PozBearWI
-
Posts
2,142 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by PozBearWI
-
Good point @frank86 If we can't engage in a civil dialogue then what do we really gain from sex with each other.
-
I won't be making it; but delighted to know it's an option.
-
Attempts at serosorting has been with us for decades. One can ask but often people don't know. They just state or show a card that their last test was neg. Or they just say "no" and the other one believes them and they go on to have hot sex and not fret it. If the only thing one does is ask if the other is neg for STI's that is pretty lame if the individual is truly concerned about catching an STI.
-
Continuing though; each infection cycle results in some of the hosts DNA becoming part of the shedding virus. The more rapidly they cycle though our species the faster they mutate. To the altruistic that point would not be lost. We benefit our species by our informed behaviors. I talked a friend off the ledge yesterday. He sent me an article showing the monkeypox problem locally with the nearest city at 37. I replied that indeed that's how many cases occurred but there are no active cases. With alarm he passed on a graph saying "don't believe it, here are the graphs!". I view them, noted that the last reported case was on October 8 and no new cases have been reported since. I indicated where on the graph one could see that. I don't think we have a problem of intelligence or ability though. There is a lot of social noise these days and in a breaking news world, when does one spend time to reflect? He was finding the information, he was just too distracted and/or alarmed to take time to read what was in the graphs. -
Okay, so he's ejaculated it on your face, now what?
PozBearWI replied to Desperatekyslut's topic in Cocksucking Discussion
Now what? I use my fingers to push as much as possible into my mouth and swallow that load. -
How Do We form Our Taste Sexually?
PozBearWI replied to BBBxCumDumpster's topic in General Discussion
I have to agree, playmates and sexmates can be very different. At least in my personal experience. WRT sex first vs friends first; I've experienced both (with men). I have met manipulative men as well as women; although "the fairer sex" (which to me is an utterly stupid term) seems to dominate in manipulation. Like you @BootmanLA I have experienced "how does she not know I don't give a damn about her tits or snatch?". -
Newsom. But if the question were based on politics, neither would be my honest reply.
-
How Do We form Our Taste Sexually?
PozBearWI replied to BBBxCumDumpster's topic in General Discussion
I don't have genetic studies to back up any fetal development theories. Certainly that might be the case. But I know enough formerly straight only guys that I've come around to thinking all humans are essentially bisexual. What we actually do about that is influenced by factors after we're born. Some were conditioned so strongly a straight life is what they pursued and never actually questioned attractions to same sex other than being buddies. -
How Do We form Our Taste Sexually?
PozBearWI replied to BBBxCumDumpster's topic in General Discussion
@BootmanLA that certainly resonates with me. Another perspective on the "me, always gay" theme. When I step through my years from "fourish" on I know I was learning what stuff was. How I could have been in a position to know then, with certainly, how I would unfold as a human in various dimensions of my life I find foolish to entertain. At the time I was still discovering. I was, as my grandpa used to say; a "snot nosed kid". I didn't take it personally. Eventually I came to understand what he meant. But that didn't come completely from schooling. While I look back and can now see where young faggot Jim began to show himself; it is because of have the advantage of looking back. It might be that too many of us views sexually more like an "A - B" switch vs a rheostat. I don't think our sexually is that flat and uninspired. From todays vantage point, I interact with a rather large number of men sexually; the majority having come from a straight life until middle age. Some of them were on a similar path as me; but each was unique and reflective of who he is. Genetic predisposition? Perhaps. Environmental for me argues for multiple gay siblings. -
At 73 most assuredly SCOTUS will be substantially right wing. (I was going to write "conservative"; which I had always taken in a more fiscal context with the social spectrum within both parties). Local representative here in a non partisan village government. I am on a committee which is a consortium with peers in nearby communities. It is interesting how party simply isn't a driver for us. All of us actually deliver services to our constituents. We are also fellow tax payors so how we affect taxes affects us too. I know in my lifetime we'll never achieve a rewakening of our common purpose with a lessening once again of "Hatfield's vs McCoy's" life we experience today. If we ever get to that point, I think one priority needs to be a reflection of how money and technology impact elected people in destructive ways. For myself, I am planting trees.
-
@JeffPigDadd given the title of the post, what brings you here to read it then? There are myriad other places on BZ to meet your desires...
-
LIkely true, which is sad. But she knows hubby is with men and if she chooses to assume, that is at her own peril. Fortunately, HIV is treatable.
-
Potential albeit quite low...
-
His wife would do well to go on PrEP.
-
Media portrayal of gay life vs reality
PozBearWI replied to tallslenderguy's topic in General Discussion
I suspect if someone where to video my daily routine on TV it might cure insomnia! 🙂 -
Smeg is dreaded????
-
Thankfully, we are not in that space. But Rich and I would not have made it our decades with deception. Ultimately coming clean that you're going to play with others. it is up to him to decide what that means for him. At least, for me, that's what I would do. There is nothing wrong with being true to yourself and candid with those you love. When we get to "this is what I am going to do" it is no longer a negotiation. It is really a go/no go decision that we hope those who love us accepts. When they don't, then their assertions they love us fall as flat as their assertions we don't love them. It is about being true to oneself and sharing ones truth.
-
It sounds like you had a lot of fun. I fail to understand your motivation? I play quite a bit. My husband is well aware. We have a video doorbell and he has ability to see results on his phone as do I. We both find it HAF when the other has a visitor. If you've promised monogamy, and if you care for your mate, what's the point of subterfuge? I love you so much I want to pull the wool over your eyes? For me you would be a fun friend and were I not married already somewhat husband material. Save that we would be openly playful.
-
Yes indeed. I don't think the metric should be "success" in this case. We're human. Failure to recognize the effort (whether or not declared) seems to be what is taking dialogue away from solutions these days. In WI, there is a lot of focus on use of native american referenaces. My town, Saukville is an amalgam of "sauk" (NA for river) and "ville" the ubiquitous american town name as evidence in "Smallville" et all. At the moment there is no hue and cry at our use of that name... I grew up being referred to by many as "faggot". Sure it was unpleasant. But those are simply words. Absent anything else the word has no power. When I was being threatened with physical harm by someone calling me "fucking faggot" was way less focused on "faggot" than the threat itself. So, I would propose we change "Resdkins" to "Faggots". I would love to be in a stadium with thousands shouting "Go Faggots!!!!" and "Yeah faggots". Thousands declaring they want the "faggots" to win the season... How is that demeaning??? {{and yes I am aware how this changes the topic rather substantially; but my reply is not intended to change the course of the flow, but rather to be an interesting bend in the river of dialogue}}
-
Well said. WRT PrEP being as ubiquitous as condoms; i agree. It should also be a ubiquitous as Flu Shots. (injectable PrEP already exists although now available everywhere; WI being one of the "not available" states). We are still thinking of HIV in four decade old terms. The better part of half a century has passed. The effects of HIV now vs 40 years ago are vastly different. It is really since then we've come to know HSV and HPV although we don't consider those people "poz" even though arguably they are. People can vaccinate for HPV now and HSV is pretty controllable. No one is serving a criminal conviction for those. HIV belongs in those categories. One of the things which fucks that up is that we still have massive expenses for treatments. The beneficial treatments for diseases which came from what we learned about HIV and human immune system are also stupidly expensive. PrEP is also expensive. For me here in WI; at least for now; it's about even up cost to prevent or treat. For me that argues that it makes little sense to start HIV treatment until I have HIV. Context though gentlemen... I am of an age where HIV would likely not make much of a difference in my longevity.
-
The words that stand out for me in @ErosWired response are "I appreciate your effort to be sensitive". I didn't understand any of that from your response, nor was it, I believe; your purpose @BootmanLA. Emotions are factual for the individual experiencing them but they are not "the facts" for the rest of us.
-
Beautiful!
-
SUCKING COCK WHILE GUY IS ON THE PHONE
PozBearWI replied to marktulley2000's topic in Cocksucking Discussion
I have sent guys away for that. Once it was clear his engagement was with his phone there was no point in me sucking. -
So many of our laws still consider HIV in the context of life in the 1980's. In my opinion it should fall under the same set of rules as HSV and HPV (which in my generation was common). How we consider HIV should evolve to more like that context. Individuals who wish to prevent HIV infection have ways to prevent that and still bareback. I assert that man of the medical advances and treatments and even cures we're experiencing now is the human benefit resulting from the AIDS crisis. If as a society we wish to control disease; we need to make it readily available to everyone without price as a barrier. At the moment there are programs still around whose roots are in the 1980's here in Wisconsin. Affordability is for now less an issue here. Of course that could change drastically with a different administration. Germaine to this topic; socially I assert we would be better off decriminalizing disease. For HIV specifically there are methods of controlling that are not dependent on whether someone withheld information or even outright lied.
-
@BootmanLA Is HIIV pounding on a medicated HIV poz person? Or is it so well controlled that further damage to ones immune system is stopped?
