cumslutfuckpig

buddy and i got into a debate about what constitutes a "slut" - i said we needed an objective standard... he said 365 loads/year (which i think is high for slut status, more like fucking legend)... 2020 - 315 received, 40 given 2021 - 286 received 11 given our rules don't say anything about counting distinct individuals - a lot of those came from some reliable cum-producing friends...

I don’t really care for people sitting in judgment of “healthy minds”. You have expertise here? Or are you the latest round of prudes to tell people who don’t hew to your kinks how sick they are? Screw you - if I wanted to be judged I wouldn’t come to a site devoted to no small extent to pozzing and getting high. Kind of makes me wonder why are you here? This site, with few carefully carved out exceptions, does its best work exploring boundaries, marginal behavior, kink, and [banned word] by being inclusive and safe… like scat? I won’t do that but I won’t delegitimize your kink, or dehumanize you, by ranting about how I feel about it. if you don’t like the story, don’t read it. as to the question of consent, especially consent in the context of repressed sexuality, ego enhancing and disinhibiting chemicals, it becomes extraordinarily complex. Trust me when I tell you, having experienced a top who listened to my body not my mouth - truly listened - I was taken places I’d have never been brave enough to ask for and my life would be several shades paler without. that’s not an argument to dismiss consent. That’s nuts. But imposing provincial attitudes on others and deciding for us what’s right and wrong us not your place.

🖐

I joined babz

I had a wingman for something like this in Florida. It was TOTALLY necessary. Had at least one little bitch boy troll in and try to siphon off bottoms we had taken weeks to contact and line up. We caught another person trying to sneak out with a bag that wasn't theirs. If you have a wingman, you can have 15+ guys in a room.

Nothing like milking dudes dry with my fuckhole.

ErosWired, I'm diplomatic, but also... I'm not cruel (and we have more than enough of that in our community)... but even more so... I can't tell you how many guys who have fucked me who are not good looking guys. Maybe they're sehior, or heavy, or just woefully asymmetrical... and yet can fuck like demons and make me howl at the moon while their jizz is painting my innards... And how much poorer I'd be if I was snobby about looks. I'm serious about blindfolds - why let your eyes get in the way of an amazing fuck? And. I'm genetically fortunate - I don't get fat. Like I'm middle-aged and I'm still nicely constructed and it's completely unearned - I do nothing to deserve it. Walking this planet like I have something over someone who's 40 pounds heavier than they'd like is begging for a comeuppance. Sometimes a little diplomacy staves off bad karma.

It's a failing, but I can't do it. On me, up my butt, in my mouth... but swallowing? I retch and that's disrespectful to my top, so I try to avoid that.

There are a lot of connotations built in IMHO. No loads refused not only should be a blanket "yes" to all tops, it's also a tacit "no questions about status asked" statement. In these cases, poz tops are more likely to play, especially if the bottom is neg, because the question of risk assumption has already been answered, and it's understood that they don't need to disclose. In SF if you post a "poz my neg hole" ad, you will frequently get no responses. If you post a "no loads refused" ad, however, that's different. Guys who are tired of or irritated by verbal poz play know in advance that the bottom isn't going to fetishize them. Also, I have to wonder if, despite the poz tops who find breeding neg hole problematic, there aren't some who use the fig leaf of mystery to get over whatever ethical concerns they have. As to putting it in a profile, it should either be true or left out. (And it should probably only be there when you can hook up). If you're trying to say "I'm a total slut but I do turn a few guys away" or "fuck I love cum, but I can't host and can't travel", then there are ways of signaling that that aren't misleading. I think there are a lot of guys who use hookup sites like porn, whether because they aren't ready to play for real, or because logistics (time, place) don't work, or because they're aestheticallyi unfortunate and lack confidence (people, this is one of the reasons they invented blindfolds and glory holes). Where it's free porn, they want descriptions because you're coloring in your character for them. Guys who are jerking off aren't hard to spot. Also, there's the pics and / or vids they'll ask for. The more asymmetric it is, the clearer it is that it's going to go nowhere.

Great question... bottom, south of San Jose, but mobile. Limited to daytimes.

OMG making us beg... pleeeeaase can we have another chapter?

I know what you meant, and I agree 100%. I had a lot more to say on the matter and stepped back because it felt like appropriation. better to model positive behavior. the kind of crap your talking about is racism in its purist form - and people think that fabricating a power imbalance for the purposes of gratifying their fantasy is the same thing as respecting someone of a different color. It's not the same thing at all.

I met a graduate student whose family immigrated from Nigeria. He told me he wouldn't have sex with American Black men "because they were descended from slaves". As awful as that sounds to my ears, I'm a white boy - I have no idea what it's like to walk in his shoes, and I have no idea what kind of mental gymnastics that might induce. Worth noting that with the white boys that he did play with, he liked to thoroughly dominate them. I'm thinking there are some issues going on for him. Anyone who says "I want to limit the number of potential bedmates because of some random characteristic" I don't understand. For me, it should always be about discovering more. When I was younger, I had no exposure to much other than other white people, and as a Mediterranean kind of guy, I had a thing for blond & blue. Then I grew up and met people, and my tastes have evolved. Do we all absorb cultural clichés about race (such as BBC, mandingo porn, black = hung = top, or Asian = femme = bottom)? I'm certain of it. I feel bad for every hung bottom who's expected for service everyone else with their big dick, but imagine being expected to have a big dick (and therefore top) just because of the color of your skin? What a load of bullshit. Do I allow cultural input to cloud my thinking? I'd like to think I'm grown up enough to self-check using the brain in my head. But I do like racial aesthetics - I like to see guys who look different, I think variety is sexy and interesting and fun. For me, originally, blond and blue was as far from me as one gets. Now there's a whole world to pick from. (find91, cover your eyes for a moment). Look at find91's skin - it's beautiful, deep mahogany wrapped over a ripped muscular frame. I don't care whether he's of African, or South Asian (Tamils get quite dark, too) origin, he's got a gorgeous tone (and it happens to look photograph really well with relatively pale kinda furry buttcheeks kind of like mine (just saying)). Bring on variety. And stay mindful of your stereotypes, or you might miss the fuck of the decade from a sexy Asian top guy. ;)

So I have a ridiculously Victorian standard for manners. I typically thank them, sometime quote formally, and frequently follow up with a text - especially if they hosted. The juxtaposition of a formal thank you with being a fuckpig shows that I can act wild and crazy without forgetting myself (and it’s hilarious for a cumsoaked naked man to be offering heartfelt gratitude . The text follow up helps me recall details of our meet, and the good manners are all about getting invited back. The whole point is to get more sex, more loads

But that's not at all what's happening in the (rapidly multiplying) stories and posts he's targeting here. detailed and highly eroticized imagery around gono, syphilis, etc. down to the pus. That's not a public service announcement. The principle problem, however, are instances where people are encouraged by others to never go on meds and let HIV becomes AIDS and have that be what kills them. There's arguable liability there (Commonwealth v Carter) for the person making the encouragement. Right now the site most likely enjoys technical protection afforded providers who are not responsible for content, but this site also makes an extremely unsympathetic figure and an easy target - technical protection wouldn't be enough to survive the kind of scrutiny. And the site admin also has to be able to sleep at night, so he gets to set boundaries. Playing devils advocate (RawTop please forgive me here), if the admin were so inclined, I'd recommend putting the fiction or posting with STI, AIDS chasing, and death fetish into it's own category. The way it's mixed in now, a lot of us are mid-wank and discover the author takes a sharp left hand turn into pus oozing from cocks and have to start over lol.

Kudo's, RT.

On that note, younger folks today don’t understand how hard it was for single poz men back then. If you know a long-term survivor, thank them for making all we have in hiv prevention, treatment, and most of all legal protections. Then give them an amazing fuck - they’re due.

I met a super hot guy on Grindr who insisted on a rubber. I was like yeah, raw only and he coyly suggested I should trust him and come anyways. Bent me over his desk and lubed me up with thick stuff and shoved a fat gloved cock into me. I figured I’ll get the condom with the cum after he’s done and do what needs doing. About really hard four strokes in I fucking felt the latex snap and he went into overdrive. Didn’t take long for him to cum and when I turned to suck him clean, there was his latex “cock ring” with tattered latex still attached. Looking up he’s smiling like the Cheshire Cat and wiggling a jar of Vaseline at me 🙂 That was hot. B

A few things: it’s easy especially early on to have our appetites exceed our capabilities. It’s a reputation that’s hard to shake so I recommend testing your capabilities before you put yourself out there. That means duration size positions whatever find out what your limits are. For a successful gangbang you may find it helpful to find a wing man. Dude who is invested in watching you take a lot of dick can help be a second person in searches, may have his own resources, it is great for minding the door while you’re taking the dick

I used this yesterday and yes - it works like a charm! Correct dosing is critical.

Fuck sake, definitions matter. What was done was not treason but sedition. If it’s as important as you claim, get the particulars right. As to Hotty McShitbag, objectively my first instinct is “yum”. From there it gets complicated, because he deserves no good things. Works out to something like “can I use this guy for my pleasure, leave him blueballed or otherwise uncomfortable, and maybe give him an STD he doesn’t want that has the possible side benefit of screwing up his life?. Alternatively, there are less ethical fantasies that still involve my pleasure, his... not pleasure, and maybe an object lesson in how lady liberty feels when she’s violated. Not everyone gets an erection when told to squeal like a pig.

And give them a chance to show you. Guys I’ve met know how to use their piece - if they’re big and get very hard, they’ve worked on learning technique and position, for example. Where you get into trouble is when you have guys who suddenly have trimix and lack the technique to use piece now.

Let’s not forget that Trump and the GOP want to use government to dictate to private businesses the content of speech - the EXACT thing that “Qilly” is pretending to be the victim of. Or he’s too stupid and ill-informed to understand the rights he believes are his. It’s not the left that demands the nanny state, it’s the right. I’ve never really seem people demand that government make them popular and completely free from the consequences of their actions.

You just named private business and private institutions, you ass. Where’s the “government” in this? The First Amendment protects you from government censorship. it doesn’t shield you from criticism for stupid shit and It doesnt prevent a web moderator, dinner party host, or bartender from kicking you out for saying dumb shit. what you’re really demanding is that private people agree with you That’s not how that works

I’m not going to shame a anyone’s kinks. But where artists can, let’s be sure to draft black characters as being as 3 dimensional as all the others. If we’re doing that we’re off to a good start.