blackrobe

Good lad.

They can. However, in my experience, they don't advertise or wallow in that ennui. Men who raise their own boredom as a thing for other men to vanquish are rarely the creatives you describe. They feel more ownership of their own internal state and don't relinquish it to others to modify for them.

If I see a man using "bored" to describe himself, I won't engage with him. If you have a creative mind and some imagination, you're almost never bored. I've found that people who are bored are quite often a bad fit for me as there is seldom enough mind at work.

I'd never heard of Mark or the show, but now I want him in my cunt pumping in his fertile seed.

I think Sniffies dot com is the least-worst newish entry in the space. It's sufficiently differentiated being focused primarily on geolocation or "sex right now wherever you are/are going", but most apps have fallen below the minimum utility bar. Scruff is the best of the bunch in my location, despite a terrible recent period of outages related due, I believe, to a software update they boned. The worst now in my location is A4A - it's become nothing more than a) the number one home for bot generated and scam profiles and b) an advertising pipeline for offers I don't care about. I send more reports for fake profiles that message me than I do messages to real men. It doesn't help that advertising posts outnumber interactions with real people as well. BBRT's UX is very dated and not very focused on the user. Visual hierarchy isn't at all clear leaving the eye to wander fruitlessly for long seconds until you find what should be obvious and fast to locate. Even simple UX consistency is broken with the location of the back buttons changing location in the frame as you change view. Load times are in the 5 second range here also. The number of men on BBRT has declined too. It's frustrating when you have an urge to serve and a cunt to offer.

Do you mean Hollywood Boutique or Videos Video? VV is the sleaziest, I think.

I'm really struggling with how to answer this. I take dick from guys I feel a connection with regardless of how they look, but the connection isn't that common. At the same time, I also take dick from men my dom picks for me without question. I'm definitely drawn towards strong looking men, but have learned that a (dom selected) slender willowy top can fuck me so intensely and memorably that my desires need to be broader.

I've been either spoiled or well trained to service tops like you. I found a few multi-cummer tops early on that were getting the stop light from other bottoms after pounding out just one load. So when they went to pull out of me, I said keep going as long as you want. The look on their faces when they realized they could keep fucking and cumming as much as they wanted was perfect. My goal is always that I have more of your seed in my body than you have left in yours when we're done.

The converse is also true. I assume that if you want to fuck me bareback it's because you want to fuck your cum inside me, so unless you tell me otherwise before you mount up, that's my goal and what's going to happen.

At my local clinic where I get my tests done they swab my mouth, have me self-swab inside my hole and give a urine sample, just before they take my blood samples. I think of testing and getting results as a responsibility and pure upside. Each time I get negative results I'm able to advertise my "just tested and neg" cunt for men to mount and enjoy. It's like a little sexual rebirth...

See a doctor ASAP. I had "sudden viral hearing loss" and if you get in quickly they can give you meds that might help.

I'm happy to take your cock and receive your seed inside me.

Huh, is this a thing with Latinos? I've noticed it too but mostly guys who don't know how much spit it takes to make it work. I usually add my own to help them out. One guy who spit fucked me got me so wet and juicy that my cunt practically sucked his cock inside me. He produced this thick spit he called fuckspit that really felt amazing as he fucked into me.

My rapist robbed me of my first experience. I was first fucked when I was 12 but because I was a small kid I looked much younger. I was in a Catholic Boy's home at the time and it was the Marist Brother who was the dormitory master for my year. He found some pretext to take me out of the home for a weekend running an errand up the coast. I don't remember all of it. I'm fairly sure he drugged me before he raped me. The last thing I remember clearly is him stripped down to his briefs with an enormous hard on and climbing on top of me. The next clear memory I have is standing in the shower of that motel room the next morning, my arsehole throbbing with pain and feeling really crappy and numb. Over a decade later when I was coming out to my mother she asked me whether that Marist Brother had sexually abused me on that specific trip. By this time I was getting help dealing with the sexual abuse and coming to terms with the fact I'd never get justice because there was no evidence. A bit stunned, I told my mother that wasn't what we were talking about but that, yes, he had sexually abused me on that trip. What made her ask? That's when she told me she found my blood-stained underwear in my bag afterwards. There had been evidence, and she had suspected something, but she had spoken to no one and done... nothing. Being raped put a huge block on my sexuality and erotic life for many years. There is no playbook to find your way back to sexual joy. Everyone needs to find it for themselves, if they ever can. I was a vulnerable little gay boy in a boy's home and I believe I was targeted because of that. Recovering and finding joy in sex and taking men into my cunt took a lot of time and a lot of hard work. Early in 2019 I had a breakthrough. I surrendered my cunt to a man I shared a great connection with and he brought me to the brink of an assgasm on his cock. In a way, he was my true first time getting fucked. That connection persists and we've stayed close since.

Don't forget the Australian and New Zealand Rugby teams... Seriously, some prime breeding stock in both.

My piss baptism was similar. I'd just taken many loads from my dom breeder and as he was resting in me, possessing my cunt fully, then he filled me with his hot piss.

I don't know where you are in the world, so I'm going to talk about what's approved for PrEP where I live in the USA. The first pill approved by the FDA was Truvada which contains two different medications, emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. The second pill approved is Descovy which contains two medications also, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and emtricitabine. TAF has less risk of kidney or bone side effects than older versions of tenofovir (like that used in Truvada). In both cases, its a single pill with two medications in each. I recommend reading this site to understand the efficacy and risks of each. The short answer is Truvada has been more widely studied and Descovy, being newer, less so but research has determined they are equally as protective.

I'm very curious about the SEA top daddy now. He sounds ideal to me.

I think it's true to say that the majority of cisgender gay white men have very little understanding of the transgender experience. My position has always been that if I expect straight folk to show up to support my full humanity and rights, then trans folk (black folk, etc.) should be able to expect no less of me. I worked on reducing my ignorance, increasing my understanding and spent several years fighting to expand my employers transgender healthcare benefits and improve their accessibility. We were ultimately successful, but there is always so much more to do. That's why I've been watching all the current administration's roll-backs of Obama-era LGBT protections closely, and with mounting frustration. Transpeople are the most vulnerable in the LGBT community and transpeople of color especially so. We all need to take time to learn, understand, and help groups who have been "othered" by society. Trans people and people of color are top of mind for me right now.

Men who know the facts about sexual health and know how to protect themselves and others turn me on.

"Hitchen's Razor" says that what can be asserted without proof can also be dismissed without proof. While that's certainly true, there's no need to settle for that when the data exists. The CDC has an "Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19" report that has a set of live dashboards and data visualizations that was last updated on June 10th 2020. The algorithms used, methodologies employed, and caveats made are documented and open to scrutiny. This is one pool of data from which the concern about undercounting of COVID-19 related deaths springs.

Plenty of people with stats degrees get it totally wrong by failing to include all the data thereby "shaping" the data, and by having a conclusion they are focused on proving, rather than seeing where the data takes you. The people I'm referring to in this case are those who used purported statistics to oppose every advance in LGBT rights over decades. The reason they could do this is because LGBT people were so little studied in so many realms of medicine and public policy so it was easier to distort what little data there was or make up what was missing. The Williams Institute at UCLA was established to focus on doing the analysis and research to fill in that gap and make those distortions stand out for the self-serving manipulations they were. A great deal of their work is in the record rebutting the anti-Marriage Equality cases at the Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS). My point being that people with agendas, or who want to justify their actions, misinterpret data and statistics *all the time*. That doesn't mean that reality conforms to the shape of their self-delusion or self-deception. Statisticians and data scientists who are held to the standards of peer review around the world are looking at the rapidly emerging data and, certainly based on the US dataset, there is evidence that COVID-19 mortality is being undercounted based on a "spike of excess mortality" in broader CDC data. The issues involved are complex. What is the distinction between someone who died OF COVID-19 rather than WITH COVID-19 and what should be counted? How are OF COVID-19 deaths being confirmed when the testing rate and the autopsy rate are just fractions of the total deaths? What percentage of the up to 40% spike in excess mortality numbers can and should be attributed to COVID-19? These are things it will take time to come to consensus on. After all, there is still no agreed on final death toll for Hurricane Katrina and that was in 2005. Your blithe dismissal of the threat COVID-19 presents to individuals and society seems both unfounded and unwise based on the data, even as early and imperfect as that data is.

You're quite correct. That dosing schedule is called "2-1-1": It's all about appropriate levels in the body to be prophylactic.

This is me as well, although I take the big ones as far as I can. I just want to please them so much.

Damn. I'm feeling the pressure to play here in SEA town as well.