ejaculaTe

5 hours ago, ErosWired said:

Yeah, definitely let me know when you’re around. You’re welcome to come by here, or I can come to the ABS and you and I can show the idiots how it’s done

that sounds as if it would be the best show that ABS has had in years....

30 minutes ago, Treehugger said:

Then on to Florida to visit a friend/fuckbud. We had a three-way with a black friend of his (weez both white) He fucked us both but I got the load. He He.

Is this the one for which the gods punished you the next day by rendering Grindr, etc. deaf?

6 hours ago, MuscledHorse said:

. . . including being the demo bottom for a fisting class

My admittedly twisted sense of humor imagines that being the response when asked at the 30 year high school reunion what you've been doing.

11 minutes ago, ejaculaTe said:

". . .he writes in several posts that he had previously posted them on bugshare (which is practically prehistoric times)."

A little clarification now that I've skimmed a few of these stories -- Btmbob2 seems to have the foresight to save stories that were posted on bugshare before bugshare closed. The software here will show Btmbob2 to be the author, but the software is actually saying he's the author of the post, not necessarily of the story. (There's probably a fancier technical way of saying that, but I leave that to a more knowledgable person.) In fact, there are a few instances in which the real author of the story happens to be a BZ member, sees the story here, and resumes writing.

7 hours ago, NastyRigPig said:

Does anybody know who the author of this story is?  It’s been around for a long time, I’m just curious if he has other stuff out there.

The author hasn't been here (at least under this particular screen name) since May 2018. He has a boat load of stories - I stopped counting at 12 - here in chem sex fiction, and he writes in several posts that he had previously posted them on bugshare (which is practically prehistoric times). Some of them are really short, less than 5 pages if one printed them. I found them by going to his profile (at the top of this page, click on his screen name which is just under the title) and then clicking on "See his activity" (it's on the right hand side of the screen). 

On 10/2/2021 at 4:04 PM, Poyzin said:

Post Script Memo:  STI/STD Historical fact. Chicago Mobster Al Capone died of Syphilis while in Custody with the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

Capone was released in November 1939 after doing about 7½ years of an 11 year prison sentence.  He died at his home in Florida in 1947.

[think before following links] https://time.com/4639795/al-capone-obituary/  [think before following links] https://www.britannica.com/biography/Al-Capone

42 minutes ago, ErosWired said:

Not trying to be a heart stomper, but I see some red flags here.

@ErosWired beat me to it (I had to take the dog out), so I'll emphasize his words of wisdom. Not to put too fine a point on it, but this is a dumpster fire attached to a fast burning fuse. If you haven't noticed, doctors tend to chat when they're not in the OR or doing rounds or whatever else they do. Any move you make on Dr. Kildare will be the subject of conversation within a month. I'm assuming you're in the US, and the last time I looked, most anesthesiologists here are in group practices. American society is generally more tolerant of homosexuality than it was when I graduated from law school in 1982, and it's unlikely that bad things would be said in public about your infatuation with Dr. Kildare. That doesn't mean, however, that the other doctors in a group practice which you wish to join would welcome you. Some, on grounds of religion, might object to working with a gay man, and others might think it a character flaw for you to pursue a man who is, to all appearances, in a happy and stable relationship with a woman. Some might see you as an insurance or litigation risk (as if your specialty didn't attract enough litigation) because they'd see you as someone more subject to claims of sexual harassment. In addition, if you haven't noticed, folks in your specialty tend to see patients when the patient is not fully conscious. No one would say it to your face, but I will: chasing Dr. Kildare will plant a seed of suspicion in the minds of some people that you can't keep your hands to yourself and in the right circumstances, you'd make a move on a patient. (Yeah, I know you wouldn't, but the point is that some people will think you're always on the edge of giving in to temptation.)

There are a couple of threads from this summer about workplace affairs and the like. You might want to avail yourself of the very good search function on this website (upper right hand corner of the web page) and find those discussion threads. My advice, perhaps unsolicited and unwelcome, is to keep Dr. Kildare at arm's length; you can certainly be friends, but unless you want to toss your professional career in the wastebasket, don't make a move on him.  

My time as a TA in college and in law school was nothing like this, that's for damned sure.... Maybe that's a good thing; I could be the oldest undergrad at my college otherwise.

nice looking veins on the model....

You might want to make a trip to  your friendly neighborhood doctor. Too many guys die of prostate cancer because they didn't go to the doctor sooner. You might have prostatitis, but your doctor should be the next phone call you make.

(BootmanLA types faster than I do; his reply beat mine by a minute.)

4 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

I don't know how many people here post from a cell vs. from a notebook or desktop computer (I use all of the above, depending on the circumstances).

What I do not do is post random selfie shots with posts just because it's technologically feasible. It's a stupid waste of bandwidth and storage space to stick pictures of your dicklet into discussions just because you can. If you're trying to illustrate a specific point, fine. If you're posting to a personal gallery, fine. If you're just showing your dick because you're an exhibitionist there are sites for that elsewhere.

I'm guessing you might have disabused the OP of any notion that you're a chatbot.

The concept reminds me of Dry January. I can see there'd be health benefits from Dry January, but as @ErosWired has explained, the physical benefits from NoNutNovember aren't very obvious. The whole thing has overtones of Victorian masculinity which viewed jerking off as a drain on the masculine essence, leading to physical and moral decay.

This article from the Journal of the American Medical Association discusses some of the reasons.

Community-based organizations step up to confront HIV in southern states.pdf

13 hours ago, DarkroomTaker said:

OMG... I am sorry, it took me that long to write it as Kept wanking to him and and  the experience, that I got signed out and logged back and it was still there, it must have stopped half way through typing. Let me see if I can edit and carry on. Sorry.

Thanks for finishing the tale of your encounter. I know I never got offers like that when I went in to the office early.

On 10/25/2021 at 5:32 PM, DarkroomTaker said:

He then had his hands in his sweats and said he was going to clean the Mens toilets on the 3rd floor, so he w

You seemed to have stopped in mid-stroke so to speak. Any chance you'll continue your tale of shagging the cleaner?

7 hours ago, str8mature5 said:

I have to laugh at the guys who keep asking if your clean, they are probably the ones that are dirty or stealthers.

And just as aggravating, it's likely that they haven't seen a doctor in years except on tv.

Don't get writer's block -- we're all into this story....

I'm a bit out of practice so 7, 5, 1....

On 10/2/2021 at 10:52 AM, CumdumpDad said:

* * *

Next the 21 year-old BBC who had daddy issues. Wanted to keep his mask on and hoodie. Just blow him and then he was going to turn me over. That's what he thought. Ultimately got all his clothes off and that mask .... Haha. (3)

* * *

That night, another BBC said he was going to fuck me like a pornstar until I couldn't take it. Rough fuck. Made me drink his piss twice. Two hours and two loads later he tapped out, not me! (8)

Proving yet again that experience overcomes youth. Simply awesome....

I suspect that there are plenty of us who have had experiences like Treehugger but prefer to forget it as much as possible. And sometimes, as Treehugger writes, all you can do is laugh.

Condom failure because of a manufacturing defect would be evidence that there was no intent to cause the harmful or offensive contact; if the defense can convince the jury that the thing broke of its own accord, the defense wins. (The testimony about quality assurance at the condom factory, to my mind, would surely be one of the stranger moments in legal history.) That defense, even if factually true, is hardly a surefire winner. If the person being sued (call him “D”) says, “Hey, I started out with one, but it broke,” the next question is “When did you discover that it broke?” That question is surely followed by “Why didn’t you stop intercourse (or whatever) when you realized it had broken?”

Facing a “it broke by itself” defense, the person bringing the lawsuit (let’s call that person “P”) will have to show that the failure was created by D. Evidence of D’s prior behavior can’t be used to show that D had a tendency to act in a particular manner. Thus, the fact that D has a history of condom failures can’t be used to prove that he broke the condom in this case. But the history of condom failure can be used to establish the absence of accident in this case. (If you think that’s a distinction only lawyers and judges would create, you’re not alone.) One condom failure is likely an accident; failure of condoms in almost all of a man’s sexual encounters isn’t bad luck, but something beginning to look like a campaign of condom sabotage.

Stray observations: (1) In a criminal prosecution, the State has to prove the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil lawsuit, for example under the California statute, the burden of proof isn’t as demanding as the criminal standard — P has to prove the case by “a preponderance of the evidence.” (2) As to whether the California statute will prove “to be a lawyer’s picnic,” since the time of Henry VIII (if not earlier), lawyers have been accused of making the law so complicated that the lawyers turn out to be the only “winner.” (3) Consent is a defense to a claim of sexual battery under California law. But if P gives consent when he’s intoxicated or under the influence of controlled substances, the consent is worthless as a defense for D. The flip side is that a jury might not be very sympathetic to P who will have admitted to using drugs.

On 9/11/2021 at 5:59 PM, DarkroomTaker said:

Does it cover purposely damaging condoms to infect people, like some of the threads confess on here? 

I'd say that even before this year's amendment to the statute (which added the specific language about removal of a condom), the statute covered intentional damage of a condom to infect a sexual partner. The statute defines "sexual battery" as acting "with the intent to cause a harmful or offensive contact... and a sexually offensive contact with that person directly or indirectly results."  I'd guess that most juries would view damaging a condom to be evidence of an "intent to cause harmful or offensive contact" and infecting (or attempting to infect) another person with HIV to be "sexually offensive contact."

Side notes: (1) The California statute is Civil Code §1708.5; it was enacted in 1990. (2) The definition of "offensive contact" has been in the statute from the start. (3) Moreover, the definition of "offensive contact" used in the statute is pretty much the same definition used in American civil law for purposes of defining "battery" (as in "assault and battery"). (4) The New York bill would amend the state criminal code. (5) The issue has come up in several criminal cases in England; the one that comes to mind at the moment is that of Daryll Rowe. He was convicted in 2017 under the Offenses Against The Person Act 1861 for infecting (or attempting to infect) sexual partners with HIV, tampering with the condom if the other man refused to go bareback.

On 9/11/2021 at 3:51 PM, skinster said:

This thing is removing links :

CA [think before following links] [think before following links] https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB453

NY [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/s4401

NY Senate Bill 4401 would have died at the end of the 2019-2020 legislative session. The bill introduced in the current session (2021-2022) is AB 4994. There's a "Sponsor Memo" attached to Senate Bill 4401 that explains the statutory text and the need for the amendment. (The language in the NY bill was somehow easier for me to understand than the California bill.)

On 9/5/2021 at 6:36 AM, IcemanCummeTh said:

Well, Rainbow Cabaret and Tampa Men’s Club are both only a ten minute ride from Tampa International Airport (TIA).  I’d be willing to act as a shuttle driver to and from the airport and area hotels. Would do it for tips…tips of dicks deep inside my ass. 

If I cleaned out the milk crate, landscaping stuff, trash, etc. out of the car and put up  the 3d row of seats, I could offer rides <wink, wink, nudge, nudge>.

23 hours ago, BBArchangel said:

I’m a big fan of Swiss Navy, but someone recently fucked me using plain old Crisco. Pretty damned amazing.

You haven't lived until you've done laundry for a friend and the smell of Crisco pervades the laundry room. Silicone lube offered far less room for comments by and raised eyebrows of the building's other residents.