fuzzybttm

I've had anal orgasms on full, half, and empty bladders. Further, sometimes I think it's an empty bladder (e.g. I just finished peeing before we start fucking), and a top still manages to fuck more piss out of me.

I definitely have anal orgasms that don't involve ejaculation. When it comes to bottoming, I have anal orgasms with cum, anal orgasms with piss (pissgasms), and dry anal orgasms. They all share the same wash of euphoria and the same pressure release, the only difference is what the contractions in what my pelvic muscles are physically pushing out of me as they pulse and spasm, if anything. In the last few years, I also unlocked the throatgasm, where I can orgasm from getting throat fucked hard. In terms of how long they last, I think of them as buildable, meaning that once I crest that first peak, I can lean into it or fight it, and if I fight it it usually just accelerates the sensation and forces me to cum harder. Whereas if I lean into it and ride with it, it can lengthen the time between crests and slow-play an orgasm over potentially up to 15 minutes; there I have peaks and dips but all of it is riding high on that orgasmic plane, and only once I feel the come down do I know it's over. Honestly, the best thing I ever did for my orgasms was lock up in a tiny chastity device and force my penis to not be part of the narrative. When the orgasm has zero penile stimulation involved, I can ride it so much futher and deeper than I ever could from a cumshot.

There's no one perfect solution because different cocks/positions. You're most likely to stimulate process when the top is fucking you in an upward angled direction toward the bladder/gut. Think, typically, fucking facing each other, where his thrusts are up/into you. However, if he's got a curve, it could be reversed for him. So the only universal answer is whatever angle not push right into your gut, and angle toward the other way.

Over the weekend I got together with a fuck buddy I met several months ago at one of my regular orgies. He's a thick 8 in cut with a wicked curve, and when he gets hard it's ROCK hard. Meanwhile, I'm locked in a microcage and wearing nothing but a jockstrap and a bandana as a blindfold, and he pulls me onto him and starts to push my head down on his cock. I start deep throating, against the curve, deeper and deeper in, until he had me to the hilt. And then he started to fuck my throat, thrusting harder and deeper as I gagged and choked. I had my first two caged sissygasms from the throat fucking. After what seemed like forever but was probably around 25-30 minutes, his dick was so coated in throat slobber that we didn't need any lube, I just hopped on and started riding. He fucked me so hard and deep he milked my prostate and I was dribbling cum for the next 20 minutes before he fucked a pissgasm out of me. As I was left laying in a puddle of my own piss, he dragged me to the edge of the bed, pulled my head over the side, and (this time with the curve) throat fucked me and choked me so deep, long, and hard my eyes were bulging and I shot yet another load. He fucked me for another 45 min or so before using my throat to lube up his cock to jerk off, and right when he was about to cum jammed his cock all the way down my throat and shot right into my guts, then pulled out, stuck it in my loose cunt, and fucked me until he came a second and a third time, during which time I had another two pissgasms. He left me wrecked, moaning, and hungry for more. I haven't slept as well as I did that night in months.

Are you ever truly naked if you're locked in chastity? Anyhow, naked.

Typically my birthday suit! However, sometimes if I'm going to an orgy or something, I might throw on a jock or assless briefs or something to help hold my chastity cage flush against my body, instead of flopping around in a way where I might get pinched or clipped uncomfortably.

So, for my hole, for a long time no matter what, initial penetration always stings. He can finger me, eat my hole out for hours, doesn't matter, the first time it actually slips in it hurts. I could either breathe through it and it would eventually go away, or I could ask him to pull out, pause a sec, and go back in with literally no issue. It's just a quirk my butthole had. So what I started doing is just telling tops put it in, my hole will freak, pull out, count to 5, and go back in, and since I've told them up front, it's not an issue. And then as I started to really become a much more receptive and capable bottom, I stopped doing that, just learned to relax the hole and try and swallow the cock deeper faster to just push past it, and now my hole behaves normally. It's just a matter of training and mental state.

Back when PrEP was much newer and U=U was much less well understood, things like condoms, PrEP, HIV status, etc came up a lot more often when guys would ask. But I haven't had anyone utter a peep in years regarding that.

Honestly, for me, even then I kind of discourage it because I'm a chastity bottom, and I'm actively trying to not have my cock used, I want my arousal to come fully from my holes. But generally speaking, point well taken

If you're at an orgy/bath house/fuck club; and you're surrounded by naked or near-naked men; and everyone's got their cocks out but someone's wearing something assless? That's a clear sign they're telling you what they consider to be their availability. They're there to get used, get fucked, and they're not there to have their cock be the front-and-center star of the interaction. A jockstrap is slightly more ambiguous, you have to see how they're wearing it. Are they giving good sleazy vibes and stroking their cock through the jockstrap? Or are they wearing it because they want to keep their cock put away and not be the focus? Further, some chastity bottoms wear a jock or assless underwear to keep the cage fitting comfortably as they get knocked around during sex, or to avoid unwanted attention from guys who might not know what to make of it.

I was unaware of "top poppers" and "bottom poppers" from the safety sense. Certainly poppers hit folks differently, and some really help relax and open a hole more than others, but I thought poppers by virtue of being nitrate compounds just flat out didn't jive with ED meds.

So I have a few thoughts to this. First, I know some doms who will have a sub come over, jerk them off immediately, and only start the scene once the sub is spent since it's not about the sub's arousal or orgasm, it's about the dom. Never tried that kind of session myself, but sound hot. Second, I think there's a big difference in the kind of orgasm you have and how spent you feel. For instance, I know as a chastity bottom, I can cum and keep getting fucked repeatedly for hours, whereas if I'm unlocked and actually stimulate my own dick, I can cum once for sure, twice sometimes, but my body has very different reactions to the sense of finality that comes with cumming. The more cumming is just fucked out of me as opposed to linked to an active stimulation of my penis, the less I experience excitement drop and the more I stay horny (and even crave more fucking).

Yes, once you can relax and convert the pain to euphoria it's like heaven and you feel it everywhere.

Of course many of us are concerned, petrified, mortified... A solid half the country voted against the syphilitic cheeto, and of the half that did, many of them have been misled politically by charlatans on the right for decades. It all comes down to two things: (1) Branding, and (2) Zero-Sum Politics. With respect to branding, there's a lot of folks who just won't cross party lines because the other party is the enemy, because political divisions are entrenched. And increasingly parties are reflections of their most polarizing features, which in turn allows others to dismiss as caricatures. Couple that with zero-sum politics where there's two parties and for one to win the other must lose, and there's no such thing as compromise. It's been YEARS since the majority of the middle has managed to even come remotely close to accomplishing anything because Republicans refuse to advance anything that they can't pass without Democratic support, and when Republicans are in the minority they stonewall any democratic initiative. Then on the flip side, Democrats are bad at drawing a line in the sand, saying "this is where this bill ends and we can't solve every issue all at once," and messaging a victory so they struggle to coherently articulate a position. The modern Republican party is a party of opposition that is now governing, which is the worst of both worlds. And many Americans recognize that. If you scan domestic news, most are highly critical of the Administration; anti-Trump protests draw major crowds; and everyone's downright panicked that this time he might manage to break the government beyond simple repair. In terms of perspective, most Americans you meet beyond the US's borders tend to be wealthier, tend to be more liberal, tend to be more educated. Only half of Americans have a passport, and most Americans who have a passport use it exactly once (i.e. they get a passport for a specific trip and that's it). So, not universally, but generally around the globe the average vacationing American you meet will look at Trump negatively. In terms of the appearance of contentment, the US is almost as large as all of Europe, and contains certain geographic features (e.g. the Rocky Mountain Range) that significantly divide and disperse the population. If, for instance, Belgians wanted to, they could easily congregate in Brussels and protest, with nobody having to travel particularly far or expend significant resources. Not to pick on Belgians, just an example. The US is almost 5000 KM across, that's not feasible. This issue of scale plays out in all sorts of distributional ways in the US, but importantly it makes collective action hard to objectively recognize. Meanwhile, news sources love to feature MAGA whackjobs hooting and hollering about how much they love what Trump is doing, because he's a cult leader. Ultimately everything's about money, higher prices and inflation and an uneven recovery from Covid-19 led to disillusionment with the governing party and for all his flaws Trump is an excellent self-promoter with a natural instinct for generating news coverage of himself. So he won the election against a politically weak incumbent. Unfortunately, this is the hell we get to live in. But I'd strongly caution against assuming we're all content with it, any educated American wouldn't assume that the average citizen in the UK or France or Germany or Italy backs Keir Starmer or Emmanuel Macron or Olaf Scholz or Giorgia Meloni...

Just take a hit of poppers, relax, and don't fight how big it is. Then it's both worth it, and not painful