All Activity

@tallslenderguy So to start with an answer to your Qs, first consider the above thought experiment -- typical in philosophy, economic, and political science. What did you do in thinking about that? The only (simple) answer is to do absolutely NOTHING with the offered gold but stick in room/box and tell no one. Answer: Even at that high volume of $, you can never help everybody. Let's say you cash it in and dole it out to people and groups you think are worthwhile, there will always be others you've missed or can't get to. But you've now flooded the gold market and devalued it. You get back to a fraction of the original (supply/demand -- markets, not capitalism). That then undermines all world currencies, which begin to collapse, as they're foundation is stores of gold. That, then, triggers global 'systems collapse' (search on that phrase). Society is 'a system' and systems need to be as self-sustaining as possible either independently or in groups. The human body is a great example of inter-related systems to provide an analogy...simply: it's better not to need a ventilator to breathe than to need one. Most times, government programs are the ventilator. UHC is a great example but let's only consider one of many aspects for sanity. And, with it, only the 48 contiguous states. A construct to understand one issue with UHC is population density via OMB/Census Bureau defined Urban Areas ("Places" with minimum 5k+ population or 2k+ Household; I'm using caps here to imply a defined term). 80% of our population live in Urban Areas but those cover only 3% of our land area. It's easier to provide UHC (or ANY service) in densely populated places...but a government program can't be selective. So everyone would be required to pay the same by increased personal taxes and/or increased consumer prices as corporate taxes get passed along. But rural populations always get less -- and that's OK if they're not required to pay for services they can't really use. And this is where partisans, Democrats here but both sides across issues, stop considering other people. The 20% outside Urban Areas makes up ~30%+ of Republican voters. What's in it for them? And the cutoff of 5k people is a arbitrary thing. It's not like a city of 7,500 people is a glowing megalopolis. But I don't want to answer your Qs purely from a UHC perspective. It's just illustrative. Government isn't a system, people are systems and the society we put together. Government programs are ventilators. They try to fix a problem but, like a ventilator, it shouldn't be permanent. At minimum government programs should not create more problems, like increased debt. I won't get into that here. But, as a centrist, I will consider any program -- even a program I dislike -- if it's paid for. I will ignore any program which is not, even if I like it. It's hard to consider Democrats viable after their spending plans in the 2020 primary -- where multiple candidates funded multiple proposals from the same increased revenue stream, mainly on the progressive wing. And the few times they were called out for it, the reply: "it's not the plan, it's the idea." No. I can sit here and say no one should have to work so they can play all day long! That idea is great. But it's bogus. But consider your Q, simplified here, "what should a government provide." That's sorta a Democratic perspective -- "what can government do?" I look at that this way: "How can government help the most yet be involved the least?" I'm looking for a balance. Think ACA. It's about paying for private healthcare. It's not government-run or facilitated healthcare. Principally, that's balance. Opposite side example, to demonstrate this from convos with conservative/libertarian friends, I argue: "Financial market regulation is an absolute necessity due to greed and market manipulation." But those convos don't happen on this site! I'd say it there if they occurred. But this is way too long. I'll leave it there but happy to have a conversation about issues, topics, etc around it, or anything.

Ah cool, fun and interesting question. i despise AI as a substitute for individual expression. i've been on a few gay dating sites where scammers were using it to reply to attempts at engaging... which i get coming from scammers, but when i see guys using it as a tool to connect? Makes me a wee bit crazy. i'm going to answer the question, thinking on it, and would also like to read your answer to the through experiment as well, and that we both answer prior to reading the others response? What think you?

B1g- Yes thats exactly what I mean, if i get hospitalized for my heart issue or anything else..

Funch 💋💧

Yes 💋 💧

Better swallow 💧💋💧

Pulled pork with plenty of Hot Sauce to add to the memories.

I looked for that post, and here's a link to it: https://breeding.zone/topic/38710-warning-points/page/4/#findComment-971420

YES! An update! And as usual, it did not disappoint! Thanks!

[think before following links] https://xhamster.com/videos/anonymous-cum-donors-breed-ex-military-fag-xhWsVa6?utm_source=ext_shared&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=link love to be the btm here...woof!!

[think before following links] https://xhamster.com/videos/i-need-to-fuck-you-right-now-6859271?utm_source=ext_shared&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=link damn thats hot!

[think before following links] https://xhamster.com/videos/bareback-pounding-and-seeding-in-the-basement-8524235?utm_source=ext_shared&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=link Love this top, execellent fucker and breeder!

You said it right there. I hate mainstream porn for exactly the reasons you stated. There's something unfulfilling about the staged, scripted performances that lack genuine emotion and connection. I prefer the kinky couple who get off on showing the world just how perverted they are. When the moans are real, we all recognize them in an instant. They can't be helped, for it is a moment of surrender to the pleasure received, a raw and unfiltered expression of ecstasy that transcends any act of performance. The look of a bottom who can't handle the fucking but keeps submitting to the dick is absolutely priceless. It's a testament to their trust, their willingness to push beyond their limits, and their utter devotion to the act of submission. There's a certain beauty in the struggle, in the way their body betrays their mind, craving more even as it reaches its breaking point. And nothing is hotter than watching a guy's eyes roll back as he is overwhelmed. It's a moment of pure, unadulterated bliss, a surrender to the sensations that consume him completely. The way his body tenses, the involuntary moans that escape his lips, the sheer intensity of his expression—it's a sight that leaves an indelible mark on the mind, a reminder of the power of pleasure and the depths of human desire. These are the moments that make kinky performances so captivating, so authentic. They are a window into the raw, unfiltered experiences of individuals who embrace their perversions without shame or hesitation. It's a celebration of desire, a testament to the beauty of surrender, and a reminder that the most powerful connections are forged in the heat of genuine, uninhibited passion.

I'm hoping HIV treatment gets to the point of six month injections.

@Pozzible I think you've down a different road. You can see the exit polls here for VA and navigate to NJ too: [think before following links] https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2025-elections/virginia-governor-results These are regular studies of voters done by a Edison Research, paid for and reported by all major media. I think NY Times and FOX News team up for a different service...that may be Presidential elections only. Given the depth of questions and limited time, they asked / reported only two political questions this year -- one supported by each party as noted above. Again, you can see the results there on the site. Additionally and on those topics, I'm not sure how many Republican governors or state legislatures led by same have passed pro-gay rights bills let alone trans. Equally, I'm not sure how many Democratic governors or Dem-lead state legislatures have passed law restricting migration. The point of their work, as reported by media companies, is how divided we are. I'm not sure where you're going with your response.

ohh wow it is so hot!!

Sorry that that was such a long AI response. So do you think the AI listing is an example of this? Because I don’t think those ideas are responding to anything mainstreamed by the Democratic party. The Republican ads set up straw men rather than respond to anything promoted by Dems.

The way I look at it, there are some HUGE guys out there, and they need to fuck, too. My loose, sloppy hole isn't for everyone, and I'm happy to be of service to huge hung dudes. They seem to like that I'm not going to tap out, and they can go as hard and fast as they want. Honestly, I think it's more THEIR insecurity. They're nervous you cant feel them because they are so small. Don't let their insecurity get in your head, bro.

Yes Sir!! That’s the way to use us bottoms.

Pin me down Sir. Make me your son.