Jump to content

viking8x6

Moderators
  • Posts

    2,129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by viking8x6

  1. It's notable here that the main definition and the "especially" definition here actually are different in a fundamentally important way. "strongly and unfairly dislikes" refers to an individual's emotions and internal dialogue. "hates or refuses to accept" refers to an individual's actions and public dialogue. The first principally harms only the individual having the thoughts. The second principally harms the members of the target group. This is why it's important for people to work at making that distinction for their own prejudices (and we ALL have them, because that is part of human nature). The arc of the moral universe may tend toward justice, but it does so a lot more readily if we all pitch in.
  2. Because you're being vague about it, the only thing anyone can do is to search on the title - which isn't anywhere in the forum. Rest assured that you are unlikely to be suspended for asking a legitimate question. That said, I did a search of this forum and found a story that (on a quick skim) seems pretty likely to be the one you're thinking of:
  3. This is truly excellent! The psychological journey is fascinating, and the sex is hot AF. Thank you!
  4. Given that it sounds like you have been in a monogamous (heterosexual, though it doesn't particularly matter) relationship for the last 3 years, of course you couldn't be poz (unless your partner gave it to you). In fact, given the probabilities involved, I'm rather surprised that you were even bothering to test. So my suggestion would be that you think through the issue and maybe look at the real math involved. And ask yourself why you were (illogically) worried enough to test, and scared by the false positives (when it was fairly clear that that was the only realistic likelihood). If there's some unresolved psychological issue or fear going on, take care of that so that it doesn't make your life miserable. Because having a healthy respect for the risks of sexual activity is prudent and sensible, but having unreasonable and unrealistic fear of them is a recipe for unneeded unhappiness. I understand the knee-jerk reaction of fear of a lethal disease (I've had it myself), but the scientific reality of HIV in the 2020's is a very long way from what it was in the 1980's.
  5. That's diversification of income streams, son. And beautifully dovetailed marketing - both products share a common audience. 😄
  6. This has been an issue for nearly a year. @rawTOP is aware of it and will take care of it if and when he can. Because the chat is built on a completely different software platform than the rest of the site, and because he has a replacement based on different technology in the works, this is not a high priority.
  7. I'm hardly adopting false science. Quite the contrary, I'm agreeing with established science which clearly demonstrates that chromosomes are not 100% correlated with phenotype. This is hardly news, it's been known for nearly a century at this point. Also, you miss the point I was making (perhaps I was too subtle) - that gay men in general can be (and are, by some people) construed as not being "real" men, because they don't fuck women, they do get fucked, and they don't procreate. So are we going to throw them out of the bathhouse, too? Blanket generalizations don't work well in this sort of discussion. To view the whole thing from a different angle, the question under discussion in this thread is trans men in bathhouses. Therefore, the relevant consideration is whether they are appropriate people for the activities the discussion participants prefer to engage in at a bathhouse. It's for each of us to decide how much bearing their chromosomes, their musculature, their body hair, and their genitalia (as well as all their other characteristics) have on that. But to decree that one particular characteristic or another is the only one that matters for all the people in the conversation is absurd. You may care about the dude's chromosomes when you're getting hot and heavy, but I assure you I don't give a flying fuck. And I say that with firsthand experience to back up my assertion for my own opinion in this case (although said experience was not in a bathhouse). In other words, if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, who cares if it's really a coot, a grebe, or a loon? Apart from the game warden, of course.
  8. For the various people contributing to this topic who have denigrated trans men as "not real" or the like: As others have said, this is rude. But also, it's absurd. Many trans men are in fact extremely masculine - because they have gone to great effort and expense to become so, in spite of the biological disadvantage they started with. And many of the "real" men you would supposedly welcome in bathhouses are far, far less masculine! I'm talking about all of those exclusive bottoms, self-declared "sissy faggots", and persons with what they refer to as a "clitty", about whom you can read extensively elsewhere on BZ. None of the posts you all have made are against the rules (inasmuch as they haven't been ad hominem so far). Yes, you can say those things here. But if you choose to say it, you can expect to be criticized (and appropriately so) for saying something idiotic. Saying "I don't like seeing that in a bathhouse" is a reasonable personal response to the topic. Saying "That isn't a real man" or "Nobody would want to see that" is not.
  9. You might try contacting them by phone or email https://www.flexspas.com/cleveland
  10. There is no way to attach photos directly to a private message. You have to post them in a restricted album in the gallery and attach them, or else attach them as links to photos hosted elsewhere. You can attach photos directly to a post on someone's activity feed, but that's not private.
  11. Sounds like you did a good job of explaining as well as possible, given his preconceptions. I'd have been tempted to say "Of course you don't understand it. If you did you wouldn't be straight, would you?" Maybe for people with this sort of blinders it would help to direct their attention to the actual evidence in the world around them? Men are willing to have sex with other men despite the risk of imprisonment or execution -- that sounds like a pretty powerful attraction to me.
  12. Back when I was in college a complete stranger on the street offered me money for sex. Which was quite bizarre, as I was walking down a busy city avenue (at a major intersection, as I recall), not in any kind of shady neighborhood. I was on my way home from the university at the time, and had no idea what to do about it, so I just kept walking. Now, in cruisy areas, it's quite normal to be hit on in public, and that kind of approach I've both received and given many times. Not so much these days; the scene is dead.
  13. I'd be delighted to encounter one.
  14. Hey you nasty sexy man! Just thought I'd mention here that I greatly enjoy your contributions. And that I'm sure I'd enjoy more personal (and fluid) contributions from you were we on the same continent 😈

     

    1. PozTalkAuthor

      PozTalkAuthor

      oh thanks! I do my best to contribute to communities I enjoy. Anything I can share! 

    2. PozTalkAuthor

      PozTalkAuthor

      you, we always have talked serious. But you can dirty-chat me anytime! 

  15. I do, a bit. I miss in-person cruising sex (public restrooms and parks and such) a lot more.
  16. Moderator's Note: This topic is NOT in the Backroom. Please refrain from posting inappropriate fetish material here.
  17. I'll just put this here: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/2020-presidential-election-voting-and-registration-tables-now-available.html
  18. If you are considering doing this, here is how (and how NOT!) to do it, per your moderators: @drscorpio's take on it: My take on it: This is a duplicate of a post in the main fiction forum. Please post any comments there: https://breeding.zone/topic/82445-continuing-an-existing-story-of-which-you-are-not-the-original-author/
  19. If you are considering doing this, here is how (and how NOT!) to do it, per your moderators: @drscorpio's take on it: My take on it:
  20. Well, I guess I should have read the text of your explanatory post first, because I answered the wrong question, slightly. The question I answered was, "What actual size dick do you is appropriate to label 'big'?" I said 8 inches - mine is a little under that with a tape measure and nearly everyone I've met thinks it's legit big. If a guy tells me he has a big dick, I actually expect it to be over about 6 inches. I wouldn't expect over 8 unless he tells me it's "huge". Not that I had a ruler with me, but the largest ones I've ever actually seen in person I'd estimate have been around 9-10 inches.
  21. If the system is giving you that for a size limit, you are bumping against your total attachment limit. You can fix it by deleting some of your old or less-important image attachments. More info in the topic below:
  22. This is delightful! Nice character development. It will be interesting to see where it goes.
  23. From the appearance of your screen shot, I'd guess it's a browser problem. The menu bar and main content box should have expanded horizontally to fill most of the window, and they haven't done. Suggest you try a different browser and/or turn off any add-ons that override HTML/CSS interpretation and see if that helps.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.