TT2025
-
Posts
61 -
Joined
-
Last visited
10 Followers
.thumb.JPG.2817f3b13bc5c8cce6d369b7d75bee6c.JPG)
Recent Profile Visitors
360 profile views
TT2025's Achievements
-
Sure, I could elaborate. By the term 'oppressive' in the context I meant setting 'needless' rules which forbade someone or coerce someone to act differently that he would otherwise would. The problem is NEEDLESS. We could all agree that we need some set of rules of engagement with each other, liberals tend to set these rules in a way to create more manoeuvring space for different individuals. Eg. anti gay laws were always heavy on the conservatives agenda... You mentioned some examples, but I would add one special one: Iran, when Shah ruled there, it was a 'liberal' dictatorship, I suppose, but there is a difference between allowing women to study uni (not forcing them), or not demanding a dress code, and what they have now. A really conservative dictatorship of ayatollahs. The fun story about Turkey (don't know if it is true): When progressives wanted get away with headscarfs on women they didn't forbade them, but made it compulsory for prostitutes to wear them 🙂 Don't know what the economic and libertarian conservatives are. In my limited understanding libertarian and conservative are antagonistic in essence. (Not trying to go in a fight there.) -
Few hours ago.. (gave one and took one). FB came to my place. He was in a mood for trying to bottom. So after some 69 foreplay he talked me into fucking him... It was quite fun, cause he is somewhat 'new' to M2M, and I suspect he doesn't really get the top-bottom stuff (probably expect that if he can fuck me, I sure can fuck him no problem). As a bottom I got somewhat derailed by the request (and with his finger in my ass, I expected something different). So after hearing the proposition and seeing that he clearly painfully showed dildo in his ass as a preparation for the act, my dick went soft. 🫠 After he saw that he asked If I had a Viagra at hand.. (didn't help either) 😂 I tried to explain that as a bottom I am not used to this sort of things.. (but promised to try). After about two to three minutes I was up to go for it. So I fucked him kissing the back of his neck and shoot a load in.. Then we swapped the positions and he had his go cumming in my ass. Topping is fun, but I prefer to bottom.
-
I scanned the study briefly and for me, It works as expected (on the conservative-liberal line). In historical and also contemporary perspective conservatives tend to be oppressive in nature. Liberals in their essence tend not to.. So if you are liberal you should be expected to be oppressed by the conservative folk in broader terms. So less sympathy to oppressing group is, I would say, natural. I can be wrong but I can't remember any dictatorship which was or is liberal in nature. All of them are 'conservative' (rigid structures and believes, usually allies to religious fundamentalists). Sorry but I myself can profess more empathy to teacher wanting to teach theory of evolution than some kind of fundamentalist zealot...
-
Yea, the bigger the better notion. 😂 For me, it may hold some truth, but up to about 8", then potential problems arise. But I actually had one of the best experiences with a boy with average dick. He was quite unsecure about it (even knowing he is average) and my bigger dick didn't help with that.. but this boy made me cum almost every time he fucked me (best in this metric I have ever met in my life). Frankly dick size isn't the main parameter upon which I let someone to fuck me (to exactly answer your question).
-
remember the first time you took raw dick?
TT2025 replied to SweetPiss's topic in General Discussion
Remember it well (about 25 years ago). My first time raw was first time EVER. It happened when I was on sleepover with my friend (2 years my senior). We messed around before and he even tried to fuck me.. But we were young and stupid, so he rushed things and the pain was quite intense so we stopped. This time however he did some research in the internet (thank God for the dial-up connection!) and so he talked me into trying it again (slowly, me in control and with a sunscreen as lube). This time he was really gentle and patient, so after few minutes head of his cock was in my ass, so he slowly pushed his cock all the way.. Wow that felt so amazing that I wanted him to pull out and slide inside again (repeatedly). He remarked, that it seems to feel great if I wanted him so bad to repeat that. Then he fucked me slowly and shot his load deep inside. It went like that almost every sleepover with him after this episode 😍 -
Don't like randoms / strangers / onetimers. As a bottom I like to know how to please the top. Yea, I KNOW IT IN GENERAL.. but the variability of preferences is huge. So the second to third hookup is usually the peak in the context of me 'reading' the top. How he likes to be sucked, what the preferred position is, what he doesn't like, etc. And the guys usually tend to hold back on their kinks for longer. The harder stuff usually surfaces much later. With 80+ kilos, reasonably toned, I am probably deemed dangerous if freaked out, so the guys seem to be extra careful when deciding to grab me by the neck - I like it BTW 🙂 Actually don't care much where you live, or what is your job, but I really want to know how to fuck with you proper 😁
-
As the US officials are up in the ass of everyone in Kremlin, and are shopping in Moscow malls these things get publicized: [think before following links] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/29/viktoriia-roshchyna-ukrainian-journalist-death-russian-prison Its about Ukrainian journalist detained in Russia. Some gruesome reading, I must say ("...However, the exact cause of death may never be known because when her body was returned during the exchange on 14 February, certain parts were missing, namely the brain, eyes and larynx..."). Hope Mr. Witkoff will show some more respect to Russians he is dealing with, they are really some respectful people...
-
Don't think its about censorship (least not from EU).. The CNN was the US one (not one of those franchise offshoots). And BBC World service isn't practically EU anymore. But its hard to handle watching news for prolonged time.. Made me sick to listen that the US stance is that the Russia made big concessions by agreeing not to take whole Ukraine. (Yep, that is the world we live in). One wants to ask: What about returning Alaska to keep Vladimir happy? Even The Guardian or New Yorker aren't big on protests about el presidente. So don't know.. Are those protests you're talking about so big and consequential? (rhetoric question)
-
I believe you, BUT I today actually spent an hour watching CNN, some recap on France24, and part of BBC World News America. My take from all this is as follows: White House bickering, Trump is going to install new (BIGGER) flagpoles on White House, Washington is doing the Kremlin's bidding, Pope is dead, Musk is going to spend more time doing whatever.. and no reaction from the public was shown. Well, BBC added something extra, which I decoded as: 'Washington wants Ukraine to secede Crimea to Russia'. A while ago I saw some protesters in a news piece with a sign about Vance and skiing in jeans. Fun stuff 🙂
-
I mean that the majority electoral system (which BTW is implemented in US and only few other countries) by design doesn't allow for gradual change... In our system, when a party gets more than 5% of votes it is guaranteed seat(s) in the parliament (so it can be somewhat visible). One-party government is usually unheard of. So when one party fucks up, there is usually shift in power dynamics. Sometimes huge one. We have had parties, which ruled country for multiple terms (in some coalition), totalling more than 30% of votes, which went to fringes (and some came back to power). So left or right, you have at least two parties which you can vote for (and can be certain ti will be in the parliament). So if one of the fucks up great deal, it risks loosing all, because there is always viable alternative with similar programme.
-
Would love there was some communication-empathy courses for medical personal in my country. I witnessed how my friend was informed about proceedings about his mother death standing like 20 minutes in a hallway of hospital. (I thought: what a heck! You can't have some place quiet, to sit?) He was near collapsing when I dragged him from the hospital... (And yes, and I have some other horrific experiences with healthcare.) The thing is when trust is lost it is very hardly (if ever) regained back. But back to the topic - it looks like that it doesn't apply to US politics. Maybe it is for the reason you practically have only two political parties to choose from. There is no way to somehow stop voting for one ever, cause it will by totalitarian (One party system? We had that, don't recommend it.) So even after some interesting things (Nixon, Kissinger era) people didn't stop voting Republican.
-
FB does the same thing. As he is getting close, he fucks me harder and harder, but when he shoots a load it is balls deep as he can make it. It is some sort of instinctive drive, I suppose. If I (very) occasionally top, it is balls deep as well.
-
And so aren't they dodging their duty? It will not cost them dear in the next elections? They sit there, do nothing, say nothing - what a good representation. (Would you vote for someone like that?) My reasoning is that if you're loud enough, people get notice. Isn't that opportunity to show some moral fortitude and consistency? These people weren't voted for office just to be passive enablers..
-
You are right, but I have a better advice: If someone thought plausible that their bank is exchanging passwords in plaintext (or even better using HTTP auth in URL) should find a better bank. 🤣 (Sorry, couldn't hold my horses on that one.)
-
You, my friend, should give some people more credit. Sure not all the supporters of Donald are dumb sheep... The problem as I see it is lack of meaningful public discourse - political opposition used to be good for that some years back (least in my country). If there are people who are showed propaganda in the face constantly, they might stop thinking critically and someone must remind them that. Here in EU we have this 'Green Deal' thing - lot of dogmatic supporters and dogmatic opponents, well I'm none of them, so I tried to discuss with the opponent of this. Using this kind of reasoning: 'It sure has some good stuff in it and must be implemented (if at all) with a great consideration. By the way you installed heatpump a decade ago without anyone telling you to do so.' He was, yea, right then spit out some made up stuff circulating the news and internet. So I said: 'You must see, that these things are not feasible if not paid by the government or even ever.' And he was: 'Yea, thought it might be exaggeration.' So you can't just rule vast majority out as lunatics... You are risking their future actions to be fuelled out of spite towards you. - Does Brexit ring any bells? 😉
