rtpbbcub

I was squeamish about that question, as well as being asked about other experiences. As in, you a face down with a top buried to the hilt inside you and then he says , "how many dicks you had today," or "you ever go to bookstores?" Seems silly now, but in the moment it always seemed to be a little "crap, what's the answer that lets him keep fucking me?" But after the ex who decided to bring up that he knew I was cheating on him, during sex, I havent had a problem with it. For as pissed off as he was, and as violent as the sex became, he was harder and more turned on with each detail of what he suspected that I confirmed. Or so I thought. I finally pieced together that it was less "suspected" and more "gleamed" from my email account. So by the time he asked about Eddie, and whether his cock was bigger than his, and then whether I liked it more (yes and oh god yes) he was shooting his load. Whether he had fucked me after I had taken other loads, had already been answered, of which Eddie was one of them. And I guess he had figured that out by the timing of the email exchanhes between Eddie and I and our own messages back and forth. Afterwards he turned into a sobbing mass of "you dont love me, blah blah blah." Whatever dude, you seemed to enjoy it, despite all your protests against it. We still talk occassionally, but I dont know if he has ever admitted to himself that there may be a reason (he enjoys it) that everyone he dates is a slut. But, I digress. Since then I have never thought twice about admitting that I've been fucked and loaded, or how many times, or how recently, or yo admitting any other details.

It's a very good question, since so many guys tend to assume in one direction or another without ever asking/saying what the "plan" is before hand. Which can be good or bad. Personally I like not knowing. Or giving a guy that was going to pull out because he feels "that's what ya do," the surprise of not letting him do so. I've noticed that the majority of guys who pull out do it on instinct and are typically bisexual, used to women who expect that you will pull out. It's amazing what you can do for a guy who is so used to having to finish in his hand, more than a few experiences have gone from "nothing to write home about" to "fucking christ let me tell you about him," upon his sudden realization that I *want* his cum. As for me, I either finish inside or I don't finish at all. If you don't want my cum, why bother? I'll wait for someone that does.

I don't really so much get "horny" as I go into heat, everyone knows that I'm looking to be fucked or that I'm being fucked. My biggest turn offs are guys who treat bookstores like a church or a social gathering. On the one hand, I get you are there for some cock worship, but, porn. It's right there, volume turned up. What's one more chorus of "fuck me," "I'm going to cum in you," stall wall shaking, belt clanging going to do? On the other hand, I get that historically bookstores and bathhouses were pseudo community centers. But could you take the conversation about your new furniture, broken down car, shitty ex, etc. somewhere else? And also, not look at me like you just suffered listening to me enjoy some dick.

It seems to be more that, as a whole, we are taking away the right to choose for ourselves. At least as far as criminalization states are concerned, it isn't that one has a right to not get infected (which means one would have autonomy and responsibility regarding their choices, as in an HIV positive partner who fails to disclose or takes intentional effort to infect another against their knowledge or will and does so (seroconversion occurs), but otherwise an HIV negative person could equally choose to become infected), so much as it comes from the position that infection is always illegal, if a person knows they are HIV positive to start with. What I'm getting at, is that the whole onus is on the HIV positive person. Much as the same as, for comparison, we view statuatory rape. Whether an underage person consents or not is irrelevant, they have no right to consent. Regardless of ones feeling on bug chasing or gift giving, is there a sound basis to tell someone that they cannot choose for themselves whether or not to have sex with a partner thwy know to be HIV positive, whether it is for the express intent of infection or just indifference. States are frequently saying yes, even when transmission of the virus fails to occur, no one has the ability to (as an HIV negative partner) make that decision. The problem is, it gets turned into the issue of the HIV positive partner who "needs help" (or a lynch mob, gas chamber, psychiatric counseling, etc.) What it doesn't become is anything to do with the HIV negative partner and whether or not they have any fore knowledge of the situation. They are an automatic victim in need of support and understanding, not of their choices or indifference to making them, not of the responsibility for ones own health, not of the sex they consented to, but of their "feelings" toward the demon who tried to infect them. It's utter nonsense. Nonsense, unless you start from the position that people do not have a choice. Who needs anti-sodomy laws so long as we can just lock up all the poz ones, based on the notion that their own community will throw them to the wolves so long as they keep buying the narrative that they need not have responsibility for any part of their sexual experience, so long as they are HIV negative, because it's the poz guys fault, because you can't consent to infection.

Very nifty, sounds like a cool place to work as well. I have lonng liked but wondered his predominately hands off approach. In a way it's cool, but in another it is rather hollow. On the "ask me" thing, there's ask me and then there's ask me. Not sure if it applies todrscorpios experience, but leading with "are you poz," "are you looking to be pozzed," or whatever it is you are asking, may not be a good first message, or may not be well received if its still early in the conversation. Mostly because asshats who do occassionally slip through and go on bashing and lecture tirades tend to do that. It's less a reaction to what was asked and more a reaction to what it implies will come next. I have gone through more than a few idiots who have eiyher started with or fairly quickly asked, and given the totally not about hooking up or having sex comments that came next, I would be very likely at this point to send such a "fuck off." Let the conversation develop before you jump into those questions. At least enough to get the feeling that the reason is hookup potential, not door answering on a vacuum cleaner salesman.

Yeah different areas come with different expectations of what you should do. Sometimes there are areas in which a true cum dump and a true cum dump lovin top can get it on without any bullshit. Then there are the areas where there are lots of double talking or just plain say one thing and do another. The south is loaded (pun intended) with bareback bottoms and tops. Fuck if anyone seems to really use a condom there. But, every top and every bottom are safe sex only. And how dare you bring it up, because, obviously, you are a perverted freak. Meanwhile, not a single bottom has a condom, though you will be asked about using them, not that that is a valid question as most are lubed up with Vaseline and I have a load or two up them as they have the conversation anyway, and every top that is going to "bring condoms" never does, or brings one that conveniently breaks. And then, heaven forbid, any bareback sex and you enter a conversation, because then you become an AIDS seeking whore, for the exact behavior your accuser was doing in an adult bookstore, parking lot, or Craigslist ad last night. WV is a little kinder. Everyone has "ask me" or "safe only," no one says a single word about condoms, and just about everyone fucks bare, save some of the more twitchy married closet cases. The reality is there are lots of bare fucks going on, and the only condoms used are imaginary ones generated by "safe only." But if you get off on the verbal side of hearing about a guys sluttiness, you may be stuck with only a few guys here and there.

7 seems to hit the ring in the right position, 7.5 will definitely hit and go plast (again, in the right position) and beyond that they are definitely past. Past doesn't do much for me (as in through and propping it open), but the guys who hit and don't get through, or who are slipping in and out of the ring, NICE!

Raw and semi-unplanned. I had been chatting. aa guy up and decided that we were going to do this. I invited him over and wasn't even thinking about condoms. Maybe I assumed tops carried them. Or maybe I just wasn't even thinking about safe sex. He was a hot guy, and even if I had been thinking, I would have still not cared if he had insisted on going bare. So when we got ready to fuck he asked if I had a condom, I said no, and he said "that's okay," as he lubed up and then slid in. I fucked about three more guys that day. All bare. And only had safe sex when the top insisted on it. A few years later I began to ignore tops that insisted on it.

Risk free, no. Low risk, extremely so. In fact, you are most likely a greater risk to him than he could possibly be to you. The nature of HIV healthcare is such that he is getting a constant stream of hard data about all aspects of his health. Compared to the average "healthy person" (who doesn't even manage a yearly physical, sees a doctor every few years for a cold, and otherwise only has an occasional HIV test) the likelihood of you giving him something (assuming that you are not a sexually monogamous couple) is far more likely.

Doctor - Tennant Fuck if a Scotsman doesn't make me drip. But a gangbang with Jack, Into, and Captain John would be hot. Maybe invite over Rhys. I'd let Owen jerk off in a corner and clean up after us. Now, there are other Dr. Who characters I would do . . . Mickey and The Master (the one who took over the world, not the one with dementia at the end of), do spring to mind.

Or, developmentally challenged man statutorily rapes teenage boy. Or, two people had sex, it wasn't an "ideal situation" with potential to devlove into a can of worms of abuse allegations, especially given that it was gay sex. But where one begins to chalk that up is anyone's guess. If you want to feel bad about it, worry that you are going to hell, have a fond memory, or whatever else is up to the two of you. And it all touches the real challenges that come with intellectual disabilities, and the very sad way institutionalization has had a very lasting effect on how we perceive people with such issues.

A top isn't an appliance, neither is a bottom. Just as "shit happens" to bottoms, so too does an occasional limp dick happen to tops. Fuck for fun and pleasure, or get a vibrator and stay home.

I've seen some crazy things go down on that site. I used to be active in several forums there, but ultimately became a tourist. I go once a month or so, login, logout. And feel kind of bad about bothering to login in the first place. Like any site that uses a hand grenade when a scapel will do, there's not much sense in being a contributing member of anything that frequently trashes whole communities without warning.

First, criminalizing HIV, not just intentional infection, is probably one of the worst ideas ever. Really. All anyone gets out of that is the mistreatment of people with HIV and a system that has a loophole, "untested, unknown, unprosecutable just in case." And frankly, the fact that you could go snooping into someones medical records that way, is even more credence to the "just in case" school of thought. Second, there seems to be a paradox there, you both understand the risks of relying on the honor system and then you are upset that the honor system isn't perfect, pick one. But all of that aside for a moment, at what point do you have any right to feel cheated by the honor system if what he said was true, not in the sense that he wasn't HIV positive, but that he posed no risk to you. Or, more importantly, if you have as much gall to claim the ends justify the means of prying into someone else's medical records to find out their status, how can you sit in judgment of what happened? And therein lies the whole problem with untrained busybodies snooping into material they do not understand, they go hunting for a single data point and care fuckall about what information or knowledge should go with it. In arguing RawTops IMHO, you counter that it could also be a sky high VL. Great, so while digging into someone else's life, you couldn't be bothered to ask questions that were relevant? No, of course not, you only wanted to know something you had no business going after to feed your own maligned sense of self righteousness. Sorry, but if you think that is the honor system, that you deserve being treated with honor, that others have a responsibility to you despite that, you are wrong. And that why the honor system doesn't work. People, just like you, feel the ends justify the means, and that their means are not what the honor system is there for. You think it only has to do with someone else's actions and nothing to do with your own, and then feel outraged at the fact someone else isn't playing by the rules. Reminds me of that girl in kindergarten who had a fit because I didn't bow my head and close my eyes during prayer, tattle-telling as hard as she could to the teacher how bad I was and should be punished. To quote that teacher, "perhaps you are right, we should punish all children who don't bow their heads and close their eyes during prayer, by the way, how did you come to know this?"

I like conspiracy theories, not because I believe them, but because I wonder at the ability a person needed to create it, the charisma to convince others of it, and the capacity of so many people to keep believing despite evidence to the contrary. It really is, in a way, inspiring. Where ever there is a dollar to be made, someone will come up with a conspiracy theory. Because, let's face it, we all have to eat. And some people have a skill set better suited to convincing other people to give them money, not to doing anything productive that people would want. Its the story of televangelists, infomercials, climate change deniers, ponzi schemers, snake oil salesmen, get rich quick books, and anyone else who could sell other people on an alternative reality. Which isn't very hard, the desperate want to believe.and what is really being sold is comfort, peace, and hope. False comfort, peace, and hope, but sometimes that is better than what science has to offer.

That is kind of the point of sex with random strangers, especially bareback sex with random strangers. It is an intimate act with someone whose name you may not even know. It seems rather strange to expect to get a knight in shining armor who starts a conversation with, "wanna fuck" or "your ass would feel good on my cock." If you want real intimacy, both bareback sex and honesty, there is this thing called dating. But if you crave bareback sex with random strangers, you may want to reconsider the notion that their debt for your ass is more than their load. Which is to say, your best protection is yourself, not dependence on the kindness of strangers.

Always enjoyed sounding, definitely a rush. In addition to the advice here, which is great, do remember to take it easy. Be careful of the lube you use as flavored lubes and "intense" lubes should be avoided. Most of these contain what will effectively become an irritant due to either the environment inside the penis, or the highly sensitive area. Don't force anything. Don't force the sound, don't force yourself, and don't try to force an orgasm. You could do far less damage trying to forced an oversized dildo than trying to use an oversized sound. Bleeding when you pee is never fun. And above all, USE SOUNDS! I know there are some hot "sounding images" online of pencils, forks, beads, etc. being used as sounds, don't do it. You WILL regret it.

No, I don't agree. Fuckboy20, you seem to be confusing "responsibility" with p"rostrate self-flagellation for being a despicable human being." Kind of Nathaniel Hawthorne meets the 21st century.

Could be any number of possibilities, lube seems a likely one. It seems you are having the problem with things (I hope) you lubricated before inserting. It could also be a yeast infection (lubes contain glycerin, the fancy science way of saying sugar alcohol), and can really set that off. As someone who is allergic to latex, aloe, and has to be really careful about what I do if I even think about taking antibiotics or pain meds (because they make me a into a yeast roll), I know the feeling.

The new domain sounds great. But as for the whole series of new TLDs, it just seems more like a gimmick to saturate search results than an exciting change in the way people think about URLs. If you look at the words, I would suggest you will start seeing lots of companies that buy up and create landing pages for lots of them. For instance big box retailers of home improvement items might pick up their domain, and variations, and even some misspellings of competitors names (or the actual site with a different TLD). Which is also a big consideration for existing site owners, and a need to buy the TLDs for their site(s) that correspond to common search terms that are used for the sites. Effectively, this is keyword link loading taken to its limits. But I still think breeding.zone is cool. Like bow ties. :-)

Thanks for the thread! I have had many of the same questions and was really surprised with the squeamishness that a lot of the piercing boards seem to have. Ask about the procedure for a subincision, you can gets pics and anything you want. Ask how long before jerking it like a demon possessed monkey and you get blank stares. Guess I know what I'm doing next weekend. Find a piercer. >:-)

I enjoy a good spit roast, but so few guys know what that is. For the guy who walks into the situation wanting to be blown, realize that you are walking into a fuck in progress, and that you either need to make it work for the top fucking me. How? By not expecting to just stand there while I try to both give a good blow job AND take it up the ass. Either lay/sit down so you have a good alignment, or expect to give a face fuck. While the idea of pistoning the bottom back and forth makes for great visual imagery (and jerk off fantasy), it rarely works in reality. It is rare to find two guys who respond to the same rhythm, and usually the bottom ends up rag dolled between the two. Again, great for fantasy, a real bitch the next morning when you can barely walk and your neck is killing you. Ultimately I'm more interested in getting the load in my ass (not that I won't swallow yours), so if I have to choose (because you are trying to just stand there) I will follow the fucker's needs. Or use teeth (in the clumsy cock sucker way, not the oral Bobbit way) and make sure you want to walk away from the experience quickly.

Knees and hips are about all that stop me, once those start hurting, that's it. Most guys want to either fuck doggy style or missionary and, after a couple hours, that starts to hurt so bad. But that doesn't mean I'm not in the mood for more cock, it's just that I can't hold the positions any longer.

Love a sloppy hole and a loaded hole, kind a limp for a tight and dry. Lube is great, but cum is the best lube.

On actual ability, its all the same. Some guys are skiolled, some are not, and some dont give a fuck whether you enjoy it or not, you are just the hole they are fucking. But the sex with a married top (or bottom) can be hotter than with gay guys for the more thrill/rush aspect. Especially when you are at their place.