blackrobe
-
Posts
1,073 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by blackrobe
-
I usually have to do this about once a week with younger breeders. It's not just PrEP they seem to be ignorant of. I give them the HPV, Hep A, and Hep B vaccine push too. The cost of PrEP and the problem of how to get it prescribed are the biggest points of resistance I hear from men. I point them to a local sexual health clinic so they don't have to tell their doctor (even though I tell them they should be able to) and hook them up with the PrEP DAP scheme in their state. Helping breeders and bred be safe and sexually healthy is a duty I feel pretty strongly.
-
New Meaning of “No Load Refused Cumdump?”
blackrobe replied to BlackDude's topic in General Discussion
I believe it. It mystifies me, but I believe it. I've heard many similar stories from black men. Not growing up in the US, I wonder if it's to do with growing up in this culture and whether the experience of black men in majority non-black countries is any different. I'm sorry that's something that you end up dealing with. -
I think black bottoms are damned sexy. That is all.
-
There's a truth here that I think bears teasing out and acknowledging. Actions, and speech can be an action, have consequences. Free speech doesn't mean freedom from critique of that speech. A lot of what people brand as "cancel culture" I see as simple accountability for the positions, and the actions, that people take. The consequences of these things are, in my opinion, very weak tea indeed. The fact that these kinds of forces function to help discuss and define cultural norms and let people know when they're butting up against them is somewhat comforting. If only that mechanism had been working for governmental and institutional norms over the last few years. The ethical bankruptcy and bald-faced hypocrisy of the right and of the religious right in the US has been startling to observe. One thing I could not get past was how many people felt they needed to assert they were not racists for voting for the Republican Presidential contender in 2016. What I took away from that was that, while they may not have been racists demagogs themselves, they decided that the candidate's transparently racist views and policies weren't a deal breaker for them. It was then that I decided that there really was an "unfuckable" category of men. I decided I wasn't rewarding crypto-racist fascists with access to my cunt.
-
There has been only one guy who regularly (every time) and intentionally fucked through my inner ring, and he was 9"+ long. It was always an incredibly intense experience for me. Another guy who has "popped" me a couple of times was about 7.5" to 8" but super hard and he made me sit in his lap and impaled me on him, pulling me down onto his root. I think many factors come into play, among them my depth, his length and hardness, our positions, and his intent.
-
There was no conflation of race and gender in @BootmanLA's post. I think what you are actually objecting to is that there was an implied equivalency, and that you'd assert the two terms are not equivalent and therefore not interchangeable or comparable. The problem with that assertion is there is a lot of anti-discrimination law written protecting race, ethnicity, and gender (among other attributes) using common language. On the face of it I don't think your assertion stands up to scrutiny. In response, I'd assert that the simple "attribute substitution test" that @BootmanLA used is a valid check to identify if an *act* is discriminatory independent of the attribute it's targeting.
-
I have friends and colleagues who are transmen. Not going along with discrimination against transmen doesn't make me a "social justice warrior", it makes me a decent friend to those men. It should not take having a trans/black/gay/disabled/etc. friend for us to feel and act on our responsibility to others. Tactically, I don't think using the extreme right wing's "SJW" rhetoric helps anyone make a credible pro-separatist argument. From what I can see, it seems the objections to gay transmen in gay male spaces have more than a small whiff of misogyny about them. Here's a useful thought experiment to explore that more: Would men in women's clothes be welcome? Would transwomen who haven't had bottom surgery be welcome? In both cases they have a penis, but their overall gender presentation is feminine. I think the responses will be illuminating.
-
Can you clarify the founders reason/s for excluding transmen? From your post it seems like you're saying it's to protect men from being disappointed a guy doesn't have a dick.
-
In general, as a private campground they can set what restrictions they want on who can be there. Male only spaces and public sex environments are disappearing so there is an argument to be made that these spaces need to be defended. I find the idea that lesbians are upset about a male-only campground surprising given the past militancy of lesbians about women only spaces, and the actions of broader women's organizations making similar bio-women restrictions to exclude transwomen from events. It doesn't make much sense to me to prevent gay transmen from attending. They are gay and men, so what's the problem? If the specific campground you are referring to is Camp Boomerang RV Park and Campground, then based on what I've read some of them sound like transphobic pieces of crap. There's this quote from one of the founders: That's grade A misgendering transphobic bullshit, right there. If gay men are ever going to get over any *feelings* they have about transmen, they are going to have to interact with them to do it. If people can't deal with a few gay trans guys sprinkled into a group of gay men, I'm forced to wonder whether they are already metaphorically emasculated themselves.
-
Thanks. After some research, it seems like this is a brand or standard of cumdump and it's meant to communicate the extremity of commitment.
-
I have no idea what this is about.
-
I think we're in violent agreement on general probability. I just wanted to ensure US folks knew the data was not there to make any similar transmission prevention claims for the two mRNA based vaccines being distributed in the US, and that any implication that a sex partner who's vaccinated protects you in any way is not founded on data. Having someone in my family land on the 9% "bad" side of a 91% "good" probability taught me not to ignore even small probabilities.
-
The Oxford/Astra Zeneca vaccine is not approved for emergency use in the US yet, and there are currently clinical trials underway for it. Right now, Astra Zeneca are largely focused on supplying the EU. It's also worth noting that the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are mRNA based while the Oxford/Astra Zeneca vaccine is viral-vector based. These are both new technologies so we should expect there to be differences in how they perform regarding preventing transmission. Based on the data you point to, one third of people vaccinated with the Oxford/Astra Zeneca vaccine (33%) still end up transmitting the virus to someone else. I don't think that's especially good odds. YMMV.
-
It bewilders me why men do this based on the science as I understand it. Being vaccinated protects you from becoming sick, or dramatically reduces the severity of the virus if you do become sick. As I understand it, the vaccine studies didn't examine whether it prevents you from passing on the virus. Without that data, you have to assume that vaccinated people can still be a carrier of the virus. Ergo, until there is data to the contrary, a vaccination only protects the vaccinated person. The unvaccinated person accrues no known benefit and, even worse, may have a mistaken impression that a vaccinated person is somehow safer for them to fuck than another more COVID-careful unvaccinated person. Because of this, I see people putting forward that they are vaccinated in ads as an inducement to fuck as either evidence that they don't understand enough of the COVID science (so my unvaccinated as shouldn't fuck them), or that they do understand the science, but are totally okay with fucking unvaccinated men who end up unknowingly taking more risk than they understand (so my unvaccinated ass definitely shouldn't fuck them).
-
Think how much hotter he'd be if his nub was in a tiny metal cage.
-
That really is horrible timing. Stay strong and only take calculated risks with maximum mitigation if you can.
-
I love a hairy cock with a full bush in my cunt.
-
I love men with the natural level of fur nature gave them. That said, a gorilla-hairy wild man breeder trips all kinds of submissive boy and impregnation needs in me. If anywhere I touch is long enough for me to wrap my fingers in it while he uses my cunt, its a huge treat.
-
Here's my list off the top of my head: Amos Burton (Wes Chatham) from "The Expanse" Superman (Henry Cavill) from "Man of Steel" Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen) from "The Lord of the Rings" Ronan (Jason Momoa) from "Stargate: Atlantis" Bones (Karl Urban) from "Star Trek" Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) from "Deadpool"
-
"Err, Doctor I have a waiting room full of men wanting to become new patients. Do you have any idea why?"
-
What should bottoms do with cocks when fucking?
blackrobe replied to asiantw1nk's topic in Your Last Load...
Yup. Mine just rolls around putting out precum ropes and the better I'm getting fucked, the more juice my dick throws. Some top breeders really enjoy how much they can get me to make and spray as they thrust. I focus on the breeder and how he's experiencing my cunt. -
Anyone here actually get their cocks sucked by their sons?
blackrobe replied to Str8man's topic in Cocksucking Discussion
It's totally fine for you to not be into what other people are. Some people get turned on by the idea or reality of having sex with someone they are related to. If it's not your thing, just keep walking on by. At the same time, people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. By your own admission, the first person who sucked you off was your own older brother, and he was the first person you sucked off as well. You don't say it was non-consensual or mention any trauma, so there's a whiff of hypocrisy to your reaction in these father/son threads.- 17 replies
-
- 10
-
-
-
Your fear of having your use of PrEP detected in routine blood work is, pardon my bluntness, complete nonsense. I get that you have a fear of it being discovered, for whatever reason, and I'm sympathetic, we've all had to come out in various ways and it can be emotionally taxing, but your fear of routine blood work is not rational, reasonable, or credible. If your fears persist now that you've been told by multiple people that they are not justified, I really recommend finding a mental health professional to talk to. Good luck to you.
-
First things first, I can't imagine how they might figure out you're on PrEP from any normal diagnostic blood test. Those tests use specific agents for specific things and they don't show up anything else other than what they are made for. They won't identify non-specific drugs in people's systems so that's not a factor you need to worry about. You do need a trusted sexual health doctor you can be 100% honest with. If you don't want to leave your current doctor, you need to find a local sexual health clinic and get your full sexual health taken care of. That means getting on PrEP (perhaps Descovy as it has the lowest chance of showing kidney impact) and getting all your vaccinations - Gardasil for HPV and the vaccines for Hepatitis A and B. PrEP wasn't approved for "On demand" use in the US last time I checked and, to be honest, your reasons for avoiding a safer "daily dose" regimen don't make any sense to me. It would be far better to have a doctor you can trust with your complete health, but using a secondary clinic works too. Next Steps: Call the Granite State PrEP Hotline: 508-686-PrEP (7737) to get any/all your questions answered about getting PrEP in your state and here is a list of the clinics in your area where you can go to get PrEP. Don't forget to talk to them about Hepatitis A and B vaccinations as well as HPV vaccination. Whether you've had HPV before or not, you need it. There is no way to know if you've been exposed to the carcinogenic variety already or not, so getting vaccinated is only prudent.
-
Or, alternatively, we try and treat each other with kindness and compassion because we've had those experiences.
