TT2025

Yea, the bigger the better notion. 😂 For me, it may hold some truth, but up to about 8", then potential problems arise. But I actually had one of the best experiences with a boy with average dick. He was quite unsecure about it (even knowing he is average) and my bigger dick didn't help with that.. but this boy made me cum almost every time he fucked me (best in this metric I have ever met in my life). Frankly dick size isn't the main parameter upon which I let someone to fuck me (to exactly answer your question).

Remember it well (about 25 years ago). My first time raw was first time EVER. It happened when I was on sleepover with my friend (2 years my senior). We messed around before and he even tried to fuck me.. But we were young and stupid, so he rushed things and the pain was quite intense so we stopped. This time however he did some research in the internet (thank God for the dial-up connection!) and so he talked me into trying it again (slowly, me in control and with a sunscreen as lube). This time he was really gentle and patient, so after few minutes head of his cock was in my ass, so he slowly pushed his cock all the way.. Wow that felt so amazing that I wanted him to pull out and slide inside again (repeatedly). He remarked, that it seems to feel great if I wanted him so bad to repeat that. Then he fucked me slowly and shot his load deep inside. It went like that almost every sleepover with him after this episode 😍

Don't like randoms / strangers / onetimers. As a bottom I like to know how to please the top. Yea, I KNOW IT IN GENERAL.. but the variability of preferences is huge. So the second to third hookup is usually the peak in the context of me 'reading' the top. How he likes to be sucked, what the preferred position is, what he doesn't like, etc. And the guys usually tend to hold back on their kinks for longer. The harder stuff usually surfaces much later. With 80+ kilos, reasonably toned, I am probably deemed dangerous if freaked out, so the guys seem to be extra careful when deciding to grab me by the neck - I like it BTW 🙂 Actually don't care much where you live, or what is your job, but I really want to know how to fuck with you proper 😁

As the US officials are up in the ass of everyone in Kremlin, and are shopping in Moscow malls these things get publicized: [think before following links] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/29/viktoriia-roshchyna-ukrainian-journalist-death-russian-prison Its about Ukrainian journalist detained in Russia. Some gruesome reading, I must say ("...However, the exact cause of death may never be known because when her body was returned during the exchange on 14 February, certain parts were missing, namely the brain, eyes and larynx..."). Hope Mr. Witkoff will show some more respect to Russians he is dealing with, they are really some respectful people...

Don't think its about censorship (least not from EU).. The CNN was the US one (not one of those franchise offshoots). And BBC World service isn't practically EU anymore. But its hard to handle watching news for prolonged time.. Made me sick to listen that the US stance is that the Russia made big concessions by agreeing not to take whole Ukraine. (Yep, that is the world we live in). One wants to ask: What about returning Alaska to keep Vladimir happy? Even The Guardian or New Yorker aren't big on protests about el presidente. So don't know.. Are those protests you're talking about so big and consequential? (rhetoric question)

I believe you, BUT I today actually spent an hour watching CNN, some recap on France24, and part of BBC World News America. My take from all this is as follows: White House bickering, Trump is going to install new (BIGGER) flagpoles on White House, Washington is doing the Kremlin's bidding, Pope is dead, Musk is going to spend more time doing whatever.. and no reaction from the public was shown. Well, BBC added something extra, which I decoded as: 'Washington wants Ukraine to secede Crimea to Russia'. A while ago I saw some protesters in a news piece with a sign about Vance and skiing in jeans. Fun stuff 🙂

I mean that the majority electoral system (which BTW is implemented in US and only few other countries) by design doesn't allow for gradual change... In our system, when a party gets more than 5% of votes it is guaranteed seat(s) in the parliament (so it can be somewhat visible). One-party government is usually unheard of. So when one party fucks up, there is usually shift in power dynamics. Sometimes huge one. We have had parties, which ruled country for multiple terms (in some coalition), totalling more than 30% of votes, which went to fringes (and some came back to power). So left or right, you have at least two parties which you can vote for (and can be certain ti will be in the parliament). So if one of the fucks up great deal, it risks loosing all, because there is always viable alternative with similar programme.

Would love there was some communication-empathy courses for medical personal in my country. I witnessed how my friend was informed about proceedings about his mother death standing like 20 minutes in a hallway of hospital. (I thought: what a heck! You can't have some place quiet, to sit?) He was near collapsing when I dragged him from the hospital... (And yes, and I have some other horrific experiences with healthcare.) The thing is when trust is lost it is very hardly (if ever) regained back. But back to the topic - it looks like that it doesn't apply to US politics. Maybe it is for the reason you practically have only two political parties to choose from. There is no way to somehow stop voting for one ever, cause it will by totalitarian (One party system? We had that, don't recommend it.) So even after some interesting things (Nixon, Kissinger era) people didn't stop voting Republican.

FB does the same thing. As he is getting close, he fucks me harder and harder, but when he shoots a load it is balls deep as he can make it. It is some sort of instinctive drive, I suppose. If I (very) occasionally top, it is balls deep as well.

And so aren't they dodging their duty? It will not cost them dear in the next elections? They sit there, do nothing, say nothing - what a good representation. (Would you vote for someone like that?) My reasoning is that if you're loud enough, people get notice. Isn't that opportunity to show some moral fortitude and consistency? These people weren't voted for office just to be passive enablers..

You are right, but I have a better advice: If someone thought plausible that their bank is exchanging passwords in plaintext (or even better using HTTP auth in URL) should find a better bank. 🤣 (Sorry, couldn't hold my horses on that one.)

You, my friend, should give some people more credit. Sure not all the supporters of Donald are dumb sheep... The problem as I see it is lack of meaningful public discourse - political opposition used to be good for that some years back (least in my country). If there are people who are showed propaganda in the face constantly, they might stop thinking critically and someone must remind them that. Here in EU we have this 'Green Deal' thing - lot of dogmatic supporters and dogmatic opponents, well I'm none of them, so I tried to discuss with the opponent of this. Using this kind of reasoning: 'It sure has some good stuff in it and must be implemented (if at all) with a great consideration. By the way you installed heatpump a decade ago without anyone telling you to do so.' He was, yea, right then spit out some made up stuff circulating the news and internet. So I said: 'You must see, that these things are not feasible if not paid by the government or even ever.' And he was: 'Yea, thought it might be exaggeration.' So you can't just rule vast majority out as lunatics... You are risking their future actions to be fuelled out of spite towards you. - Does Brexit ring any bells? 😉

Yep, oratory capabilities of some folks are just out of this world. However I must apologize for saying it is short.. It is relatively to how it is packed with information and argument. But I strongly encourage everyone to give it a try. 😊

Woa, what moron came up with that PReP prerequisites? (And I thought we have it hard to get on PReP.) PeP is not available (probably not or some beautiful rules attached as well)? Well you could try to talk him into it (in advance). I mean explain worries and offer test as a way out (compromise as it really is, cause it sure isn't 100% bulletproof). Then you'll continue by his reaction (insist or back down). Two tests seem to be overkill, but would be nice if you took test yourself - just out of solidarity, purely psychological reasons (thou you could have better chance of success, when you want him to do what you will do also).

I admit, the kickoff was quite simplistic, but of course, I can elaborate: In past decades the US created and wielded what many call 'soft power' so it could nudge other states in certain directions, encourage/discourage some actions simply by asking nicely (or maybe not so nicely), nevertheless just by asking. And I'm pretty sure many things happened only after careful deliberation of 'what the Americans will think od it'. It was made easier for the governments of 'affected' countries the high approval rating of the US by general population. Poland for example had approval rating of USA above 90% (Poles, probably thought more highly of USA than its own citizens...). But actual establishment is deliberately ruining all that, so less 'soft power'. I would think, given the chance, everybody would rather live in a country, which is loved and respected, than hated and mocked. I'm sure, US (its actual government) could have much of what it wants by just playing it nicely (tariffs, border security, probably not Canada or Greenland). Its called diplomacy, I think (not an expert). When I saw Donald's: "...pease, please, we do everything.." speech I was horrified and I would have been even as US citizen (maybe more so). US is now just spitting insults with nothing to gain from it and it starts to have real consequences (eg. consumer boycotts, reevaluating strategic purchases). And there are probably some psychological consequences of being citizen of a country that used to be 'greatest in the world' to 'that odd bunch which wants to annex Canada and believes that Ukraine invaded itself with Russian tanks'. So my position is that public should be concerned.. It visibly was during Occupy WS in 2011 (but it was about the money.) I actually promoted it here once, but people still bumping into the subject which is explained in essay TWO CONCEPTS OF LIBERTY, Isaiah Berlin. In short its about difference between freedom from and an sinister version of liberty, which always ends up in totalitarian disaster. It is short and enlightening, promise 🙂