Jump to content

drscorpio

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,160

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Everything posted by drscorpio

  1. drscorpio
  2. drscorpio
    I have seen ads for various HIV meds making the point that being undetectable will give you peace of mind. I think the more important issue is that unless one is suicidal, HIV meds are a necessity for poz folks. Ads for such meds are only going to encourage you to perhaps ask your doctor to switch meds. PREP, on the other hand, is entirely elective, so ads are more likely to generate new customers.
  3. drscorpio
    You can help us by reporting weird tags like that. It's easy enough for a moderator to fix the typo.
  4. drscorpio
    Yes, that 4th of July thread turned into a dumpster fire of name calling and personal attacks. Rather than give dozens of infractions and hide most of the posts leaving what remained unintelligible, I thought it was more reasonable to just remove the thread from view. That's what that message is telling you.
  5. drscorpio
    Again you are accusing me of things I have not done or said. That's what projecting means.
  6. drscorpio
    @Chuckiebowe, you should be able to post a story. Make sure you put it in the right place. Stories with Chem Sex in them belong in Chem Sex FICTION. Stories with Poz Fetish but not chems go in Bug Chasing and Gift Giving FICTION. Other stories belong in General Bareback Sex Stories. Posting a sex story is a good way to attract attention and likes which will help you get promoted out of New Members.
  7. drscorpio
    Just a general comment, posting pictures in a thread isn't the best habit to get into because you have a fairly tight budget for the total size of all the pics you post there. It's far better to create a gallery attached to your profile and refer people to it.
  8. drscorpio
    There is tons of chastity stuff on Twitter. Try searching #gaychastity and #teamlocked to find guys to follow.
  9. drscorpio
    Moderator's Note: I moved this here to the Softcore Fetish area. I am assuming SPH = Small Penis Humiliation.
  10. drscorpio
    I know this won't be to everyone's interest, but I am finding it fascinating. The Financial Times are doing a podcast series on the money behind the porn industry. It is not a sexy sort of thing although there is plenty of explicit discussion. I have only heard 2 of the 5 episodes out so far, and 3 more have yet to be released. Still, I thought some of you might be interested. [think before following links] https://www.ft.com/content/762e4648-06d7-4abd-8d1e-ccefb74b3244
  11. drscorpio
    Dude, you are really projecting. I didn't say/imply any of those things. I just pointed out the Thomas invited challenges to those cases. But since you mentioned it in this, he is going further than Alito did in his majority opinion (he assured us these cases would not be considered since the "taking of a human life" makes abortion special) and than Kavanaugh did in his concurring opinion. I would say that he is displaying an extreme position in the sense he is more willing to reconsider these cases than the other Justices. Everything to do with Trump and the Big Lie and the January 6th Attempted Coup are beside the point of the discussion I started about Dobbs and the potential implications of other cases decided on the basis of a right to privacy, and I don't intend to be drawn into that mess. Pretty much everything in your last paragraph was utterly outside anything I ever said, and I think it speaks more to your mental state than mine.
  12. drscorpio
    temporary bump
  13. drscorpio
    The Democrats under Obama had a super majority for a couple of months before Ted Kennedy became too ill to carry on and subsequently died. After that point, they did not have the 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, and McConnell famously stated his aim to insure nothing POTUS wanted would get passed. Should the Democrats have passed laws to protect abortion rights at some point during the 50 years Roe was in force? Probably. But as we discussed before, it was considered settled case law. Part of what SCOTUS is supposed to do is make unifying decisions for the country when law differs from state to state in a way that is disruptive. I do think we were better off with Roe in place.
  14. drscorpio
    I am not muddying the water with discussing Maxine Waters. She likes to grandstand, and that has nothing to do with this discussion. The entirety of the case in Dobbs v Jackson was Roe and Casey were decided incorrectly. No new information was used to justify the reasoning other than the basis by which these decisions were reached was flawed. Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Coney-Barrett stated unequivocally in their confirmation hearings that Roe was settled law that should not be reconsidered. Then they turned around in less than 4 years and voted to overturn the decision. Under the principle of stare decisis, precedents should be honored UNLESS some significant development as occurred.
  15. drscorpio
    Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Coney-Barrett who were all nominated by the last President were all asked under oath by the Senate their position on Roe v Wade. They all stated unequivocally that it was settled law and not up for reconsideration. There was nothing new in the case that was just decided that warranted overturning a 50-year-old precedent. They simply lied under oath, and are guilty of perjury.
  16. drscorpio
    I agree with this personally. I find it distracting. Oddly enough, I was talking about this with a twenty-something fuckbuddy. He is used to having the tv on in the background to keep people in surrounding apartments from hearing him have sex. He says he likes porn with tv in the background; he says it makes it more realistic to him.
  17. drscorpio
    I'm not sure why whoever downvoted my post did so. I am not stating opinion. A sitting Supreme Court Justice explicitly stated this in an official opinion. He is announcing to any anti-gay state official that if you give SCOTUS the case to overturn these rights, he will do everything he can to make it happen under the same reasoning used to overturn Roe v Wade.
  18. drscorpio
    I get that chastity is a growing fetish, and I support everyone's right to their kink. But there is a clear link between frequent orgasms and decreased risk of prostate cancer. If it turns you on that someone else has the key to your cage, that's great, but for your health, you need to cum 4-5 times a week. [think before following links] https://www.nfcr.org/blog/ejaculation-prostate-cancer/
  19. drscorpio
    [think before following links] [think before following links] https://qburgh.com/they-will-come-for-us-next/ In his concurring opinion overturning Roe v Wade, Thomas explicitly stated that SCOTUS should revisit Griswold (the right to have access to birth control), Lawrence (the right to have sex with the person you choose - it overturned all laws against same-sex activity), and Obergefell (the right to marry the person you choose). Voting and organizing for the fall is just that much more important.
  20. drscorpio
    Here's an answer to part of what you asked about. I have no personal experience to share though.
  21. drscorpio
    Several years ago, my late husband and I were attending TBRU (Texas Bear Round Up in Dallas). We had gone on a group excursion to Club Dallas, and I had a pretty good couple of hours taking loads. I was lying in the sling when a hot, muscular Asian dude stepped up between my legs. He was only half hard, but my hole was pretty open. He slipped his cock inside me and began to pump. "You have a load for me?" I asked. He said, "I just shot a minute ago, so I don't know." He slid in and out a few times lazily. "Nice and silky - how many loads you have in you?" he asked. "Six," I told him. His cock immediately got completely stiff (about 7"), and he fucked me hard until he gave me a seventh load. I ran into him again a little later as we were both getting ready to leave. He hugged me and told me what I hot slut I was. I still get an invite to his party at TBRU every year.
  22. drscorpio

    Thanks for following me! Welcome to the forum!

  23. drscorpio
    The prohibition against incest is social not biological. I mean it is something we learn rather than something that is innate. Grown children around a parent who they never knew for the first time will often experience some attraction to their parent. Here are a couple of links you might want to look at, @DanishDude76 [think before following links] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_sexual_attraction [think before following links] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect
  24. drscorpio
    I think there is just a logistical problem filming an actual orgy. You are going to have multiple couples (or threesomes or moresomes going at it at the same time. You need at least one camera man for each grouping, and that means working really hard to keep all those cameramen out of the shots of other camera men. And then how do you edit it together to both get across the feeling that it is all happening at once without leaving out any moment of any particular groupings activities. I think porn shoots tend towards gangbangs because they are much easier to film.
  25. drscorpio
    Moderator's Note: This thread seems out of control. If people want to discuss this concept civilly and without name calling, start a new thread.

Other #BBBH Sites…

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Top Bareback Porn Sites…

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.