Jump to content

rawTOP

Administrators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,082

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Everything posted by rawTOP

  1. rawTOP
    I copied your original post to the Boston section and then deleted the reference to Boston in this thread. So the Boston thread can be where you find a bottom to fuck you, and this thread can be where we discuss the general idea. Anyway, I totally get what you're saying. I'm more of a vers top than a strict top these days and the idea of taking loads from a cumdump is a huge turn on for me - especially if he's got an ass full of cum when he fucks me and uses some of the cum from his ass as lube. Or better yet, dumps some of the cum from his ass into a condom, works the contents of the condom into my ass, and then fucks my then cummy hole. Just yesterday I was chatting with @GangbangBoi on Twitter asking if he ever tops. If you don't know him - he got something like 550 loads in his ass last month. He's possibly the world's biggest cumdump. Anyway, he says he does top from time to time at bathhouses between taking loads himself. And he's even recently fucked a 16 y.o. - which is legal where he lives - though in some areas if you cause harm to the minor you can still be charged with other crimes and he's one of those "my last test was neg" guys. But I gotta say I'd love to meet up with him next time I'm in Toronto and swap loads. IMHO, a load from a cumdump just seems more special than a "regular load". It's really about the #BBBH community - passing on what you've collected from other guys…
  2. rawTOP
    That explains why you guys are so focused on prostitutes (and not swinging, etc.) What I found most curious in what you said was that straight barebackers are being attacked on other sites. Really? I thought bareback sex was pretty much the norm for straight folk. Or, is it the worry that straight men will bring something home to their wives if they're fucking prostitutes bareback? Yeah, I personally am a bit turned on by threads like "My last hetero load" - almost makes me wanna fuck a woman so I can say I've done it. But I think all the femininity would be a huge turn off in real life. I'd need a pretty boyish woman if it was going to work. Messing with the guts of the site isn't an option because they're written by a 3rd party developer and any changes I do will get wiped out next time there's a version upgrade. BUT, I am going to move the data from the site to a completely different and more modern software package and they're working on an upgrade where two sites can have the same login (more elegantly than I do with this site and Raunchy Fuckers). I will probably be able to feature data from one site on the other site. I'll have to wait to figure out how all of that works - but that's the general idea.
  3. rawTOP
    During the clinical trials there were seroconversions. Most, but not all, of those seroconversions were people who didn't take it regularly. I suspect the same is true in the general population.
  4. rawTOP
    Agreed. They're a good bunch of folks (like you guys are as well). The nice part about having straight folks around is that bareback is largely just normal sex in the straight community. That normality is sorta what I'm shooting for (in the gay community) as well. Well, it all started with the bi guys who were fucking gay guys and then girls on the site. I suspect many of the guys in the straight section are at least a bit bi (e.g. will top a guy when pussy isn't available). Which I see as a good thing - more loads for you cum hungry bottoms!
  5. rawTOP
    There is basically no risk from blowjobs unless the top has a cut on his dick or the bottom has some open wound in his mouth. Even a top with a cut on his dick is probably low risk since there's something in saliva that kills HIV. BTW, we've known all of that for over 25 years now. Many of the older gay guys who are alive today are alive because they were only interested in sucking cock - not getting fucked.
  6. rawTOP
    Now that the straight section is getting busy, I was thinking of breaking it off into its own site/subdomain. But that would be this fall at the earliest. In the meantime there's not much you can do. Sorry.
  7. rawTOP
    Hit me up. I'd probably be up for fucking you.
  8. rawTOP
    Would love to hookup with you.
  9. rawTOP
    All I can guess is that the sender deletes it before you see it. Legit PM emails include the message so you shouldn't be missing anything.
  10. rawTOP
    Can't say I've ever been fucked by a cock with a PA, but I have one and have fucked guys with it… The thinner the ring, the more harm it can do. Thin metal can cut. Of course that's an issue for the top as well as the bottom. It also depends on the type of jewelry that's in the piercing. A curved barbell is essentially just a big bead on the bottom side of the dick (from the bottom's perspective). That will give an extra sensation. But if the top has a ring in you'll really feel it going in and when it comes out. You'll also feel it "hit bottom" in your ass if it's big and heavy. Usually when I fuck with a ring I go in, stay in, and then just pull out at the end. But if I really want to punish the bottom's hole I'll do long strokes and keep pushing the PA in and out of his sphincter. One gangbang bottom had to stop getting fucked after I roughed up his hole… http://www.raunchyfuckers.com/videos/big-prince-albert-makes-for-painful-fuck-550.html
  11. rawTOP
    How in the hell did you manage to stay neg until '93? If you had been so scared, how was it that you were willing to go raw 3 years later and then exclusively raw 5 years after being scared? What was going through your mind? Were you OK with becoming poz? How did you come to that point with so many people dying?
  12. rawTOP
    I'm in NYC as well. Would need to start with a hookup but there's the chance it might progress to something more. Contact me if you're interested. First step is seeing pics, stats, etc.
  13. rawTOP
    I'm guessing you're a bit hooked on anonymous sex (it's addictive). I say go back to the saunas and enjoy yourself. You only go around once. Testing isn't so much about knowing you're neg - it's about knowing when you become poz so you can get treatment in a timely manner. If you give up on staying neg you should still get tested every year or so - definitely don't let more than two years go between tests.
  14. rawTOP
    I could swear that one of my email addresses has been flagged by CL. Nothing I put up under that email address lasts very long. But I can put up stuff under another email address and it has a much better chance of staying up.
  15. rawTOP
    Pulling comments out of another thread… Can someone please point me to studies, not sponsored by the pharma industry, that show exactly how much benefit poz guys get by starting meds early compared to someone who starts before their t-cells fall below 300? In other words, I recognize that there is a point when you can wait too long (when t-cells drop below 250-300), but I'm questioning immediate treatment vs. slightly delayed treatment. In other words do poz guys really need meds the first couple years they're poz? And let's concede that going on meds is good for the community in that it will reduce infections. I realize that way of thinking resonates for Europeans, but being a rather individualistic American I'm not the type that will tell someone to go on meds to keep their random tricks neg. I've heard theories that early treatment may stop HIV from hiding out in the body and make it easier to eradicate HIV completely if such a cure comes along. But taking meds in the hope that a cure might come around some day seems silly. If such a cure comes, who knows whether having taken ARVs early will be necessary for the cure to work. What I'm looking for is actual reductions in illnesses, complications from illnesses, and actual increases in life expectancy for the person taking the meds early. Does that hard data exist in studies from researchers who aren't funded by pharma companies?
  16. rawTOP
    I've reinstated him with a huge warning. If you see him do anything weird or disruptive hit the little triangular "Report Post" icon under the post and let me know.
  17. rawTOP
    He reached out to me on Facebook last night. I was just about thinking he was for real when I noticed his FB profile was started last month. Something just doesn't feel right about him. And he's disruptive.
  18. rawTOP
    It would need to be a manual edit of the robots.txt file on my part, but I'm planning a site migration at which point it will stop working. Realize that Google doesn't see everything. Check the site in a different browser and don't login if you want to see what Google sees.
  19. rawTOP
    In my judgement the new user (& newly poz user) that came on the site recently, jtonic, was so over the top in his hysteria that he wasn't for real. He was basically spamming the site with the same concept in every post - and not really listening to what people were telling him. I've banned him for 3 days. On the off chance he was for real in 3 days he will have thought things through and his discussion should be more cogent. I realize some of you may disagree with what I've done. So be it. I've seen all sorts of weirdos come on the site over the years trying to disrupt the flow of things. jtonic was a bit more subtle, but still quite disruptive. Everything he needed to hear was stated already. It's not like anything new was going to be said. If he is for real, I wish him well. But Breeding Zone needs to get back to it's ordinary mix of activity.
  20. rawTOP
    That's not at all what I said. I said, for the moment, you're not ready to deal with disclosure issues so stick to situations where you don't have to disclose. For god's sake pull yourself together and stop being so hysterical. I'm about to ban you because you're starting to sound fake - like someone baiting the guys on the site. Enough all ready.
  21. rawTOP
    After reading your post in another thread I'm going to change my recommendations for you... Stick to one of two things - 1) anonymous sex in bathhouses, or 2) seek out guys who specifically say they're poz or poz-friendly. In both cases there's no need to disclose. Honestly, I don't think you're ready to disclose your status to anyone yet - you'll kill the mood and it will be bad sex. So stick to circumstances where no disclosure is required. I'd also mention that you might want to seek out guys who specifically want unmedicated poz guys (bug chasers and poz guys who are looking for a "recharge"). I think you could use the ego boost of someone who wants you exactly the way you are.
  22. rawTOP
    IMHO it depends on the circumstances. If you're ass up in a bathhouse I don't think there's a need to disclose that your cummy ass is poz. Plus, it's hard for tops to get HIV from bottoms, and if you're taking his dick and load no questions asked he should just assume you're poz. For online hookups ideally just put "poz" as your status in the profile and be done with it. Or at least an "ask me". For a hookup in a bar - that's where you might need to disclose. Know the HIV disclosure laws in your area and follow them. If it's not required legally then it's up to you. Once again it's not particularly easy to poz a top (I've fucked many poz bottoms and stayed neg). There is a greater risk if the top is uncut. But bottom line - just do what feels appropriate, and don't lie when asked a direct question.
  23. rawTOP
    It's about time the big HIV/AIDS organizations start changing their tune on HIV prevention. Their message has been so out of touch for so long that it's probably caused quite a few infections as they continue to push unrealistic approaches that are based on fear and stigma. Where I differ with Staley is in the push towards Treatment As Prevention where guys get pushed into treatment quickly after diagnosis. While I'm all for getting guys tested, I think they shouldn't feel pressured to go into treatment immediately unless they want to. His approach, once again, puts the onus on poz guys for reducing infection rates. And when that fails it becomes their fault. IMHO, neg guys should shoulder the responsibility for staying neg. It's their body, their health.
  24. rawTOP
    This is just factually wrong. If he was undetectable, then there were no bullets in his gun. If you want to talk about risk talk about neg guys who aren't on PrEP. Recently I saw someone say that 85% of infections are caused by people like that. I need to verify the number, but it seems about right. HIV is predominately spread by people who think they're neg. And this is your last warning. I don't tolerate factually incorrect statements that are used to vilify people. Say it again and I'll ban you. Ditto for anyone else who repeats false statements in this thread. On a more personal note - from 1991 to early 1995 (before ARVs, back when HIV actually killed you), I lived with a guy who strongly implied he was neg when he was actually poz - and had been poz for years. Long story, but I stayed with him after I found out and while he was sick just before he died. In retrospect he wasn't being honest with himself either. He knew he was poz but he just couldn't come to terms with it. It wasn't just me he was lying to. So I've gone through being lied to back in a time when it could have killed me, and I'm sorry - it's not as simple as just blaming the poz guy. They have the right to be human as well and you don't really know what's going on in their head. HIV Criminalization is a huge problem - it is not the solution. HIV criminalization leads to fear, stigma, fewer guys getting tested, and hence more infections. Especially now that's there's PrEP - the responsibility for staying neg belongs to the neg guy, not the poz guy.
  25. rawTOP
    No one is to blame. Nothing happened. The OP is still neg. The risk isn't just "lower", it's zero - and that makes a huge difference. Find me one person who's been infected by someone who's consistently undetectable and has no other STDs (which is included in the "I'm clean" statement). The scientists and public health folks can't find anyone who's been infected. And this is 18 years after the advent of ARVs. If such cases existed, we'd know about them. Since there was zero risk, how exactly was the guy mislead about the risk? The poz guy's only moral obligation is to not infect someone who is making a concerted effort to stay neg. If there's no chance of infection, then there's no moral obligation. To say that discrimination against poz guys is OK because people are ignorant is wrong-headed. Arrogance is thinking it's OK that someone suffers because of your ignorance.

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.