skinster

Actually, same cock sucked more than once. But I think only in senior year, and plenty of hand action before that.

You're not weird. That guy didn't really go all that far. But there is a first time for everything. I can tell that over time there will be less of those before you will want more and more instead. I've seen a bottom gagging on me pissing down his throat. It also happened to be his first time, and he did agree pretty much to a similar setup for no questions asked. We played with much more.

I think site operators should see drops in paid clip rotations and banner ad revenue from such kind of policy - there got to be some economic impact. Just like stupidity should be painful. May be not a full-blown Darwinian Awards but nevertheless. Premium membership fees alone were not the only funds they were receiving, but it is a sure thing what they want to gain on. Variety of amateur content used to work for me, and I would have stayed on their pages for much longer and clicked on more of them than it is now. That was the business model - views and clicks and average time spent per page for unique visits. Go ahead, verify all your silly content. How many times would you want to see the same 1-min promo clip? Right. And to pay for membership and then see only pay-per-view or get some other monetized-only content - yeah, that's a nouvelle idea to separate me with my money. Porn was the first line of business to make money online. There is simply no reason for me to pay for online porn in this day and age.

Instant hardon before and after pancakes LOL.

That is a sign of proper mindset in a relationship that the bottom is looking to satisfy the top outside the bedroom just like when in it. That's what it should be. I am lightly jealous.

I'd say stay with your original idea. If it needs expansion - sure. BugBoyEric is less of a cliche than BBEric, but it's not like you're using rubbers under your old name either.

Raw. A new ass especially if smooth is so exciting!

Some beautiful ass there, man

It's not only horny men but also men that are there for the same reasons with everyone else. That ass would have been popular and stuffed proper. Even if that was a next week or two in between - ever more exciting to make a bee line back and take the rough edges out with more practice. Getting hooked is not even the word. Definitely. 100% <knowing evil grin> P.S. Almost doesn't count.

FF is far from stand-alone separate in anything fetishes. I'd say that finding a FF person with no other non-vanilla interests would be a harder task than coming across a kinkster of many ways. The rest depends only your imagination, willingness of your wallet and your self-awareness in the fetishsphere. Beyond just sexual or raunch practices and more gear-related things I can say rubber/latex, leather, restraints and boots/trainers would be the most common choices to be combined and extended at will. They are very close neighbors to FF. Having a sling would bring it to a pro level of interest.

There are benefits to both views that you mentioned. To me compatibility (physical and mental) is a bigger key than heightened level of virginity or major existing skills. It is about (for lack of a better word) sharing a mutual development experience, bonding over mutual kinks and molding to a degree of a deeply mated situation sexually and domestically. Most of other things don't establish any similar connection and feel like quickies and second-hand sloppy holes. At the same time having virgins gets tiring quicker than you think. When you're broken in by a particular hand, you would feel like a broken-in glove to it. To me - that's the biggest ownership idea. That's what brings in chemistry to the collar. The intimate, sleazy side of filth, the connection. Not passing pretty butterflies or immediate gratification - open mind before an open ass.

Oh yeah. Too many. I'd say out of FF bottoms I can hardly remember any that didn't want/take/like it bare, any age group. To me it's like a given.

It's the parties at Folsom weekend in Berlin.

BottomsUp, you should try something like CCBC and alike in the gayborhood at Palm Springs.

Tru dat. As sad as it is, but nevertheless Club Philly is probably the best option in New York.

Both usually. Nearly always commando and always bare.

I don't think a 1,000 count for a bottom is that unrealistic to arrive to. It doesn't make it less of a metric, just a number totally within reach. But I haven't looked at it from the view of just fucking - usually by that time in my experience the interests wonder to something more entertaining than plain vanilla. Yuck. For the advanced open minds that happens sooner than the same 1,000 mark.

I usually don't 'thank' the bottom but say "Good boy" after dumping a load if the hole was tight. Would that count? I think it does. Just like repeat use presented to a returning customer.

I concur. Many a fun time. I liked TO one better than Chi. Or may be just because I was younger.

I can't say that I know anythings relevant to any part of your story other than what you said before. But at the same time my earlier comments are not a coincidence. It's closer to experience kind. This post turning out to be long. Sorry. I've been around too many blocks stateside and especially overseas being a pervert that I am. And I have seen similar scenarios with literally only minute details missing from your description. It's not very hard for me to add possibilities without turning into overly fantastic hypotheticals that I would re-engage your suspended disbelief to what I am saying. Partially it is also a professional trait. I think I can elaborate below. Here is a movie quote for you - "What your eyes see, your mind believes" (Swordfish). I think I've ventured before a guess that you may never be able to find out something factual to what happened with Mark that would have come from a 3rd trustworthy professional party - police, doctor, hospital, etc. The reason is simple - known details are too vague for them to be certain and convey that certainty to other people. But at the same time you are seeking closure and completion to depth of understanding driving your own mind into overdrive. I understand it is a very emotional subject for you. Rightfully so. I have no interest to rub into that wound. On the other hand sociopaths are usually very calculating personalities. Drug dealing usually demonstrates that clearly. I have no reason to doubt at the time Carl was one of them. And had it been a pre-calculated scenario with Mark, or not the first run of the mill play party where Carl was pulling an impromptu amateur hour and Mark just happened to be a next guy, I'd say that scenario ran as expected - bottom got knocked out on GHB or meth and what not and got used relentlessly every which way many times over. Accidental scene prop change, room rotation or an intentional switch is the easiest trick in the book if there is an opportunity to distract somebody while you're doing it. Where details of that scenario would be ready and polished smooth to a degree that would have kept your disbelief to change in circumstances around you very much suspended. It would look natural and unsuspiciously regular. Had you been inebriated - the host doesn't even have to try that hard. This bottle, that bottle. Whatever cup, whatever's in the cup. It didn't even have had to be a bottle. But there is nothing certain. You can counter it only with level of your own attention. As a common container for liquids portioned for single use (explanation later) - shit, I even have single-packs of tooth brushes for someone the morning after if they stay over, not just a case of pint water bottles. You get to crack the cap - if you notice it - it's all yours and you take it with you. Everything is just in level of preparation. But it didn't go exactly to plan for Carl - end scenes involved some medics. However used to course of play that he was, he probably wasn't ready for this on that day. And subsequently any forced attempt to yield an explanation out of the blue showed reluctance on detail and gaps that re-engage that same suspended disbelief. Not smooth any more. You no longer trust the explanation, and you didn't expect it to fail that soon. And rational mind thinks that there is something not said out of a conspiratorial attempt to embellish, which it very well may be. Because that's what the mind does - watches for patters and organizes them into pictures. I've seen enough passed out bottoms in bathhouses that got fucked without even registering it. With and without their own intent. I've seen people at sex parties scavenging and drinking up from others' leftover cups and beer bottles just to get more drunk and get fucked quicker. I've had people overdoing drugs in one-on-one play with me personally. You really can't demand morality there, and I am making no opinion of Mark in those circumstances. I've heard enough stories from my contacts in local law enforcement and EMS that I worked with over the course of many years of how fucked up the indiscriminate humans can get. It never ends - there's continuous slew of punters trying for things out of common norm just because it came to their mind, one thing more fucked up than the other. And that is before you get to anything sexually deviant. Sex you don't even have to describe to me - I've been there myself, seen and done it first hand. Nevermind, both hands. As to single-portion liquids - that is a note from a different story. One of my doctors taught me that a liquid is the most efficient method of payload delivery - both for medicine and for poison, both ingestion and injection. And if you have problems with blood pressure, watching out for salty chips is easy. But you never notice the salt in sauces because it's already dissolved and could be more concentrated than chips themselves. Smother that ketchup. Because in turn you don't see crystals of salt as an identifiable ingredient added at will. It is already there. Or a spiked bottle of whatever standing handy to be pulled up, if there was such a plan and a bottle in the story with Mark. "What your eyes see (or don't see), your mind believes". And if you remember the story of former Soviet spy in London Alex Litvinenko - he got poisoned by a radioactive isotope put in his tea, in a posh London hotel bar by someone he was meeting with and considered a friendly, when all his professional training was to be suspicious of every detail - he already defected. Cat and mouse experience, no sex involved. His human error in concert with opposing malicious intent. I see now how much I don't know in that story with Carl and Mark.

Hey Concerned, I think you are just catching up. Prep or not, sooner or later diffusion of practice reaches down to all corners.

Chance encounters - I've attended a group party with someone who was definitely above the rest in attitude. Someone else there later explained it along with the host. I would have not known otherwise. Another time - stayed at the same resort in PS at the time of Hot and Wet. The guy later that year was titled and toured as Mr. Leather <location> at Folsom SF. Public kink events is a great way to come across all horny beasts.

Twitchy bottoms are annoying - no concept or comprehension what gives a top pleasure.

Pushy bottoms and demanding bitches are the biggest turn-off. "Lackity skillz" as a friend used to say. Ruins the whole premise of hunting.

I'd agree it is mostly a numbers game. You can't derive convincing statistic from a demographic of one. I would say some of the things are mostly biomechanical - like (1) height and position, where and how things are bent, whether the knees are locked, which way the hole is turned, how would I rock it to stick it in. I don't wanna do calisthenics and acrobatics just to find out that the penetration angles don't work for my prolonged pleasure, and the hole is so out of alignment with the rest of the body that I have to be on a prop to attempt anything at all. Some people are simply inflexible physically and mentally to find a good position and play along to get fucked well - it's not only me who will be doing things to get results even if you're in a fucking sling or on a fuck bench. I.E. I usually look for guys that are 3-4" shorter than I am - angles in doggy style work out the best IMO for shoulder support and leg lock to facilitate balls-deep experience. Taller guys basically make me work more to get the same result - why would you want to do that? Short guys can work out too if there are no other show stoppers. Missionary I don't even do any more - easier to loose balance in motion. Plus you have to handle more shifting weight. (2) body weight, if some non-vanilla play is expected - I want to be able to shift and move you around without getting a hernia. (3) elasticity and tightness of the hole upon hands-on inspection - you've got to find some friction possible for the time to be able to cum successfully and copiously. Unless of course it is a fisting event, and you need a very loose hole. A hole that doesn't move in response to your touch is just too lazy to give you pleasure getting its own pleasure. It may sound too complicated at first, but with accrued mileage you'll be able to do all that math from the first glance or early on in a nick of time. Then everything would out well.