What annoys you most about gay porn.

[hntnhole]

1 hour ago, ErosWired said:

why would such a person have any interest in me, given their wide range of choice

Simple. I won't go into it, since I don't think you care to read it - but .... like it or not, you're one of the special ones.  Don't take this as flattery or any silly business like that.  Take it as acknowledgement that men like you just don't grow on trees.    

[ErosWired]

1 hour ago, hntnhole said:

Simple. I won't go into it, since I don't think you care to read it - but .... like it or not, you're one of the special ones.  Don't take this as flattery or any silly business like that.  Take it as acknowledgement that men like you just don't grow on trees.    

I won’t attempt to deflect your compliment; that would just be another sort of self-absorption. It does, however, underline the point. Your assessment of me is derived entirely from the content I have posted on this website. You do not know what I look like apart from, if you have been inclined to look at the images, the (admittedly explicit) details of my breeding anatomy. There is nothing particularly notable about that, as a casual perusal of the “Let’s See Your Holes” thread demonstrates, so your judgment that I am in some way special by your measure cannot be based on visual criteria. It must, therefore, come from your reaction to things I have written.

Which, fair enough, if you so judge. I am not a Top, freely confess that I don’t fully understand how Tops think, and am in no position to question it if you say so. But the salient point for purposes of this thread is that whatever qualities I may have that would cause a ‘hot’ Top to take an interest in me, they aren’t visually evident. There is no reason for such a Top to initiate contact with me unless he already had the information about what is not visible.

[hntnhole]

11 hours ago, ErosWired said:

Your assessment of me is derived entirely from the content I have posted on this website

You're entirely correct, of course.  We've never met (at least that I know of)*, and may never meet. 

Thus, the foundation of my admiration has absolutely nothing to do with physical characteristics. I don't know what you look like physically, and it doesn't matter to me.  It's your devotion to your calling that is so impressive, and the fact that you're very able to translate your intellectual abilities into well-written, well-thought out text is just one more attribute.  

As to a Top appreciating more than merely your sexual talents, some of us find intelligence very sexy.  Some of us find the commitment of a bottom hearing (and acting upon) the call to cumdumpery very exciting sexually.  We Tops aren't monolithic, we're just like (well, with certain exceptions) other guys, and we find value in all kinds of qualities in others. It's the determination to be the very best we're capable of, at whatever we're called to do that counts.  This is one of the reasons I love the darkrooms; we can't really see much, we can only hear the sweet music of men rutting in each other, feeling our way as we slowly move into the mix.  Maybe some of the bottoms are "hot".  Maybe not.  Maybe some of the Tops are too, or maybe not. It doesn't matter one whit, because we're all there to Breed each other, share our Lusts together, and that's the only thing that counts. 

 

11 hours ago, ErosWired said:

There is no reason

There is every reason for any Top to want to Breed you.  Some may not devote any intellectual efforts into why they need to mate with your particular mind/body, but many Tops know a dedicated cumdump when they find one.  There are Tops that have a little bit more going on in their minds than some others, and when we sense the dedication, commitment of a man who's embraced his calling, it turns our Cocks to granite.  The old "magnet / iron filings" thing.  

Thanks for your thoughts.  I hope this makes it clear there are mental connections that can be at least as powerful as the sexual/physical connection.  

*I did attend an annual trade show in Louisville every year for many years, but that was all about business; I didn't go "exploring" - merely suffered through interminable dinners with advertisers. I've also been to the Derby a couple of times. Other than that, I have very little experience with KY.

[JeffSLmmPigDadd]

Condoms. 

[BootmanLA]

On 11/26/2022 at 9:48 AM, ErosWired said:

Indeed. This is one of the reasons I really don’t understand why Tops want head when they can get ass. 

Because topping for fucking is work. If a guy is fucking and he starts to lose stiffness, he may well lose the ability to keep penetrating, and then he's got to mentally go through the work to get himself hard again.

Even soft cocks can be sucked, and even soft cocks are sensitive enough to enjoy getting sucked. The top has nothing to worry about except sitting back and enjoying himself.

Moreover, unless the bottom has no gag reflex, it's quite possible for even an average cock to present a challenge to suck well. Such a top can hear the gagging sounds and imagine he's hung a lot better than he is. Unless the bottom's exceptionally tight, an average thickness 5"er is not going to find any obstacles in an average man's ass - especially not an American's ass, home of the 32-oz "medium" soda.

[Guest]

Tops who pull out and shoot over a guys ass/ back. Semen should only be shot into a willing guys ass

[PozBearWI]

As much as I would enjoy being bred by HVL guys; it is up to each guy where he shoots @pozguyuk; not you.  

[Phallarchist]

On 11/26/2022 at 4:48 PM, ErosWired said:

I really don’t understand why Tops want head when they can get ass. An ass isn’t surrounded by hard bitey things.

Throats grip really well, and the lubrication is superb. There's also the matter of making the bodily conquest complete. The latter has made me appreciate men who take women rectally. I used to be uninterested in the phenomenon, but have come to appreciate their total domination of the female body.

[HungVersCumdump]

Pulling out honestly ruins the fantasy for me. 

[ErosWired]

2 hours ago, Phallarchist said:

Throats grip really well, and the lubrication is superb. There's also the matter of making the bodily conquest complete. The latter has made me appreciate men who take women rectally. I used to be uninterested in the phenomenon, but have come to appreciate their total domination of the female body.

I take your point about the bodily conquest, but even if the other two aspects are true, it still doesn’t address the question of why the experience is worth the abrasion and possible laceration by the teeth, unless you’re saying that the grip and lubrication are so far superior to an ass as to outweigh the dental demerits.

Personally, in the rare occasions when I have ever been obliged to submit to having fellatio performed on me, I have never found it so. Indeed, fellatio does very little for me, in the main because I find all the hard places very unpleasant to encounter, including the hard palate, the mandible, and various other semi-firm areas, in addition to the teeth.

[parvenu]

Fake moaning, staring at the camera with the 'join my Only Fans' desperation eyes, trying to be dignified sucking cock, being afraid to gag, spew up drool and suffer when the cock is orally abusing them. A blowjob starts at your throat hole, not your lips, let the man slowly open and use it - look up or down depending on what he wants but get ready that you chose to offer your mouth so he will want to make it sloppy.

In a lot of porn they seem to want to maintain their dignity as pretty boys and that just doesnt work. It's sex so get sloppy and sweaty and submit. Theres a reason why GagTheFag still gets millions of views, a decade later.

[hungry_hole]

2 hours ago, parvenu said:

Fake moaning,

Especially when they sound like a girl.

I like to see a man fucking another man, and in porn, I prefer the bottom talking to dirty to the top. The moaning, I like it from the top, and especially when he's flooding the hole with his cum.

[Guest]

There were a few Treasure Island and Dick Wadd (or possibly HDK) gangbang scenes where one of the tops just kept yelling “fuck yeah!” over and over. Girl shut the fuck up and wait your turn.

Also Eastern European twink porn where the bottoms go “ssssssss … awwww” repeatedly. Why are you hissing?

[Orlbttmntraining]

On 4/26/2022 at 8:35 PM, Barebackpiggy said:

I have a love/hate relationship with gay porn, the only type I watch. No cunts in my porn.

I hate 99% of it, absolute garbage, and that's because I'm only turned on if it's real. Anything with porn stars, an obvious cameraman and it's a no-no for me.

Though I think my biggest gripe is all the dubbing on porn. Total turn off when the grunts and groans are obviously not coming from the participants.

So, what pisses you off with gay porn? Just curious. 

 

 

The same thing that bothers me about straight porn.. the fakeness of actors and the perfect bodies and everything of then. Simple reason, but easy for me to point out.

[wbekk85]

Fake moaning, fake jizz, pulling out for the "money shot" instead of shooting the entire load inside the bottom's ass. I can't say it enough. Yet they STILL keep doing those things in porn.