Jump to content

TaKinGDeePanal

Senior Members
  • Posts

    1,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TaKinGDeePanal

  1. 2 towns away from me lol
  2. The RW loons never send any scrutineers. In both instances, the candidates who I was scrutineering for both won their booths.
  3. We had 3 candidates in ours. One is a Reich Whinge loon who was actually suspended 2 years ago when he was a Councillor. One never goes under his real name. I voted for the other one, as one of my friends (who was running for Council herself) endorsed her. Which Council, might I ask? My friend was running in Merri-bek (she was the Mayor there a couple of years ago, and was running this time as an Independent) and I'm in Hume.
  4. I think you're referring to the Senate. BTW re: housing - NEITHER side wanted to spend enough - and then the govt told the Greens that they were assholes for "not respecting the government's mandate" because the Greens want to build 1,000,000 new homes over 20 years, while the government think that 30,000 over 5 years (including just 4,000 for social housing - which nobody is going to be actually eligible for) will "permanently solve the problem of homelessness".
  5. You have to rank EVERYONE (apart from your last choice) on a House of Representatives Ballot in Australia. For the Senate, it's different, but I rank everyone as the Parties have decided IN SECRET where votes are directed if you don't rank everyone. For example, one Senator (Malcolm Roberts) won a seat with only 77 Primary Votes - however, due to aforesaid backroom Party deals, he won enough Ranked Choice votes to take office (and yes, he's pretty much the closest thing we have to a fascist in the Senate): [think before following links] https://www.tallyroom.com.au/29932; [think before following links] https://independentaustralia.net/life/life-display/one-nation-and-the-rise-of-fascism,10149 Ranked voting is a way for shit candidates to direct their votes to even more shit candidates. For example, say Trump has 37%, Harris 47%, Green Party 2%, RFK (who is still on some ballot papers) 10%, West 4%. If Stein and Kennedy advise their voters to put Harris last (and we ALL know they would, plus generally their voters are as bad as they are) - and West puts out a 50-50 advisement (as some candidates do), that means that Trump picks up 14% (2+10+4/2), which puts him in the White House. You also would then have the spectacle of people handing out "How To Vote Cards", which in a country where people are being encouraged to attend polling stations with automatic weapons, could very well see things turn deadly on Election Day. While it is compulsory for voters to attend a polling station and collect their ballot, it is actually NOT compulsory for them to cast a valid vote. Some people fill it out incorrectly. Some people drop a blank ballot into the box. Some people deface their ballot paper. It usually runs at 4-6% of the vote (I've scrutineered before).
  6. One of our two major parties in Australia has pretty much gone full loony - and the other one has broken a slew of promises. However, RCV DEMANDS that you still give one of them a higher preference.
  7. Actually, it means a LOT of backroom deals before the official advisement from each candidate of preferences - not exactly a democratic process ...
  8. You forgot those who hand out "How To Vote Cards" ... 10 candidates? Yikes. I only had to choose between 3.
  9. It sounds hot - and I'd love you to do it to me.
  10. Apart from devil's dicks, the only use for a condom is so that you can keep your vibrating egg from absorbing things it shouldn't when it's lodged in your ass and on maximum setting ...
  11. @joeri - hoT twist.
  12. Looking at what you post, I'm not sure you actually do - unless you're using two profiles, and have posted under the wrong one.
  13. As Neal is a doctor, this leads to new possibiliTies ...
  14. The 13th Amendment (a GQP construct) still permits slavery "in state-mandated cases" - and Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation only referred to black slaves in the Confederacy. In truth, Lincoln basically only GAF so far as slavery was concerned as an economic weapon: [think before following links] https://www.loc.gov/collections/abraham-lincoln-papers/articles-and-essays/abraham-lincoln-and-emancipation/
  15. and I need your cock in mine ...
  16. Fuck, I LOVE Jack-in-the-Box. Take note, @versmetropig ...
  17. Guessing it's Molly/MDMA, seeing as the character in this story "ate" it, thereby suggesting some sort of pill.
  18. All Sydney guys: @Anonass has a great ass. You'll enjoy it.
  19. @versmetropig - sadly not enough time to do even a quarter of what we wanted to do, but the two of us (and his friends) will be making amends for that later this year ...
  20. @viking8x6 - I was just about to post the same question. Any hints as to where we can find such a list? Thank you 🙂
  21. There's one way around it. You could submit it to a site (with whatever edits you need), then post the link here.
  22. I might look innocenT, but you're welcome to take my innocence ...
  23. While chems can be done off-camera, the livestreaming of abuse of people would still be classified as a criminal act, and therefore subject to prosecution.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.