All Activity
- Past hour
-
He'll be hitting all the right spots...🥵🥵🥵 -
Like my good friend Cher used to say: "They might not know what they're doing, but they do it all night." 🤣🤣🤣 -
You and me both - and soon.
- Yesterday
-
German swimmer Erik "Stony" Steinhagen. 🥵🥵🥵 What a shame he's straight - would love to find out how deep I could take him down my throat...🤤🤤🤤 -
I was a stablehand at that event! I hope I was able to help you get those loads.
-
So a few weeks ago now I hooked up with a guy from Sniffies, Turned out he lives just down the street in walking distance. He is early 50s, heavy set with a big belly, with a tiny dick, I dont think its even 3" Turns out he is also a prejac, he has came in less than 60 seconds every time. Sometimes he cums in seconds. He isnt even fully hard at times before he does. BUT....... He shoots a MASSIVE load every time. Shockingly large load. What I have realized/learned. I LOVE to suck cock, so only getting to suck it for seconds is really a bummer, and I LOVE cock in my throat, so basically he does nothing for me in those departments. BUT,,,, his HUGE load makes up for it, its SO good. Its easily worth the tradeoff that hes tiny and a prejac. Since he is in walking distance, I am sucking him off several nights a week, and its SO wroth it to me, its hot to show up at his place, drop to my knees, and be fed a HUGE load in second, and then me sent home. Im literally there just to swallow his load basically. I love his big load, and love how it makes me feel, showing up and just consuming cum, not getting any other pleasure from it since Im not getting to suck a nice big cock for a long session. -
ah .. FUCK YEAH! TOPSONs! -
Tombb joined the community -
.thumb.jpg.0e1b7fca00a384f3f66a9a4cc22860e6.jpg)
Most twinks want young or Trans bottoms, the youngest guys i have gotten were in their 30s and that was decades ago -
WhtBttmNAnnap changed their profile photo -
As A Faggot in A Wheelchair I love worshipping any cock while im in it, yes ill suck cock while out of my chair also but God Damn does it more fun, [banned word], Hotter when im in my wheelchair sucking on A Cock especially Huge Cocks at eye level tol me
-
OK. You're focus is on the election. I've tried to express the limitations of the "selection set," if you will. Can we try this? 2026 will be: a referendum on Trump a referendum about affordability and cost of living other things too I think we'll likely have a broad agreement there? Here's the issue with your "selection set" in regard to affordability: One of the key impactors of affordability, specific to apartment rentals, are companies like AirBnB. This has taken millions of rental units off the market. Cities are desperately trying to pass ADU-build incentives to get home owners to add more rental units to their marketplace. If candidates take this on, AirBnB and other similar services will have millions in brand advertising to compete against the candidate messaging. And, by definition of "brand advertising," this excludes any reference to the election or candidate so isn't money to a PAC, super PAC. It's just standard advertising. That Super PAC stuff is above and beyond this consideration. AirBnB has every right to advertise their brand and their version of its benefits. That is covered under free speech -- as long as it's not false marketing. This is what I mean about neutering campaigns. Candidates have to compete against more than just each other for "share of voice." (marketing term there) If you simplify the world to a point where the ONLY messaging is that of the candidates to the topic(s) at hand -- I agree with you. But that's a false assumption. There is NO election where that's true. environmentally-driven candidates: vs. oil/gas, or vs. "clean" coal, etc data privacy: vs. social, or vs search/AI, etc deregulation: vs. unions, or small business, etc and on it goes, processed foods, ride share, tech monopolies, screen time for kids, etc, etc, etc.
-
Love that cock -
me too. It would be a dream cum true.
-
Viktor Rom fisting - with his prominent bio tatt.png
Leather-lee commented on ff69's gallery image in User Galleries
Didn't realise he had one... -
I love taking dick in public places outdoors is my favorite but also into public bathrooms and pretty much anywhere else there is a chance of getting caught
-
noname244 joined the community
-
Jackjl joined the community
-
bet he has a fine ass too! -
It's not that hard. I just chill out and every now and then I get the chance to suck someone off. Sometimes I get 2 or 3 back to back. 😍
-
-
I would love to stay with a poz couple or man when I visit this summer instead of the typical motel 6. Rent a room and take their loads whenever they want. Anyone help or no someone in PS that rents a room?
-
Pics of you with cock in your mouth
calthegoose replied to blackfeeder's topic in Cocksucking Discussion
-
calthegoose changed their profile photo
-
Visiting again - 7th to 17th Feb. Neg bottom/bator, can host in Kingsbridge.
-
Nullo2Be joined the community
-
Recently got fucked by A guy who Managed a Chuck E Cheese on one of the Tables at night, we met on grindr, had me Lyft to the Chuck E Cheese , he put me one of the tables and fucked my Ass So Hard a few times
-
You're safe with having to "defend" Musk... because, you are wrong on both counts. i am not asserting that "small dollar donations are better," that is presumption on your part. Here's what i envision (and i'm sure one can find rocks to throw at this and it would take more thought for a finished approach, but try to bear with me to see where i am actually coming from): i made reference to "one big pot of money equally divided." my idea is to divide the democratic process into many more individual pieces of influence, as in: "we the people." Musk and Soros are still free to follow their profound code of 'altruism' and donate vast sums. Since it can be argued they gain no substantial boon any more that Joe Shmoe, who paid 'nothing' but his taxes and his vote. Although, you may stumble at this because, if i recall, you believe altruism should not be part of the political process? (tongue in cheek). My point, for more clarity, is to work towards a system where no one person or group has more influence than another in the selection, voting, process... as much as can possibly be managed. So yeah, have at it billionaires and SGI's, feel free to donate, not to your cause, but to the democratic selection process, that way everyone can be equally pissed when they don't get what they want. To me, that would address issue two as well. Can i prove beyond a shadow of doubt that many large donators are buying influence? Maybe, if i spent lots of time and did lots of digging, but it's not a stretch (at all) for me to believe in the likelihood, almost naive not to consider it. But, as i see it, removing the donation from the individual to the many (i.e., anyone who votes), the democratic process instead, i suspect would soon demonstrate whether or not those massive donations would still roll in, individual or SIG. And again, the money part of this is just one factor in my mind, that needs reform.
-
My sister and I used to share a diaper. Either she'd pee in it first and then give it to me, or vice versa. I loved the feeling of her warm pissy diaper against my dick. Sometimes we would pee in our clothes too, and I would steal her pissed panties, hang them to dry, and rub my face in them while jerking off. I loved her pissy smell.
.gif.f9ebb6df759871bc324ef20f2f506635.gif)
