onlyraw

If Biden gets challenged in the primary almost certain he will be defeated in November (just ask Jimmy Carter (or would be president teddy Kennedy) while I get frustrated with Biden at times - you need to remember that he can only do so much by himself- and the senate is 50 50 and our good friend sen Manchen seems to enjoy stringing the party along and then saying no at the last moment

From what I have read it is extremely painful and not something I would want “just to get it and get it over with” I am lucky to live in Massachusetts and to go to Fenway Health (an early LGBT health center - started before AIDS) (I just checked their website - Fenwayhealth.org - and they now have on their home page a whole thing on Monkey Pox - so a great and trustworthy source for up to date info) I had a Dr appointment right before July 4 weekend and so asked my Dr about it and he told me that even here in Liberal MA we do not have that much vaccines -definitely not enough - so it it not yet being given to everyone who wants it - but only those at high risk - or post exposure So yes I agree with hntnhole- I think this this is a time to slow down our sluttier tendencies and just have sex with people you know and trust

Oh I don’t think you will have any trouble getting a daddy to plant his flag - very deep in you I know I would be happy to if you were closer

Well there are a few problems with the wonderful hanky code aside from Red (for fisting) and Yellow (for piss play) once you get to the other variables each town had their own code and there are just way too many for the various kinks and - most importantly- aside from a few bars (like the eagle in NYC) there are sadly very few places to wear them (deep sigh of mourning for all the bars that have closed )

Well for party hosts to be truly inclusive (or if they don’t even want the light from glow sticks …. They make textured wrist bands , beaded wrist bands for fucking (right or left) and then smooth wrist bands (right or left) for sucking

Hot that he is now the cumdump for one of the security guards (and I notice that our hero didn’t ask and the guard didn’t mention just how good a friend he was of Henry- is he poz too?) and just how loud were they? naked on his back on the desk …. Covered and filled up with cum and the door left wide open….. what could possibly go wrong?? def looking forward to the next chapter to find out ….

Keep the faith, I know it can be done as years ago I hooked up with a bottom who stayed soft the whole time (which was kind of a bummer for me as, as I have mentioned before, partly ego, partly my insecurities I like it when my bottom gets hard) but he had had a master that trained him not to get hard - so that he could put all his focus on the Master’s cock so I know it can be done so unless you can find a master who knows the trick to it - I agree with Sissyslut and Cumfilledbottomboi - start with chastity- the smallest cage you can fit into- and that at least will stop you from getting hard while you wear the cage and maybe (?) after awhile you will not need the cage ? you could also maybe try hypnosis (if you are open to that and can find a good kinky hypnotherapist that you trust) there used to be this very hot gay hypno site (dragon something) that was for bottoms but they did a redesign and I lost track of it ( they also had these great very sexy hypno work out tapes - now if I can just figure how to move them from my iPod to my phone maybe I could get back in shape) anyway - good luck

NWUSHorny - I would say your first experience is that way a dark room should be experienced I have no idea what was going on in the second…. (Fully clothed in a dark room ???? Weird ) can you do us all a service and let us know where these were so we can all try and make it to the first and not waste our money on the second??? (many thanks in advance) the baths I used to go to in Providence used to turn the whole place into a semi dark room by lowering tge lights in the whole place after midnight or something like that on certain nights the only true Dark Room I’ve been to was about 15 years ago in Montreal- it was also a - I can’t see 6” in front of me dark - very hot!!! i did get worried that I would get disoriented and not be able to find the door to get out - but that kind of made it more fun (worse places to get lost in) and everyone was buck naked as there were hooks outside the room to hang your towel I am not sure why I haven’t not been back to Montreal …. It was a cold rainy weekend in early December so nothing to do before my conference except tour all of the baths of the city ( there were 6 back then - I only made it to 4)

Damn - this is so well written and SO fucking hot!!!! looking forward to the next chapters

Sad but true (although there used to be a bookstore over in Somerville by 93- not the same - but at least “something” not sure if it survived Covid)

The other day I read a Really stupid blog written by Rahmel Reid, that was sent in an Andrew Christian email about “Raw is Law” Where he kept equating “raw sex” with “unprotected sex” yes - sometimes raw sex is the same as having unprotected sex - but both guys are on PrEP, or one is Undetectable, or one is U and on on P - than they are as protected from HIV as two guys using condoms (admittedly they are only protected from HIV and not the other STIs we can get) but it still drove me nuts who little he seemed to know about safer sex so I guess it is just up to us - one a time educating guys about the science

Well I think there are a lot of different reasons A LOT of guys still don’t know that Undetectable =Untransmitable (or U=U) I don’t think there was a very big/effective campaign around it i think most of the press around it was in the Poz press - and not the general community- and not that many neg guys read tge Poz press - and it was a long time ago and so it is no longer “news” so no one is going to get excited about the story “now” PrEP is only getting a big campaign because the Rx companies can make money off it - and the more they get the word out the more customers they will get (and I just heard that the Biden administration is about to pass (has just passed) a regulation that all insurance plans have to cover PrEP mind you I am not complaining about any of that but no Rx co is going to get new customers out of advertising U=U so who is going to spring for tge a big ad campaign? and then we are still left with the old original binary definition of “safe sex” which is condoms or die where as safe sex is now really a multiple choice menu where you can order one, two, or all three from: U=U, PrEP, condoms depending on your comfort level

BareLover666, Very true although extremely rare it is possible- I didn’t think of mentioning that as the topic was about cum slut bottoms using PrEP but you are right anyone Fucking raw - top, bottom, or vers should look at all their safer sex options and choose what is best for them given the nature of this site I would assume most not choosing condoms every time as their first choice- which is why PrEP is such a great advancement for those guys on the site who are still neg (with the disclaimer of course that I am not a Dr- so guys should talk to their Dr and figure out what works for them)

It is also important to remember that back in the 80s when condom use was first pushed it was called “safer” sex not “safe” sex as with so many things the general population did not fully appreciate the subtle but important difference and shortened it to just “safe sex” Bluedragon is right the only way to guarantee that you don’t get HIV through sex is to abstain Condoms when used and used correctly are very (though not 100% effective) but,… they can break (or be broken) slip off or be taken off, or be forgotten in the heat (or drunkenness) of the moment Everyone has to choose their own comfort level when it comes to what level of safer sex they will participate in Fortunately science as had big advances since the 80s when condoms were our only choice now in addition to condoms we know that poz tops can become undetectable and therefore untransmissible and we have PrEP or you can do any combination of the above for bottoms the good thing to remember is that PrEP is only one of the options where they can be totally in control of their choice

Yes - keep your stories cumming i was hoping that as he was high - that maybe this was the time he would finally swallow

I was just starting to date a guy (he was neg) when I got tested- this was back in the mid 90s when it took two weeks to get test results back That I was poz and then another two weeks to get the T cell count back to find out that it was below 200 so I was told I had AIDS we went on a few dates during this time - really nice dates (no sex just actual dates - although he had the most erotic touch - I still phantasize about the feel of his finger tips surreptitiously sliding up my pants leg and grazing my ankle while he had knelt down to tie his shoes …. Damn - who knew tge ankle was an erogenous zone) and he was really nice and kind of hot (even with his bad toupee) but his father was sick and his best friend was just told that she had cancer - and dating me was just one too many too sick people to deal with (I kind of understood- as I had just been told I had AIDS and was kind of freaking out) so he dumped me. my best friend said that if I could deal with his toupee he should be able to deal with my AIDS (but well….) jump to now there are nights when - after a cocktail or two and I find one of my old addresses books I will try and google my old boy friends to see what they are up to When I looked him up - I find out that he died about 6 years ago of cancer I was lucky to get put on the cocktail right away and was soon below 50 (and then when they could count better) I became “undetectable” and now 24 years later I’m doing fine so just because one guy is neg and one poz - tells you nothing about medical risk and potential longevity

Great story!! Just what I needed to get off this morning…. sorry there was not a Part 2 - would love to see what happens later with the first top since he has the room key ….

While I don’t think you would have luck with most juries claiming “rape” you are right that it is sex after you said no and while using a condom may be “right” for the top and they may think they are doing you a favor, it is just as wrong as a bottom who says no to bareback and the top goes ahead and fucks raw anyway (even if THAT story line is in a lot of hot stories on this site) and unless you are having Dom/sub sex with someone you know and have agreed that “no” does not mean no (and you have agreed to a different safe word) The rules are now “no means no” no matter what you are saying no to

And looking on Wikipedia it does not look like mewe is a Microsoft product either - so hopefully you are safe there- at least for now

First - I have not yet been lucky enough to play with a guy in chastity- but it is on my list To answer this question if I find the guy hot at the baths and he is in a cage I will certainly fuck him Outside of the baths I am Really turned on by the idea of keeping a guy in chastity- although - mainly in between fucks (I like the idea that the only time he can have lay with his cock is when I am fucking him ….partly it is ego - when I am fucking a guy I want to see him getting hard - and hopefully cumming hands free (or when he is in his knees drinking my piss - hit to see him hard just from being my urinal) but also- as I like it on the rough side - if I am using a bottom hard and he is whimpering- it’s great to look down and if he is still hard I know I am not being too rough with him Admittedly I have not been to a club since tge shutdown- so I don’t know if chastity is a thing around here — but I hope it is But also as I top I have total respect for those bottoms who want (or are willing) to be in chastity while getting fucked so that their whole experience (no pun intended) can be focused on pleasuring my cock - not worried about theirs and at the baths I can see it as being very practical for those bottoms who look like a top- or have a big dick - to let guys know that they are a total bottom - or at least at that moment in time they are a total bottom

I have no trouble saying BB only- but the problem is that is not what the category is, it is “safe sex” - - so if you are undetectable or on PrEP - you could “never” use condoms but “always” have “safe sex” So I am hoping they will clear up the wording and choices so that they can keep up with the science if other members of Recon agree I hope that they will also Recon know that they need to change and keep up with science (although it is really hard to find the link to connect with customer service) thanks

Unfortunately once Judge Jackson is sworn in - I fear we are stuck with this court for at least 10 years….. Thomas is only 74 and now that he has a conservative majority- I doubt he will retire any time soon if he will ever retire at all … I think we will have to learn to live with the “Thomas Court”

Voting is always important and not just every 4 years for President (as they are the ones who select the candidates for all of the federal courts) But also every two years for congress and senate candidates AND, candidates all the way down the ballot- remember the school board can ensure that our younger generation grow up in a safe nurturing environment or a “don’t say gay” world (where suicide rates of gay youth will only go up) So Drscorpio is right, we need to organize for, donate to, and vote for the candidates that will support our right to be who we are

Well I heard back clearly a badly worded letter as he thought I was proposing adding “hiv conversion” to their list of fetishes i wrote back assuring him that I wasn’t- but that in this world of U=U and PrEP, and condoms that their broadly named category and then their narrow list on their drop down menu choices didn’t mesh and that if their mission was to keep transmission low - I suggested that may they follow Daddyhunt’s lead and have a section Headed “Safer sex practices” and then have a drop down menu of options like “only condoms, staying undetectable, PrEP and condoms, etc” He said they would look at the issue like you guys I normally have it at “needs discussion” - as yes it is a topic that needs to be discussed between partners But if they are going to have it a sortable field- it would be nice if everyone had the same understanding of what the sortable categories mean I guess time will tell

Hi Guys - this is for those of who also have a profile on Recon. For a long time it has bothered me that in our Profiles on Recon along with height, and age a how "active" one is (there way to code for TOP or bottom) etc they have a section for "Safe Sex" which I have always treated as if it were asking "condom use"...... except as it is labeled "Safe Sex" I have always felt uncomfortable listing "Never" (where as if they had it listed as "condom use" I would certainly list "never" anyway - I finally got around to writing customer service a letter about it (although I must say you really have to hunt around for how to do that)...... the letter I sent them is below..... if you would like to join my campaign to get Recon to change their ways..... I hope you will write them too.... and feel free to crib as much of my letter as you would loike Dear recon Some time ago you announced you were looking into making some changes to the site and I wanted to propose one key change you need to make. Currently in the “profile” section one of your categories is “Safe Sex” And the drop down menu offers the following options Always Needs discussion Never I’d Rather Not Say Sometimes I am writing to express my concern about this category. As “poz play” much less “poz conversion” sex are not in your list of fetish communities that members can identify with- I think that the wording of this category is no longer up to date with current science. Research shows that U=U (or, if a person with HIV is compliant with their meds and so is “undetectable” than their virus is untransmitable - even if they fuck bareback) Because of U=U and then the advent of PrEP, guys - even those with HIV - can fuck bareback with safety Because of this, I find your continued use of “Safe Sex” as a category to be AIDS phobic I don’t think I am alone in using the “Safe Sex” category as a stand in for “Condom Use” - as thanks to U=U and PrEP more and more guys are fucking without condoms (at least “Sometimes” or after the have had a “Discussion” My proposal is that you make this clear by changing the name of this category from “Safe Sex” to “Condom Use” - and you could still use the same drop down menu. Because I am undetectable I no longer use condoms- but feel uncomfortable saying that I “Never” practice “Safe Sex” - I like to think that as I am “U” that even when fucking a bottom bareback I am "Always" practicing "Safe Sex" - even if I never use condoms. If you would change this I think you would make things clearer for everyone. I was impressed several years ago with the serious look you took at racism in our communities- I urge you now to take the same look at the AIDS phobia in our community. I urge you to change the wording of this category as soon as possible. Thank you. Dotdomtop