Jump to content

rawTOP

Administrators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,082

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Everything posted by rawTOP

  1. rawTOP
    Vaseline was pretty standard in 70s in the heyday of gay sex. It's name (and KY) were almost synonymous with lube.
  2. rawTOP
    Easiest way is to tell them to cum in the condom and then afterwards take the condom and dump it's contents up your ass. It's difficult for the bottom to reliably get a condom to break or fall off.
  3. rawTOP
    There's a warning dialog that you have to say Yes to. It confirms your age, that you're not working for law enforcement, that you take responsibility for what you read on the site and won't use it against anyone, etc. If you say 'no' to that (which apparently you are), then you're taken to one of my Male Prime sites which are "family friendly".
  4. rawTOP
    That's how it will look. Final colors may vary, but that's all.
  5. rawTOP
    Given that PrEP appears to be effective when taken 4x/week, you might think of skipping a few doses here and there to stretch the time you have to get a new script once you get to LA.
  6. rawTOP
    It's under development.
  7. rawTOP
    Just thought I'd let you guys know my bf and I have been working on logos and such the past day. I mentioned in another thread that BBBH.com got a logo… There's also another version of the logo on the BBBH Facebook page - one that reduces to a small icon better (we're still playing with colors). But CumdumpNetwork.com got a logo as well… Cumdump Network will be a sub-site of #BBBH which will let cumdumps have public profiles with contact details so non-member tops can contact them for a fuck. I haven't been very good about getting things done on those sites. Now that I have some branding I feel more motivated - so fingers crossed - I still hope to have the sites up and running by the end of the year. Any thoughts on the logos?
  8. rawTOP
    What dead links are you talking about?
  9. rawTOP
    There's a lot of discussion about biohazard tattoos, but with news that undetectable guys can't transmit the virus, a biohazard tattoo is really more symbolic than literal since most poz guys who have one are on meds. The other day I was looking at a video that featured Italo Gang and I noticed he had SEX tattooed on his lower back as a tramp stamp. That got me thinking… I liked his tattoo, but was thinking that #BBBH might be even better. When Italo bends over and his shirt pulls up and random people see his tattoo, they know he's a slut, but may not know exactly what type of slut. But what if you wanted to communicate a message just to other barebackers? #BBBH sorta achieves that. Your average straight friend may not know what it means, but other barebackers will know exactly what it means. So, the last few days my boyfriend has been working on the design of BBBH.com. The logo is done, so I had him do an outline version for the purposes of a tramp stamp tattoo… If anyone is interested as that as a tattoo, there's a vector image file version of it that a tattoo artist can resize… https://bbbh.com/ui/bbbh.com/resources/bbbh-outline.ai I'll be happy to do stuff for anyone who goes for it and gets tattooed with the #BBBH logo - free t-shirts, free premium memberships on the hookup sites I'm working on, etc. So what do you guys think of the idea of a #BBBH tramp stamp? Could you see yourself getting one? Would seeing one on a bottom be a turn on? If you were at a sex party or sex club would you be more likely to give your load to a bottom who had one? UPDATE: If you'd prefer a cumdump tattoo - I've got ideas for that too…
  10. rawTOP
    So you're not having sex on holiday? That sounds boring! The other part of the equation is how risky was the sex you had before stopping. If you put your ass up in a bathhouse and took 15 anonymous loads then you may want to take the pills longer than if you got fucked by an undetectable guy or another guy on PrEP...
  11. rawTOP
    I'm not quite sure the context of your question, but if you're thinking of starting and stopping it on a regular basis - don't. Once on PrEP stay on PrEP. Especially with the results of recent studies it's probably OK to take it just 4 times a week - that's what I do - I take it Mon, Wed, Fri & Sun (plus on "off days" if I was a slut the day before). But whatever you do - don't drop below 4 times a week - the effectiveness starts dropping pretty quickly below 4x/week.
  12. rawTOP
    Compliment him on his pic. Let's him know you saw it and liked it. Yeah, it's a bit flirty, but as long as you're completely cool with it, he will be too. Whether he then takes the next step after that is up to him.
  13. rawTOP
    There is no such thing as 0% risk in life.
  14. rawTOP
    I only wait for the required week after treatment. If I have symptoms my doc treats me immediately, so never more than a week wait. I work on the assumptions that no symptoms and no test result (yet), then I'm good to go.
  15. rawTOP
    Small claims court. I'd love to see something like that go in front of Judge Judy. I think she'd rip them a new asshole.
  16. rawTOP
    Getting back to the original subject - here's a blog post on some of the tactics being used by the anti-PrEP crowd and how they have little, if any, basis in fact… http://blogs.poz.com/peter/archives/2014/07/anti_prep_scare_tactics.html
  17. rawTOP
    Are you saying that women need men's point of view to come to the right conclusion? That they can't figure out the moral issues on their own? What exactly will men contribute to the conversation that women can't figure out on their own? How is it any of men's business? It's not their bodies. I disagree. Neg guys have a very different relationship to ARVs than poz guys. We can can skip does, etc. The poz perspective can color the discussions in ways that are unhelpful. That said there are times when the poz perspective can be useful (when the neg guy gets to the point of having side effects) or when they're the only people around who have any experience with ARVs (e.g. "don't worry - I take multiple pills and it's no big deal for me"), but I think the poz guy has to keep reminding themselves that there's a decent chance the neg guy is having a different experience with the meds - and that's not an easy thing to keep in mind.
  18. rawTOP
    I think you have grounds for a malpractice suit. Nothing motivates doctors to do the right thing more than the fear of a lawsuit. If doctors start hearing that they can be sued over it, they won't say no when guys ask to go on PrEP.
  19. rawTOP
    My doctor only did a simple rapid test before giving me PrEP as well - and he's gay and practicing in one of the biggest gay and lesbian health centers in the nation. I wouldn't worry too much about the rapid test vs the RNA test. It sounds like you're in an area where getting care will be hard and you've got someone who may not be 100% current on things, but she's willing to do research and say she was wrong. PrEP isn't that hard to monitor - personally I'd stick with her unless you think you can get better care elsewhere. Just make sure you stay informed - it's not a bad idea to know more than your NP, take her copies of new studies when you see her, etc.
  20. rawTOP
    He's been banned for a few days for this comment. It is refuted by recent scientific studies that clearly show that guys on PrEP do not have riskier sex (on average). The rates of syphilis (an indicator of bareback sex) are identical to guys who don't take PrEP. And studies are confirming the previous theories that PrEP is at least as effective as condoms at preventing HIV. Since his comment was wrong on many levels and only served to promote fear, uncertainty and doubt - he was banned.
  21. rawTOP
    Maybe you should read the statement and the clarification more closely… "Additional choice", "full range of options" - That makes it completely clear that they're recommending that they see PrEP as an alternative to condoms - or it can be used in conjunction with condoms for even greater efficacy. The comparison with birth control is right on target - Yes, you could take multiple forms of birth control, but typically one is more than sufficient.
  22. rawTOP
    Either way - it doesn't make a difference. If a condom statement is in there it's only a gesture to the traditionalists who don't like change. TasP is becoming more and more accepted as people see it work.
  23. rawTOP
    I think the CDC and and the WHO dropped the part about condoms.
  24. rawTOP
    100% within the sample. Real world experience may vary slightly - that's why statisticians have "confidence intervals". Typically statisticians look at the range of numbers where they'd be 99% or 95% confident that the real-world results fall within that range. The bigger the sample size the smaller the confidence interval. In this case you'd choose the lower limit of one of those and that's the number you discuss publicly as the effectiveness of the treatment. So even now you can't say "100% effective", but you can definitely say things like "at least as effective as condoms - probably more so". Which really is the message that needs to get out.
  25. rawTOP
    Right, reading between the lines - if skipping it completely isn't that big of a deal then taking it late is even less of a big deal. We neg guys have a completely different relationship with meds than poz guys. We can be more relaxed about them. It's only a problem when we get completely complacent that there's reason to worry.

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.