bb1991

I think there is an big issue in the UK regarding the fact that those charged with crimes are not kept anonymous. The jurors aren't allowed to discuss what they hear in the trial so why can the media? I think it would be much fairer for all involved to give those accused of crimes anonymity until the conclusion of the trial; those who are found guilty can then be named to the media; those found innocent or whose cases are dropped, there by keep their reputations. There have been a fair few examples of 'trial by media' - like the old man (teacher/land lord) in the Jo Yates murder trial; or even the man who was eventually convicted of her murder: both were named to the media before the cases got to court. The old man had his name flung through the mud with accusations thrown here there and everywhere- all because he was questioned by the police- no charges were ever brought against him. Or the headlines of 'angel of death' for that nurse who was questioned by the police for the tampering with saline drips, but again was never charged with anything. (but still lost her job and will probably never work in nursing again) False allegations against teachers are another example: bad local headlines but most never reach trial. The media doesn't portray people as 'innocent till proven guilty'. Only the other week the media was declaring Harry Rednapp as guilty of tax evasion, as if an open and shut case - and he was found innocent. There should be anonymity: people questioned to the police or awaiting trial should not have their names released to the media; it should be their choice if they go public or not. The media always portrays these people as guilty and rarely if ever apologises if they are found innocent (and what's a tiny 2 line apology hidden somewhere in a paper vs. countless slanderous headlines). And the public will always believe 'there's no smoke without fire'. If people had anonymity until after the trial, the newspapers would still get their opportunity to go to town with their damaging stories: but only against those found guilty.

There's one advert where it goes on about 'two letters that will change your life' 'bb: it will change your life' which made me chuckle (sorry: macabre scene of humour at times) There must surely be gay people working at Garnier? - surely they picked up this double-entendre . Bareback is used very very commonly in straight sex too nowadays - it was even on Gavin and Stacey - so its hardly a secret gay joke... its quite an obvious double-entendre. What does the BB in BB Cream even stand for? I thought maybe Ball-Bearing; but apparently not

My first time was bareback I was 14- he was in his 40s - I met him off internet Hooked up under some trees at a park He asked me if I wanted him to put a condom on - I sald 'up to you' I didn't know about STDs and thought condoms were just to stop girls getting pregnant (blame the British education system that doesn't touch sex ed) He didn't cum in me though Second time we met we fucked in his car- this time he did cum in me- he didn't want to get cum on his car seats (expensive car) lol

I think some sort of collection of links would be good - I end up spending ages trying (and mostly failing) to find some good porn on xtube. Then when I find some, I can never find it again!

Peto Coast, whos been in a few Machofucker and lately T.I.M. Videos, is on there- search Peto- theres not many lol

Problem is, the morning after the first night, my ass will be practically clamped shut. We use plenty of lube and everything is fine during sex: it's just the next day when its tight and a little sore. It can take a day or two till it feels normal again and in the mean time, sex can be very awkward and painful because my ass doesn't want to let anything in :S All really annoying if you want to have sex frequently (never mind the effect it has on the ass's other functions)

I have quite a tight ass and find I get sore quite often during sex and my ass can be sore and tight feeling next day. Is there any way I can "train" my ass to be used to taking cock so that I can have sex more often and with less painful side effects?

I used to enjoy getting fucked by older guys (dont now as in a relationship) I think they used to appreciate fucking you more than guys my own age. They definitely found fucking a teenager a big turn on - and I think the fact that they were turned on so much turned me on even more.

Berlinstar films made a movie at one of their parties. Sounds an interesting night

Few near misses where people have come home before they we're expected. But no ones ever caught me in the act. Fingers crossed, They never do!!!

After being fucked - even with lots of lube - when I go to squirt the cum out or go to the loo later, there always seems to be a lot of blood. (it looks a lot when its on tissue but probably isn't masses) Sometimes there can still be a bit of blood the net morning or even the next day. There's no pain or anything. Anyone else have this problem and how can I stop it?

I'm trying to think up flirty nicknames for tops. Bottoms can be Cum-Dump, Cum-Guzzler etc etc etc What ones are there for tops?

If you read Ian Jay's blog, he said that he accidentally caught HIV when someone fucked him when he was passed out. So although I agree, the wording of the advertising does point to bug-chasing: its not true.

Peto Coast and Dan Frisk definite favourites.

I think the porn encourages people to bareback. Porn is a fantasy. It glorify's bareback and raunchy "piggy" sex. People base their sexual fantasies on what they see in porn and then like to try out their sexual fantasies - hense more people try bareback. I think an important thing is that it portrays barebacking and no strings sex in a very clean and consequence free way. For example: porn videos where a bottom is gang banged by 10-20 tops. Perhaps theyve all been tested beforehand, perhaps not. Its obviously not discussed as the porn is trying to portray a fantasy but that no strings attitude crosses into peoples sex lives.

I met my bf on a hook up website. Met for an anon shag - turned into alot more - so I can well believe it happens in sex clubs

Just wondering what you guys do in terms of music and lighting when you fuck? I don't usually have music on, but I've friends who have a special "fuck" mix tape. As for light -when at home- its usually with the lights on or by the light of whatever porns on the tv lol

Usually I only wank whilst being fucked if its uncomfortable or painful - pleasure of wanking gets me through Sometimes if im really enjoying myself il cum whilst being fucked but usually its later on when the tops finished

thin oil based lubes work best for me

Its something I've always wanted to try - but have never been able to arrange.

Lying on my stomach is best for my comfort, can also tighten up to make the top cum quicker, or clench cheeks to stop him going too deep. When I want to be intimate, on my back is favourite, with legs around tops waist or resting on his shoulders, can look him in the eye, kiss, hug, play with nipples etc.

Just bouncing some ideas around (I tend to think a lot late at night)- would love to know what you guys think I was thinking logically. If you are HIV+ but Undetectable, I've read the chances of passing on the infection are lower. Therefore, those with drug resistant strains who do not become Undetectable, have a higher chance of passing it on. Therefore it would make sense (presuming the majority of HIV+ people are having treatment) that most new HIV infections are the result of drug resistant strains I know that ignores people who do not take Medication but I would also presume the majority do take it in order to stay healthy. Anyone got any thoughts or theories for and against?