All Activity
- Past hour
-
-
I think what your experience is the massive knowledge gap that exists for what U=U means, what the implications are, etc. It's unfortunately because it puts some of us in educator roles in situations we'd rather not have to be educators in. There was a little cheat sheet I saw recently for "how to explain to someone who is neg...." - I'll try to find it and send your way
-
HornDog started following Nashtoxiclvr81
-
chargedodger started following DirtyPozSlut
-
HornDog started following RawCountryGuy69
-
For decades my profiles have always disclosed that I’m poz undetectable and I haven’t have a hard time finding a willing hole. Oddly, in the last 6 months I’ve noticed that more guys whose profiles say they are on PrEP and fuck bb, have been wary of me. On two occasions I was asked to explain what poz undetectable meant. After I explaining it, they passed. Anyone else running into that lately?
- Today
-
glitterbomb started following BurnAfterReading17
-
jizz70 started following Nchikerbttm
-
-
-
Nypiss31 started following Vatican666
-
Here are some that I know or have had to Google when I saw them show up repeatedly on hookup profiles that I don't see on the list: ATM cock block/cock blocker cuddle buddy DTF/down to fuck frot gouinage gooning/gooner HJ picnic spooner
-
Fucking love this! Hope there is more! Love to be used by Stuart.
- 6 replies
-
- bisexual male
- bareback
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Blindfolded Anon Bottom is a Friend
Close2MyBro replied to VersAlwaysLooking's topic in Your Last Load...
I'm one of those guys. My friends have no idea I have a slutty side and LOVE anon fucks. 😊 -
sixel joined the community
-
-
I Corrupted My Young Husband
pozpopperpig replied to Rillion's topic in Bug Chasing & Gift Giving FICTION
Fucking love it! Can't wait for more! -
Tell Me Your Thoughts On Hookup Sites/Apps & Finding Sex
WorkJack replied to rawTOP's topic in General Discussion
That's a great idea. -
As mentioned: I don't think it's ever a decent thing to lie. Whether it's a this or that, that or this, or a mix of both ... lying is simply not ok. Whatever the contrivance; it's just not ok to lie about stuff. Guys and parry, guys can change the subject, guys can do any number of things to avoid telling the truth. Any astute hearer of the previous will be able to understand quickly that the guy is simply not going to be honest, and either move on or accept the situation. Some may say that the guy in question should not be expected to answer certain questions, and that's a different discussion. The question in this topic though, is clear and unmistakable. And, my answer is no. If/when asked, any decent guy should tell the truth.
-
-
I get that everyone is all about this show right now and that I am antithetically not really that impressed. 🙂 I'll accept my role as iconoclast. To lightheartedly make fun of all the bruhaha, however, I created a really low-brow series called "RELAXED COEXISTENCE" - I had to take a break from editing Trunk and Cage. [think before following links] https://x.com/poztoxverspig/status/2014691885953241102?s=20 [think before following links] https://x.com/poztoxverspig/status/2014793946581631275?s=20 I am actually drawing from storylines in the show.....it cracks me up. I can finally fuck again so ya'll only have to deal with me a few more hours! 🙂 TGIF! 🙂
-
I feel like I was asking you a similar question to that you were asking to Trump supporters. But you got frustrated and angry with me. But let's go back to the statement: Then let's go to: Ultimately, you answered your own question, "This goes out to Trump supporters. i want to know and, hopefully understand your perspective." Because both sides have their extremes. Under Biden, Democrats had been governing from an increasingly extreme position. Democrats not only failed to offer Republican voters little to switch sides, they alienated over 6 million of their own 2020 voters. I realize I'm direct and that's off-putting to many. I will take my lumps on that...and do so regularly. But I don't understand why it's so hard to understand the vote and his continued support. Let's go to this version: consider this 2013-14 issue in West Hollywood. [think before following links] https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-rainbow-flag-west-hollywood-20140113-story.html Does anyone in the LGBT+ community feel even a little sad, even if you agree with taking down the flag? If so, that's a conservative principle -- of preserving or conserving culture heritage. If a person feels this way on the political left, why do they demonize others -- e.g., Christian conservatives -- when they have those same feelings in other contexts, say on immigration? We don't have to agree but can't we understand it better? Think about being a Christian conservative, after being demonized on immigration for trying to preserve your culture...and you see people on the political left in WeHo doing the same thing. Don't you get angry, fed up, etc. and some point just shut down? And isn't that as good as any example?
-
How and when did you know you were addicted to cum ?
hntnhole replied to IntoBBvisitor's topic in General Discussion
It isn't. What is addictive (or at the very least, habit-forming) however, is the wanton sexual behavior that earns a bottom a Top's load. Better yet, a number of Tops. More, that addiction, properly identified, is extremely addictive, thank Whatever. -
-
"Is stealthing morally okay?" ^ the title of this thread (it's almost a whole blanket of threads by now) could easily be expanded to a wider question: "Is dishonesty morally okay?" While there may be situations where lying can save an innocent life - in wartime, for instance - the basic question would be as directly above. I doubt any person likes to be lied to, and thus that person (i,e. every person) that doesn't care for being lied to should, obviously, refrain from lying to others. There are ways to parry unwelcome, obsequious probing questions, some more blunt than others. In either case, dishonesty is not the proper way to parry the offense. A reply with something like "talk some other time" (the more polite version) or "it's really none of your business" (a more blunt response) is always better than returning a lie with another lie. At least the respondent doesn't stoop to the liar's level.
-
Hey @lttltvbb - congrats. I have posted a bit on this topic - I'll send you a link about my experience. I'm currently in the recovery period from my last upsizing which is a thing in and of itself if you're going for a 2, 0 or 00. I hope you love it as much as I do!
-
and that is completely honorable, P.T.V.P. It's not asking too much to be completely honest with our (potential) fuckmates; whether in-the-flesh or here on BZ (to a lesser extent, obviously). There's everything right about being honest, and nothing wrong with it; particularly in sexual contexts. If some potential trick doesn't care for some facet of me, that's fine. There are plenty of other holes in the fuckjoint, so each guy can find what he most needs. I too am completely comfortable with being honest about sexual proclivities at the fuckjoints.
-
I just re-read my earlier post, and I want to clarify because they seem as though they are at odds with each other: I think I make best available efforts to inform any sexual partner of my status - via public profile updates, as well as clarifying their understanding of my status. To the extent I hook up with someone randomly, anonymously, whatever, I'm not compelled to stop things in their tracks to ensure that someone engaging in anonymous sex is aware of any potential risk they might be facing, nor do I expect someone to tell me if they don't know their status (HIV or STI). When and if asked in the latter situation, I will always obligate myself to honest.
-
str8iowan4smcock changed their profile photo
-
@PozBearWI the fact of the matter is that nearly 2/3rds of the states in the US have HIV criminalization laws. You've seen and read PLENTY of MY posts from me about the ridiculous low rate of transmission, but the fact of the matter is - if I don't disclose it, I'm still liable under current law in a lot of places. If not criminally, civil charges can also be made. These laws are UNFAIR, and should be overturned, but they are the law. What these laws criminalize: HIV-specific charges: Elevating charges for sex crimes or other offenses if the person knows they have HIV. Non-disclosure: Failing to tell a sexual or needle-sharing partner about HIV status, even if transmission risk is zero due to treatment. Exposure: Actions with no realistic risk of transmission, like spitting or biting, especially in correctional settings So the reality is - YES, under the law, we ARE required to disclose this in most states. And I sure as shit don't want to have to hire criminal and civil defense attorneys and get involved in a protracted court case...we can fight this, disagree with this - but I for one don't want to spend a decade of my life and a huge amount of money being the poster boy for HIV Criminalization reform. Also, your comparison between the flu and HIV is inaccurate. HIV is a retrovirus which integrates with mRNA and attacks the very core of our immune system. The flu does not - it isn't near the level of sophistication of HIV and the way it fully integrates via mRNA into its host...it is helpful to make appropriate comparisons here because they are fundamentally different.
Other #BBBH Sites…
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.