ejaculaTe

Only the first chapter, and the story is already wonderfully twisted. 

On 7/13/2020 at 10:16 PM, Sfmike64 said:

Garrett started to plow my ass relentlessly, while keeping up a steady stream of filthy talk. Telling me how he was going to get my number and come over to breed me every day after work from now on.

I could use someone like Garrett....

In a totally perfect world, Roommate agrees to leave without any fuss. But if he refuses to leave voluntarily, you have bought yourself a real big headache. Because Roommate pays you rent, the two of you have a landlord-tenant relationship, and that's true even if there is no written lease. If Roommate refuses to leave, you just can't put him and his belongings on the curb. Instead, you'll end up having to file an eviction action; if you think the atmosphere is tense now, just wait until a process server gives Roommate the eviction complaint. I hesitate to recommend that you talk to a lawyer because lawyers don't come cheap. But an improper eviction can expose you to substantial liability (like a few thousand dollars), and eviction actions are real technical, making it easy for regular folks in your position to screw up their case. I totally sympathize with your desire to see Roommate move out, but I also wanted to give you a perspective you may not have imagined.

On 7/28/2020 at 5:57 PM, BootmanLA said:

Yeah - I give new guys (who may not have figured out how to post everything yet) a bit of slack, but if you're still saying "ask me" about every answer, it tells me your answers vary depending on what you think the other person wants to hear. Or that your answers, if honest, are the one(s) that would turn off the most people and you're hoping it won't come to that.

I offer a couple of other possibilities — The guy might want to know if X has a profile on the site; he has no interest in hooking up so he doesn’t deal with the profile. The other possibility is that he was drunk, stoned, tweaked, whatever when he created the profile (or someone dared him to do it), but had no interest in hooking up (and still doesn’t). And these two possibilities aren’t mutually exclusive.

The description of Jake's reaction is spot on... hell, I feel as if I had gotten the slam instead of Jake.

On 3/18/2020 at 7:51 PM, norcalraw said:

The only hassle with being poz, is dealing with getting prescriptions, it can get awkward. Maybe it’s just me, but I feel eyes on me at the counter getting meds...judging me for being a cumslut and getting infected. 

Naw, they’re looking at you as a recurring source of revenue. 

22 hours ago, BootmanLA said:

But if your feet are going in the air, what, they're afraid they'll get cold?

In a word, "yes." Cold feet have a way of distracting you from the task at hand, and I rather doubt the other guy would want to have a cold foot resting on him.

Hungrypighole

Ptyguy

Seaguy

5 hours ago, funpozbottom said:

So yeah, I can sit and watch a movie of hot guys fucking and spend the whole two hours critiquing set design. Does that mean I'm gay?

It means you've read too many home remodeling/renovation articles.... And I too make comments (snide or otherwise) about the set design (usually about the kitchen or the bathroom if the scene is filmed in either of those rooms).

10 hours ago, alteregomn said:

I did.  The leave most of it to the imagination.  Lots of the porn stars are main stream.  Same sketchy sex filming techniques but now there's a "back story" where the bottom trades drugs for getting fucked.  Instead of the edits, someone blows thick white smoke (possibly from Ms T) into the action.   Hot to watch, but I dig the amateur stuff where you KNOW they're having fun with Ms. T.

To my mind, the filming is even more frenetic than Sketchy Sex videos; one could almost think that the cameraman has been hitting the chemical enhancements and now can't stand still. There's the occasional cloud of smoke and the camera sometimes catches a guy holding a torch. If you're really paying attention, you can just about see someone in the background hitting a pipe.  A couple of the bottoms at the start of their particular videos look as if they've just been the recipient of a slam -- the guy has a "holy fuck" look in his face and eyes that, to me at least, says he's just slammed. (I admit that it just could be all pretend, but if that's the case, those two guys are amazing actors.)

14 hours ago, TwinkFoot said:

I have used Gun Oil (Silicone based) for as far back as I can remember, and refuse to use anything else, but the shit is so god damn expensive. Of course it doesn't wear out and that is the appeal of it. What do all of you use? Any lubes you recommend that are similar to Gun Oil but aren't nearly as expensive? 

BF and I typically use Wet or Swiss Navy (silicone based, of course). An advantage to using Wet or Swiss Navy is that one of the national drugstore chains carries them and sells them at sensible prices.

great opening....

15 minutes ago, iamwhatiam84 said:

It can just suck sometimes when walking around out in public and I'm really horny that day......can get quite messy after a while.

That'd be one helluva commercial for Depends (yeah, I know -- I need to get out more, but no chance of that happening)

16 hours ago, cnyrawfukr said:

18 looks like he is holding a mirror, while some white stuff on it. 16 has some sort of white stick or tube in his hand. Mystery solved!

I like that idea... and we can all fantasize about the nature of the white stuff on the mirror and the object in 16's hand...

On 3/22/2020 at 7:35 PM, ErosWired said:

Besides the wastefulness of them, I dislike facials for one very particular reason - their aim is almost universally lousy. I can be lying there with my mouth wide open, a Top right over me with his cock pointed straight down - and not one drop hit my mouth.

Just like in the movies. Art does imitate life in this instance.

11 hours ago, Irvone said:

Still do not know what 19 is doing???

After I looked at the drawing a few more times, it seemed to me that 19 is looking up at 16 and 17. 19's left leg is rather hidden behind 17, but it looks as if 19 has moved his left leg so he's in a half-prone position.

2 hours ago, NLbear said:

I wonder what 16,17 and 18 are doing. Just waiting for their turn? Having a break? Trying to decide which bottom to nail or which cock to attack? 16 looks like he is either pulling on his foreskin or putting on a condom. In the latter case he should politely be asked to leave the party 😉 

Doesn't it look as if 18 is holding a tray?

Numbers 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 14. And what the hell is 18 holding? It looks as if he's serving hors d'oeuvres ("pigs in a blanket" would be so perfect).

When I lived in the mid-Atlantic region of the country, I played several times with a guy who, after he had ridden my ass like the Lone Ranger, would put his dick and balls in my ass. It was an okay experience from my perspective, but needless to say, the importance of me being perfectly still was not lost upon me.

Everything that BreedMeInVegas said -- especially about the blindfold (or eye mask), wrist restraints, and the sling position. Being blindfolded not only heightens your other senses, but (at least for me) adds an element of surrender or loss of control, as will the wrist restraints. Have a good time....

4 hours ago, ErosWired said:

What are you trying to tell us with this? You start out acknowledging that what you did was very wrong and that you broke trust with another person - then you turn right around and tell us how good it felt because it was so wrong, and crow about getting away with it. That doesn’t paint a handsome picture of you, my friend. Not at all.

The internet has an amazing memory: it was not so long ago that concerned1 was agonizing over the decision to tell a potential boyfriend that he (concerned1) had misstated his age on Grindr. I refer the reader to the Feb. 17 post, "Age difference in potential relationship," that can be found in the General Discussion forum. The reader is obviously free to draw his own conclusions.

Exactly what Nclchub and ErosWired said. Any assistant district attorney with a modicum of intelligence wouldn't even need a statute that specifically criminalized transmission of HIV, statutes regarding assault or recklessly endangering someone being more than enough to support criminal charges. And I can't agree enough that there's a fair likelihood that the guy, despite what he says before, during, and immediately after the breeding, will come to have a different opinion. He only need meet someone whom he finds attractive, etc., but that person is mortified by the fact that you pozzed the guy. In a flash, someone will be very upset, very angry, very vindictive, and the target of that anger will be you.

You're playing the odds that the guy's attitude about being pozzed won't change. In this day and age, that's a bet I wouldn't make. Can you definitely say that  the #MeToo movement won't hit the breeding/pozzing phenomenon?

Nothing like making the visitors feel at ease....

16 hours ago, BBCcumdump said:

 I made notes about each encounter and would love to share more if anyone is interested...If so, I will open a thread in the backroom due to some of the content.  Let me know.

Start typing those memoirs... Sex in a conservative small town is always intriguing -- that your encounters were with men of color heightens my interest and, I'm sure, that of many others.

So, how was your trip to Tampa? And Tampa Men's Club...?

8 minutes ago, Sunovabesh said:

But, here comes a 6ft. lean pretty boy with a cock ready to fuck him raw, and recently tested all clear - and here he is not wanting to talk to me, but messaging other guys - guys his own age/slightly younger.

I admire your restraint -- aggravated assault or attempted murder would have been my first reaction, mitigated only by the fact that he paid for your travel.

11 minutes ago, Sunovabesh said:

This scenario usually comes as the older guy wanting the idea of sex, but not wanting the reality of it, nor desiring it. And this happens the most.

This is a specific example of the principle "watch what you ask for because you may get it." A more light-hearted phrasing is "the dog that chased the car and caught it." Down on the ground, though, it's a display of fear and self-doubt: your arrival means that if Mr. G [for "older guy"] puts much thought and effort into achieving a goal, by Gad, he can do it. So what does that mean for the last 45 or 50 years of his life? --Another example of this comes to mind -- Craigslist was famous for having M4M ads in which the writer would fervently express his desire to have a man with 8 inches or more come by and plow him like he was a prairie in the spring. No prize for guessing a frequent outcome: it's too big, I'm not ready, this is a bad time, blah, blah, blah. I don't know the fancy psych term for all of this, but the word "avoidance" is coming to mind. Actually, as I sit here typing, it sounds like a pretty good description. -- I suppose my point is that your experiences, aggravating as they are, are within well-worn patterns of human behavior. I readily admit that being in the midst of the encounter is uncomfortable at best and quickly approaches the level of "damn annoying." 

16 minutes ago, Sunovabesh said:

but their mind is not on my well-being or such, but rather on their means of "oh, I'm not lonely anymore, and now that I have a younger guy in my life, I can put all my emotional issues and problems on him to fix it, rather than change as a person, because look - have a relationship now."

At a bit more abstract level, the issue of loneliness among the elderly is a concern especially in the health care context -- folks who have frequent bouts of loneliness or social isolation have a higher risk of malnutrition, injuries caused by falls, heart problems, etc. But you're not required to make the world a better place just because some guy sees you as the panacea to all of his emotional and psychological woes. The catchline "make the world a better place if you can" doesn't require herculean efforts on the part of the listener, just that the listener do what he can to improve his little corner of the world. I can't adopt every dog that's in an animal shelter in the US, but I can (and did) adopt two rescue dogs -- their world is pretty good and so is mine, but I digress. Going on a date, however you want to define that term, doesn't require you to have a master's degree in social work so you can be your companion's therapist for the evening.

41 minutes ago, Sunovabesh said:

The men I dated (51 (18 at the time), 39 (18), 26(19), 49 (19), 54 (20), and 49 (23)) just kind of did the same thing - which was act like everything was fine and dandy, but then out of nowhere started to yell and accuse me of things I never did.

At the risk of making too broad a generalization, that's how men of that generation (hell, it's my generation also since I'm in my 60s) learned how to approach conflict. The emotional sensitivity that -- watch out for another broad generalization -- guys of your generation possess (or at least have been exposed to) was something that developed in the mid- to late-80s. By then, all of us poor saps had been molded and formed, and it could take some real god-damned effort to change. Again, at the risk of boring the reader, it took me 4 years of therapy to get myself on a better emotional path, and the emotional and psychological reactions of 50+ years ago still occasionally flare up. I'm not excusing their behavior towards you, just trying to explain it.

I don't have any other ideas, clever or otherwise, at the moment about this. I'll mention though [that damn risk of boredom again] that my boyfriend of almost 2 years is more than 20 years younger than I am. There are guys of my age who really do give a damn about younger guys and who appreciate the energy and perspective they bring. (Note that trophy spouses are a societal-wide phenomenon, and if you read enough history, you'd think that's what the societal elite is about -- who's on whose arm and getting laid that night.

A note of appreciation though (this and $3 gets you coffee somewhere in America).... thanks for raising the subject and for challenging us to look at ourselves and around us. You can modestly disavow any intent to have such an effect, but thanks for the time and effort.