Hey sluts, I need an official ruling

[BREEDmeRAW]

NO !!! It does Not count as taking a load. Direct Deposits REQUIRED to count as a load.

The ass can be filled with cum and a good feeling for the bottom, it does not count as  officially taking a load. Some guys do "freeze" several loads and later inject it in the ass with a full feeling, it does not count. Swallow the load is acceptable but does not count.

Especially for men that are chasing and/or bugchasers. HIV is not transferred if exposed to air. You can lick cum off a wall/floor or mixed with food and down your throat. Mailed cum to be inserted are all options, but Direct Deposits are REQUIRED to be counted as Officially taking a load.

[indianowned]

In my case I am never used with a condom. 

[norefusal]

anyone saying no is obviously french and trying to pull some champagne type bullshit. 😜

let me put it this way: if someone toxic fucked u with a condom and then left and you, never having asked his status, go ahead and shove the condom up your ass smearing the toxic jizz alll over your stretched out walls and you get the fuck flu weeks later - guess what: it fucking counted as a load taken. 

when the police pull you over w a dui they don't give a fuck you only drank "sparkling wine" 😜

10 loads up your ass is 10 loads up your ass. not "but only 9 counted"  

[hntnhole]

First, Thanks to NJRawDaddy for coming up with an entertaining thread.  There are more entertaining facets to this question than I would have believed. 

My thoughts;  

1.  "taking a load" means sperm being transferred from one man to another (at least here on BZ), generally from one guy's cock/balls to another guy's breedhole.  No intermediary needed, simply cock to hole, no "vessel" of any kind needed for the transfer.  Otherwise, it's merely a contrivance, as opposed to a raw fuck.  There's zero chance of "connection", it's simply a substance (however delightful and needed) being transferred from one man to another. 

2.  About as exciting as staying home on Saturday night to watch reruns of Lawrence Welk.  

[PozBearWI]

Yes although I fail to see the point.  If I were going to pour the jizz into my hole anyway, why not directly?

[tallslenderguy]

To me? partly.  i have a fairly complex view of the Top/bottom dynamic.  To me, a Top has two cocks, His physical cock and an internal cock that drives the external, physical cock.

 i don't think i've ever met a Top Who wore a condom because He loves the way it feels, He does it to protect Himself against potentially catching an STD, or maybe He has cleanliness concerns. Either way, He is sacrificing part of His total desire to penetrate, fuck, orgasm, inseminate, breed.  As i see it, all of those involve His physical cock and His internal cock.  With a condom, he is sacrificing the element of skin on skin,  To me, He's literally avoiding/sacrificing that component of Topping, even if He's the one Who ultimately empties the condom into His bottom.  

Two parts of bottoming i desire/need (crave lol) is receiving all of those parts i listed. While i perceive orgasm and insemination as closely tied together, i also see them as distinct. So, even if He ultimately empties the condom into me and seeds me, He disconnected it from His skin on skin  orgasm inside of me. He not only sacrificed His physical skin on  skin breeding of me, He also sacrificed some of the pleasure of His orgasm.  i am impregnated and bond to both., and that's missing with a condom. 

Edited 12 hours ago by tallslenderguy

[NWUSHorny]

I'd call it artificial insemination, it can work if your just trying to get inseminated, but no where near as enjoyable as natural insemination.

[NYBBGUY58]

No. I want to know that as I feel the top losing control that the load is more or less simultaneously shooting up inside of me. That's half the fun!

[phukhole]

Yes, but only if you take the condom off the guy who just fucked you. It doesn't count if you find the condom on the floor.

[SIReast]

On 3/4/2026 at 3:50 PM, NJRawDaddy said:

The top didn't empty it in me.  He left about 30 seconds after he came, and I emptied it in me.  So... Yes?  No?

no

[fillforfun]

It does! And if the condom was lubricated with spermicide (which most are) then you have a HIGHER chance of getting infected by whatever STDs the top has, because the lubricant is an irritant to your skin as much as it is the sperm (it's a slight increase, but measurable).

[Sfmike64]

18 hours ago, RotzBBengel said:

Wow, an American versed in Byzantine church history. Respect! Apparently your school system must be better than its reputation... 😉😋

Made me think of the rulings of the Council of Chalcedon on the nature of Christ: fully divine and fully human at the same time, without confusion, change, division, or separation.

So maybe he's taken that load AND not taken that load at the same time.

Man, this is so Zen... 🤣🤣🤣

ROFL! That's hilarious.

I have a university degree in history and grew up Catholic. 🙂 I was a very nerdy boy who paid attention in school.

[anonCUMtainer]

OMG I totally love this question. Thank you @NJRawDaddy for posing it.

I think it's an acceptable loop-hole. So, I vote yes.

I would do my best to avoid it, but if the breeder sneaks a condom ON and he ejaculated inside me and ultimately I receive his seed. I think it counts. It's just NOT the order of operations that I would desire it to be. I have made the exception and this was the only acceptable compromise to me.

I think depending on the guy its worth the trade off.

[bareback-flipflop]

I love this thread. It’s so scientific (and I love science as being an academic), furthermore it needs a multidisciplinary approach. 
However, as not being a native speaker I would definitely use a local expert, LoL. 
I guess we should start to decide on the meaning of the word “taking”. After that we also should clarify the meaning of “taking a load”. Plus load also needs clarification.  And we should do it from at least two directions, from the direction of linguistics and also philosophy. The linguistics approach also has two layers the daily use of terms and slang. And if it wouldn’t be enough, I believe that we need a psychological approach, too. 
So it’s so comprehensive. 😁😁

To touch upon this last one, from my perspective the point is to be barebacked and feel how the top is exploding in me. Therefore, again, fron my perspective the original question makes no sense because I don’t let anybody to fuck me  in condoms. In the very low numbers of exceptions the top is hot that the fact he fucks me matters much more stronger than being barebacked. I mean , if Tom Hardly would fuck me but he would want to wear condom, I wouldn’t say no. 
All in all, if taking load means being fucked and bred, it can’t mean putting jizm from a condom. 
 

[sub4oralcum]

This is just semantics. Did a man cum? Yes. Did that cum end up inside you? Yes. So, did you "take" a load? Yes! I take loads in lots of different ways. Down my throat, in my mouth, all over my face, in my ass, on my ass. I take it by sucking cock, by men jerking off, by getting fucked, by licking it up, by finding cum filled condoms and consuming their contents. I've even sucked several loads from sloppy pussys. To me, getting a load is taking a load. It's a load I didn't have before.