NWUSHorny

They may be trying to play to the common fetish so many gay guys have of being fucked by straight guy. Don't bet they aren't really bi and getting their own hole fucked every chance they get, as well as seeking out total bottoms and telling them they are straight to keep the bottom from backing out.

I have never understood guys who want to "hookup" and play dildos, blue dragon or any other kind. It's not just the hookup sites, here in the PNW guys bring their dildos with them to the sex club, I guess it is a way 2 bottoms or 2 guys that both hate real dicks can play. If you are presenting your ass I don't want to use that dildo sitting next to you on it, and if I'm presenting my ass to be fucked I will say no if you approach me with your dildo and ask or try to use it on me, I use both hookup sites and sex clubs to find guys who want to actually fuck.

I love to flip fuck, and have absolutely no problem if someone comes up behind me and slips me a dick while I am fucking a guy, but I have been with a lot of bottoms that get pissed off when they find out you are not a total top. Total bottoms don't seem to have any concept of how rare total tops are, or how much easier it is to get fucked in a group that is primarily made up of versatile guys. I know there are a lot of bottoms that claim they have never even tried topping, I'm not sure I know any highly active tops that could or would make that same claim about bottoming.

There reasoning is different from mine. I love leather events in most places, the only exception is if it is in a city where most guys go to model their gear for everyone to admire instead of using it to enhance the sex. I avoid all fetish events in cities where I know that to be true.

Timely thread for me, I've been working almost entirely remote since the pandemic started and recently started a new job that allows me to live anywhere I want as long as it is near a major airport on the assumption that people that do what I do will eventually start traveling to client sites again someday. I'm in the Portland, OR area now, which is fairly expensive, is dark, overcast, cool and rainy for 10 months of the year, does not have an active casual sex scene, and has horrendous traffic with limited public transit options to avoid it. I have a fairly specific set of wants, active casual sex scene is a big want. Here are some of my others based on places I've lived in the past: Reasonable cost of living (I don't want to spend much more than I am now, and if it is lower that is even better) Four season climate (I actually missed fall, winter and spring when I lived in the south east) Free flowing traffic or an adequate public transit system to avoid the gridlock (I may be weird but I prefer to live in the suburbs and go into town for most of my encounters although areas that have decent activity in suburban parks are good to) Outdoor recreational activities, I love hiking and biking Here are some of the areas I'm considering along with what I consider to be their pros and cons: Denver Pros: I loved pretty much everything about living there; Great casual sex scene even out in the burbs,; Easy to drive almost anywhere and park when you get there; My idea of perfect climate; Mountains to hike Cons: Even more expensive than Portland; Both bathhouses have recently closed leaving only Buddies on Colorado Springs which unless I moved fairly far south would not be ideal for spur of the moment weekday evenings Chicago Pros: Cheaper than Portland; Great casual sex scene; Good public transit system to avoid traffic gridlock and parking issue if I don't try to go too far out; Close to family (not sure if this is a pro or con);4 distinct seasons Cons: Somewhat difficult to drive and park if heading into downtown; Harsh winters, hot summers; No mountains St Louis Pros: Much cheaper than Portland; Decent casual sex scene; Easy to drive and park for the most part; Close to family;4 distinct seasons Cons: Less major airport; Hot summers; Do the Ozarks really qualify as mountains Milwaukee Pros: Much cheaper than Portland; Decent casual sex scene (but no big bathhouse, is the one in Kenosha still open?); Easy to drive and park for the most part; Close to family; 4 distinct seasons Cons: Less major airport (but easy access to Chicago O'Hare); Harsh winter and hot summers; No mountains Minneapolis Pros: Cheaper than Portland; Decent casual sex scene (but no bathhouses) ;Easy to drive and park for the most part, starting to get a decent public transit system; 4 distinct seasons Cons: Harsh winter; No mountains; Some other places that I'm considering that I don't have much experience with Palm Springs: great casual sex, but expensive and not my ideal climate; Indianapolis: similar to St Louis, and Milwaukee and I know nothing about the casual sex scene. Anywhere else a versatile soon to be 53 year old with a high sex drive and loves group scenes should be considering?

I am truly versatile, and pretty much always have been. I am 6'2" and my cock is almost 8", so I don't have any problem finding guys who are willing to bottom for me versus willing to top me, so by default I have been more of a top over the years. When I first started out fucking I had a crazy idea that I should only get fucked if the other guy had a bigger dick than I did, which seriously limited my options. After being almost exclusively a top for a year, I hookup with a really well hung versatile guy who insisted I fuck him back and taught me the error of my ways. The only times I revert to more bottom than top, is when I go to a sex club with lots of posing and little to no actual activity, I can't get hard in that situation but can still get fucked if I actually find a guy willing to fuck me.

I have several guys that will ask me how many loads I have if they see me trying to get fucked at the bathhouse, and that they will come back and fuck me once I've been loaded. Most of them run like a deer if they see me get fucked and bred. The guys that actually like to fuck a loaded hole (including me) don't ask, but will ask someone they are pretty sure is loaded if they want another load.

I've always thought sex needed to be pleasurable for all of the parties involved. If it isn't pleasurable, I generally won't hookup with them more than 2 or 3 times (I have to be sure they weren't just having an off day). If you both enjoy it, why not keep hooking up if he isn't insisting on a relationship of any kind. I definitely understand the desire to fuck mercilessly. As far as I am concerned there is nothing better than a hard pounding fuck, top or bottom. We are men and driven to be horny and most of us aren't physically frail or delicate in any way, so let's drop our inhibitions and pound away.

The irony is if you are interested in topping and make that request to a bottom, most of them would have no trouble rounding up a handful of bottoms in most cities.

I would make one exception to the rule. Many of the hookup sites have a way of listing future travel plans, or you could put it in the text of your profile. I see nothing wrong with some advanced scouting for a trip you are publicizing that you are taking (and have even done it myself). If you don't actually have and indicate travel plans, you are probably just another time waster. The train platform line dancing is an interesting metaphor, I often describe what way too many guys do in a sex club as the no mating dance or the blue ball. I've been watching some of them for over 10 years and have no idea what they like or do sexually.

I don't mind being called a faggot in a sexual situation, but these questions are more about being submissive, which I'm not. I guess I can answer yes to " Do you like being fucked with other Men watching?" Hopefully I will get fucked with other men watching more than once tonight.

I'm a verse white guy that has topped and bottomed for all races and many different ethnicities. I have topped pretty much every stereotypical top and bottomed for most of the stereotypical bottoms . Aren't Asians generally stereotyped as bottoms more than tops? I know I'm not a repressed minority in any racial/ethnic sense, but when I read these threads I get the idea that some guys think I should be offended if someone calls out my big white cock (yes I like to top and do get that label applied to me fairly often) when I top or if they ask me if I'm enjoying their big [fill in the blank] cock (which also happens fairly often), am I supposed to say "no that's racist"? Should I go off the rails on someone who assumes I am exclusively a top (or bottom) based on genetic characteristic that I had no control over? I will admit that no one has ever verbalized that I look like a bottom, even though I do love to bottom. I never assume anyone is a top or bottom based on physical characteristics alone. I enjoy flip fucking with guys of all races and am not that picky about the size of their endowment as long as it is long enough to penetrate an ass.

Isn't the point of a hookup site to actually hookup for a fuck? Based on empirical evidence, I realize those of us that believe that may be an extremely small minority.

I just saw a new one on BBRT "power cuddler". I could be wrong, but it sounds like a way of telling guys that you don't fuck without coming out and saying you don't fuck.

My guess is they are guys that have no intention of actually fucking with anyone, for fantasy distance doesn't make a difference.

That is my biggest red flag, that is 90% or more on any hookup site where I live at the moment.

It sounds like just another variation on something that drives me crazy. I repeatedly run into guys who want to "hookup" as long as "I agree not to touch their icky dick or ask them to touch my icky dick."

I enjoy "tasting our fuck" and sharing a kiss after the bottom has tongue cleaned the tops cock and the bottom has lapped up what is leaking from the bottoms fuckhole.

Doesn't versatile bottom imply that they are more bottom than top? Due to the over abundance of total bottoms and versatile bottoms that very rarely top, compared to guys that are more top than bottom adds to the skew towards bottom in the profiles.

I was probably 3 or 4 for 25 years as a top. I wasn't bottoming very much, and did not let guys cum in me. Once I found out I was poz I went to 6.

If we could just get them to stop acting like they do on the apps when they are cruising in person, we would have it made. From traveling fairly extensively, my experience is that how a local area behaves on the apps is very similar (but more extreme) to how they act in in person cruising.

They aren't looking for casual sex, which begs the question what are they looking for other than attention?

If you are in the over 10 category, post where you live. I'm now in situation where I can live almost anywhere as long as internet is available and it is near a major airport.

Just wondering how active guys on this forum actually are when it comes to casual fucking? For the last 15 years I've been in the 2-5 category when at home, if I'm traveling for business to a place where I can find like minded men it is usually higher, and if I take a sexcation, I will get to be over 10 for that week. 15 years ago when I lived in another city I was regularly over 10 and sometimes up to about 30 in a week. I don't cum or get cum from anywhere near all of them, but I definitely enjoy the act.