 get deleted because they're not appropriate (the most common reason is that they should be thread in the forum, not blog posts). Update: Just looked at your blog post - it's not really appropriate. It's more like something you should put in your profile. Blogs should generally be stories about your sex life.
  25. rawTOP
    Read this thread… https://breeding.zone/threads/27374-Is-early-treatment-of-HIV-really-that-much-better Well, he didn't go on them immediately. It's been a year since infection. AND (except for that guy who had a bone marrow transfusion) no one has been cured of HIV and been able to go off their meds. Holding that promise out as a reason to go on meds seems disingenuous.

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.