tallslenderguy

"Donald Trump issued an executive order rescinding two orders that Biden signed on his first day in office four years ago, one advancing racial equity for under-served communities and another combating discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation." “As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female,” the president said during his inaugural address." [think before following links] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/20/trump-executive-order-gender-sex

To me, sex is a holistic connection between me and another guy. i think we can connect with people intellectually, emotionally and physically, and for me the ultimate sex is when all three of those are in play, the chemistry is right, and we connect in all three of those places mutually. A step further is when all of those elements get exercised and experienced with one particular guy over and over and the connection becomes a bond. i've come to see that as the 'real' bond of "bondage." i see a 'Top' as someone wired to penetrate, fuck, mold, create, inseminate, impregnate, possess, control, _________ and a bottom as having the corresponding needs/desire to be penetrated, fucked, molded, created, inseminated, impregnated, possessed, controlled, __________. The wonder of it all is we are all individuals and can experience all of these things, or some but not others, in varying amounts and levels of intensity. For instance, to me, a Man Who not only wants to penetrate and fuck me physically, but that also extends as a desire/need to penetrate and fuck me mentally, or emotionally, or both. The variations, combinations, levels of intensity can be infinite. i also perceive myself as having a sort of womb that only a Top can penetrate, impregnatie, possess, etc.. That there is a mutual need, yin/yang. i see it expressed in nature at the most basic level of atoms, positively and negatively charged elements that naturally attract, connect and sometimes bond to form ("create") something other, additional, while still remaining their individual self.

Here's some more substantial benches, butt expensive. [think before following links] https://pleasurefactorys.myshopify.com/collections/benches Here's a pic of a wood, saw horse design [think before following links] https://metro.co.uk/2018/01/17/bdsm-enthusiasts-heres-where-you-can-get-handmade-sex-furniture-7237039/ i wonder if a child sized picnic table could not be padded/modified as a cheap alternative? [think before following links] https://www.homedepot.com/pep/Costway-Blue-Kids-Picnic-Table-Kids-Dining-Table-Set-for-4-Wooden-Bench-Seats-Backyard-HCST02837/332111074?mtc=SHOPPING-BF-HDH-BNG-D59H-059_034_INT_FURN-NA-MULTI-NA-PLA-HDH-HDH-NA-NA-NBR-NA-NA-NA-All_Subclass_New&cm_mmc=SHOPPING-BF-HDH-BNG-D59H-059_034_INT_FURN-NA-MULTI-NA-PLA-HDH-HDH-NA-NA-NBR-NA-NA-NA-All_Subclass_New-11561183930-107925097170-2361450124465&msclkid=fd271756dc8e179b4b70702fbc92e593&gclid=fd271756dc8e179b4b70702fbc92e593&gclsrc=3p.ds

Speaking as a total bottom, it's not really a matter of elected or unelected, it's more about the dickwad.

Agreed. Given the original question, i'm assuming it's not the Top having and orgasm inside of the bottom that the bottom is concerned about, but the question is having the Tops resulting "cum" inside? I.e. a top wearing a condom may still have his orgasm inside of the bottom, but the seed is contained in the condom and doesn't go inside of the the bottom. For me, a Tops orgasm and cum are different, though connected, and i want Him to plant them both inside of me. The bottom who doesn't want semen inside of him, in my opinion, has no right to expect bare sex. Anyone with the internet can learn in less than a minute that a bottom is at risk of infection from pre cum that often a part of fucking, though quantity varies from Top to Top. So, if the bottom in question is not totally ignorant, i think he should not expect to have bare sex with anyone he doesn't accept the risk of fluids inside of him as part of the connection As for the Top? i agree with topblkmale. If a bottom doesn't want a Breeding Males seed then to me, His cock doesn't belong in that bottom. To me, a fuck without at least the potential of breeding, is not fucking. To me, the whole point is breeding... though i define "breeding" in a more detailed fashion than physical. For instance, a Top's desire to open, mold, penetrate, control, possess, etc., to me, are all forms of breeding... but that's another topic.

He just left. my sweet FB, usually 3 to 4 times a week. He wasn't feeling well today, said He'd been sick the last couple of days, probably food poisoning from how He described it. It didn't have and effect on His breeding though, even got a little vocal which He doesn't usually do when He is fucking. He pretty much always fucks hard, He's been weight lifting since He was 12 and it seems every single muscle on His body is hard, so fucking for Him has a lot of muscle behind it. But He seemed to be feeling particularly like He wanted to breed deep, even said: "I may need to come back for seconds tonight." i love when He slams deep when He shoots, i love when His seed goes past the curve... love being inseminated.

my whole body is pretty much an erogenous zone. A massage for me is foreplay, and sex for me is being bred. That said, a massage that leaves me horny is a really good erotic massage in my book. As a total bottom, i don't really want to orgasm when i have sex with a Guy. my "happy ending" is when He has an orgasm inside of me. Touch, from a Guy, for me, is about accessing, manipulating and ramping up my desire and need for Him. For me, being in that continual state of desire is a good thing, as long as i am receiving a Mans orgasm often enough.

As does fundamentalist Christianity. To me, it's more the mindset (emotional set?) of the espousing the religion, than the actual religion itself that makes for the bigger differences. After i stepped away from religion (fundamentalist Christianity in my case), i later ended up in a "Christian" church (to help them start a farmers market). The church was 150 years old, as were probably 70% of the congregants, and they voted unanimously to be a gay open and affirming church. As protest, they refused to perform any weddings until gays could get married legally. They were not fundamentalist in their approach, but still identified as "Christian," and they were accepting of me, not only as a gay guy, but also as someone who freely and openly debated many of their beliefs. After leaving religion, i also read the book Infidel by Ayaan Hirs Ali, who was raised in fundamentalist Islam. i was struck by the similarities between things and ways she was taught, to my own. i know people who espouse Islam and Judaism who are openly accepting of gay people. i know atheists who are just as hateful as many fundamentalists i have known. The US democracy long had laws against homosexuals, i was arrested and charged with a felony for asking an undercover vice cop if he wanted to fuck me (using a 100 year old 'sodomy' law). The state AG in office at the time was a rabid anti gay and had directed those under him to go for blood. i think there are, and have always been anti gay people in every corner and walk of life. I think those in power at the time largely set the stage for the performers, so, we will see.

You do realize that the stuff in yellow and quotes is an excerpt from an article? The writer is not here to respond.

i was going to put this in the Bigly thread, but see it's been closed. Despite the frequent forays into snark, i thought there was some descent debate and discussion as well in that thread. Ah well. Here's an opinion piece i read this morning. i have not verified it's authenticity, but still have known enough people who have similar thoughts and feelings that i think it's a valid piece from a real person. Here's a partial excerpt with a link to the entire piece. "Commentary: I am a Mexican American who voted for Trump. No, I don’t hate myself I’m a proud, first-generation, college-educated and gay Mexican American with undocumented family in the United States, including a mother who was previously deported to Mexico, and I experienced homelessness as a child. I am everything Democrats claim to support, right? Wrong. Democrats have accepted a progressive platform, ignoring decades worth of change and focusing on erroneous issues. They have built campaigns on a foundation of misleading airs and fake vibes. Voting for Donald Trump does not make me racist, sexist, misogynistic, homophobic or any other “ist” and “ic” I’ve been called. I, along with more than half of the voting public in America, am sick of the self-righteous and label-obsessed left alienating us over differing opinions. In her concession speech, Vice President Kamala Harris claimed to have built strong coalitions. What she did was the opposite. She did not motivate enough Black voters, Latino voters, Asian voters, Jewish voters, union voters and female voters to cast their ballots for her. Fewer women voted for Harris than they did Joe Biden, even with abortion being a top issue. To the very end, Harris ignored the data; she ignored what voters needed." [think before following links] https://www.yahoo.com/news/commentary-am-mexican-american-voted-131500521.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&segment_id=DY_VTO_NTK_T2&ncid=crm_19908-1202929-20241115-0&bt_user_id=wU8przkQslG8%2BgQgEkTQ7DrYat2QR1cLn%2BDaVmZzxngIqJCvefWqmIQ%2BWVYABQxG&bt_ts=1731673543360

You are such a sweet, awesome fucker. One of the advantages of a well used hole is not having to use lube. i can't remember the last time a Top used lube with me. i love the feel of a Mans warm spit dropping onto my hole before He penetrates me.

"WASHINGTON — Former President Donald Trump said once again Wednesday that he would pardon Jan. 6 rioters if he wins the election, repeatedly lying about what happened during the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol, which injured more than 140 police officers. "Oh, absolutely, I would. If they're innocent, I would pardon them," Trump said during a panel at the National Association of Black Journalists. "They were convicted by a very tough system."" [think before following links] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/donald-trump-says-absolutely-pardon-jan-6-rioters-rcna164565

i have found some things about me are more intrinsic identity factors, others i can go either way. For instance, i'm total bottom. i've found a work around for guys who wanna suck me, it's actually hot if they like to suck me but not make me cum that way. But i know myself pretty well and that's something i can't honestly choose. Hair i can choose. i think it looks better smooth, but i'm not really doing the hair thing or not to please myself because it really doesn't matter that much. i can be naturally hairy. fur on the ass, bush, hairy legs, moderate chest, pits... never had facial hair because i look like Shaggy on Scooby Doo with a beard, and fucking a cartoon character is a narrow niche. i have found guys are about 50/50 on hair, so if it's an ongoing thing, my Top chooses. Since it doesn't really matter to me, i'd just as soon do whatever turns Him on.

Just finished prepping for my FB and sometimes after i'm done, i will insert a tampon to absorb excess water. It's not me being fem, just really utilitarian, but it does feel kind of kinky at the same time. my reasoning is that if there's to much water there's not as much friction for Him and it may feel better for him? i take it out when He arrives and He doesn't know i do it, and by the time He leaves, i'm always sloppy. Just wondering if anyone else does this?

i've no plans for a Y2K farm, but i'm probably gonna keep my rifle. i think we'll all have areas of enlightenment in the next four years.

Just left. Sweet FB, seems to go in cycles. Lately it's 3 or 4 days a week after He is done with work. He really loves getting oral, front and back, and is so verbally enjoying it, i'm a total slut pleasuring Him. But He has never cum in my mouth, always wants to breed me, which i love Him for. So He's keeping me pregnant lately. He likes to ask after if i felt His load going in. 🙂

"On a Friday morning post on Trump’s social media site Truth Social, the former president referred to one of the most prominent openly gay journalists in the U.S. as "Allison Cooper.” Trump made the subtext even more explicit later Friday during a rally in Traverse City, Michigan, where he criticized a town hall Cooper hosted with Vice President Kamala Harris. “If you watched her being interviewed by Allison Cooper the other night, he’s a nice person. You know Allison Cooper? CNN fake news,” Trump said, before pausing and saying in a mocking voice: “Oh, she said no, his name is Anderson. Oh, no." On Saturday, Trump repeated the name during another Michigan rally, then followed it up during a nighttime reference in Pennsylvania. “They had a town hall,” Trump said in Michigan. “Even Allison Cooper was embarrassed by it. He was embarrassed by it.” In referring to Cooper with a woman’s name, Trump appeared to turn to a stereotype heterosexual people have long deployed against gay men. Such rhetoric evokes the trope of gay men as effeminate and comes as Trump aims to drive up his appeal among men in the final stages of his bid to return to the White House." [think before following links] https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-refers-cnns-anderson-cooper-203011584.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&segment_id=DY_VTO&ncid=crm_19908-1202929-20241027-0&bt_user_id=Dv94amI6yCejmWrPIjSE2LApXT6edhtslMy467EKWoqZJ7lfWCg2XJ2p4I7bSfW4&bt_ts=1730027747542

Another take from Noam... he identifies nuclear war and global warming as having "great importance to the future of this country".... and humankind. i like Noam, he seems pretty balanced in his views on politics, isn't nanana's about either.

Here's a somewhat prophetic take on Trump post 2020 election from Noam Chomsky... who is neither a lover of the republican or democratic party. i think the whole interview is a worth read, but then, i'm very fond of Chomsky. "One way or another, Trump will leave office soon. But the question that still lingers in the air is whether Trumpism will also be gone. In your view, is there Trumpism without Trump? Returning to my original speculation, I think both Trump and Trumpism will remain with us for a long time, both the individual himself and the poisonous currents he has unleashed. These poisons may be virulent enough to bring civilization to a horrifying end. There are workable solutions to the crises that humans face in this uniquely dangerous moment of human history. What happens within the most powerful country in human history cannot fail to have an overwhelming impact on what eventuates — an impact even on survival of human society in any recognizable form." [think before following links] https://truthout.org/articles/noam-chomsky-trump-has-revealed-the-extreme-fragility-of-american-democracy/

Is Trump a fascist? Two opposing views. "Roger Griffin, the author of The Nature of Fascism and a professor of history at Oxford Brookes University, summed it up well: “You can be a total xenophobic racist male chauvinist bastard and still not be a fascist.” Five years have now passed, and the fascism questions have only grown more frequent. Trump has had time to implement quite anti-immigrantand anti-Black policies, and refused to denounce his most extreme and violent supporters, from the neo-Nazis and white nationalists in Charlottesville to the Proud Boys group. And every week, I receive dozens of emails from readers wondering if I stand by my conclusion in 2015, that Trump is simply a bigot with an authoritarian streak, not a fascist." [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/21521958/what-is-fascism-signs-donald-trump Retired Marine Gen. John Kelly, who was former President Donald Trump‘s longest-serving chief of staff, called Trump’s leadership style “dictatorial,” “fascist” and lacking empathy in new interviews this week. Kelly, the highest-profile Trump-era official to publicly criticize the former president, said in an interview with The New York Times that Trump "certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure." “Certainly the former president is in the far-right area, he’s certainly an authoritarian, admires people who are dictators — he has said that,” Kelly said in the interview, published on Tuesday. [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.npr.org/2024/10/23/g-s1-29490/trump-john-kelly-fascist-dictator

my first time having sex with a guy was unexpected. ii was still captive to a religious belief that being gay was "sin." i went down to Long Beach harbor one weekend to help restore a missionary hospital ship. i spent the night and they roomed me with one of the crew members, "Skip." The berth was tiny and that night he came into a dark room where only shadows could be seen from the dim light of a port hole. He probably thought i was asleep, and got undressed and lay about 4 feet away on his bunk. i could hear the sounds of him masturbating, you know, the kinda wet sounds spit on your hand makes when you are stroking? Well, i was fully awake and straining to see, but couldn't in the dark, so i made kind mouth, sucking sounds back... and that got His attention. We went on like that for what seemed forever, no words between us. Finally, i couldn't stand it any more and went over to His bunk. He turned His cock toward me and a life time of lust went into that BJ. It didn't take long, He unloaded with a sigh, and i swallowed my first taste of cum. He rolled over without a word and fell asleep. i went back to my bed and finally slept, When woke up the next mooring He was gone... and i listened to love songs all the way home lol.

Here's a link that takes you to the 31 reasons vs the whole Bill Ackman X page. And here's an excerpt from one "fake news liberal puppet's" response with links to the whole response. "Presidents aren’t the same as mayors. Party politics is very different at the city, state, and federal levels. Liberal and conservative politicians can sometimes push their agendas further in smaller jurisdictions that lean heavily one way or the other, such as San Francisco for liberals and Oklahoma City for conservatives. Presidents representing the country as a whole face much stronger pressure to hew toward the center. The party’s radical wing usually doesn’t run things. Presidential candidates usually pay lip service to the most radical members of their party to keep them in the “base.” But the far-left or far-right wings of each party usually support policies that aren’t popular with the general public, and any president who governs too far toward the fringe will suffer a collapse of approval." Now for Ackman’s list and its flaws. Among other things, he equates some of the fringiest Democratic antics in the nation’s most liberal wards with a Biden-Harris administration that has been far more pragmatic. He takes old campaign promises at face value without doing a simple reality check to see if they ever happened. He also applies logic tests to Biden and Harris that Trump would fail as well. On Ackman’s list of 33 items, for instance, 5, 6, 10, and 16 refer to some local Democratic efforts to decriminalize shoplifting and other petty crimes, tolerate disruptive protests, and “defund the police.” These are best understood as experimental and largely failed policy ideas that some local Democrats tried out, especially after the 2020 murder of George Floyd and legitimate protests against police brutality. These ideas have no traction at the national level. Drop Rick Newman a note, follow him on X, or sign up for his newsletter. Ackman is basically tying Harris to some of the dumbest ideas in the most liberal parts of the country. In item 7, Ackman frets about efforts to “limit and/or attempt to limit or ban fracking,” which is the revolutionary fossil fuel drilling technique that has led to a surge in US oil and natural gas production. If Ackman were scrutinizing a company he planned to invest in (or against), he’d probably read up on relevant statements by the CEO, then go a step further to see if the CEO actually did what he said he was going to do." link below for the rest of response [think before following links] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/commentary-what-bill-ackman-and-other-business-titans-dont-get-about-politics-170901549.html

Okay, i'm just a liberal mindless puppet (hey, i'm a bottom, i don't mind a hand up my ass), and i know this is from a "fake news" source (ABC, i think they did a particularly good job with the AI Obama on this one). But for those who are not convinced of a vast liberal conspiracy that only they can see, here is the actual speech vs the original article i posted that quoted the speech.

Why not, seems like only good ideas to me 😉

Well, some Tops obviously like loose holes, but i don't think it's a universal desire, but individual... for a variety of individual reasons. i was with a Top two days ago Who is very wired for loose, open holes. It's a focus of His. i had an Oxballs pig hole in, something i bought with Him in mind, and was presenting ass up and naked for Him with it inserted and a dildo inserted into it. He loves a gaped hole, loves the visual, loves making it that way as a form of marking, and loves the way it feels. Turns out He also loves a rose bud. He fucked me for about an hour after removing the pig hole and kept pumping me full of air. The overall effect was a lot of hole sounds, but He also liked the feel of the air being pushed back out while His cock was inside of me. The other effect of all that air was it kept pushing back out and ended up giving me a rose bud along with His constant cock manipulation of my hole. i spent most of the day yesterday pushing it back in lol, He did a thorough job of leaving His signature on me. But an overall effect of His fucking was to leave me gaped and budded. For me, a Top purposely doing that is a form of impregnation and part of a Tops identity that i love, leaving a part of Himself in me.