topblkmale

43 minutes ago, NWUSHorny said:

Personally I think he will pick Kari Lake as his VP. She has a very similar mentality, and enjoyed his kind of popularity and electoral success and then "unfairly" prevented from taking office.

While I believe if offered, Kari Lake would accept the VP spot. However, Trump would lose some of his hardcore base by picking a woman.

There is nothing wrong with the acronym BBC. 

18 hours ago, TaKinGDeePanal said:

Does that still theoretically mean that the RNC could overturn the results of the Colorado Primaries on the floor of its 2024 Convention if the other results end up being close (with no Winner) - or order the electors for CO to become false electors if nobody gets to 270 in November - but the difference is less than 10 and Trump is still the Official GQP Nominee?

This would only negatively impact the 2024 Dem candidate (Biden or Clinton/Obama/Newsom/Harris)

Colorado's 10 electoral votes would be subtracted from Biden's electoral count...(not added to Trump's count).

This is Obama's 2008 playbook. Its how he beat Hillary. He removed Michigan and Florida electors from the primaries.

2 hours ago, TaKinGDeePanal said:

Haley knows how evil he is, so I doubt that she would want to be on the ticket.

Carlson? You surely can't mean that POS on television? His bio sold a total of 3,227 copies in its first week of sales (and this includes the pre-sales figure).

Smarmynazi might be an outlier. Same policies, same background.

Abbott has gone against Trump enough times for him not to be a contender.

What's the bet that he'll pick one of his spawn instead (provided that no other State that Colorado disqualifies him from the ballot: [think before following links] [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.denverpost.com/2023/12/19/donald-trump-colorado-ballot-case-supreme-court-14th-amendment/ )?

 

Vivek will certainly NOT be Trump's VP pick. 

Vivek will be Trump's bottom bitch in 2024.

For context, Trump's name will not be listed in the 2024 presidential primary ballot. Write-ins won't be counted either.

On 12/8/2023 at 5:28 AM, HoneyBuns1980 said:

Other than Tucker Carlson, there’s none out there. Unless you think an unholy alliance with DeSatan is the way forward. I’m thinking they’re going to want that female swing vote demographic that typically votes Democratic. I don’t think they’ll get it with Trump as the GOP nominee if he’s standing there with another gas bag White guy like him. 
 

As long as the MSM keeps pushing the Haley-is-the-most-qualified narrative (which, I believe they are/will), the #2 spot is hers to lose. The question then - for her - would be: is she willing to stoop that low? I think it’s 50/50. Whereas, DeSatan would jump at the opportunity - it’d be the only way he ever makes it to the White House, and would give him an edge over Newsom if/when they do finally square off - I still wouldn’t be surprised if Tim Scott found his way back into the mix if Haley shows any apprehension. 

Trump will lose supporters if he picks Haley as VP. He'll lose even more support if he picks anyone else from the GOP debates. DeSantis is a meme at this point.

The deeper you shoot the load, the less the bottom will push out.

Nothing about government buildings in DC is sexy. Even the bathhouse there is cold and sterile with DC types. It feels like a free government clinic when you enter.

An insur-erection. A threat to democracy.

9 hours ago, hntnhole said:

Can someone give me a brief explanation of what a "troll" (in the above context of this post) actually is?  It seems that a human (?) called Harry has been stirring this pot - is a "troll" (not in the sense of a broken-down old person) some mechanical device?  Or an actual human behaving like a troll .... 

1a & 1c below:

troll

1a. Noun
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument.

1b. Noun
A person who, on a message forum of some type, attacks and flames other members of the forum for any of a number of reasons such as rank, previous disagreements, sex, status, ect. A troll usually flames threads without staying on topic, unlike a "Flamer" who flames a thread because he/she disagrees with the content of the thread.

1c. Noun
A member of an internet forum who continually harangues and harasses others. Someone with nothing worthwhile to add to a certain conversation, but rather continually threadjacks or changes the subject, as well as thinks every member of the forum is talking about them and only them. Trolls often go by multiple names to circumvent getting banned.

2a. Noun
Sometimes compared to the Japanese ‘Oni’, a troll is a supernatural creature of Scandinavian folklore, whose race was thought to have carried massive stones into the countryside (although actually the result of glaciers). Lives in hills, mountains, caves, or under bridges. They are stupid, large, brutish, hairy, long-nosed, and bug-eyed, and may also have multiple heads or horns. Trolls love to eat people, especially small children.
The Females of the species are generally kinder and more intelligent, but still fairly hideous.

2b. Noun
An aesthetically repulsive person, often has terrible social skills, usually a woman. See Troglodyte.

2c. Noun
An old, unattractive gay man who hits on young men, and cannot seem to understand that they want nothing to do with him.

3a. Verb
To fish by dragging bait behind a moving motor-boat.

3b. Verb
To cruise for immediate sexual pleasure without commitment. Often characterized by an older man, seeking a younger man, or any man for immediate, often anonymous sexual contact.

4. Noun
A joke disguised as an outrageously stupid statement or question, intended to trap people into believing it is serious.

5. Verb
To use **** and **** simultaneously. See trolling.
(Comes from ‘Tripping’ on ***, and ‘Rolling’ on ******)

6. Noun
A toy popular in the 1980’s, a ‘troll’ is a cute little plastic trolls with fluffy, colored hair.

On 12/13/2023 at 1:06 PM, cumcravingbottom said:

i know this one top that has fucked me on and off for 10 hours without cumming

I must be old-school. That used to be called we fucking all night.

I can only imagine what happens on Amazon Prime Day.

Most younger cum-dump bottoms only want 5-minute tops. They don't want to be away from their iPhones for that long.

I shoot for that second hole. 9-pointers. Double overtime. All net. SWOOSH!

My on-call cocksucker always says 'thank you' after he swallows my load.

What I call ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ service! 👍

Respect is not owed to anyone because they're from a marginalized group. Respect is earned.

This is America where we enjoy Freedom of association. 

Persons with vaginas don't belong in gay bathhouses. Full stop.

1 hour ago, BathhouseBottom said:

You mean women in gay spas. Gay men have actually been brainwashed to accept pussy at the spa!!!! Thank the farleft media for destroying every facet of our society even gay spas 

Exactly! 👍

6 minutes ago, BootmanLA said:

With respect to notices: I think the point is that bathhouses (and indeed, most, if not all, commercial institutions) should post any "rules of the joint" as well as notices of "special rules for special nights". Those could be as simple as "restrooms for customers only" (which you'll often see in tourist area restaurants, bars, and stores) or as complex as "Trans men are welcome in this space" in a bathhouse. And those notices can be temporary, as in "Tonight's bi-night" or whatever, signaling a temporary change in an otherwise general policy.

To me, the latter is like going to a restaurant that's normally fairly quiet, and finding that tonight, there's live country (or other genre) music all evening when you don't like that kind of music. You decide whether it's worth putting up with the music you dislike, in order to eat the food you want; or you go somewhere else to find different food that's acceptable; or you go eat at home; or you skip dinner. But it's the restaurant's choice whether to periodically change up the vibe of the space, and your choice whether to participate in their establishment's offerings or not.

In other words, @ErosWired, I'm not necessarily opposed to men-only spaces, particularly sexually-oriented ones that cater to men having sex with other men. I'm not opposed to such places limiting (if they choose) to cis men; I'm not opposed to them welcoming trans men. What seems overkill to me is the attitude some men here seem to have that a bathhouse is irrevocably tainted if there's a man born with a vagina somewhere on the premises - that the entire experience is ruined for him just knowing that such a person is in the facility.

Many gay men are adverse to vaginal sex just as most straight men are adverse to anal sex (with males~with penises).

7 minutes ago, harrysmith26 said:

Ever since about the 2nd half of 2021 I've realised both Joe Biden and his son (Hunter) look like they would kill their son on the spot if they came out as gay. Or in Joe's case he would just try to do some feeble punch or slap cause of him being an old fart.

They just look like loathsome Scranton trailer trash who would do that, basically. 

Trump voiced his support for gay rights at the 2016 Republican convention, he had no plans to try and undo gay marriage, and all criticisms of him are ancient shit he said in the 1970s, or talking about his VP Mike Pence, who fulfilled a ceremonial role.

It's easy for Joe to say he's "pro-gay" that's just another policy and having a pride event at the White House - that's just "another event". After all there is no known member of the Biden family who is LGBT. I'm sure we can come back to the topic of how someone can say they support something in public but be different in private.

All I see on social media is lefties saying "i'm loving seeing Trump supporters crying" and "i love the taste of your tears" ... etc. So horrendous - I wasn't one of the ones who said stupid shit like "liberal tears". In 2016 when all those Hilary supporters were uh... you know, actually crying on election night, I just looked at them with a mild bemusement and some pity, then I moved on.

If you agree with all my assessments, please indicate by calling this a "screeeeed" or something predictable like that. Thanks!

Seems you're new here.

Most in this forum, since its LGBT, are leftie liberal.

So is this a troll post?

What if the transman is straight and wants to bring his woman along for some fun? Why not be inclusive of straight men (and women)?

Is the Atlanta bathhouse Flex still active there?

20 hours ago, hug said:

I'd like to know what other languages use to describe such an act. Barebacking itself comes from the equestrian term bareback, which is the practice of riding a horse without a saddle. In this case, the saddle would be a metaphor for a condom.

a pelo (español)

possibly related to the term for 'bald'

33 minutes ago, hntnhole said:

I don't know which "debate" you watched, but it couldn't have been the R's most recent one.  That little (small in every way - particularly manners) man has no proposals to better the country, nor it's citizens/citizens-to-be.  All he does is shout over the others, waving that bony finger in the air.  His foreign policy stance is truly numb.  

He's toast.  

Perhaps no one you respect watches certain news channels, but that's nothing more than an embarrassing bloviation on your part.  

 

You're right.

I should have stated he's the GOP 2028 front runner. IMO

On 8/30/2022 at 7:15 AM, discreet4rough said:

I tried to find another topic about this, but I'm wondering if anyone has this fucked up attraction to dangerous men. Every time I see a man who I could see beat me up or unstable, I get scared, but that fear makes me horny as fuck. All I want is him to take me.

I think it came from early experience when I lost my virginity with this guy who got me high on weed and had his way with me. I was always scared of him, like there was some unstable part of him. To this day, it was the best fuck of my life.

Come down to New York. Ride the subway after rush hour. 10 PM on the weekend works best. The E train specifically. You'll see many dangerous unstable men. Some with very nice bodies. I've seen quite a few exposing themselves and masturbating. My only concern is little kids around to see that. Otherwise no one cares anymore. You'll experience what you're looking for.

On 12/6/2023 at 10:37 PM, Jose said:

The thing I hate the most is when I tell a dude I want to breed him and he says yea then when I’m at his house and about to put my dick in he asks me to put a condom on. Then I leave and I look like the asshole… it’s weird. Everyone knows what breeding is, fucking hate when dudes act like they don’t. 

He knows what breeding means. He does want it raw. But he's deciding in the moment based on other factors. Possibly looks or attraction.

Did this dude by chance claim "well I'm clean" before asking you to put on a condom?