Jump to content

rawTOP

Administrators
  • Posts

    6,070
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by rawTOP

  1. The problem is that the handles in those apps are not unique - they're more like profile titles - several people can have the same handle. Those apps probably track people based off a hash of the person's phone number or off their email address - nothing that could be used/shown here.
  2. Good point. Though I would hope medical marijuana could be handled differently than other drugs. Here in Manhattan the DA is refusing to prosecute cases of pot possession when the quantities are small - he says it's a waste of his office's resources. But SSI is federal and the feds aren't so reasonable.
  3. Does he have Hep C? If you don't know - ask him... The answer can save you a lot of worrying.
  4. A few months ago I moved from a upper middle class neighborhood where almost no one was on public assistance to the middle of Harlem where "getting your own" / working the system is a way of life for many people. It's opened my eyes to the problem and now I see it more clearly even outside Harlem - for example in a fair number of the guys I hookup with. The Republicans have some valid points when they talk about abuse of the sytem - though I think they'd make a huge mess of things of they had half a chance - comments like Romney's "47%" comment show they see it as a bigger problem than it really is. Still, there is a bit of a problem with abuse of the system and things like drug testing for recipients of significant government assistance (more than medical and food) makes sense to me.
  5. Keep working and make your own money to the extent you can. Too many of the guys I see who appear to be on SSI don't keep themselves busy with work. With all the free time they figure they'll just fuck all day - which leads them to PNP... And before long they're seriously addicted to meth. They sorta just waste away and die at that point (takes years, but too often it's a one way road). It's really sad. All they had to do was keep busy with work. Now, medical benefits, food stamps, etc... That's all good... As is income support for guys who are so sick they can't work. But be careful with handouts that don't require you to work - it's better to be self-sufficient IMHO...
  6. MAL = Mid-Atlantic Leather - see LeatherWeekend.com for more details. Basically it's a mini-IML. When you get 1000+ leathermen in a hotel for a weekend there's A LOT of fucking. The host hotel is basically a big bathhouse. Guys put hankies on their door knob for what they're looking for - dark blue for fucking, red for fisting, etc. Plus sites like BBRT are buzzing that weekend. Lots of sex parties and gangbangs. I'd be happy to include you in some of the gangbangs... Email me at rawtop@breedingzone.com and we'll work out the details. [bTW, I just unlocked my pics for you on A4A - my profile is NYCFucker.]
  7. I'll be there from Thursday to Monday. Going to be whoring out a 24 y.o. skater guy who bottomed at one of my gangbangs 2 years ago and is still testing neg. I'm going to organize a bunch of gangbangs for him. Will be looking for other bottoms to join him.
  8. In a bathhouse - lay on your stomach - head towards the door means you want to give a blowjob first, though head away from the door guys often give blowjobs as well. When you walk around, just wear a jockstrap - dick covered, ass bare signals bottom.
  9. BTW, this is really similar to the thread "How Many Loads In A 24 Hour Period?" Might want to check that out...
  10. Because HTML5 players suck and streaming is pretty much impossible. Simply put, Flash works, and HTML5 isn't nearly as good. That said, if you look at the site on an iOS device it should degrade properly and still work - though that's something I still need to do final testing on...
  11. Just curious what status people put in their profiles when they were poz and not on meds... This only applies to poz guys who stayed off meds for a while...
  12. 8" is pretty thick - some bottoms won't be able to take something that thick - plus it might stretch when you get fucked. So on the one hand, it sounds like some tops might not be able to fit into the small, and on the other some bottoms might have problems getting the medium up their ass. I wonder as a top how different is is to fuck with each of them. I'm maybe slightly above average in thickness - I assume the small will feel like a tight hole and the medium like a loose hole.
  13. There was a time while this case was winding through the courts that just being on meds was sufficient to not disclose. There's a thread in this same section about it.
  14. If you're in Canada and you're poz, you now have to disclose at all times unless you're 1) undetectable AND 2) using a condom. Most people would say that either of those things would be sufficiently low risk not to disclose... Requiring both basically criminalizes HIV and creates a 2nd class group of people... IMHO, the neg guy is equally responsible for asking your status (and then the poz guy should only be required not to lie when answering the question).
  15. I think the trick is 1) what you eat makes a difference, and 2) don't clean too deeply (unless the top is really hung).
  16. Sorry I've been busy with other stuff. I need to get to the bottom of the mapping problem I was having and then hand it over to one of my guys to run...
  17. That's useful info. Can you tell me what the exterior circumference is? Thinking aloud... At 1.5" diameter the interior circumference would be about 4.7", but assume the walls are at least a 1/2" thick at the thickest part - so that means an exterior diameter of more like 2.5" so an estimated max circumference of nearly 8". Even that is pretty big (and it's the small size) - I can see where a tight bottom might have trouble taking the Pig Hole. Anyway, if you can measure the actual circumference and give me a real number that would help. What do your tops think of it? Do the prefer fucking with it or without it? Do they find it hard (or easy) to cum with it?
  18. The ex-boyfriend sounds like a loser. Move on and forget him.
  19. That pic is of the small one? The hole looks huge (or you're rather petite). Ever had tops with thick dicks who didn't fit into it? Or, based on masturbating in it, do you think a thick dicked top would find it too small?
  20. For black guys I'd try Atlanta.
  21. I'd love to fuck you. Doesn't sound like you're looking for a gangbang - more of a group thing - but if you're up for getting gangbanged, let me know... I'm planning on putting a sling in my cellar and starting to host little gangbangs.
  22. I believe it. Take a look through the section on HIV & sexual health... I'm actually going to move this thread over there now...
  23. You guys need to upload some more videos... I want to see raunchy fuckers be a place where pigs can celebrate their raunchiness
  24. I'm up for videotaping my fucks whenever - well there are times when I'm sorta tired and it's a hassle, but I want to do more videotaping especially now that Raunchy Fuckers is up. Also, I'm up for videotaping anyone who's in NYC - I don't have to be the one doing the fucking... I can fuck you and your bf, you and your fb or go with you and videotape you sucking dick through a gloryhole - whatever...
  25. Well, there are two issues... Under age content and copyright. The law of the land (in the US) when it comes to age verification is "18 U.S.C. 2257", or just "2257" for short. 2257 is a mess. It was pushed through by Republicans in an effort to "be tough" but it's so riddled with problems that it's essentially unenforceable. For example, a Canadian can be in a porn video and their Canadian government ID is considered valid if the video is shot anywhere in the world except the US. But if the video is shot in the US then only US government ID is allowed. That's just dumb. With 2257 the emphasis is more on record keeping than actually preventing underage guys. You can get fined for not having the right document filled out in the right way. For example, if you shot a guy who's 80 years old, you could get thrown in jail because you don't have the correct documentation proving that he's not 16 or 17 when clearly an 80 year old isn't a teenager. As a result the Justice Department has essentially refused to enforce 2257 mostly because they know there are lawyers all over the country itching to fight them on it, and they know they'll lose. Now, 2257 has an exemption which applies to hookup sites. Amateurs can upload pictures and videos of themselves all they want. All the site has to do is verify that the person certifies that they're at least 18, and that they own the image/video. Then there's the issue of copyright. That we do have semi-adequate laws on - though they need updating. IF (and it's a big if) a producer files their videos with the copyright office, then every non-licensed use of that video carries something like a $5,000 fine. This is why I'm a hardass on professionally produced videos - the fines can get into the millions very quickly since every viewing is a use. However, typically producers just send take down notices and lawsuits are only brought against the egregious repeat offenders.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.