KinshipLab
-
Posts
377 -
Joined
-
Last visited
.thumb.JPG.2817f3b13bc5c8cce6d369b7d75bee6c.JPG)
Recent Profile Visitors
3,287 profile views
KinshipLab's Achievements
-
Hi @tobetrained, you may be conflating corporations, which describe the legal structure and method of recognizing profit and loss, with companies, which may or may not be organized as a corporation and which relate much more to the assets, value creation, and cost of value. This distinction may clarify why @Rillion rightly raises the inherent connection between corporations and governments. I’m enjoying this discussion but highly confused as to why anyone would trust a government - especially the Federal Government - to champion all people’s interests equally be they rich or poor. The Federal Government was founded by the war-bond elites in alliance with the slave-owning elites to ensure that the states didn’t default on their war bonds, using the Federal Governments brute force to derisk their investments. In all states, there were restrictions on voter eligibility to secure elite property by confiscating (taxing) money and spending it on armies that could put down rebellions of poor taxpayers e.g., whiskey rebellion, slave revolts, etc. certainly things have evolved, but it’s useful to remember the foundation we’re building on.
-
I wonder how much all of the Economic Impact Payments from all of the COVID-justified debt-balloon acts like CARES, ARP, yaddah are worth in today’s $? I wonder how many people noticed what a small percentage of the stimulus was going to “the people”?
-
Tops becoming always more agressive and rough
KinshipLab replied to IntoBBvisitor's topic in General Discussion
I’ve taken to asking tops I’ve never connected with if they could help reshape my hole so I can last as long as they need me to last. Most get excited by the idea and certainly get that it’s in their interests for me not to break before they are satisfied. Once that happens, it’s easier to achieve my goal of creating freedom and joy for a fucker. I have moved on from thinking it’s best to self-abnegate proactively, as I’ve been fucked by enough top pleasers to know that they get joy from giving me joy. In general, two pleasers coupling requires an enormous amount of emotional intelligence to back out of going with the first thing that comes out of the others’ mouth, really peeling back whether the scene is playing out to either one’s excitements or just an image ricocheting between two mirrors. -
Outercourse Another New Term For Non-penetrative Sex
KinshipLab replied to NWUSHorny's topic in General Discussion
FWIW despite misinterpretations of my point I stand firmly in the camp of more assfucking :-), better luck for me at saunas and sex clubs than at ABSs but I’ve definitely added them to the repertoire and looking forward to finding more raw fun there -
It seems that Liberals are the new Catholics when it comes to being born into a state of guilt.
-
Outercourse Another New Term For Non-penetrative Sex
KinshipLab replied to NWUSHorny's topic in General Discussion
Last time I was in Portland I got 5 loads in my ass at the sauna and flew them in me to the East Coast -
I didn't direct that at your comment @tobetrained. I felt that I was elucidating under-pondered aspects of current thinking that would support your point. I enjoy reading your commentaries @tobetrained partly because you seem to explore when intentions and outcomes diverge. I appreciate arguments that are essentially hypotheses (well represented in this blog) that simply provide a semblance of logic without any test of whether the logic is supported by facts or works in the real world. I find arguments that report real-world tests or case studies to be much more interesting, and I find arguments that actively look for the unintended consequences to be even more credible and interesting. @tobetrained, thanks for adding some of those juicier, less pat elements to your prose.
-
Outercourse Another New Term For Non-penetrative Sex
KinshipLab replied to NWUSHorny's topic in General Discussion
I can see why a fucker would be in the position less often of having to find pleasure in a situation that is less than ideal. Although I couldn't statistically confirm it, it seems that lots of gays have noticed that holes outnumber fuckers, and as a result, it would seem to be logically quicker for a fucker to find a hole than a hole to find a fucker. I bet most holes have to spend more time looking to be successful in getting a good fuck, especially if you are a less photogenic hole or a hole that falls further from the statistically most attractive qualities. I wonder if there are any statistics about that. I appreciate the comment, but I would argue that it's exactly the OPPOSITE of prioritizing everything EXCEPT the primal, uninhibited man-to-man fucking. My comment STARTED with the fact that I want to be fucked, and the whole side thing is a way to wreak enjoyment out of a less-than-ideal situation. I think a better alternative scenario to consider after spending a certain amount of time seeking and either not finding an available fucker or getting fucked until one runs out of fuckers or being at a party where fuckers are outnumbered by holes is 1) to continue looking for a fucker, in which diminishing returns are likely; or 2) to discover other ways to enjoy a less-than-ideal sexual environment. There is of course the option to exit the sexual environment and return to non-sexual spaces and pursuits. I find that part of the pleasure in remaining in sexual environments rather than leaving them is for me at least the lack of constraints on intimate behavior, increased likelihood of nudity, uninhibited conversation, etc. But maybe I need to spend more time studying my game and removing obstacles that prevent me from having men in my ass as much as possible. I am definitely open to that :-). -
Any recommendations on cam sites/groups for gay sex? Thanks.
-
There is another layer: the artificial creation of indivisible blocks of space that are subject to centralized extraction that are too juicy for psychopaths to ignore. The premise of this conundrum is that instruments of government can be built to do ONLY good without inherently being empowered to also do evil. It is also premised on the idea that human nature would magically change so that the pool of humans would somehow be GOOD. Another way to manage the projection of evil is to stop building political structures that subject large groups of people to the rule of a single psychopath. Smaller scale government would not change human nature but WOULD limit the extractive tools available to any one psychopath. Anyone who builds a new bureaucracy for GOOD should go in with eyes open that psychopaths will see this new instrument as a juicy banana to subvert
-
Scotus considering trans vs non-trans sports competition today
KinshipLab replied to hntnhole's topic in LGBT Politics
Two other severe problems with this whole topic: 1) people tend to overfit socially centric issues to “science” and ignore other variables that rightly affect the rules of the game. Those who think a “solution” should be derived solely from “science” are abusing science by treating it as a sacred arbiter of conflict and increasing the likelihood that it will be corrupted to politics. They are also underusing the skill of sound judgement. 2) The scale and scope of Federal government and the use of Federal tax money drives us to the least empowering method of spending energy on the topic. In this scenario, I have 1/340,000,000th of stake in the matter, $0.53 of my annual tax assessment is used to subsidize leagues in Alabama, Vermont, and all the states ideologically in between. Instead of letting this be a decentralized decision for each team and league to make with their own resources, it gets marketed to people as something they should have an opinion on but which leaves them with nothing to do but execute against central policy. While I definitely feel the pain of individuals, for reasons of not having the connection of thought and action be completely broken in two, I’d prefer to see each league pay for itself and navigate the complexities of decision-making at a “team-sweat-equity,” “paid-for-by” so ownership-rule-making alignment. The continued usurpment by the Federal government of local flavor and initiative has completely recast people as passive complainers trying to hijack others’ leeway with one-size-fits-all policy and tiny amounts of tax money confiscated from people of whom a significant minority will be opposed to the policy. -
It’s dull because for whatever reason, explorations of how to create futures have been dumbed down to how to spend other peoples money. This framing crowds out all participants but critics and passive observers, driving the topic away from creation and self-empowerment and toward bickering about the size of someone else’s slice.
-
There is a critical qualifier that frequently goes below the radar so that a comparison of “individual” versus “collective” becomes almost non-sensical. To make any sense of the balance, you must determine whether the collective was voluntary or involuntary. Since this distinction is often obscured in commentary, we lose a lot of nuance in simplistic working agreements that collectivism is “left” and “individualism” is “right.” It REALLY matters when someone’s agency is removed from the equation. It allows people to retain the silly notion that big things can be done only if the government imposes a single solution on everyone. Rhetoric long ago hypnotized those involved in civil discourse to think democracy looked like voting and then imposing the majority decision on all. Real democracy may look much more like a population of individuals exposing their opinions, which enables voluntary coalitions to form around not only the majority views (forced on 100% of the population) but also minority coalitions, who can use their energy to advance their goals. If you’re tempted to argue that crises sometimes necessitate 100% alignment, then you should also concede that non-critical conditions do NOT necessitate involuntary adherence to majority votes. The issue hiding behind the ridiculous divide between “collectivists” and “individualists” is centric to “autonomy.” Under what conditions should someone or some group have the right to curtail someone’s autonomy?
-
Outercourse Another New Term For Non-penetrative Sex
KinshipLab replied to NWUSHorny's topic in General Discussion
As someone almost religiously awed by cock-and-cum-in-ass and to a lesser extent mouth-cock, I hated the sterile idea of a side. I would never try to hook up with a side, but I HAVE come to appreciate sides as a fallback in group sex when I feel a connection but not a sexual compatibility with an awesome guy. It’s at best a fallback but given typically uneven top-to-bottom ratios in generaland the exacerbation of unevenness when the top minority gangbangs a bottom, it’s useful to open the aperture of sexual enjoyment when you’re spending time with cool guys who are not sexually compatible -
was very happy to discover how many hunky young raw fuckers have daddy issues, would love to connect, feel you push in to my unprotected hole, liquefy my core, and bring me into your DNA club. currently living in DC, screen name mostly the same on hookup apps.
