nanana
-
Posts
164 -
Joined
-
Last visited
.thumb.JPG.2817f3b13bc5c8cce6d369b7d75bee6c.JPG)
Recent Profile Visitors
1,590 profile views
nanana's Achievements
-
That’s what I’m worried about.
-
As someone who has gotten old enough not to worry about what others think, I have grown much more tolerant of views less than adoring of homos, but I can still channel my inner child who would wilt at any resistance to my fragile handle on acceptance/approval/community and take my measure of success from an unrealistic vision of complete tolerance for buggers. I hate the idea that gay kids might feel suicidal over the silly gods children like Anita. Let’s make sure our insecure pre-teen faggots have some people in their lives reducing the power of the Anitas and helping them enjoy their unacceptable beauty and uniqueness.
-
And yet this was after 100s of successful efforts to rebalance the number of voters in state districts by the Democrats (to their credit, it was a good thing to do not to let the value of an individuals vote be equitable) but with the result that Trump increased his vote count in even “rebalanced” districts.
-
What are you most optimistic about in political developments in 2025?
nanana replied to nanana's topic in LGBT Politics
It also sounds as if you may be having a super bad day. Breathe, smile, love. That may be the hardest thing to do, but I wish you peace and connection. -
What are you most optimistic about in political developments in 2025?
nanana replied to nanana's topic in LGBT Politics
That’s super creepy. I hope you figure out how to share the planet. -
Hedonism is compelling but tunes out some other great values such as enjoying the unattractive, using your full-brain consciousness, and non-sensual connections to other people. Has anyone else had moments when they wished to transcend the gay gift box?
-
What are you most optimistic about in political developments in 2025?
nanana replied to nanana's topic in LGBT Politics
your dick looks much better not scraped up by bottoms gone nuts... lol maybe some municipality will pass a law that bottoms are no longer allowed to eat popcorn unless by explicit permission of some fucker who likes exfoliants lol. maybe Uganda will finally legalize sodomy. perhaps Gretha Thunberg will come out... what other happy occurrences are wished in the new year of politique? -
Greetings all: It's never a bad time to be hopeful. What local, state, national and international developments are you most hopeful about? Happy Holidays!
-
I agree with you PozBearWI. Talking can lead to breakthroughs in understanding. I’m also appreciative that there’s a fine line between a right and a privilege, with one frequently confused for another. I am fond of rights for all but often find privileges less defensible. I am sure that many non-gays are sensitive to what may seem like gay privileges OR to incursions on their rights to live the lives they want to live. I am also sensitive to this AND thick skinned. There’s room for us all, from the sluttiest whore to the most righteous Muslim, if we just figure out the right balance between public and private spaces and how to treat each other without violence in the shared public sphere.
-
This is just a paraphrase translation: “The first human who hurled an insult instead of a stone invented civilization.” - Sigmund Freud. Perhaps we have a different appreciation for our intellectual heritage.
-
This may seem counterintuitive but there’s a balance of peace between tribes when they talk about each other behind their backs to blow off the steam of not being in a trust-and-understanding tribe, which makes for healthy coexistence. I think coexistence is about the best our Homo sapiens can aspire to. The caveman who put down his club and started swearing is the caveman who invented civilization. While it’s true that evil triumphs when good men do nothing it’s also true that giving people no space to voice potentially offensive thoughts leaves them with no other tools but violent tools to oppose threats to their autonomy. We are not so thin skinned are we? People having bad day. I found Someone who listened to me in a puny moment rather than judged me. Jonah was discovered in a whale. Live reins down while people (men) go through anger. on the other hand I get Hard when alpha/omegas acknowledge the hierarchy. I might Be destined to fill up a faggot that is hierarchically beneath me. Or I might be destined to be a fucktoy for a superior alpha. Both are good. The alpha/faggot thing is difficult to stuff into a democracy closet. @BootmanLA the only things we really know about you are that you have a formidable command of MSM facts, an ability to ensure that the left-of-center is well represented (thank you for giving voice to a less-than-loquacious majority on this fagsitw) an asshole that we all want to name the Capitol (from your beautiful pixels), and an argumentation that makes us choose democracy or hierarchy. Perhaps we should all be hole-less and dick-less and just be too kind to fuck. So many beautiful contradiicktions on the planet. I’ve seen a triple fuck but want to see or feel a quadruple fuck before AI takes over.
-
Bonus for your parents or younger siblings’ funerals (could be rites of burial or celebrations) bonus is not the right word don’t seek my approval just seek my sperm hole or my (if you believe in HIV) death dick.
-
In the job interview you cum sewer. I now want to hire you to take cum during your zoom job interviews maybe right on your eyelashes as you’re accepting the salary.
-
Greetings Guys, Curious to know how much of your day / night you are hard? Is it pretty consistent, or does it vary, and by what variables? Looking forward to stimulating responses.
-
I'd argue that the level of detail be it kingdom, order, or species, should probably be "fit for purpose." If we are looking for broad loving acceptance, give me a kingdom. If we are looking for a more specific purpose, e.g., to fuck cum into a bareback bottom or absorb cum from a fucker-mate, then maybe not even the species level is sufficiently specific. It is perfectly reasonable, and unhateful, to specify a level in the heirarchy that is "fit for purpose."
