Most BB Porn SUCKS!

[Redviking81]

Here is one of the hottest short videos on XTUBE I've seen in a long time! Nice fat long cock, you can see the bottoms butt being pulled in and out, you don't get to see the load, but you hear it when he shoots! Awesome!

http://www.xtube.com/watch.php?v=qU7Ky-G170-#.U5FBbPldUpg

[TigerMilner]

This one is hot. Love internal cumshots.

Here is one of the hottest short videos on XTUBE I've seen in a long time! Nice fat long cock, you can see the bottoms butt being pulled in and out, you don't get to see the load, but you hear it when he shoots! Awesome!

http://www.xtube.com/watch.php?v=qU7Ky-G170-#.U5FBbPldUpg

[SpermMyCumhole]

I know exactly what the problem with bareback porn is, I think the comments is this blog post can sum it better than me. http://maxsohlblog.com/2014/05/02/contestant-5-jack-handler-so-you-wanna-be-a-cumdump-timfuck/. Basically it's the mentally of the producers. That's all..

[bbfan74]

Couldn't agree more.

BB studios should show real breeding (and breeding means cuming inside a guy's ass and not pulling out!). That's what we want to see, that's what happens in real life.

But most studios cannot take any customer feedback. They simply delete the negative feedback (TIM did that several times with my comments) instead of taking them as suggestions, which is what they were supposed to be.

So yes, I agree with the title of this topic: Most bb porn these days suck.

My favorites are still Machofucker (although not all of their scenes are great either) and RawStrokes (and they still do not offer individual downloads). So I'll continue to watch private / amateur porn on XTube, which is more authentic anyway.

[drscorpio]

I was very disappointed by Antonio Biaggi's porn site. I was expecting to see lots of good internal cum shots because I have seen him give so many of those in other people's films. But every single scene is a pull out, beat off, and only stick it back in when the orgasm is done. I didn't stay a subscriber.

[Human Behavior]

I can see both sides of the coin on this. I love seeing the internal cumming because it seems more natural, but I also want to see some jizz when I'm watching porn. The best cum scenes are the ones where the top cums internally and leave the bottom's hole oozing cum. But I guess these are difficult to execute.

I do agree that the "pull it out, jack it and stick back in after cumming" routine gets a bit old and seems unnatural. I would never do that in my actual sex life. The pullouts don't irritate me nearly as much as watching a BB scene that ends with the top cumming in the bottoms mouth instead of a breeding.

[BoredMidwest]

I can see both sides of the coin on this. I love seeing the internal cumming because it seems more natural, but I also want to see some jizz when I'm watching porn. The best cum scenes are the ones where the top cums internally and leave the bottom's hole oozing cum. But I guess these are difficult to execute.

I do agree that the "pull it out, jack it and stick back in after cumming" routine gets a bit old and seems unnatural. I would never do that in my actual sex life. The pullouts don't irritate me nearly as much as watching a BB scene that ends with the top cumming in the bottoms mouth instead of a breeding.

I agree, but shooting inside seems so much more real. Who actually pulls out, shoots, then goes back in???

[bbfan74]

I know exactly what the problem with bareback porn is, I think the comments is this blog post can sum it better than me. http://maxsohlblog.com/2014/05/02/contestant-5-jack-handler-so-you-wanna-be-a-cumdump-timfuck/. Basically it's the mentally of the producers. That's all..

He took off the comment after I posted a comment there too. As I said before: TIM and its people are big fans of censorship, they have deleted comments of mine many, many times.

And my comments were not rude, they just were not praising their work. But I am a customer of theirs and have often bought their scenes (mostly used the download-to-own option), which means I mostly like their work. However, I'm not a big fan of their recent work and have posted this on their website, so I don't know why they are not grateful for honest customer feedback.

[Guest fuque_toy]

I agree, I'm even sick of TReasure Island's lameness these days, they waste 99% of the cum by pulling out, and they shoot their gangbang scenes over several days. You mean to tell me in scenes such as DAwson'd 50 load weekend, What I can't see etc, that if a bottom took 25 loads or more non-stop you would see a constant river of cum flowing from their ass, but not in porn as they piece togther the shoot so the bottom only has a few loads in them at a time.. Wouls someone just shoot a video with one take non-stop action with a few cameras for different angles... I am at the point now where i only watch amature stuff, because the studios are on;y interested in the look of the models not the sex itself.. It will be their demise.. People overtime will stop buying the lame product. I suspect they already have

I totally agree. Amateur is a crap shoot but, it's still better then most of the fake garbage that the studios are mass producing

[Confident]

I'm wondering if lawyers have anything to do with this... a percentage of bareback stars are HIV positive - it's not speculation, we all know it. It just is what it is. I'm pretty sure knowingly exposing someone to HIV is illegal (it would have to be, at least in some parts of the world). So maybe the positive actors are refusing to do it, on the grounds they MIGHT be prosecuted somewhere down the line - with hard video evidence to prove it.

There's an interview with Paul Morris floating around, where he was asked point blank whether a guy had been infected on a TIM set. He had a "neither confirm nor deny" attitude about it, so it sounds pretty likely. I don't think I'm by any means right, but it doesn't make sense for porn companies to deliberately give customers the opposite of what they want. There's got to be something else going on in the background here...

[drscorpio]

As passionate as many of us are about seeing internal cumshots, there is another group of porn consumers who will always believe an orgasm is faked if they don't see the load actually shooting out of the top's cock.

When the top shoots inside and pulls out to show a cummy ass, they assume it was fake cum like the lubes that look like cum. I have seen guys online bitching about internal cumshots being fake when you can see the top's cock pulsing and the cum drips out when he pulls out in real time. These guys will never be happy with internals.

The best compromise (and I acknowledge it is a big let down for those of us who like internals) is to pull out, shoot one spurt, reinsert for the main part of the load. But that requires a top who can execute all of that in the moment of orgasm. So I think a lot of studios settle for the lame pull out, shoot your whole load, reinsert. I was really disappointed when I saw that all the porn at Biaggi Videos was like that since we have probably all seen Antonio do some excellent internal cum shots for other producers.

[bbfan74]

When someone shoots inside and pulls out, you see it's not fake because the cum is dripping either from the hole or from the cock.

I mean what's the point of bareback porn if they don't shoot inside. I'm sure the consumers frustration is because the studios STILL have not realized that customers want to see internal breeding! At least RawStrokes is slowly getting into the right direction. Many of their recent scenes have internal cumshots.

[nekofox]

As passionate as many of us are about seeing internal cumshots, there is another group of porn consumers who will always believe an orgasm is faked if they don't see the load actually shooting out of the top's cock.

When the top shoots inside and pulls out to show a cummy ass, they assume it was fake cum like the lubes that look like cum. I have seen guys online bitching about internal cumshots being fake when you can see the top's cock pulsing and the cum drips out when he pulls out in real time. These guys will never be happy with internals.

The best compromise (and I acknowledge it is a big let down for those of us who like internals) is to pull out, shoot one spurt, reinsert for the main part of the load. But that requires a top who can execute all of that in the moment of orgasm. So I think a lot of studios settle for the lame pull out, shoot your whole load, reinsert. I was really disappointed when I saw that all the porn at Biaggi Videos was like that since we have probably all seen Antonio do some excellent internal cum shots for other producers.

That's the one thing that's always going to be a catch-22 about. When we're doing the act, we know when we're about to actually shoot and do so, but at the end of the day, that too isn't always as visible to be seen. Some of us are guaranteed to shoot a huge load that can be seen (after a good while of waiting/edging), but others aren't so lucky. What's to say that if they do shoot, it's always going to be highly visible? That's the only thing that would be my "issue" when they are shooting inside the bottom.

[baggerr]

they pull out for the "cumshot" Almost all porn straight or gay is done this way. They go for the visual of blowing the load. When you cum inside you dont see anything which defeats the purpose of "porn"

I realize that some of us want to see the guy blow his load inside But its anticlimactic visually and porn is all about the visual. All straight porn is this way, except for the nich of creampies, which is cuming just inside instead of balls deep Again, done for the visual.

[Guest]

Besides requiring tops to pull out before they cum, my disappointment with most porn is the boring close shots of cocks pushing in and out of asses, which go on ad infinitum.

 

What makes watching sex between men hot for me is seeing their entire bodies while they fuck - especially their faces, which reveal more about lust, passion and the intense thrill of sex than just their anonymous body parts.