tallslenderguy

I think this is the kind of reason and eloquence we need in the White House.

i don't know that i see it as "burn out," (that terms seems too permanent to me lol), but i appreciate the point. i think we can swing far in one direction, almost as part of self discovery (self preserving?). We are often socially/culturally conditioned against our sexuality, and i think going the other direction and 'whoring' can be a reaction against that conditioning. How much is too much? i think that's individual, and fluid. i think it's easy to make rules and habits that don't always fit the reality of where we are at at a given time. my experience is like others have expressed, sort of the tide coming in and the tide going out when it comes to my sex drive.

"After quoting from the Bible, the Democratic lawmaker said, “A religion that has to force people to put up a poster to prove its legitimacy is a dead religion, and it’s not one I want to be a part of. It’s not one I am a part of.” Talarico then brings up that this bill seems to go against Republicans’ desire to get parental consent for everything. “Every time on this committee that we try to teach students values like empathy or kindness, we’re told we can’t because that’s the parent’s role,” he said. “Every time on this committee that we try to teach basic sex education to keep our kids safe, we’re told that’s the parent’s role, but now you’re putting religious commandments — literalcommandments — in our classroom, and you’re saying that’s the state’s role. Why is that not the parent’s role?”" [think before following links] https://news.yahoo.com/watch-texas-democrat-leave-republicans-161826585.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=0_00

Just left... He went black Friday shopping today and is going to the casino tonight, but said He was horny. Said he was thinking of jacking off, but decided to call me. Told Him i'm glad He didn't waste it, that He has a place to put it. i'm so fucking cum sloppy.

Just left about 30 minutes ago... still floating though. He bred me Wednesday and wanted to yesterday, but i was feasting and we all know eating and bottoming don't go together. It was a tough call, but the food was already in. Lately, our routine involves me sucking Him and doing a lot of kissing an licking of His thighs, balls, crotch, and of course His Cock. Then He turns over and presents His ass. He's the only Guy i will rim, but He so obviously gets into it and is so vocal, it puts me in the zone and keeps me there... so He's found a way. He's really hairy, and i like smooth, but again... i'm so into Him, even His hair is hot to me? He's Latino, so unlike my hair, His is short and curly. His skin is golden brown and absolutely flawless, just thinking about Him makes me salivate. Funny how chemistry can get one liking what i wouldn't normally. He always finishes breeding me, which is probably key to our longevity. He's bred me hundreds of times and definitely has built and taken possession of a space inside of me, which He fills and maintains on a regular basis. Loving life right now.

When it comes to piss, it seems piss drinkers fall into (roughly) two categories: Those into piss, and those into the pisser (and then there's always "versatile" guys lol). i'm strictly "into the pisser." i don't relate to drinking piss from a glass or bottle, or in any way detached from a Mans Cock. For me, the piss itself is the lesser reason for the act of receiving. i'm still working on getting past the taste of piss, has no appeal at all for me. For me, it's all about receiving a Mans desire,, lust, release, pleasure. If a Man agreed to piss in my mouth, just because i wanted it, it wouldn't work for me. For me, it's about connecting mutual desire. i'm the same with force or bullying. A man who would try to force or bully me into taking his piss would be totally missing the point (for me, i know this is not universal). A big part of the mind fuck and power dynamic for me is Him realizing the power and control He already has. Force or bullying comes off as compensatory, him not realizing his position with me. For me, there is nothing hotter than a Man Who shows His desire and asks if i will hold His cock in my mouth so He can piss. There's courage in the act of asking because it risks rejection... but He also realizes His full power when He is pretty confident i will say "yes" and He obtains my submission through my need/desire. That is missing when a person uses force. He may get capitulation, but that is different from desire/need based submission.

If You were my roommate, You could have slid into my ass and unloaded, even if i was asleep.

just left, haven't written about my FB in awhile... don't wanna be boring, just cause He never gets old for me, doesn't mean the same FB repeatedly seeding me isn't boring to read about? idk. For me, He's kinda like a drug and i'm addicted to Him, Him breeding me is like a fix. Butt better. my holes so sloppy when He leaves. Normally i wanna keep all a Mans seed in deep and absorb it, but He keeps fucking and shoots a couple of times, so the outside of my hole is cum sloppy too and i end up fingering and tasting Him from inside me after He pulls out. He wants to sleep over, hang out, watch movies together and eat together and fuck a lot. i've tried to explain about bottoms and eating, but He doesn't really seem to get it lol. idk, it's sweet and hot. Told Him if He wants to sleep over just to give me warning and i'll leave my back door open and He can come in and crawl in bed with me and slide on in. 🙂

MJ's wife runs a counseling business. i would not be surprised to learn that MJ is a repressed gay and his wife is his ally in his fight against being homosexual. Yes, i'm speculating, but many would be surprised at how common this is in fundamentalist circles. They do not believe there is such a thing as being gay, in their counseling against gays they frequently equate it to alcoholism (not kidding here). 'HuffPost reports that Kelly Johnson, the spouse of the newly elected Speaker, runs a counseling business that in its operating documents compares being gay to, among other things, having sex with a family member or animal. Specifically, Onward Christian Counseling Services’ 2017 operating agreement states: “We believe and the Bible teaches that any form of sexual immorality, such as adultery, fornication, homosexuality, bisexual conduct, bestiality, incest, pornography or any attempt to change one’s sex, or disagreement with one’s biological sex, is sinful and offensive to God.” The Speaker, who previously practiced law, notarized the document, and his signature appears on the last page. The company’s website is no longer accessible online" [think before following links] https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/10/mike-johnson-kelly-johnson-onward-christian-counseling-services

"The Mike Johnson hits keep on coming — in early October, the soon-to-be speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives took part in a “prayer call” in which he said American culture was “dark and depraved,” partly because so many young people identify as “something other than straight.” The call took place October 3, just hours before Rep. Kevin McCarthy was ousted as speaker and three weeks before Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, was elected to succeed him. It was first reported this week by Rolling Stone and has been picked up by other media outlets. It was hosted by Jim Garlow, cofounder of the World Prayer Network and founder and CEO of Well Versed, a Christian right organization. “The culture is so dark and depraved that it almost seems irredeemable at this point,” Johnson said on the call, which was posted on the Well Versed websitethe following day. Among the signs of this are that church attendance has dropped below 50 percent and that “one in four high school students identified as something other than straight,” he said, putting air quotes around “straight.” “We’re losing the country,” he added. He said he believes God will lead the U.S. through what he considers a crisis, even though the situation merit's God's wrath" [think before following links] https://news.yahoo.com/mike-johnson-u-dark-depraved-204710159.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=0_00 Stay tuned. In another recent comment MJ noted how Americas leaders placed in leadership by "God," (a common fundamentalist belief). They believe they are in position to do 'God's work,' not represent the people. Many of these would not hesitate to be 'the instrument of' "God's wrath."

idk. Reading through this thread, i begin to wonder if "side" is yet another piece to the sexual culture evolution puzzle? There's nothing like a new term to evoke our staid feelings of what is (or what should be?). For those old enough to remember, imagine the responses before transpeople became more visible? i have to agree (though i think we can do without the moral superiority) that we need to treat each individual with respect, even if they are not what we want or need. To me, as society becomes more and more digital, hookup sites are the gay bars of yesterday. It doesn't feel right to me to hang a sign on the door that says: "we don't serve your kind here?" To me, "side" is yet another descriptor to add to the list along with Top, bottom, versatile. Why not? i don't approach other bottoms (no matter how much i may love them) because we do not want the same thing. If someone identifies as "side" and i don't wanna cuddle, but wanna get fucked, i simply won't approach them.

OMG, as a repressed gay teen, i spent hours in restroom reading the messages on stall walls, just sitting there and being amongst my people lol. No, seriously, i did. Those who did not grow up in an era of repression, where being gay and fucking could get you arrested and charged with a felony, may think it weird that we had sex in restrooms (read: "in hiding").

Fundamentalism is truly a mind fuck (not the good kind), it's the essence of cults. It took me 35 years to process out of it cleanly. i quip: "being gay saved me from 'God.'" That rankles fundamentalists, but if there is a "God," then that God knows what we went through to try to do it the fundamentalist way. What saved me was trying for 35 years to be what i was conditioned to believe "God" wanted, and it didn't work. There was no changing the way i am. I.e., the reality of who and how i am could not be changed by the fundamentalist ideas of what i 'should' be.

Editorial excerpt written by Amanda Marcotte in Salon "I suspect Johnson dodged a government shutdown because he really is, as Gaetz put it, "MAGA Mike." The endless and mostly fruitless battles to force Democrats into budget cuts aren't Johnson's motivation for getting out of bed in the morning. Sure, he claims to want the same spending cuts that Republicans always want. But his heart's not in it, and he's happier dragging the topic back to his personal priority: forcing his rigid religious beliefs on everyone else. He has actually argued, for instance, that a national abortion ban would soon produce enough "able-bodied workers" to "cover the bases of Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid." "It's not that Republicans have entirely given up on slashing taxes and spending. If they regain control over the Senate and the White House next year, we can certainly expect more tax cuts for the rich and further slashing of social programs ordinary people rely on. But by electing a House speaker who is a culture warrior first and a "small government" ideologue second (if at all), Republicans have signaled an important shift in priorities. They're not much interested in investing political capital in widely unpopular government shutdowns. Their energies are shifting towards the cultural preoccupations of the MAGA base: Banning abortion, gutting LGBTQ rights, undermining racial equality, and generally seeking revenge against disadvantaged groups, liberals and people who went to college. The switch from McCarthy to Johnson was never about the budget fight. It was about MAGA's final conquest of the Republican Party." [think before following links] https://news.yahoo.com/much-small-government-budget-fight-110001807.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=0_00

These guys live in a different world from the non fundamentalist population. Most of us, almost instinctively, understand that a father does not make himself sexually accountable to his 17 year old kid. But that is exactly what Mike Johnson is doing. Having been raised in this BS, i know it well. Here's a sample of what MJ means when he says: "...go pick up a Bible off your shelf and read it. That’s my worldview." Spoken like a true ethno/ego centric. His presumption is that anyone reading the bible will come away with the same 'worldview,' despite the plethora evidence of denominations with all their different interpretations of the bible. I.e., there is no standard "worldview" derived from reading the bible. MJ is fundamentalist. That approach to religion is, in my opinion, what makes him and his ilk so very dangerous. Views like the above "War on Technology" and "accountability software" are prime examples of MJ's views that he would impose on the "world" if given the power to do so. MJ thinks we all need "accountability" to his notions of "God."

Surprised no one has mentioned this yet... but as a bottom, the best way for me to cum is from getting fucked/bred. Only happened a few times for me, but when it has, it's the best orgasm ever.

As many here have read, i was married (to a woman) till 2008. While i was still processing out of religious conditioning that disallowed being gay, i had an ongoing fantasy of a Man Who would kidnap me and spirit me away to His secret lair where He'd do all manner of things to/with me. Of course, it was my fantasy, so everything He did just happened to be what i wanted/needed. Now that i am free from the conditioning, and have been free to pursue sex, that fantasy has gone dormant for me. The challenge of the above scenario for me would be: "He would do anything you wanted" At this point in my life, sex is largely about finding Men or a Man Who wants what i want. Go down the list of "anything" and, for me, it's all contingent on Him wanting it as much or more as i do.

"SPEAKER OF THE House Mike Johnson admitted that he and his son monitored each other’s porn intake in a resurfaced clip from 2022. During a conversation on the “War on Technology” at Benton, Louisiana’s Cypress Baptist Church — unearthed by X user Receipt Maven last week — the Louisiana representative talked about how he installed “accountability software” called Covenant Eyes on his devices in order to abstain from internet porn and other unsavory websites. “It scans all the activity on your phone, or your devices, your laptop, what have you; we do all of it,” Johnson told the panel about the app. “It sends a report to your accountability partner. My accountability partner right now is Jack, my son. He’s 17. So he and I get a report about all the things that are on our phones, all of our devices, once a week. If anything objectionable comes up, your accountability partner gets an immediate notice. I’m proud to tell ya, my son has got a clean slate.” " [think before following links] https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/mike-johnson-son-monitor-porn-intake-covenant-eyes-1234870634/

"The second-in-line to the presidency informed Americans on Tuesday that their time-honored conception of one of the founding principles of the country was a “misunderstanding”. Speaking to CNBC’s Squawk Box, he tried to turn the conventional wisdom about the founders’ intentions on its head and claimed what they really wanted was to stop government interfering with religion, not the other way around. “The separation of church and state is a misnomer,” the speaker said in an interview with the TV channel from the US Capitol. “People misunderstand it. Of course, it comes from a phrase that was in a letter that Jefferson wrote. It’s not in the constitution.” Johnson was referring to Thomas Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists Association of Connecticut, written in 1802 when the third president was in the White House. It makes clear that the founding fathers subscribed to a powerful separation of church and state, which they enshrined in the establishment clause of the first amendment. Jefferson in his letter quotes the establishment clause saying that Congress should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. He goes on to say that it builds “a wall of separation between Church & State”." [think before following links] [think before following links] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/nov/15/mike-johnson-separation-church-state-misnomer "In an interview last week on Fox News, the newly elected speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, told host Sean Hannity, “Someone asked me today in the media, ‘People are curious, what does Mike Johnson think about any issue under the sun?’ I said, ‘Well, go pick up a Bible off your shelf and read it. That’s my worldview.’”" [think before following links] https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/10/polite-zealotry-mike-johnson/675845/

i don't get annoyed, but it does tell me something about the Top that needs further discussion for me. Conversely, there are a lot of guys identifying as bottoms who have cock profile pics. i've learned that for myself identifying as bottom, it's more about the orgasm. i've had a FB for almost 4 years now Who breeds me a couple times a week. More recently, last year or so, He's gotten into sucking me. Something i never thought i would do, and generally don't with other guys. For me, i think it works because while we've fucked 100's of times over the years, He has never once made me orgasm from stimulating my penis. His sucking my penis really just makes me hornier for His Cock. Nor has He ever cum anywhere but in my ass, even though i suck Him for a long time, it's more like foreplay and it works for us. On the other hand, if i'm looking at hook up sex with someone i don't know, i'm not going to get sucked or have my penis touched without first knowing why and what He wants when doing that. If he wants me to have a cock, it's not going to work. If He's using my penis to make me more hungry for His cock and cum? That works. So, depends on why He wants the pic.

ErosWired and BootmanLA covered most of what i would have said. i'll add a specific to diet... i've found quinoa to be almost magical when it comes to fiber and mess reduction.

i guess we're not talking side of beef here? i haven't had to deal with this. It strikes me as funny though. Sort of like drive thru: "would you like fries with that." To me, a 'side' is something you have along with the main course, not something one makes a meal out of.

Your response strikes me as a deflection from the fact that an NIH ongoing medical education paper identifies PDE5's as vasodilators. You argue eloquently but don't provide substantiation for your assertion that "It's NOT correct to call them vasodilators, because that term has a specific medical, pharmacological meaning." The National Institute of Health disagrees with you. So far, you have cited nothing, just assertions, speculations and extrapolations based on what you have apparently read. Your arguments almost always impress me, and i'd happily suck your cock 🙂, but as someone who administers these drugs on a regular basis, i'm going to side with the NIH on this one. i appreciate and agree with a lot of what you say (even say as much in one of my responses). i "actually" read a lot of research and also have a great deal of experience administering drugs like vasodilators, as well as dealing with their effects in my patients. All eight of those vasodilators listed are complex and have varied effects on individuals. Give a beta blocker or calcium channel blocker to one person (we usually give those for heart rate or dysrhythmia, and their BP drops like a rock as a side effect. Give the same drug to another and there will be no appreciable change in BP. We monitor both BP though, because we don't know for sure till we try. i know of no drug that has one effect only. Human physiology is an infinite universe. We know and can affect a lot, but it's not much in the context of infinity. When one reads my original post, one is reading my experience and frank trepidation because of all the variables. Yeah, i absolutely treat PDE5's as a vasodilator, and cite research how it affects other areas of the body than the penis and lungs in "normally healthy people." Not most, and they're generally safe for their intended use. No argument there. Are they a different class within vasodilators? Certainly, no argument. Does the risk for heart events/hypontension resulting from the combination vasodilation effect with other drugs (like poppers) become an important factor. Yes, which is what i have asserted from the start. Put another way, just taking poppers alone rarely results in a life threatening effect. Just taking PDE5's alone rarely result in a life results in a life threatening effect. The life threatening effect of putting them together is because of their vasodilation effect, not from a limp dick. We don't know that PDE5's suddenly start effecting the rest of the body because of adding, say nitrates, to the picture. We realize it because those effects become noticeable in a deleterious way. We do know PDE5's work by prolonging the effects of cGMP, which relaxes smooth muscle tissue. All of our vascular anatomy includes smooth muscle, smooth muscle, it's the part of the vasculature anatomy that causes vasodilation and constriction. i know of no research that demonstrates vasodilation/constriction apart from the smooth muscle encapsulating our veins and arteries. I.e., if the smooth muscle was removed, there wouldn't be a remaining 'tube' mechanism that affects BP significantly. cGMP is all over the body and PDE5's work by prolonging cGMP that causes vasodilation. A lot of these things are still being studied. i'm speculating here, but i can see a possible connection between combining PDE5's and nitrates because PDE5's prolong vasodilation, which typically ends pretty quickly with the effects from nitrates alone. idk. But yeah, i see it and focus on the vasodilation effects of both of those drugs because of what that can mean in terms of hypotension and mean arterial pressure that can result in organ death.

To me, you are doing a more than adequate job of communicating your point. i dispute is your correcting me for calling PDE5's a vasodilator. In that case, you are simply wrong. Your correction is incorrect. It all feels pretty silly and pedantic to me. Regardless of what you (or i) may "believe," the medical/pharmacological community does consider PDE5 inhibitors to be vasodilators (see evidence below). i'm not making this up, offering belief or opinion, nor am i interpreting. i am purposefully quoting and providing links to reliable sources. Here's one more source: The National Library of Medicine list of "Vasodilators." (their heading, not mine). They list 8 different kinds of "Vasodilators." Scroll down to number 8. If you still want to argue this, perhaps send your argument to The National Library of Medicine, they'd likely do a better job explaining their rationale for listing PDE5 as a vasodilator than i can. "1. Direct-acting vasodilators (hydralazine, minoxidil, nitrates, nitroprusside) 2. Calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine, amlodipine) 3. An antagonist of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors) 4. Beta-2 receptor agonist (salbutamol, terbutaline) 5. Postsynaptic alpha-1 receptor antagonist (prazosin, phenoxybenzamine, phentolamine) 6. Centrally acting alpha-2 receptor agonist (clonidine, α-methyldopa) 7. Endothelin receptor antagonist (bosentan, ambrisentan) 8. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil)" [think before following links] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554423/

"The Department of Transportation announced in February that it was reviewing Buttigieg’s use of FAA aircraft at the request of U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican. It is also looking into the use of FAA planes by Elaine Chao, who was Transportation secretary during Donald Trump’s administration and is married to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. When the review was announced, Buttigieg had flown on FAA planes 18 times out of 138 flights for official trips since becoming secretary early in 2021, according to The Washington Post.He takes commercial flights most of the time, and when he uses FAA aircraft, it’s usually because it’s cheaper than commercial flights, a Department of Transportation spokeswoman said. The review will “put some of the false, outlandish, and cynical claims about the secretary’s mode of travel to rest,” spokeswoman Kerry Arndt told the Post. Transportation officials also said the total cost of Buttigieg’s flights on FAA planes up to that time was about $42,000. Chao took 15 FAA flights early in the Trump administration, and the cost of just one of them, which was international, was nearly $69,000, the Post reports. When Buttigieg, the first out gay Cabinet member confirmed by the Senate, received the award in Canada, he was representing the U.S. at the International Civil Aviation Organization General Assembly last year in Montreal. While he was there, Quebec LGBTQ+ organization Fondation Émergence presented him with the Laurent McCutcheon Award, which goes to someone who has contributed significantly to the advancement of LGBTQ+ rights. Laurent McCutcheon was the founding president of Fondation Émergence and the creator of the National Day Against Homophobia, now known as the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia." [think before following links] https://www.advocate.com/politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-dollar-buttigieg