NWUSHorny

As a 50+ versatile guy, I don't see much difference. Because of body type and dick size, I've always been stereotyped as a top and have had an easier time finding bottoms than I do tops. It really isn't any different at 52 than it was at 22. To be fair, I was bred by two 20-30 something guys this weekend and no guys over 40 (although I did get fucked by a couple). I did slightly better with the older crowd as a top it was probably evenly distributed older to younger, 2 of the 3 guys that got my loads appeared to be in the 20-30 something age group. I find, at least in a sex club, how actively a guy is seeking and having sex is a much better indicator of a good fuck than age. A "quality over quantity" guy that mostly stands and poses while looking for their concept of "perfect" is a lousy fuck at any age. To be perfectly honest I prefer guys of any age that are willing to flip with me, if you want my load the best way to get it is to be willing to fuck me back.

I will definitely be there the night of the 3rd, debating on staying the night of the 4th or going to San Diego that night.

If you are taking cock in a sex club how do you tell? I can tell when the 1st cock breeds me even if the owner doesn't let on that he has cum, but after that I usually can't tell. If I've been fucked by multiple guys I answer with an "at least" (my confirmed load total).

No strong preference, other than the few holes that are too tight to comfortably fuck, or so loose I can't get any friction.

Same here, my best fucks are flipping with other big dicked versatile guys. I've never understood why so many guys, including versatile guys, aren't willing to switch roles.

Any ages on the people that contacted it? I'm curious as to how well the smallpox vaccine works at preventing monkeypox, those of us over 50 were for the most part vaccinated for smallpox.

No, because I know that when I top I can tell very accurately if the hole I'm fucking has been seeded.

Ironically, finding a "straight" married top is even harder than finding a bottom that is married to a woman. My experience is that men in hetrosexual marriages are even more inclined towards bottom when they have sex with other men than any other group of gay or bi men. Over a period spanning slightly more than 30 years, I can count on 1 hand and have 2 fingers left over, the number of men that I know were in heterosexual marriages that have topped me, and all of them happened when I was college and grad school and I don't that any of them were 25 years old at the time. Where as the number I have topped would be in high double digits. I have also probably played with 25 or more married couples in 3 ways, in every single one of those cases I fucked both the husband and wife, but have yet to get fucked by a husband. Getting fucked by a "straight" married man, simply isn't going to happen in my experience.

Drug use may definitely be a factor, although I doubt it is exclusive to meth. It could even explain the difference I saw moving from Denver to Portland 15 years ago. There was definitely drug use in both cities, but it was much more visibly apparent in Portland. I may be somewhat unusual, in that I have been a stereotypical top since I 1st started having gay sex, but I did not find it easier to find guys willing to top me in my 20 and 30 than I do now in my 50's. I still looked very young well into my late 30's, but was 6'2" 225-230 lbs. but never bigger than a 34" waste, and an almost 8" moderate thick dick, I've always had my choice of bottoms but very few guys willing to top me. What has changed besides getting older and heavier, is that I can only cum 2-3 times in a night versus 5-7 when I was younger. I still love to both top and bottom.

@DudeLiquor and @ErosWired that poopers are a problem. I think in many cases they are used as a defense mechanism for guys who don't really want to fuck. I've been with too many poppers dudes that as soon as they are hard enough that you asked them to fuck will take a big huff wilt, so they can ask you to suck them hard again and keep repeated it until they either cum from he oral or even more likely completely lose the ability to get an erection. If that happens every time they hookup, they really don't want to fuck. Personally I hate poppers the only thing they ever do for me is give me a headache. I will fuck a guy who is using them, but you are not taking a big huff and then getting my dick in your mouth, those fumes you are exhaling can feel like you are burning the skin on my dick.

Interesting, we are at 60% that are bottom to mostly bottom, which doesn't surprise me. What does surprise me is the 10% total top number, and only 23% moving towards bottom. Hopefully we will get more responses.

It's not my site, but as far as I'm concerned you are welcome to use this site. However, you are not entitled to limit replies to your postings to only people who agree with you.

Neither is suitable to perform oral on after a couple days of camping, especially if they are getting lots of use. I've never had a pussy, but do know that by the 3rd day I find a way to clean my nasty itchy dickhead no matter how cold of water I have to use.

I jack off almost every morning unless I'm sure I'm having sex later in the day. If I don't have sex during the day I will do it at least once more during the day. I occasional don't jack off for 2 days if I'm planning on attending an orgy that will have a lot of fucking.

My position has not changed over time, but I have definitely noticed a trend towards bottoms on the hookup apps over the last 10 years. I also think there has been a lesser trend towards bottoming for in person cruising as well, but also a trend away from guys actually seeking any kind of casual anal sex. Even here on BZ I think there has been a trend towards more fantasy postings than postings about fucking that has actually taken place or fucks that guys are realistically trying to make happen in real time.

There is a lot of complaining about a lack of tops, and that they are becoming even scarcer in the gay casual sex world. So I'm curious what your current position is for casual sex, and if and how it has changed over time. By casual sex I mean random hookups with other men from either the hookup apps or in person cruising. Please reply with the reason your position has changed if it has changed. I picked 10 years If I see some interesting trends I may add some additional polls. If anyone else sees something please feel free to add a follow up poll as well.

My only suggestion, which doesn't seem to be very welcome, is to try exploring your versatile side too. I am truly versatile, but wind up topping 2x3 times as many guys as I get to fuck me. Because so few guys are willing to even consider topping 80-90% of my time and effort goes into looking for guys willing to top, too. I've also pointed out, to many total bottoms disgust, that if I'm at an orgy my load will likely get squirted into a guy who is willing to give me one in return. I think I've heard all of the arguments, about why guys want to be total bottoms, but the fact is the very nature of having gay tendencies means there are very few gay or bi men that don't want to bottom at least occasionally. I can understand that maybe you prefer bottoming, but you also need to consider that if no one is even willing to consider topping, no one can get fucked no matter how much they like to bottom.

@SeanBrah what is stopping you from offering your holes on the social media platforms that the MAGA favor? You could also go to their "rallies" and actually offer them your holes in realtime. I know here they have truck parades that disturb the users of several parks every weekend. If you don't feel comfortable doing that, perhaps you should consider the reason.

Any parties or good locations for Tuesday or Thursday nights? I'm not going to be free until 8:30 on Wednesday night.

I had an interesting observation, from a Cumunion party last night. It was the 1st one at Steam. Guys were actually fucking each other and ignoring the guys that were just there to pose. One of the regular posers, always very tan, manscaped, wears his towel almost like a chastity device but usually appears to be sporting a hard on, also older and heavier than the average guy at this club, and never has sex. He must have been feeling the lack of attention for just standing around looking arrogant for a change. While I was fucking a guy in the sling they have in an open play area, he grabbed one of the hotter twinks that was watching. Arrogant poser looked extremely uncomfortable during the entire encounter, but the twink did get him to remove his towel, trade some brief sucking before the twink bent over and got arrogant poser to fuck him, it lasted at most 2 minutes and I'm sure arrogant poser did not cum before they stopped. I'm pretty sure it was the twink who stopped it. I'm also almost certain that the entire motive for arrogant poser to initiate sex in a crowded orgy space was to try to get guys to pay attention to him, so he could keep stringing them along to satisfy his ego, not because he needed to satisfy a sexual need. I happen to know the hot twink he chose is a good fuck and versatile.

I went to the Cumunion at Steam last night. It was the 1st time they have hosted one. Even on a Thursday night it drew a large crowd, and there was a lot more fucking happening than usual. While as far as the amount of sex, it would have been a slow Thursday night in many cities, but there was more fucking happening at Steam than happens on a great weekend night. I saw regulars fucking or getting fucked that I have never even seen touch another member. One young guy that I had been watching over the last year, took 4 loads that I saw, prior to last night I had no idea what his sexual position was (it's too bad he doesn't appear to be versatile).

It actually went pretty well. There was even an orgy with multiple couples fucking that lasted at least half an hour, which may be a record for Steam. 2 guys went home with my loads in their asses and I have one load in my hole. Maybe we can improve upon it and get an actual dog pile orgy fuck going instead of just 2 or 3 couple going at it next to each other.

I don't really have a preference. If it is at a sex club being presented to fuck and I have a hard on, I will fuck it.

I won't be paying to use a site where most of the local ads are just for guys looking for buddies to hang out with. I've never even seen a local ad that I even had an interest in responding to.

I don't usually make political comments on this platform, but as someone who leans pretty far small-l libertarian and mostly voted Republican before Trump completely upended the party's focus. I'm really curious what the people that think Trump would do to solve the inflation dilemma would be doing? I know he hasn't actually publicly prescribed any actual policies so I think any ideas about what he might do are purely speculative. Because Trump hasn't put forth any suggestions, and he has managed to keep an iron grip on currently serving Republicans aren't going to introduce any legislation that is not fully approved by Trump. I think he would either with or without authorization from congress try to implement price controls a la Nixon in 1970 (Nixon did have congressional authorization). Even in the hands of reasonably competent experts and leadership Nixon's actions led to shortages and long waiting lists for goods and services that we are already experiencing today. In addition to that problem, Trump has shown through his 4 year term a penchant to try to control the micro through "deals" with companies and individuals rather than focusing on the macro, which if any government led solution is possible on inflation it will have to come from macro policy. As a libertarian, I would expect you to be firmly against intervention at either the micro or macro levels. Another huge problem I have giving Trump the authority to attempt to deal with it is his history as a businessman. Trump's "great personal wealth" may or may not be more than illusion, but either way the perception of it has been created by taking the cash flow from a long line of failed business ventures. Companies he has controlled have declared bankruptcy 6 times. Many more have defaulted on the debts, almost all of them have negotiated with creditors to pay them pennies on the dollar owed, and numerous others have shut down after he took the customers money without providing the agreed upon goods or services, including the outright fraudulent enterprises that had to be shut down by multiple states (Trump University is just the tip of the iceberg in that area). None of which give me confidence the "fabulously wealthy businessman" has any hope of navigating the global economic currents that are driving this bout of inflation, let alone preventing or reversing it. The MAGA have been insisting for 6 years now that it is a "binary choice" where we have to pick the "least of the evils". Guess what, right now that is the Democrats. The Democrats have not pledged total fealty and discretion on policy to a single individual, that is in my opinion the most seriously flawed major party leader in US history. They have not claimed election fraud and refused to accept the results of an election, even after almost 2 years of failure to provide evidence of the fraud that has standing in a court of law. No Democrats have condoned an active revolt against the constitutional republic on the scale of the January 6th, 2021 insurrection, since the Civil War ended in 1865. Trump has been very successful at removing the philosophical and policy reasons I mostly voted Republican in the past, so at this point I don't have much in common with either party. Some of my biggest disappointments with Biden are that he has left the Trump tariffs and caps on legal immigration in place, both of which are contributing to the current inflation problem. I don't think that Biden should have followed through on Trump's withdrawal from Afghanistan. I am at least thankful that Biden opposed Putin's invasion of Ukraine, and firmly believe Trump would have actively worked to hand the Ukraine over to Russia, and actively undermined NATO efforts to keep it an independent nation. Small-l libertarianism "live and let live" approach only works if a majority is willing to heed the "do no harm to others" component of the philosophy. MAGA will not tolerate the "do no harm to others" part nor can they be shamed into even considering what harm they may be doing.